Alexop

I am joining swedish politics

13 posts in this topic

 I think politics can be a cool life purpose. You get into the party, you meet members physically, you get recognised by your charisma, competence, knowledge. No algorithm bullshit, no marketing skills that override competence. If you suck, you suck. If you're good, you raise in the party's hierarchy. Charisma is not marketing for me, it is competence.

I can use my 15 years of personal development and politics education to help people survive better. People appreciate you if you help them survive better. Most people don't care about our advanced philosophy shit. They want just to survive better. 

I joined the social-democrats, a stage Orange-Green huge party. It is basically almost double as big as the second most popular party. I got in the party 2 months ago. I already got recognised because of my competent arguments. Already met and worked with 3 parliament deputees. One guy from the opposition, the neo-liberal Moderates, I talked to, said he didn't get such good arguments against his claims for a long time.

Looking forward to grow in the party and help Sweden.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely keep us updated with what you can - big pivot! But I dare say a good fit; you have always come across as passionate around the topic :D


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Definitely keep us updated with what you can - big pivot! But I dare say a good fit; you have always come across as passionate around the topic :D

Thanks 🙏 yea politics is cool because you can combine soo many disciplines together. Sociology, psychology, economics, finance, law, power-dynamics, Spiral-Dynamics (which is HUGE and almost no politician knows about it).

It is and art too. How much truth and progress will the people accept? Where is the country's center of gravity? Which party posess excess of one or more SD memetics? 

It is not as simple as you go in and tell people about Stage Turquoise "reality is a hallucination" shit. Nobody will take you seriously or you will even be get kicked out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's awesome, I've been yearning to see more stage yellow arise in Swedish politics. Just went and voted today. I feel all parties are important (also the ones kept outside the parliament due to the >4% barrier), since they are all a sensor to concerns in the population, so voting for just one party is a bit limited. I've been starting to research ways to gradually improve the system, step by step from the current model to a polycentric commonwealth.

Looking forward to hear about your political career.


Our institutions may be failing not because people are bad, but because the architecture cannot perceive reality well enough.

Governance as Engineering — a systems-theoretic map of why modern governance loses signal, legitimacy, and adaptive capacity: The Clouded Mirror — A Reader's Guide

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Bjorn K Holmstrom said:

That's awesome, I've been yearning to see more stage yellow arise in Swedish politics. Just went and voted today. I feel all parties are important (also the ones kept outside the parliament due to the >4% barrier), since they are all a sensor to concerns in the population, so voting for just one party is a bit limited. I've been starting to research ways to gradually improve the system, step by step from the current model to a polycentric commonwealth.

Looking forward to hear about your political career.

Parties that did not make the threshold are there for a reason. People don't resonate with them. Either they are too extreme or they have a poor PR. Like those antivaxxers or those excess Green woketards (feministisk intiativ). Even the Sweden Democrats who we can all agree they are a bunch of assholes, they got so big because they were the first ones who dared to say something that was kind of true. That immigration has to be carefully managed, instead of ideological pursuit of "opening our hearts" and "my country does not build walls" and become world's good Samaritan.

Look what i got from that Moderate guy haha, he got kind of triggered. Sun cream.

 

PXL_20260908_112023429.jpg

Edited by Alexop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really hope you become a well-known figure. It’s actually quite easy to become one in Sweden. I think you’re going to say things that the Swedish people don’t necessarily want to hear but need to hear, and that’s exactly why I think you’ll stand out.

I’m glad we live in the same country.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good. What's your socials, I'll follow you. Looking forward to the new Swedish world order you will bring 🫡

 


Building a global media agency. Follow my progress on Instagram

The dream is not easy but each day we're getting closer 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's my president


There is no failure, only feedback

One small step at a time. No one climbs a mountain in one go.

Certified cutie. The best to ever do it. 51-0🥊.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh forgot I was following you already! 

Your point on SD daring to articulate migration issues first is spot-on from a memetic standpoint. How receptive are the older S party figures to ditching the old taboo and approaching integration strictly through a lens of state capacity and social survival?


Building a global media agency. Follow my progress on Instagram

The dream is not easy but each day we're getting closer 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Alexop said:

Parties that did not make the threshold are there for a reason. People don't resonate with them. Either they are too extreme or they have a poor PR. Like those antivaxxers or those excess Green woketards (feministisk intiativ). Even the Sweden Democrats who we can all agree they are a bunch of assholes, they got so big because they were the first ones who dared to say something that was kind of true. That immigration has to be carefully managed, instead of ideological pursuit of "opening our hearts" and "my country does not build walls" and become world's good Samaritan.

That's too reductionist in my view, reducing the people voting for the parties with less >4% to null. I get that it is practical to have the barrier, but the signal loss is real.


Our institutions may be failing not because people are bad, but because the architecture cannot perceive reality well enough.

Governance as Engineering — a systems-theoretic map of why modern governance loses signal, legitimacy, and adaptive capacity: The Clouded Mirror — A Reader's Guide

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LordFall said:

Oh forgot I was following you already! 

Your point on SD daring to articulate migration issues first is spot-on from a memetic standpoint. How receptive are the older S party figures to ditching the old taboo and approaching integration strictly through a lens of state capacity and social survival?

Magdalena Andersson said S will have a strict migration policy. And also a strict workforce immigration. I just had a discussion with a neo-liberal who was dissatisfied with making workforce immigration stricter. They want their cheap slaves for their companies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now