This 600 pound guy has a Girlfriend

[Leo Gura]

19 minutes ago, aurum said:

How do you even have sex with this many women?

Those kind of guys are usually sex addicts. They have genetically high sex drive. They can fuck all day. They are not normal men.

A normal man does not need to fuck 3 times a day.

Edited 2 hours ago by Leo Gura

[LordFall]

I mean the Coolidge effect is a documented thing. If you have access to many women sexually then your libido will be much higher than a man with only access to one mate. 

Women love sex too especially if they're not stressed all the time. 7 is a lot though that guy is a legend. I think they all live in his house too. I like the having hierarchical polyamory where you only liv with 2-3 primary partners and then have other ones that either have their own partner or are single. 

I read this harem game blog series a few years ago it was interesting to read a breakdown of a guy that had something like that. His was compartmentalized though the women didn't meet each other. His biggest conclusion is that societal shame will be your biggest problem to making work. 

https://www.girlschase.com/content/how-build-harem-pt-1-queen-theory

Edited 1 hour ago by LordFall

[Yimpa]

1 hour ago, Yimpa said:

how does he shower or take a bath? 

 

[aurum]

22 minutes ago, LordFall said:

I mean the Coolidge effect is a documented thing. If you have access to many women sexually then your libido will be much higher than a man with only access to one mate. 

I highly doubt that would change things too dramatically.

Libido is fairly stable, like the amount of food or sleep you want. You can't alter it that much just by having access to more women.

[LordFall]

Yeah you can, it's documented extensively across both humans and different species

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_effect

[Asayake]

2 hours ago, LordFall said:

I would say more it's a cultural narrative and partly brainwashing but mostly it's an efficient system for humans to mate as a whole. When you don't enforce it by social shame though it people tend to be more serially monogamous as in date multiple over years but one at a time or have more various arrangements depending on their lifestyle preference. Some polyamorous people live as like multiple men and women in a polycule in one household. 

I'm not saying that's polyamory is for everyone just that monogamy is not perfect either. Standard monogamy assumes one single human being can and should fulfill 100% of your emotional, intellectual, romantic, and operational needs for a lifetime, while rigidly suppressing natural biological variance.

I think it shows that you're projecting a lot of your beliefs into the situation and judging people without knowing much about them without knowing about the actual reality. Tony has children with multiple of the women in his harem. They are not prostitutes they are women he's met over there organically or on dating apps.He's intertwined his full life with these women and to my knowledge most of them are happy and having a good time.

I'm sure there are problems in their relationships and it does come up but he has the bravery to put himself out to the world and show the good and bad sides of his relationships. If a lot of perfectly ordinary monogamous people put their whole lives on the internet some problems would appear as well I'm sure. Tony is a particularly out there case he's like a full scientist and love to push his life to the limit he's really into body building and biohacking.

I don't envision myself building exactly a life like him but it is cool to see someone work on his life enough to become financially independent and travel the world and be able to live his hobbies and passions and invite other people into it. 

Andrew Tate is a whole other case entirely. He has multiple women accusing him of rape and coercion and he documents himself online admitting to scamming his own women on taxes and working hard to to rinse men of tens of thousands of dollars by lying to them through his webcam girls. 

Explain to me why Tony Huge decided to move to specifically the sex tourist spot #1 in the world to build his "family"?

[aurum]

23 minutes ago, LordFall said:

Yeah you can, it's documented extensively across both humans and different species

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_effect

The Coolidge effect only matters when you introduce a new partner.

Your harem partners are not new or novel. You will have had sex with them tons of times and will have normalized to it all, in the same way that you normalize to one partner in monogamy.

Adding a new partner in a harem is rare.

Additionally, if you are relying on the Coolidge effect for your sex drive, what about the rest of the women in your harem? They will be unsatisfied. You'd mostly only be interested in hooking up with the new girl.

Edited 51 minutes ago by aurum

[aurum]

You cannot solve the novelty problem just by adding new women, unless you are willing to do that perpetually. 

[LordFall]

12 minutes ago, Asayake said:

Explain to me why Tony Huge decided to move to specifically the sex tourist spot #1 in the world to build his "family"?

Easier to support multiple women over there.

8 minutes ago, aurum said:

The Coolidge effect only matters when you introduce a new partner.

Your harem partners are not new or novel. You will have had sex with them tons of times and will have normalized to it all, in the same way that you normalize to one partner in monogamy.

Adding a new partner in a harem is rare.

Additionally, if you are relying on the Coolidge effect for your sex drive, what about the rest of the women in your harem? They will be unsatisfied. You'd mostly only be interested in hooking up with the new girl.

I think it'll work for your brain that the women in your harem are new when you fuck them on a rotation especially because you wouldn't be seeing most of them daily. Let alone if you travel with women and fuck new women together.

I think if you make decent money it'd be pretty easy to pull this off. My game is pretty good now so I think it'd be pretty easy for me to make this happen. The financial component is most of what I'm working on at the moment. My business is just starting to look like it's gonna start to pump out online cashflow consistently. 

Having sex 2-3 times a day for multiple decades seems feasible to me. I have a way higher sex drive than most men though. Usually when I sleep with a  girl and I'm really attracted to her I can go 3-4 times each time we see each other easily. 

[Leo Gura]

It is easier to attract poor women from poor countries when you are rich. They will sleep with you just for an opportunity of escape. Of course they can fall in love too. But the wheels have been greased.

Edited 41 minutes ago by Leo Gura

[LordFall]

Sure I think it's a totally valid dating strategy. Treat people well wherever you date them but foreign women are beautiful and fun as well. Especially when things get long term I don't think there's any ground to judge people based solely on having a global dating strategy. Colombia is a common country for this as well as Argentina. 

Going to a place with weaker currency is one strategy but making a lot of money and doing the reverse strategy is equally valid. I feel like Dubai would have very cool women for example. I'm a bit unique in that I don't mind transactional women, I had a multimillionaire sugar daddy as a business partner for a bit and he was telling me that the women you meet through sugar dating are much higher quality than what people stereotype them for. 

Getting rich and dating the best women across the world is for sure the best dating strategy there is. Anything else is a stranger idea. You can do it in your own country but the world is so big might as well explore what it has to offer. 

Edited 31 minutes ago by LordFall

[Leo Gura]

11 minutes ago, LordFall said:

dating the best women

Money is not great for this. Fame/success is better for attracting solid women. The best women won't do it for the money. But they will do it if you are a somebody.

Edited 24 minutes ago by Leo Gura

[integral]

I don't see why my life needs to be lived as some indirect Pursuit to just get more sex.

Make more money to get more sex.

Learn to socialize better to get more sex.

Increase inteligence to get more sex.

Take psychedelics to awaken to get more sex.

I will not spend my life this way.

Edited 23 minutes ago by integral

[LordFall]

7 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Money is not great for this. Fame/success is better for attracting solid women. The best women won't do it for the money. But they will do it if you are a somebody.

Money is vital for lifestyle quality. I don't want my women to need to work for example. 

I agree fame is great for attracting many attractive women overall. If you're famous and have location independent cashflow that's playing the dating game on easy mode. 

Edited 17 minutes ago by LordFall

[Natasha Tori Maru]

3 hours ago, LordFall said:

Standard monogamy assumes one single human being can and should fulfill 100% of your emotional, intellectual, romantic, and operational needs for a lifetime, while rigidly suppressing natural biological variance.

This rests on the claim that one person should fulfill 100% of your needs - can you tell me a time in history when this was the case? I do not think this is historically the norm - and you can find evidence for this. Humans have always been more community based. This description of monogamy would apply to the more atomized version of society we have only faced in recent time.

Not sure about it also resting on the claim that we would be supressing natural biological variance? Could you rap a bit more on that as the meaning isn't clear? As in novelty in sexual partners? We regulate many biological impulses (anger, aggression, selfishness), so the existence of a biological tendency alone doesn't determine what people ought to do.