Women are better hunter, science suggests

[Thought Art]

@Elliott Maybe it’s a good time for you to take a break from here. No one wants what your bringing to the table. 

[Elliott]

32 minutes ago, Thought Art said:

@Elliott Maybe it’s a good time for you to take a break from here. No one wants what your bringing to the table. 

Ya because you're a bunch of misogynist cu***

 

Here's the op's sexist thread title 

Women are better hunter, science suggests

Here's the article title 

Women May Be Better Hunters Than Men, Latest Research Argues

 

Go fuck your gay ass incel forum

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-theory-that-men-evolved-to-hunt-and-women-evolved-to-gather-is-wrong1/

Quote

Bone trauma patterns on Neanderthal skeletons appear nearly identical between males and females, suggesting both engaged in close-range hunting or similar physical labor.

 

Fuck off you little bitch

 

 

Edited 46 minutes ago by Elliott

[Ulax]

2 minutes ago, Elliott said:

My dad would knock these cu*** teeth out, my mom would run them over

Wow your parents sound very passionate about Serena William's Tennis ability  

[Basman]

8 hours ago, Emerald said:

But the vast majority of men didn't typically impregnate 100s of women and leave the kids to rot... unless he was a warlord like Ghengis Kahn or something.

In most societies, the majority of men had one wife and played an active role in their children's lives.

So, active fatherhood is one of the core functions of men throughout the duration of the human species. 

Survival first. Human children are so dependent for so long that women have to be more specialized evolutionary. You can't be a father without being good at survival, whereas women can rely on the man for their survival. You see this reflected in how women overwhelmingly select for men who are good at survival (fame, strength, wealth, status, etc.).

[Elliott]

41 minutes ago, Ulax said:

Wow your parents sound very passionate about Serena William's Tennis ability  

Like serena couldn't kick your ass herself

 

ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos

https://abcnews.com

No fluke: Maine girl beats boys to win 2nd straight state wrestling title

Maddie Ripley shows off her moves on the mat on Feb. 17, 2024, as she won the Maine state high school Class B wrestling championship against a male opponent

 

@Natasha Tori Maru

Fuck you, grow a spine. I'm done here

 

Edited 34 minutes ago by Elliott

[Nercohype]

2 hours ago, Ulax said:

One harsh truth is that rehabillitation isn't very effective.

And you seem to think its either an option of being left or far right.

@Ulax 

And how do you know that? Where did you get this information? Have you actually researched it?

Personally, I would say that I don't know for sure what the truth is. Here in Finland, we have some great rehabilitation centers, and rehabilitation has worked for some people. But I don't know if it can work for everyone. That's something we can debate. But it's not a harsh truth. It's a harsh opinion. 😁

In my opinion, at least. 😂

I understand why you feel that I only see things in black and white. To be honest, I do lean heavily to the left because of this far-right push. But I don't feel like I'm tied to either side. If the left started invading other countries, committing genocide, and taking away people's rights, you'd see me right there fighting against the left. ☺️

[Thought Art]

They say in the article women were found with hunting tools. This doesn’t prove they hunted. In some cultures the women actually made the hunting tools too. 
 

As I read through the article it’s not really showing conclusive evidence of anything. It’s just saying how women could be good hunters. 
 

Why is women not hunting equating them to being inferior? That’s so wild. Being a mother, is not inferior to hunting. That’s an odd bias in the article. It’s also odd the researcher wants to show women could be better hunters than men. But they should be focused on discovering what was TRUE.

Edited 1 hour ago by Thought Art

[Ulax]

Just now, Nercohype said:

@Ulax 

And how do you know that? Where did you get this information? Have you actually researched it?

Criminology lecture at university.

Just now, Nercohype said:

Personally, I would say that I don't know for sure what the truth is. Here in Finland, we have some great rehabilitation centers, and rehabilitation has worked for some people. But I don't know if it can work for everyone. That's something we can debate. But it's not a harsh truth. It's a harsh opinion. 😁

If you provide high-quality evidence, I'm open to persuasion.

2 minutes ago, Nercohype said:

I understand why you feel that I only see things in black and white. To be honest, I do lean heavily to the left because of this far-right push. But I don't feel like I'm tied to either side. If the left started invading other countries, committing genocide, and taking away people's rights, you'd see me right there fighting against the left. ☺️

Nice

[Ulax]

6 minutes ago, Elliott said:

Like serena couldn't kick your ass herself

Flattered you're imagining my ass 

[Wilhelm44]

2 hours ago, Elliott said:

She literally beat professional male tennis players

 

These aren't pros

 

 

[Thought Art]

Not all men are stronger than all women.  This is common sense. 
 

In tree planting I met women who kick my ass daily. Even a 17 year old girl. But, none of them were as good as the best males not even close. 

Edited 1 hour ago by Thought Art

[Thought Art]

@Elliott Your time here is limited if you keep acting out. 

Edited 1 hour ago by Thought Art

[AION]

Woke people are actually dreamers. And they need a rude awakening how things are. Nothing wrong with dreaming of a world where things are better but the problem arises when they think their current dreams are the reality. It is because they live in these green bubbles. If a war happens or something you will see all these feminists drop their little dreams of feminism as seen in the ukraine war.  You won’t see women in the trenches talking about equality and how they deserve to be on the front lines. War is the ultimate hunting ground so according to this article they should be the best soldiers. 

Edited 1 hour ago by AION

[Bjorn K Holmstrom]

10 minutes ago, Thought Art said:

They say in the article women were found with hunting tools. This doesn’t prove they hunted. In some cultures the women actually made the hunting tools too. 
 

As I read through the article it’s not really showing conclusive evidence of anything. It’s just saying how women could be good hunters. 

5 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

A researcher with a PhD in colonialism or gender studies, like on that paper, will have a strong woke agenda.

The paper's authors have PhD's in Anthropology. The Colonialism PhD belongs to the science writer who wrote the article about the paper, not to the authors of the paper. Not denying there might be agendas also among the researchers, just wanted us to have the facts right about what we are discussing. According to ChatGPT, the article's author has more of an agenda than the paper, which is more nuanced.

Edited 59 minutes ago by Bjorn K Holmstrom

[Thought Art]

@Bjorn K Holmstrom Thanks for sharing that. I realize I should have looked more closely. I approached the subject more generally than specific to the article. 

[Ulax]

3 minutes ago, AION said:

Woke people are actually dreamers. And they need a rude awakening how things are. Nothing wrong with dreaming of a world where things are better but the problem arises when they think their current dreams are the reality. It is because they live in these green bubbles. If a war happens or something you will see all these feminists drop their little dreams of feminism as seen in the ukraine war.  You won’t see women in the trenches talking about equality and how they deserve to be on the front lines. 

True but there are various reasonable aspects to feminism too

[Ulax]

2 minutes ago, Bjorn K Holmstrom said:

The paper's authors have PhD's in Anthropology. The Colonialism PhD belongs to the science writer who wrote the article about the paper, not to the authors of the paper in. Not denying there might be agendas also among the researchers, just wanted us to have the facts right about what we are discussing. According to ChatGPT, the article's author has more of an agenda than the paper, which is more nuanced.

Good point

[Natasha Tori Maru]

@Elliott is on timeout to cool off

 

[Alexop]

1 minute ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

@Elliott is on timeout to cool off

 

Thanks 👍 

[Bjorn K Holmstrom]

2 minutes ago, Thought Art said:

@Bjorn K Holmstrom Thanks for sharing that. I realize I should have looked more closely. I approached the subject more generally than specific to the article. 

I know how it is to be swayed by my own agenda in the past, jumping to conclusions. But I think an agenda might be justified in certain situations too.

Edited 56 minutes ago by Bjorn K Holmstrom