Why is Omnipotence harder to realize than Omnipresence and Omniscience?

[Leo Gura]

11 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

Now that's belittlement.

No. It is just a rare form of consciousness.

[Eskilon]

11 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

I am talking about consciousness no one understands or has experienced.

As much as I respect you and your work, the chances that you are deluded is almost 100 %.

Would you believe anyone who said what you just wrote? Also, considering your spiritual outrage of the past, it's hard to take your word for it lol.

[LordFall]

On 9/19/2026 at 2:00 PM, JoshB said:

There is no basic shared reality this is something you are imagining. Learning from others is just you teaching yourself in another form. 

When you are in a dream where does the source of any truth come from?

I see so I am imaging a random user named @JoshB gracing my screen with bad not well thought out replies? 

That's good to know Josh but I think you can do better. I'm concentrating all my imaginary brain power to give you superior insight and communication skills. 

[Leo Gura]

6 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

Would you believe anyone who said what you just wrote?

This work is not a matter of belief.

Would I believe God exists if I hadn't experienced it? No.

[JoshB]

10 minutes ago, LordFall said:

I see so I am imaging a random user named @JoshB gracing my screen with bad not well thought out replies? 

That's good to know Josh but I think you can do better. I'm concentrating all my imaginary brain power to give you superior insight and communication skills. 

What did I write that was bad and not well thought out? What you quoted I said in your last reply? 

 

Edited 59 minutes ago by JoshB

[LordFall]

5 minutes ago, JoshB said:

What did I write that was bad and not well thought out? What you quoted I said in your last reply? 

 

You're confusing absolute metaphysics with relative reality, which is the textbook definition of spiritual bypassing.

At the absolute level, sure, all of reality is one undivided consciousness dreaming form. But on the relative, functional level, we operate in an objective shared medium: gravity works, physics applies, and you are literally reading and responding to pixels generated by another distinct locus of consciousness over an internet connection.

Trying to use absolute non-duality to invalidate basic empirical communication makes the philosophy useless. If there is no shared reality, why are you typing replies to convince an "imaginary" projection?

Edited 55 minutes ago by LordFall

[JoshB]

4 minutes ago, LordFall said:

You're spiritually bypassing to try and invalidate basic shared reality. Which is by definition a take based in misapplying spiritual ideas since if there no shared basic reality what are we both replying to? 

 

Or I have reached a level of consciousness so high that there exists nothing outside what is being imagined by you which is in total alignment with what leo teaches. You must break off from other / external to fully actualize your own realization of yourself as God. 

God can deny or invalidate any aspect of reality.

Edited 51 minutes ago by JoshB

[JoshB]

@LordFall To answer your question, if God is the only Being in existence then who would there be for God "share" a reality with?

I can tell you are not conscious that you are imagining the entire experience.

Edited 48 minutes ago by JoshB

[LordFall]

7 minutes ago, JoshB said:

Or I have reached a level of consciousness so high that there exists nothing outside what is being imagined by you which is in total alignment with what leo teaches. You must break off from other / external to fully actualize your own realization of yourself as God. 

God can deny or invalidate any aspect of reality.

That's what I mean, you're being intellectually lazy and spiritually bypassing. God can split itself into an infinite amount of containers. The container of @LordFall is saying that the container of @JoshB is making bad points that he hasn't thought much about. 

3 minutes ago, JoshB said:

@LordFall To answer your question, if God is the only Being in existence then who would there be for God "share" a reality with?

That's an irrelevant point to our basic shared reality. That's like saying because our universal consciousness stems from God you don't have to pay your rent and you can buy as many houses as you want to because you are ultimately the unbound.

Let me know how that works out for you, I'll be waiting for divine irony to manifest itself through your limited perspective. 

Edited 46 minutes ago by LordFall

[JoshB]

13 minutes ago, LordFall said:

That's what I mean, you're being intellectually lazy and spiritually bypassing. God can split itself into an infinite amount of containers. The container of @LordFall is saying that the container of @JoshB is making bad points that he hasn't thought much about. 

That's an irrelevant point to our basic shared reality. That's like saying because our universal consciousness depends from God you don't have to pay your rent and you can buy as many houses as you want to because you are ultimately the unbound. Let me know how that works out for you, I'll be waiting for divine irony to manifests itself through your limited perspective. 

None of this negates the fact that you are the only thing that exists. And that I am you and your own imagination. Why does my behavior bother you so much? I also never said to not take care of survival, I just said that your perspective is absolute.

There is no collective consciousness, there is only your infinite consciousness imagining the entirety of the present moment. 

I also see you and everything as the most beautiful thing there is.

God has the infinite capacity to dream reality as it deems who would of thought.

Edited 32 minutes ago by JoshB

[Yimpa]

39 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

Also, considering your spiritual outrage of the past, it's hard to take your word for it lol.

Spoiler

 

[JoshB]

@LordFall

@Yimpa gets it lol 

[LordFall]

23 minutes ago, JoshB said:

None of this negates the fact that you are the only thing that exists. And that I am you and your own imagination. Why does my behavior bother you so much? I also never said to not take care of survival, I just said that your perspective is absolute.

There is no collective consciousness, there is only your infinite consciousness imagining the entirety of the present moment. 

I also see you and everything as the most beautiful thing there is.

God has the infinite capacity to dream reality as it deems who would of thought.

I find poorly thought-out points shared in a public domain reduce the quality of our communication and thus life. It leads to confusion which leads to spiritual bypassing which leads to a life built around coping as opposed to high quality living. 

Edited 18 minutes ago by LordFall

[JoshB]

5 minutes ago, LordFall said:

I find not well thought out points shared in a public domain to reduce the quality of our communication and thus life. It leads to confusion which leads to spiritual bypassing which leads to a life built around coping as opposed to high quality living. 

Then enlighten us with well thought out points then

[Yimpa]

22 minutes ago, JoshB said:

@Yimpa gets it lol 

Not just me, I am not the Only Awakened Being (OAB) here.

Edited 6 minutes ago by Yimpa

[JoshB]

I am laying out the best way reality could be. 

That it is 100% absolutely determined by you

The only way anyone could interact with me is because it is seeded in my authority and imagination.

@LordFall

Edited just now by JoshB