Telepathy Is Real

[Monster Energy]

Can anyone explain how? Because it’s not magic, it’s not Satan’s power, it’s not black magic, and it’s not evil. It’s very real because I’ve experienced it, and I’m more skeptical than Matt Dillahunty. I’ll beg the mods to lock this thread if I hear one bastard say it’s not real. It is absolutely real, but how is this possible? I’m talking about something like telepathy, where one person thinks of a specific name and the other person knows exactly what name they’re thinking of.

 

 

[Wilhelm44]

 

[Majed]

@Monster Energy Isn't telepathy just consciousness ? How do you know you exist? Telepathically because you're conscious of it. 

Edited 21 hours ago by Majed

[cetus]

6 hours ago, Monster Energy said:

I’ll beg the mods to lock this thread if I hear one bastard say it’s not real.

What makes you say something so stupid about the mods?

Just a heads up. You're singing your swan song here.

 

5 hours ago, Majed said:

@Monster Energy Isn't telepathy just consciousness ? How do you know you exist? Telepathically because you're conscious of it. 

 Yes! Quantum consciousness.

[Carl-Richard]

16 hours ago, Monster Energy said:

It is absolutely real, but how is this possible?

How does a radio work?

 

16 hours ago, Monster Energy said:

I’m talking about something like telepathy, where one person thinks of a specific name and the other person knows exactly what name they’re thinking of.

Be a bit more ambitious, materialists will easily shoot you down there.

[Wilhelm44]

9 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

materialists will easily shoot you down there.

Brilliant example here of the arrogance of some materialists 

[Carl-Richard]

1 hour ago, Wilhelm44 said:

Brilliant example here of the arrogance of some materialists 

Omggg Steven Pinker is like the most retarded example of Stage Orange pop-science/scientism after Neil deGrasse Tyson. He is like so dreadfully contracted in the way he thinks. The way he used "Bayesian probability" there was sooo laughable and childish, pure sophistry.

Edited 4 hours ago by Carl-Richard

[Carl-Richard]

11 hours ago, cetus said:

Just a heads up. You're singing your swan song here.

What do you mean by that? 

[LordFall]

Well, can you define what you mean by telepathy, then we can have a more accurate conversation about it? 

Personally, I've had many mystical experiences where people around me complete my thoughts out loud. Like, I’ll be thinking, "Wouldn't it be crazy if VR..." and right then, a group of people next to me will say, "finally got good!" in the context of a completely different conversation. 

It tripped me out and led to anxiety and paranoia at first but I'm used to it now. I think reality is a giant mind and sometimes if you pay enough attention to the patterns the streams of consciousness cross. 

If you mean more like being able to know what someone is thinking I think that is also a fascinating rabbit hole to go down. I think humans are constantly broadcasting what they are thinking so the lines between what is telepathy and just good communication skills can blur. Getting better at reading body language has led me to understanding people many times before they use their words to convey their meanings.

For example I just got a job at an English speaking Italian deli here in Montreal and about 60% of customers speak english and 40% speak french. I can usually tell just by saying Hello if someone speaks mostly French by the sort of deer in the headlights face they make. I think that can be described as mild mind reading.

If you mean the opposite being able to implant your own thoughts into someone's mind then that's just overall communication like speech, writing, rhetoric, charisma, marketing, etc. 

Then you have technological mind reading, they are working on it as we speak. I think there are a lot of really cool applications to this technology, breakthroughs in criminology come to mind. 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by LordFall

[kavaris]

1 hour ago, LordFall said:

Well, can you define what you mean by telepathy, then we can have a more accurate conversation about it? 

Personally, I've had many mystical experiences where people around me complete my thoughts out loud. Like, I’ll be thinking, "Wouldn't it be crazy if VR..." and right then, a group of people next to me will say, "finally got good!"

It tripped me out and led to anxiety and paranoia at first but I'm used to it now. I think reality is a giant mind and sometimes if you pay enough attention to the patterns the streams of consciousness cross. 

If you mean more like being able to know what someone is thinking I think that is also a fascinating rabbit hole to go down. I think humans are constantly broadcasting what they are thinking so the lines between what is telepathy and just good communication skills can blur. Getting better at reading body language has led me to understanding people many times before they use their words to convey their meanings.

For example I just got a job at an English speaking Italian deli here in Montreal and about 60% of customers speak english and 40% speak french. I can usually tell just by saying Hello if someone speaks mostly French by the sort of deer in the headlights face they make. I think that can be described as mild mind reading.

If you mean the opposite being able to implant your own thoughts into someone's mind then that's just overall communication like speech, writing, rhetoric, charisma, marketing, etc. 

Then you have technological mind reading, they are working on it as we speak. I think there are a lot of really cool applications to this technology, breakthroughs in criminology come to mind. 

 

You r 100% right. Which is why im adding a couple more thoughts to wat youve already said...

Theres also "Group thought ("group" meaning similar ideas, and also "exact same thought"), which can exist on top of "Globally! everyone is One suddenly" which can also exist as "Individually marking thoughts within someone else, or having it happen to you"... Which can exist alongside of... ... ... And yous get the point.. All of those things can be true, together, hence, reality. Albeit, it sortve kills the enthusiasm for it now, As it sounds like ive described madness, in tele - pathos - in cognitio / gnostos.

Edited 1 hour ago by kavaris