tvaeli

Why spiritual girls talk about "frequencies" and why they get debunked?

10 posts in this topic

https://github.com/tambetvali/LaeGOS-Alpha/blob/main/LaeGOS-Skydrive/DataRfx/I-ChingPhilosophy.md - here is my I Ching Laegna philosophy.

- It mainly notes that changes, rhythyms etc. are for auditory thinkers.

 

Classically, sound theory has been proven able to map ethical concerns, changes etc. - harmony, distruption, most physical forces are naturally expressible in these terms, just as much as one can recognize them by hearing or more clearly, by absolute hearing perhaps.

 

About their scientific views they typically give me some narratives and mythos:

- That they are atheist and they do not believe, nor be able to do.

- That in their history, their common people have been cheated by someone who believen this; bring some mythical person with no name.

- Some story about money or war money - either they asked money for higher support, or said they have this thing to attack.

 

In original versions they told about their charlatans of their bloodline history perhaps, a depleted fool:

- Now they tell of thing itself.

 

I definitely use octaves, frequencies and lengths in my theory because:

- Visual thinking and auditory thinking are basically based on wave resonance;

- while the visual has 3D in space, auditory has 3 major channels in time, this is why number of notes 12 divides by 3.

 

I want to point out both theories, either drawing illustrations or talking about frequencies, are equivalent conversions of physical information; both are also used in modelling - thermodynamics allows to model sociality.

ChatGPT: Further note: Laegna treats visual and auditory models as equivalent representations of physical information. Both describe wave resonance: visual thinking maps spatial structures, while auditory thinking maps temporal rhythms, frequencies and harmonics. Octaves, the 12-note division into three major temporal channels, and harmonic relationships provide a mathematical language for expressing change, balance, disruption and even ethical relations. These are not competing explanations, but different ways of modelling the same underlying reality — much as thermodynamics can describe both physical and social systems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@tvaeli It's mostly girls/females? Never knew that.  What is the percentage female vs. male?


When the secret is revealed to you, you will know that you are not other than God, but that you yourself are the object of your quest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The use of terms like “vibration” and “frequency” is strange in new age circles.

I think it’s an attempt to scienceify spirituality, but it’s quite misguided because actual scientific people will just ridicule them for it and the worldview at its core isn’t scientific.

What’s meant by “vibration” is something like “state of consciousness,” as far as I can tell. That sounds much less glamorous though.


What is this? That's the only question.

My Youtube Channel - Philosophy | Spirituality | Consciousness Work

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just in the small amount of threads ive been in, Ive not seen/heard frequency and vibration in awhile, but granted that its prolly popping up here nd there, just not as highly sought after as an idea? I mean, i think Its still very much apart of everything as far as interests are concerned, i believe, like where you put it in the toy box, and then you re visit it later. It might take some time but itll be needed again later, As you get tired of  physical toys and such, but words, experience, insights & feelings are always there, regardless if you feel happy or sad, young or old, so one day someones gonna be like for instance: "Yeo, i had an experience, and it was all about harmonics and the way the frequency map is shaped w/ regards to the evenly distributed harmonics on the top layer, and the more dissonant tones being lower in amplitude at the bottom distribution map, such that it looks like, e.g., my reality and the way my experience is to  ultimately shape things" or something. I mean, im sayin it now, so maybe itll catch fire.

Edited by kavaris

"Sed veritas ex ore meo, quia ego asinus et mortuus"  (But truth [comes] from my mouth, because I am an ass and dead)

— Ugo Foscolo, Didymi Clerici Prophetae Minimi Hypercalypseos Liber Singularis, Caput XV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not debunked it's a real thing. Its just different than saying my emotion. Your emotion is a frequency when the woman say go in the energy or frequency or vibration of something it just means feel that and be that. You can change these vibration of frequency at will.

 

Men are taught to ignore this part of themselves so they don't understand.

Edited by Hojo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try reading David Hawkins Levels of Consciousness a few times 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/10/2026 at 6:34 AM, tvaeli said:

- That in their history, their common people have been cheated by someone who believen this; bring some mythical person with no name.

I was tryina figure out this part about the mythic with no name, what did that mean?

"That in their history, their common people have been cheated by someone who believen this; bring some mythical person with no name"


"Sed veritas ex ore meo, quia ego asinus et mortuus"  (But truth [comes] from my mouth, because I am an ass and dead)

— Ugo Foscolo, Didymi Clerici Prophetae Minimi Hypercalypseos Liber Singularis, Caput XV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

everything is vibration and frequency - which is also why the terms become so weak and fluffy :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is an example of a debunking video in this case ? 

Edited by Wilhelm44

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They use the word frequency and vibration because they externalized there feelings into the cosmos as a super natural phenomena. 

That person has negative vibration = they made me feel bad vibe.

But the above equation is to plain and not spiritual enough so they want the vibration to be a magical thing that is connected with karma as a super natural thing and so on.

New narrative: "that person has a low vibration, and their karma is energetically incompatible with mine" creates an entire metaphysical narrative.

This story is alot nicer to experience as a internal narrative and makes them feel less judgmental and inclusive while rejecting someone.

They value harmony and dont want to be in conflict with anything, these new narrative solve this problem emotionally while not changing anything logisticly.

Alot of new age slang is born from coping mechanisms transformed into one spiritual worldview.

They hate alot of things, have self-esteem issues and cant escape this emotional burden so the spiritual world view is a bandage for that. When they think about there spiritual stories they get temperary release from suffering and gain a super ego identity that is resistent to the world.

---

They dont recognize that what is real is already pure magic and does not need magical story embellishment.

New age spirituality are stuck in materisialsm but disguised it as spiritual metaphysics.

Orange Materialism: Hand is made of atoms

Green Materialism: Hand is made of frequency/vibration/energy

They think they've transcended materialism because they've replaced physical matter with invisible spiritual substances. Its the same thing! nothing changed!

They replaced the atom with spiritual sounding words and think that is the core of spirituality. So they keep doing this, just labeling the world with feel good spiritual stories, while lost in content.

Edited by integral

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now