Phyllis Wagner

Where does my consciousness end and the trees consciousness begin?

68 posts in this topic

12 minutes ago, Someone here said:

Let me ask you this.. Is it 'you' who is no one outside of him or 'me'?

Don't know what that means.

Quote

Because you are saying it works like a dream where there is only ONE Dreamer dreaming the WHOLE THING....So you are not open that simply there can be two dreamers or 7 billion separate dreams?

There cannot be separate dreams because Infinity is ONE. All dreams are within your dream.

Since God is Absolute, it experiences everything that exists. God cannot hide from itself because it is Absolute.

It's infinitely sneaky.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, seeking_brilliance said:

That's fine. I suppose it's dependent on how burning this question is for you. I expect it might be, since you responded when I was saying it to the OP. ?

ooooops im all over the placexDxDxD

p.s one time i made up with a tree

Edited by blackchair

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Depends how conscious you are.

If you become infinitely conscious, you'll find that all those other simulations are just fragments of your own mind.

You are God. There is no one outside you and you are creating the entire thing using your intelligence.

Yeah, it's fucked up. Which is why the Truth isn't talked about much. It needs to be kept a secret for the game to run. It's how you keep yourself playing.

Yes the simulations are fragments of one mind. BUT: they are running. So how does the tree not have a first person perspective? Sure, we are hooked up to the same supercomputer, but we are still running our own perspective-simulations. So how would the tree only exist when I (as a low consciousness human) look at it?

Edited by Phyllis Wagner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

It's infinitely sneaky.

oh god yes (sad noises) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, seeking_brilliance said:

@Someone here 1 arises in 0. What if there's just no dreamer, which is to say there's an infinite amount. 

Don't know what that means lol. 

22 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

 

There cannot be separate dreams because Infinity is ONE. All dreams are within your dream.

Since God is Absolute, it experiences everything that exists. God cannot hide from itself because it is Absolute.

It's infinitely sneaky.

Yeah I think God CAN hide from itself because it's absolute. 

Edited by Someone here

"life is not a problem to be solved ..its a mystery to be lived "

-Osho

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Phyllis Wagner said:

Yes the simulations are fragments of one mind. BUT: they are running.

Only in your imagination ;)

God is energy efficient. It will not create anything it does not need. All it needs is a single personal illusion.

But hey, don't believe me. Find out for yourself whether others exist.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Consciousness is a stupid label. It doesn't represent reality.

Don't try to understand reality through the lens of your consciousness, you will never get it this way. Drop the you, which is your consciousness, and then maybe you will realize.


If you have no confidence in yourself, you are twice defeated in the race of life. But with confidence you have won, even before you start.” -- Marcus Garvey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Only in your imagination ;)

God is energy efficient. It will not create anything it does not need. All it needs is a single personal illusion.

But hey, don't believe me. Find out for yourself whether others exist.

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong. I made a small diagram based upon my understanding of what he's saying here. I suppose THIS is what Leo Gura is saying? I understand the problems with trying to conceptualize this stuff too much, but hey, we need something to hold onto.

Model1.png


Release me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, John Doe said:

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong. I made a small diagram based upon my understanding of what he's saying here. I suppose THIS is what Leo Gura is saying? I understand the problems with trying to conceptualize this stuff too much, but hey, we need something to hold onto.

Model1.png

It's not finished.... Now, erase it. 


Check out my lucid dreaming anthology series, Stars of Clay  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, John Doe said:

but hey, we need something to hold onto.

said who?

@seeking_brilliance is correct, erase your chart and you'll be on the right track.


It's Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen a very small glimpse of the creation aspect to reality. I don't know how that would validate or invalidate whether there is more than 1 dreamer exists. Maybe if this insight was seen deep enough with consciousness it wouldn't be confusing, although that's difficult to believe

In this ordinary ego consciousness, one can still see philosophically they don't know if others exist.

 

If I ask myself the question "Does another person/dream/reality exist?", obviously that questioning process is occurring in my consciousness and reality. Even if that is so, that still leaves the answer unknown. A radical or existential honesty might be admitting that asking this is still conceptual, which is weird and scary 

Edited by lmfao

Hark ye yet again — the little lower layer. All visible objects, man, are but as pasteboard masks. But in each event — in the living act, the undoubted deed — there, some unknown but still reasoning thing puts forth the mouldings of its features from behind the unreasoning mask. If man will strike, strike through the mask! How can the prisoner reach outside except by thrusting through the wall? To me, the white whale is that wall, shoved near to me. Sometimes I think there's naught beyond. But 'tis enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, seeking_brilliance said:

No one does ?‍♂️

@seeking_brilliance are you comfortable with not-knowing? 


"life is not a problem to be solved ..its a mystery to be lived "

-Osho

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@John Doe my conceptual model is everything as you described but this time the real subject is all of the previous self, touch sight and all. So the last circle is not only the source but all of it. So if you round the entire model and calling it true subjective or objective, it is sorta of my model. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, seeking_brilliance said:

Neither comfortable nor uncomfortable with it. ?

@Someone here and it's that dynamic which suspends 'me' in appreciation for what arises. 


Check out my lucid dreaming anthology series, Stars of Clay  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@seeking_brilliance I see.

In practice I have to learn how to be comfortable with it tho. Or simply disentangle yourself from the issue of knowledge entirely and rest your mind. 


"life is not a problem to be solved ..its a mystery to be lived "

-Osho

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now