So I can access the consciousness of awakened beings

[Razard86]

I watch Frank Yang on Youtube sometimes and everytime I watch him on Youtube I access his Consciousness and it feels so empty. Its funny when he describes his awakening and his whole process to me of all the levels he went through etc. its hilarious to me because when you awaken you can just access his state. Its funny to me because all that hard work he did to reach that particular state and then I can just watch him on Youtube and basically trip on his Consciousness is hilarious to me.

His so called Enlightenment is different than mines. Mine is simultaneously empty and full at the same time. Like an empty container that has movement within it. But his? Its just straight up empty period. No movement at all. 

This is the video I was watching but it happens on the other vids he has as well. 

 

 

So for me I can actually tell a person's level of Consciousness by just tripping on it like a drug lol.

[Eskilon]

@Razard86 You can access consciousness of every being or just awakened ones?

How does that feel like? Like telepathy?

[Schizophonia]

@Razard86 What is my level of consciousness?

I'm a closet narcissist I love it when people talk about me—so talk about me you crazy thing.

Edited 16 hours ago by Schizophonia

[Eskilon]

Just now, Schizophonia said:

What is my level of consciousness?

You are freud obsessed, likes baguette, and bit of a troly guy. You definely belong to dmt jester level of consciousness

Edited 16 hours ago by Eskilon

[Schizophonia]

48 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

You are freud obsessed, likes baguette,

 

It's true that a good baguette rubbed with raw garlic and topped with lard is fantastic.

48 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

 

and bit of a troly guy. You definely have a fat cock

Haha thanks I wasn't expecting so much; you definitely have powers of clairvoyance.

48 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

 

belong to dmt jester level of consciousness

I've never met these individuals but I've already stepped into the erotic masquerade while on 4-HO-MET; I assume they're around somewhere.

[Eskilon]

7 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Haha thanks I wasn't expecting so much; you definitely have powers of clairvoyance.

White people are 🤏 generally. We latinos and blacks on the other hand 💪🍆

[Schizophonia]

12 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

White people are 🤏 generally. We latinos and blacks on the other hand 💪🍆

I don't know but all my white friends and myself have normal to tall sizes javelins.

 

Right in the teeth you racist.

Edited 15 hours ago by Schizophonia

[Hojo]

@Eskilon Why are you adding latinos with blacks together to make latino seem like they have a bigger penis.

Latino penis are small compared to us whites and blacks.

Me and faker are the best at league of legends compared to all other scrubs.

Edited 15 hours ago by Hojo

[Eskilon]

Just now, Schizophonia said:

I don't know but all my white friends and myself have normal to tall sizes javelins.

You guys check each others javelins?

No racist, only trolling a bit, chill.

[Eskilon]

@Hojo Africans and South americans have the highest average penis size. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/penis-size-by-country

But anyway, this is not a penis size thread

Edited 15 hours ago by Eskilon

[Schizophonia]

1 minute ago, Eskilon said:

You guys check each others javelins?

No racist, only trolling a bit, chill.

We're just talking about it over a beer.

Maybe they're lying about their height but they said wAllah so it's probably true.

[Schizophonia]

6 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

@Hojo Africans and South americans have the highest average penis size. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/penis-size-by-country

But anyway, this is not a penis size thread

In Latin America even the shemales have big dicks.

Edited 15 hours ago by cetus
Spelling correction for clarification. Not shamales.

[Carl-Richard]

OMG LOL haha

What do you think about Big Jan (RIP; he's not called that, that was a joke; Jan Esmann)?:

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Carl-Richard

[Wilhelm44]

On 29/06/2026 at 2:31 AM, Razard86 said:

I watch Frank Yang on Youtube sometimes and everytime I watch him on Youtube I access his Consciousness and it feels so empty. Its funny when he describes his awakening and his whole process to me of all the levels he went through etc. its hilarious to me because when you awaken you can just access his state. Its funny to me because all that hard work he did to reach that particular state and then I can just watch him on Youtube and basically trip on his Consciousness is hilarious to me.

His so called Enlightenment is different than mines. Mine is simultaneously empty and full at the same time. Like an empty container that has movement within it. But his? Its just straight up empty period. No movement at all. 

This is the video I was watching but it happens on the other vids he has as well. 

 

 

So for me I can actually tell a person's level of Consciousness by just tripping on it like a drug lol.

@zurew If Razard86 has this ability, and it sounds like he does, then perhaps Leo also has the ability to tune into people's levels of awakening and make statements about it. What do you think ?

(This might actually wobble one of the legs, that the cult accusations have been standing on.)

Edited 6 hours ago by Wilhelm44

[emil1234]

6 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

OMG LOL haha

What do you think about Big Jan (RIP; he's not called Big Jan, that was a joke; Jan Esmann)?:

 

 

Big JAN is S Tier. his shaktipats were basically like mini 5meo trips (RIP)

[zurew]

2 hours ago, Wilhelm44 said:

@zurew If Razard86 has this ability, and it sounds like he does, then perhaps Leo also has the ability to tune into people's levels of awakening and make statements about it. What do you think ?

(This might actually wobble one of the legs, that the cult accusations have been standing on.)

Few things:

Im skeptical about such an ability, and anyone can claim to have it.

Im pretty sure that if we were to ask Razard how he knows he has this ability and how he knows its accurate, he wouldnt have a satisfying answer. Im also pretty sure that he hasn't verified its accuracy using a relatively large sample size. (but I can be wrong).

For instance: what do you do if you have two people who claim to have this ability , but they give contradictory answers about Leo's awakening? (For example @Razard86 - do you think Leo is more awake than you and that he is more awake than literally everyone in the Universe?)

 

The other point is that even if I grant that you can determine who has what awakening, that alone still doesn't justify the claim that you are the most awake. That claim presupposes a specific norm by which different awakenings can be ranked and compared. (You could probably have two people with this ability who disagree about how different awakenings should be evaluated and ranked).

Another issue is that, depending on how this ability works, there may be constraints on how many people you can evaluate or "tune into". For example, if evaluating someone requires consuming a certain amount of information about them beforehand, that requirement would necessarily limit the number of people you could assess. (You wouldn't be able to read or watch videos about every single person on Earth, let alone every being in the universe)

---

The claim that "you shouldnt make definitive statements about other people's awakening" still stands, even if I grant that all of the above has been resolved. As long as this ability is fallible in any way, you shouldnt make definitive statements.

But even if I grant, for a moment, that this ability is infallible, that you can actually assess all beings in the universe, and that you've identified the perfect and most accurate standard by which different levels of awakening can be properly ranked, that still wouldn't make asserting the claim fine. (At most, that would address only one small part of the epistemic critique. It would still leave unresolved epistemic issues such as the failure to heal people, the failure to transform into an alien on camera, and several other epistemic problems. [And that is before we even consider the non-epistemic critiques]).

There isn't any trivial deduction from "I have this infallible ability, and I am the most awake being in the universe" to "therefore I should frequently assert that fact and use it to bully and or undermine other people." (unless he can provide a credible explanation for why this tactic or rhetoric is necessary, why it is more beneficial than detrimental to the forum's users, and why alternatives would be less effective)

Edited 4 hours ago by zurew

[UnbornTao]

25 minutes ago, zurew said:

Few things:

Im skeptical about such an ability, and anyone can claim to have it.

Im pretty sure that if we were to ask Razard how he knows he has this ability and how he knows its accurate, he wouldnt have a satisfying answer. Im also pretty sure that he hasn't verified its accuracy using a relatively large sample size. (but I can be wrong).

For instance: what do you do if you have two people who claim to have this ability , but they give contradictory answers about Leo's awakening? (For example @Razard86 - do you think Leo is more awake than you and that he is more awake than literally everyone in the Universe?)

 

The other point is that even if I grant that you can determine who has what awakening, that alone still doesn't justify the claim that you are the most awake. That claim presupposes a specific norm by which different awakenings can be ranked and compared. (You could probably have two people with this ability who disagree about how different awakenings should be evaluated and ranked).

Another issue is that, depending on how this ability works, there may be constraints on how many people you can evaluate or "tune into". For example, if evaluating someone requires consuming a certain amount of information about them beforehand, that requirement would necessarily limit the number of people you could assess. (You wouldn't be able to read or watch videos about every single person on Earth, let alone every being in the universe)

---

The claim that "you shouldnt make definitive statements about other people's awakening" still stands, even if I grant that all of the above has been resolved. As long as this ability is fallible in any way, you shouldnt make definitive statements.

But even if I grant, for a moment, that this ability is infallible, that you can actually assess all beings in the universe, and that you've identified the perfect and most accurate standard by which different levels of awakening can be properly ranked, that still wouldn't make asserting the claim fine. (At most, that would address only one small part of the epistemic critique. It would still leave unresolved epistemic issues such as the failure to heal people, the failure to transform into an alien on camera, and several other epistemic problems. [And that is before we even consider the non-epistemic critiques]).

There isn't any trivial deduction from "I have this infallible ability, and I am the most awake being in the universe" to "therefore I should frequently assert that fact and use it to bully and or undermine other people." (unless he can provide a credible explanation for why this tactic or rhetoric is necessary, why it is more beneficial than detrimental to the forum's users, and why alternatives would be less effective)

I do have it, and they're full of shit.

Edited 3 hours ago by UnbornTao

[zurew]

15 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

I do have it, and they're full of shit.

Absolutely owned.

I'm quite certain that they are only awake and that they aren't AWAKE. (But even granting that they are AWAKE, they definitely aren't AWAKE) -credit goes to Bazooka

Edited 3 hours ago by zurew

[Joseph Maynor]

I spoke with Artem.  I'm wondering what happened to him.

[Wilhelm44]

1 hour ago, UnbornTao said:

@Razard86 - do you think Leo is more awake than you and that he is more awake than literally everyone in the Universe?)

Good question