Women are better hunter, science suggests

[Ulax]

1 minute ago, AION said:

You need to filter them out asap. Or give their moneys worth

That's part of why I want to get good at pickup. You actually have options and can be selective

[Majed]

9 minutes ago, Ulax said:

You're right, I did win psychopath of the century last year 

 

@Ulax Mature up a bit bro...

[Majed]

9 minutes ago, Ulax said:

That's part of why I want to get good at pickup. You actually have options and can be selective

@Ulax Pick up is a mind virus. 

Contemplate and generate your own insights about what leads to success in this domain of life. 

[Ulax]

4 minutes ago, Majed said:

@Ulax Mature up a bit bro...

?

[Ulax]

6 minutes ago, Majed said:

@Ulax Pick up is a mind virus. 

It has its pros and cons

[Jannes]

20 minutes ago, AION said:

 

 

Wached the whole thing. The men did better but its not like the black and white story as the video suggests.

Both groups struggled to make a fire and the guys needed to use glasses (what a cheap trick) to get the fire going where women managed to do it with pure oldschool technique.

There were like 3 incident where someone of the mens groups could have gotten killed, the women were never in danger. 

Both groups lost a ton of weight and couldnt have maintained this. 

Even in the mens group there were only a few guys who managed to hunt anything of substance, most of them were incompetent. 

The men killed a croc which is very impressive, but the women group still managed to overwhelm a big pig and kill it which isnt that easy and takes balls to do. 

[AION]

@Jannes

I watched the show too. Men would definitely survived this. While the women team was almost half dead because of dyhydration and lack of basic needs.

[AION]

32 minutes ago, Ulax said:

That's part of why I want to get good at pickup. You actually have options and can be selective

it is not that difficult honestly if you look average. It is all in your mind.

[Ulax]

1 minute ago, AION said:

it is not that difficult honestly if you look average. It is all in your mind.

I find it challenging

[Natasha Tori Maru]

Please don't turn this into a men vs women excuse to dunk on either sex.

[Alexop]

Just now, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Please don't turn this into a men vs women excuse to dunk on either sex.

☝️

[Alexop]

Pick-up can improve your chances of finding a suitable woman, but is is not a guarantee. Few conscious women go clubbing at night, and there are just a few of them roaming around on the streets too. In northern Europe they are not very happy to talk to you randomly on the street. A good shot can be Green festivals or Green hippie places. But I notice women being more and more avoidant of unknown men unfortunately. If they dont know you from somewhere, bad luck.

The other way is social circles. But I am not a fan of that. I am an introvert and do not tolerate too much social shit.

Edited 2 hours ago by Alexop

[Basman]

With mammals, females are generally smaller. Human reproduction is particularilly costly and lengthy on top of that. And our children have to be born relatively underdeveloped to fit through the pelvis. women (womb men) have to be relatively specialized evolutionary in order to make it work, which means that women have to rely on men to survive (social resources) more directly. Men are much better adapted for raw physical survival. 

[Alexop]

 

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

Sure, but that has always been the case. Nothing unusual about that.

Yes I wanted to point towards how we need to understand this stuff in order to develop as people, as the whole person, not just attraction and relationships. 

Relationships being shit is nothing new. Mainly because of toxic masculinity, that created all sorts of secondary problems. What is new is the transition from toxic masculinity to no masculinity. You had the macho guys, now you have the soy-boys. We basically notice women taking men's role and "men" plummeting into immaturity.

 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by Alexop

[Alexop]

21 minutes ago, Basman said:

With mammals, females are generally smaller. Human reproduction is particularilly costly and lengthy on top of that. And our children have to be born relatively underdeveloped to fit through the pelvis. women (womb men) have to be relatively specialized evolutionary in order to make it work, which means that women have to rely on men to survive (social resources) more directly. Men are much better adapted for raw physical survival. 

With few exceptions like bonobos. Bonobos are less specialized based on sex because they afforded to. They evolved in a very resource rich area with very few challenges and enemies. They don't eat meat either.

Now the woke mob would jump and say: "maybe we also are like bonobos!" No we're not dumbass...

Edited 1 hour ago by Alexop

[Jannes]

12 minutes ago, Alexop said:

Now the woke mob would jump and say: "maybe we also are like bonobos!" No we're not dumbass...

The humans closest relatives are bonobos and chimpanzees. And I can both in humans haha. 

[Alexop]

30 minutes ago, Jannes said:

The humans closest relatives are bonobos and chimpanzees. And I can both in humans haha. 

Humans evolved their biology in Africa, primarily across East and South Africa, while bonobos evolved exclusively in the central African rainforests south of the Congo River.

[Basman]

Just now, Alexop said:

With few exceptions like bonobos. Bonobos are less specialized because they afforded to. They evolved in a very resource rich area with very few challenges and enemies. They don't eat meat either.

It just takes a few years for most animals to mature. Once they stop weening, animals just hide their kids in a cave somewhere and go hunt (unless they live in herds).

37 minutes ago, Jannes said:

The humans closest relatives are bonobos and chimpanzees. And I can both in humans haha. 

*closest living relative.

Chimps are also hominids, but a different genus all together. We're much much closer to other human species than chimps.