Autism Test

[Psychonaut]

12 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Guess this expression:

When Diemex posts something on his website, like instructions on how to run the AQ-test with his own 7-Point-Test-Survey-Runner https://diemex.dev/blog/aq-test-how-to/

[Alexop]

On 01/11/2026 at 3:05 AM, Leo Gura said:

No, that is not enough.

Mastering social skills requires much more than a few thousand cold approaches. It takes 1000s of hours of experience. Extroverts just take it for granted because it is natural for them. You don't count the hours of things you enjoy.

People whose job is to talk with people forget that all of that time is socialization experience.

We who work from home don't get that.

That explains the lack of social skills of new generations. It just does not happen if you spend so much time in isolation. And then if everyone has low social skills, there won't be much training when they meet. Socialization will be superficial and beginner level 

Edited 5 hours ago by Alexop

[Alexop]

I didn't do the test but I am sure my autism is strong hahah. Idk if my strong non conformist personality plays into this. But I have a hard time being a normy. This is what I am working now on. I have a hard time ignoring the ignorance and bullshit when I am with people. 

Edited 5 hours ago by Alexop

[Psychonaut]

Maybe we can start working on the "Neurodivergence" test and then define the flavours of autism, aspergers etc later. We have already established that the AQ-50 is a POS because of the scoring method, so let's continue with something else. I am not interested in the AQ-50 or the S-AQ-50 anymore 

Post 1: https://diemex.dev/blog/aq-test-scoring

Post 2: https://diemex.dev/blog/aq-test-key-reconstruction/

Post 3: https://diemex.dev/blog/aq-test-key-published/

Post 4: https://diemex.dev/blog/aq-test-how-to/

 

My true scores is on the AQ55 || AQ-55 is 

• AQ50: 18/50 when I am honest -> no autism (I am neuro-divergent. But I am not "suffering" and I reject all help from every doctor on the entire planet earth by default. You can't help me, so bugger off with your shit AQ50 test and your useless-shit-drugs. Thank you for your kind attention on this matter)
• AQ50: 24/50 with inferred logical answering 
• AQ50: 50/50 when I want to take the entire test apart for fun
• AQ50: 0/50 when I just want to prove a point

Absolute Perfection 

I think you guys will need a while to actually process what I am trying to say... I hope you are getting what I am pointing at... The true score is the one on the right. And my true score can also by found in the next key.... The tag-list 555.555

Background

I sat in a "Machine-Learning" course of the university (psychology department) and watched a bunch of clueless psychologists trying to use a programming language (matlab or the R statitics language) to create "programs" that can score tests for them. I as an embedded systems engineer was just watching the kids in the candy-shop trying to find the free cookie jar for printing money. And now I am throwing the cookie jar on the floor.

Thank you for your attention on this matter. If you have bullshit in your brain, the bullshit that comes out of you through the usage of tools like Gemini/ChatGPT and even Claude just turns from bs to BS. Enough said. I recall them implementing a tag-list and I was like "wonderful". You have a normal key that can be reversed and then you have another key a tag-list than can also be reversed.

YOU (psychologist) ARE STUPID = You don't know what a public and a private key is (You have failed the first lesson of cryptography). You have also failed maths (logic) and you have also failed statistics (I will always find you and call your BS out with certainty XD). Sorry dear developer of the AQ50 test, next time open-source the code you use for scoring the test so I don't have to reverse-engineer it.

Edited 4 hours ago by Psychonaut

[Alexop]

@Leo Gura it is your fault. Among other intellectuals I follow. I know and understand so much stuff now. Together with my masculine, no bullshit, introverted, autistic personality and romanian upbringing. (Honesty culture).

I can no longer be normal. 80% of what nomies talk about is mostly bullshit. How the fuck am I supposed to ignore this now??? 

Edited 3 hours ago by Alexop

[Psychonaut]

@Alexop Let's all blame Leo for our personal "Uranus Complex"  or buy a buttplug like a "Mr. Trump Buttplug" or a "Putin Buttplug" (you can put it in your butt) - it keeps the shit and farts in. But be careful, it might come out of the mouth if you leave it in for too long.

Maybe this will light up your mood?

 

Edited 4 hours ago by Psychonaut

[Alexop]

9 minutes ago, Psychonaut said:

@Alexop Let's all blame Leo for our personal "Uranus Complex"  or buy a buttplug like a "Mr. Trump Buttplug" or a "Putin Buttplug" (you can put it in your butt) - it keeps the shit and farts in. But be careful, it might come out of the mouth if you leave it in for too long.

Maybe this will light up your mood?

 

I was joking dude. Leo is the best. We cannot run away from truth as 99% of people usually do.

[Psychonaut]

@Alexop So was I - Wanna be Butt Buddies?

 

Edited 4 hours ago by Psychonaut

[Alexop]

My brain when I am in a social gathering:

My authentic self: tell them they are wrong, it will hurt but it is better for them in the long run.

My wiser self: No! They won't get it, they will get triggered and upset and you'll just make the matters worse for both yourself and them.

😆 

[Psychonaut]

1 minute ago, Alexop said:

My brain when I am in a social gathering:

My authentic self: tell them they are wrong, it will hurt but it is better for them in the long run.

My wiser self: No! They won't get it, they will get triggered and upset and you'll just make the matters worse for both yourself and them.

😆 

Story of my life 

[OBEler]

Scored 18/50

[Schizophonia]

13/50

[Psychonaut]

7 hours ago, Cubbage said:

I used to find socializing exceptionally challenging, confusing & uncomfortable but when I took MDMA for the first time it was like something switched gears in my mind and ever since then I've been a social butterfly. Some have told me it's "masking perfected" but I genuinely think interfacing with hallucinogenics triggered something within me. I went from an awkward, confused, autistic-introvert to a healthy balance of introvert and extrovert in the space of a few years. The deep mystical experiences on psychs and in meditation were just a trigger point though, the actual work was all consciously enacted after these experiences had been integrated. I have not felt uncomfortable in a social setting in a long time, which is baffling considering how I was for most of my life. I couldn't hold, let alone start a conversation for a lot of my life, now communicating is effortless. Socialization really is a muscle that you can build. Nowadays, I'm more socially-skilled than my naturally extroverted friends. I have a lot of autistic mates who are older than me and struggle socializing and it's been rewarding to help them embody some healthy extroversion and develop self-esteem.

Great work! Congrats 

On another note:

I don't know why you guys keep posting the meaning-less AQ50 test scores without saying which key you used, you gotta post the entire answers for any analysis to be done.  The score is meaning-less without the answers, because you cannot infer the answers from the score. 

Edited 2 hours ago by Psychonaut

[Schizophonia]

High-functioning autism is at its core basically essentially anxiety. This explains the fixations, the introversion, and by extension the delays in learning social codes as well as delays in certain aspects of neurological development in general.

Anxiety is in general a "widening of the gap in representation," as Lacan might put it; that’s why women wear things like garter belts it’s about stimulating attention by disrupting the way the female body is represented (by men).

When it's severe autistic individuals may end up doing some rather strange things; I remember an autistic student at my high school who would do things like stare at a hallway light switch while "scratching" it lol.

Edited 2 hours ago by Schizophonia

[WonderSeeker]

My parents nearly got me tested for autism as a child.

Years ago I asked my mom why she never did it. She told me "it just didn't feel right, I didn't believe you needed it."

I'm not autistic, but I am introverted as fuck. Which is why I moved to an introverted society after developing my extroversion skills for 3 years straight in America. Now I can be an introvert and still have social results without doing jack.

This test made me laugh several times because as I was taking it I knew which answers implied which side (autism vs non-) and I had to make myself still answer truthfully. My ability to read people down to their moment-by-moment emotions probably saved me.

15 years ago I couldn't make eye contact, but that was due to trauma. Autism is supposed to be more a built-in thing. Never assume you have it unless you get tested and put yourself out there if you're an introvert and never have. We all need some baseline loving, physical touch, etc., etc.

[Psychonaut]

13 minutes ago, WonderSeeker said:

My parents nearly got me tested for autism as a child.

Years ago I asked my mom why she never did it. She told me "it just didn't feel right, I didn't believe you needed it."

I'm not autistic, but I am introverted as fuck. Which is why I moved to an introverted society after developing my extroversion skills for 3 years straight in America. Now I can be an introvert and still have social results without doing jack.

This test made me laugh several times because as I was taking it I knew which answers implied which side (autism vs non-) and I had to make myself still answer truthfully. My ability to read people down to their moment-by-moment emotions probably saved me.

15 years ago I couldn't make eye contact, but that was due to trauma. Autism is supposed to be more a built-in thing. Never assume you have it unless you get tested and put yourself out there if you're an introvert and never have. We all need some baseline loving, physical touch, etc., etc.

I like this test a lot more, because it gives you the option to chat afterwards. That is much better than the test that Leo posted. And even better than my test. Well my test is a test-analysis-quadrouple-blind-tool in its essence and probably only useful for me and @Leo Gura.

 

Edited 1 hour ago by Psychonaut

[WonderSeeker]

4 minutes ago, Psychonaut said:

I like this test a lot more, because it gives you the option to chat afterwards. That is much better than the test that Leo posted. And even better than my test. Well my test is a test-analysis-quadrouple-blind-tool in its essence and probably only useful for me and @Leo Gura.

This was the one Leo posted though

[Psychonaut]

41 minutes ago, WonderSeeker said:

This was the one Leo posted though

No he posted this one: https://psychology-tools.com/test/autism-spectrum-quotient

The test is the

• AQ test
• The metric for scoring is the AQ50 metric, meaning 50 standardized question
• It can be administed using a questionaire on paper or reproducing the questions in a form (licensing costs for automatic scoring)

And I am using 3 attack vectors to attack the test:

• I attack the test itself -> AQ
• The scoring methodology -> AQ50
• The intelligence of the designer of the test by the publishing date (2001)
• ...  the intelligence of the entire empiric study field......

By developing a tool that can completely take apart any test into its building blocks if the user of the tool has a sufficient level of intelligence, which obviously only a handful people on this forum will have....

So with the same questions my 7P-Test-Runner can fold this test into a 4Q test. Meaning it gives you 4 scores.

• Raw sum: The original adding up of correct and incorrect answers [-150 0 150] into [0-50] == meaningless fold => Gives a meaningless 24/50 score ==> meaningless 24/50 = 48% likelihood
• Binary (Keyed) => Using the inferred key through reversing the key direction (reverse engineering the key) [0-45] (with my 5 excluded questions that are shit-question imo] or [0-50] Gives 17/45 -> 38% likelihood (meaningless score)
• Weighted (Keyed) [-150 0 150] => -21/150 (likehood = -14%) So -14% likehood of autism => Meaningfull score
• Conditional using the tag-list [0-88] -> my score 36/88 -> General intelligence score (meaningful score)

I use the same test (set of 50 questions) to answer 4 different questions. The questions itself are very smart, but everything else is not smart.

Edited 32 minutes ago by Psychonaut

[Basman]

Guess the expression

[Psychonaut]

18 minutes ago, Basman said:

Guess the expression

Me, myself and I chilling in my chair?