Davino

Why is Omnipotence harder to realize than Omnipresence and Omniscience?

188 posts in this topic

Michael Jame Rannanana, he talks about pre determinism. Right? humor me.

I talk about "pre determinism is what you make it", right? Cause at what point do you ask "What does it even mean?"

Like, say i imagine "God energy ball" or some traveling ball of good luck, and fortunate, or some sense of foresight that lives in my head, but also exists w/ me, As it does, As im very much believing it, As something true...

Suppose all of that, now heres the question. What can you call that now?

Thats something thats both real for you, real because you believe it, and validated through the real you associate with it.

So you really have two things, right? You got the A) The point of which energy was confronted, enough to be like this energy ball, and 2) you have the validation of said energy through the experience mechanism.

Im not gonna belabor the point, nor will i try to build on it, cause thats the bas8c premise, but heres the question, reiterated in a new way — Do you call that real?

What even is that? Lije how do you make heads or tails whats going on there? The question itself is the antagonist that provides the protagonist, like, thats why the question itself is everything.

On the flip side, the answer was what was required to even recognize it in the first place, so its more like a "sacred diamond", Like its got multiple ways of looking at it.


All of my writings come from David Goggins, And his 32nd book entitled "joggaholic anonymous, criss-cross superstar"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like the "you" that was everything was made true, because we said it, likewise, we can lose track of that you'ness, So what even is it now? Its us, but its not us? Its Being but its not? Crazy right?


All of my writings come from David Goggins, And his 32nd book entitled "joggaholic anonymous, criss-cross superstar"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, kavaris said:

Like the "you" that was everything was made true, because we said it, likewise, we can lose track of that you'ness, So what even is it now? Its us, but its not us? Its Being but its not? Crazy right?

I think is what the neo-advaita people try to point out, and it is a genuine problem.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, we ARE Being, so like, thats not like it goes away, like... you are not Bob on tuesday and then Jack on wednesday or something, So Being has a fundamental always playing, And Being, you could go beyond that to deconstruct yourself, and redfine Beingness.

I bring that up just to strum on whats evidently so, so its not like its belaboring a hard point, its just weird is all, and that weirdness gets pretty quiet pretty fast, most weirdness does, though its like, its never not available. Theres always something more, but evenrually its like fuck it i concede to whatever this jazz is..

 


All of my writings come from David Goggins, And his 32nd book entitled "joggaholic anonymous, criss-cross superstar"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, kavaris said:

Also, we ARE Being, so like, thats not like it goes away, like... you are not Bob on tuesday and then Jack on wednesday or something, So Being has a fundamental always playing, And Being, you could go beyond that to deconstruct yourself, and redfine Beingness.

I bring that up just to strum on whats evidently so, so its not like its belaboring a hard point, its just weird is all, and that weirdness gets pretty quiet pretty fast, most weirdness does, though its like, its never not available. Theres always something more, but evenrually its like fuck it i concede to whatever this jazz is..

Yes.  The desire to rationally resolve is also an assumption in spirituality.  This has to examined too.  Because does a rational resolution of an issue actually capture it or not?  Maybe it does.  To say it does or does not is another rational presumption and conclusion.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

Yes.  The desire to rationally resolve is also an assumption in spirituality.  This has to examined too.  Because does a rational resolution of an issue actually capture it or not?  Maybe it does.  To say it does or does not is another rational presumption and conclusion.   

And also,alot of this is prolly stuff many of yas have realized, like this little minutia, but have just forget, because its so little and stupid, or because its so similar, or its spinning so fast next to a tangentially related... i mean, forgetfulness is killer, i mean its like, if ya forget you start over, and if you remenber, you are awaiting the day to just be free of the memory, like its eternal. whatever ya want it to mean / be, et caetera.


All of my writings come from David Goggins, And his 32nd book entitled "joggaholic anonymous, criss-cross superstar"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, kavaris said:

Like the "you" that was everything was made true, because we said it, likewise, we can lose track of that you'ness, So what even is it now? Its us, but its not us? Its Being but its not? Crazy right?

It's extremely simple: being is absolute. The absolute being is, that's everything. Right not what is, is. Anything else are just structures that this fact takes, but ultimately, being is, that's everything, and if you are open to it, your psyche is burned and only the unlimited remains . Just dare to look directly to the abyss. 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, kavaris said:

And also,alot of this is prolly stuff many of yas have realized, like this little minutia, but have just forget, because its so little and stupid, or because its so similar, or its spinning so fast next to a tangentially related... i mean, forgetfulness is killer, i mean its like, if ya forget you start over, and if you remenber, you are awaiting the day to just be free of the memory, like its eternal. whatever ya want it to mean / be, et caetera.

Exactly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now