JohnD

Member
  • Content count

    80
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JohnD


  1. Guys, get out of the conceptual space and get into reality.

    When you get an experiential appreciation for what's being talked about at each stage, you'll understand you can't be effective at higher levels without development and integration in the lower levels. There is no higher level without the preceding level. Also learn about open and closed states in SD.

    If you follow someone at a high level like Leo, you'll have the experience of moving back into lower stages for periods of time, which allows you to fill in and flesh out the lower part of your psyche.

    If your parents or community already integrated the lower then you'll have the lower integrated. If not then you won't. This stuff isn't complicated, but you need to relate your learning to direct experience. If not, you make mistakes like our friend confusing Green for Purple.


  2. @supremeyingyang I wouldn't say the psychological issues are tied to the stage, but the way we deal with them is correlated. A stage green/yellow person struggling with depression will have a different approach to healing than someone at a lower or higher stage.

    1 hour ago, supremeyingyang said:

    do you think a new sort of psychotherapy could heal all of that after working on these traumas?

    I hope so, I know a lot of us here have taken that responsibility on ourselves, which can be lonely and difficult.


  3. Good info on toxicity here.

    Trauma is when you've experienced something you weren't able to process. Part of you gets stuck in that experience so some of your energy is tied up. It can relax over time and you can regain your energy, but it can be re-triggered, causing your energy to compress again.

    Any sort of psychological splitting (falling into dualities) or disconnection from the Self is the result of trauma. This accounts for ADHD, anxiety disorders, depression, narcissism+codependence, bipolar disorder, etc. Fortunately all those labels come from stage orange/green trying to describe stage purple/red/blue/orange behavior. A higher perspective will shine a much more redeeming light on this less developed part of humanity.


  4. @LastThursday The work we're doing can be described as juxtaposing the relative and absolute and integrating these. Egoless perspective is necessary, but losing the ego is losing the relative world, and therefore your ability to act in and influence it.

    I'll use a metaphor. Let's say a plane's navigation system knows where to take it, you just punch in the coordinates and it flies there. Now say the navigation becomes so advanced that it simply instructs the plane to move from the original location to the destination. The plane can't do this because it doesn't have the instructions to take off, balance, make adjustments, and land. It's like the navigation system doesn't know it's navigating a plane and just wants to be at the location immediately.

    Now say the navigation system is well connected to the rest of the plane. It knows where it wants to go, and knows how to get the plane there. It's communicating with all the sensors on the plane, the engines, wing flaps, everything that makes a plane fly moment to moment. It knows the entire route but also the situational adjustments that need to be made along the way.

    The plane is the ego, the destination is reunification.


  5. 1 hour ago, LastThursday said:

    True, but he also wouldn't care being egoless and all.

    Yes, but you're asking about systems with multiple gurus at the center. Something new emerges and takes the center, so those kind of people you're asking about exist, they're just not seen as gurus because your attention isn't drawn directly to them.

    I think the pervasiveness of ego is missed by many in this field. Ego evolves. Everything in the world of duality can be coopted by the ego. One can experience expansive states of consciousness, can contain and direct enormous vision and focus, and still use these in a way that serves the ego. If the ego didn't hide from itself, it wouldn't persist.

    Ego is also a collective aspect of our unitive consciousness that is moving towards integration. We need more conscious people on the ground, people that understand the inner-workings of the ego and don't take a dismissive perspective. Without this awareness we can't help to untangle the collective mess we find ourselves in.


  6. @Farnaby You make some good points.

    I don't find value in acting more masculine/feminine, and I find inauthentic behaviors unsustainable. However, I'm cautious to write off the idea of feminine/masculine. It's a historical polarity, and there's a reason the distinction is so pervasive.

    Here's where I find value. Having the idea can help you attune to your experience of the masculine/feminine energy, and experiencing it is what matters. When you experience any energy, you increase your capacity to hold and express it. 

    So knowing about it helps you identify it in your experience. Experiencing it allows you to integrate. Integration allows you to be more authentic.


  7. I believe the openness of a particular chakra manifests in the structure/posture/hormonal balance of that particular region. Of course depending on the differences of these particular lines the physical manifestation will also change, but not as a small, subtle dimple that is common in humans, it manifests in more energetic flow in those areas, and over time will result in growth. It's akin to a flower that can handle more sunlight, water, nutrients, and hence more growth, depending on how open it is.

    Don't forget, the most important thing here is integration. Having your third eye open is a small part of self-actualization.


  8. 16 hours ago, SamueLSD said:

    Can anyone can relate, not just to dating someone with BPD but to being traumatised from an abusive relationship? How do you remove the trauma bond and stop the mind from fantasising about the 'good times'? 

    Without diving too deep, your mind is still split since you're perceiving 'good times'. Notice how it wasn't sporadic good times and bad times, but a cycle of good and bad, the good generally arising to offset some bad that's occurred or will occur in the relationship. The part of you reflecting on good times was isolated from the rest of your mind when she put you through the experience of her trauma. I'll call this the Stockholm syndrome part. Its purpose is to protect us when we're in emotionally and psychologically unsafe environments.

    When this part arises, hold space for it. Allow it to voice its opinion without clamping down on it. Share what you know about the relationship with this part of you, but maintain a loving attitude towards it. You almost have to spoon-feed it the truth of the matter. You can be instructive and informative, but be patient. Don't invalidate its' experience and don't validate its negative beliefs. Learn to communicate with it. This can be done in a journal, in meditation, or if you have enough awareness to perceive your internal dialogue.

    I recommend finding a therapist if you feel too overwhelmed to do this on your own and have means to do so.


  9. There's two sides to victim mentality. The side that says "Poor me" and the side that says "Fuck you". Both are appropriate responses to trauma, especially in younger people. We're learners, so when we have an experience, we can integrate it for insight. 

    Trauma is an experience that is too overwhelming to process. It's not your fault something so drastic happened, but it happened. Someone who is run by their trauma will see a distorted world where anything related to the abuser is projected to be the abuser. When we recognize our trauma from our own perspective, we start to uncover and understand it. It reveals why we behave in certain ways, and helps us see through the haze.

    These are two different ways of being. Both are victims, but one is recovering, and one continues to inflict trauma their trauma on others.

    This thread was supposed to be about gaslighting...


  10. @Mesopotamian 'Country' is a label. If you want to further distinguish it into a lower class, that's fine. I will point out that you're separating 3rd world countries from 1st world countries and claiming they don't deserve to be called countries. Similarly your country has done this to you with your rights, since you don't meet their expectations.

    @Preety_India What you're referring to was not a stage-green initiative.