Why is Omnipotence harder to realize than Omnipresence and Omniscience?

[Leo Gura]

Guys, stop the personal attacks. Make your argument without ad hominim.

[Yimpa]

38 minutes ago, JoshB said:

I was referring to your picture you posted 

https://www.instagram.com/p/Ci0DiVtLoYv/

 

[JoshB]

@LordFall @Leo Gura

Well I apologize for my remarks. But my ultimate point I was making is that Self=Reality and Reality is completely Self defined. And this is the most desirable way reality could be.

[LordFall]

8 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Guys, stop the personal attacks. Make your argument without ad hominim.

It's not a personal attack, it's the easiest way to make the point. An ad hominem bypasses the substance of someone's points to attack their character; I specifically attacked his point. 

If there is no shared reality then there is nothing that can be good or bad, just what is. If someone can be offended by me saying they make bad points then by itself that proves their point wrong. The consequence for living under false coping premises is low life results as reality doesn't seem to reward surface untested opinions compared to things like deep competence and a deep bullet proof understanding of reality. 

[Leo Gura]

@LordFall You were being a jerk.

Argue without being a jerk.

Edited 21 hours ago by Leo Gura

[LordFall]

That's fair, I'll work on more pleasant delivery.

@JoshB I feel like you are still running away from the point I'm making though. Do you really experience your current reality as fully self-defined?

Have you managed to set your own rent? If you own your own property then I guess so. What about your relationship to your local government? Do you define its policies or are you still working towards that and just choosing to ignore it at the moment?

I find it easy to use the concept of non-duality to soothe our existential angst but lose in the process our relationship to responsibility. When life doesn't go our way which it's not for me all the time, I also find it soothing to remember spiritual principles to ground myself but I also fear it leads me towards complacency and I also see other forum users go towards that path so I find it valuable to point it out to them. 

[JoshB]

6 hours ago, LordFall said:

That's fair, I'll work on more pleasant delivery.

@JoshB I feel like you are still running away from the point I'm making though. Do you really experience your current reality as fully self-defined?

Have you managed to set your own rent? If you own your own property then I guess so. What about your relationship to your local government? Do you define its policies or are you still working towards that and just choosing to ignore it at the moment?

I find it easy to use the concept of non-duality to soothe our existential angst but lose in the process our relationship to responsibility. When life doesn't go our way which it's not for me all the time, I also find it soothing to remember spiritual principles to ground myself but I also fear it leads me towards complacency and I also see other forum users go towards that path so I find it valuable to point it out to them. 

When I say Self Defined I don't mean what is defined relative to josh . I mean that I have expanded my sense of self to include the whole reality. If someone does something I personally don't like I am cognizant that this is still self defined.

If you deconstruct the sense of other fully, there won't be anything outside of you to define reality against you.

When you are dreaming at night, your mind is the sole creator of reality.

To realize what I am saying, Other needs to deconstructed. Which 99% people do not want to do and have a large amount of bias in place to avoid that realization. Because reality and the dream as you know it would be gone. 

If you are the Truth there can't be truth from any other source but you. And I ofc don't mean the ego.

I am also saying everything you know and love was made by you.

Edited 14 hours ago by JoshB

[JoshB]

6 hours ago, LordFall said:

It's not a personal attack, it's the easiest way to make the point. An ad hominem bypasses the substance of someone's points to attack their character; I specifically attacked his point. 

If there is no shared reality then there is nothing that can be good or bad, just what is. If someone can be offended by me saying they make bad points then by itself that proves their point wrong. The consequence for living under false coping premises is low life results as reality doesn't seem to reward surface untested opinions compared to things like deep competence and a deep bullet proof understanding of reality. 

You are Absolutely Good and Everything. Bad can not exist because literally you are good. Your Goodness is so radiant it's impossible for bad to exist.

If someone is offended by your comments that doesn't change the fact You are the Creator. 

Edited 14 hours ago by JoshB

[Joseph Maynor]

3 minutes ago, JoshB said:

You are Absolutely Good and Everything. Bad can not exist because literally you are good. Your Goodness is so radiant it's impossible for bad to exist.

Oh yeah.  

[JoshB]

@LordFall @Joseph Maynor

Everything I have been sharing you can find in Leo's content. 

[Joseph Maynor]

Just now, JoshB said:

@LordFall @Joseph Maynor

Everything I have been sharing you can find in Leo's content. 

Cool cool. 

[JoshB]

@LordFall