Let’s Take Looksmaxxing Seriously

[AtmanIsBrahman]

42 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

I'm asking to see YOUR data. YOUR critical thinking. Data and how you got to your conclusions. YOU.

I'm not sure what you mean by "your" data. That's not what data is by definition.

42 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

ai isn't a source

Yes it is. It was citing actual studies. This honestly makes me doubt your intelligence.

42 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

I'm basically forming a claim that looksmaxxing is nothing but a rebrand with maths of concepts that always existed. Looksmaxxing isn't just a psl, angle optimisation. Your AI response even says the research isn't solid. It's contested?? 

If you actually read the response carefully, you would see that it's an adaptation of research that mostly started in the 70s and became more solidified by the 2000s and 2010s. 

42 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Why are you letting AI do all your thinking research and deductive reasoning? 

I'm not. Why are you lacking in openmindedness and critical thinking on this topic?

Look, I'm just trying to fill a gap on this subforum. If you're interested, why not research yourself rather than asking me to provide the studies or my thought process so that you can correct it (while assuming you're right from the get-go)? If you don't want to, that's fine too.
 

Edited 2 hours ago by AtmanIsBrahman

[Hojo]

Spiritual path is literally the opposite of looksmaxxing. The spiritual people make themselves less apealing and retarded on purpose.

A punk is spiritual. They lay in the dirt and cut their hair to look like a retard.

A looksmaxxer is a wussy baby.

Looksmaxxing is like the epitome of maya.

Edited 3 hours ago by Hojo

[Hojo]

3 hours ago, LordFall said:

 

@Hojo Wrong that's hardmaxxing vs softmaxxing. I agree with most of your points otherwise but looksmaxxing has many areas.

Softmaxxing isnt real, the word is a hypocrisy towards itself.

Its called shaving and grooming we dont need a new word for shaving and grooming. Its not maxing, soft maxxing isnt maxxing.

If you want to make up words to be right just know you are doing it.

[LordFall]

35 minutes ago, bazera said:

My last breakup kind of disillusioned me about relationships, I thought I would derive more happiness and satisfaction out of it but in the end, especially after initial attraction wore off after years, I was a bit dissapointed, I was yearning being single again deep inside, but I was in denial about that.

And since my last girlfriend was checking most of the points I'm looking for in a girl, and still I found relationship not that satisfying ultimately, I'm now taking a break from it all, getting my shit together in all the areas of life, that includes improving physical attractiveness, to not go off topic too much.

I want to find meaning and satisfaction while single, alone, do Consciousness work in more hardcore ways to know myself better, realize root causes of my attachment issues. Not to even mention getting more fit and stuff like that.

So to answer your question now, my ideal dating life would probably include some abundance and multiple partners (not simultaneously) to gain more experience dealing with the feminine side of the psyche, I don't want wife or kids so that filters many girls around my area because most want settling down, which I don't want to at this stage of my life. 

What form did the disaffection take? Was it more like she wasn't helping you fulfill your goals or just in general you didn't enjoy her presence?

I loved having a girlfriend last time I had one but she was BPD and made my life a nightmare so when I was with her I wished I was single but it wasn't the experience of having a woman in my life in and of itself that was lacking; that part was awesome. 

I think your instinct is correct that recentering yourself and knowing yourself better will answer a lot of the questions. Having an exploration phase afterwards makes a lot of sense especially if you've only dated that girl and she's your main reference point for women. You say you don't want kids now but later right? That makes a lot of sense. A lot of the world is stuck in an enforced monogamy framework where any dating has the implication of long term relationship and kids but that's a bit silly. There's nothing wrong with sharing your life with someone for a few months/years and then going apart. FWBs are great for that I had a few since my breakups. It lets you experience women and see what you like and dislike in a partner without the pressure of going all in. 

For example for me I disliked having FWBs where the woman was working on goals that were too separate from mine. It felt our lives were siloed or just being independent and then just getting together to fuck, hangout but working on different missions. Especially as an intellectual if I don't understand her pursuits and think on it with her I felt very disconnected from them even when that was the case with my 1 year GF. So for me developing general business skills/the money that would help my partner(s) achieve whatever goals they have is very important.

@Hojo You're literally making things up, this is part of the community and the term. Google/AI it. I dislike when you butt in topics that you have no knowledge of, to me it feels very egotistical and like you're wasting my time writing stuff that has no substance. Especially with some certainty on things you clearly don't understand. 

Edited 2 hours ago by LordFall

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

Nah I'd rather rizzmaxx and musclemaxx. Looksmaxxing is for homosexualitymaxxers

[Hojo]

@LordFall Is wiping your ass soft looksmaxxing? You are just labelling things you do as a grand scheme towards something you can add anything in there and it fits your idea of what the word is. Its just making shit up.

The word becomes completely redundant.

The words you are using have no substance. You are negating the substance of your own terms and saying im doing it. You are being ambiguous to the what your words mean cause they dont have one you can just throw anything in there.

To be part of a trend that is retarded in itself.

Edited 2 hours ago by Hojo

[LordFall]

 

2 minutes ago, Hojo said:

@LordFall Is wiping your ass soft looksmaxxing? You are just labelling things you do as a grand scheme towards something you can add anything in there and it fits your idea of what the word is. Its just making shit up.

The word becomes completely redundant.

No now you're projecting because your ego is hurt that I called you out on it. It has to do with improving your appearance to attract people. Stuff that is surgical is generally considered the hardmaxxing portion of lookxmaxxing. It's literally on the wikipedia. 

 

[Hojo]

@LordFall You dont need the term its made up. Wiping your own ass is not softmaxxing even if you say it is. Its not real. I am denying the fact that softmaxxing exists as we already have words for it. Just because a word is made up by someone dosent mean its real.

Looksmaxxing however is real.

Its like creating a word related to a mental illness to not make the mental illness seem real.

If there is a fat ugly 700 pound man laying in his own filth and he decides to wipe the shit off his body according to this he is softmaxxing. It dosent make any sense.

The word is boundless and has no meaning to it.

Edited 2 hours ago by Hojo

[LordFall]

Which part doesn't make sense to you? A 700 lbs dude is an extreme example not really worth addressing.

I basically explained why softmaxxing makes sense here. Most men do not maximize the features of themselves that would be considered looksmaxxing. It's a great enough proportion that people have argued enough about it that's its on the wikipedia. Some people take it into a neurotic level and refuse to take action and because pickup and redpill are now outside the overton window the hardmaxxing part of looksmaxxing has surfaced in mainstream media because it's shocking to people. Shocking stuff makes for easy headlines. Dude smashes his face with hammer and gets famous vs 30% of men aren't dressed and groomed optimally nor workout enough.

 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by LordFall

[Natasha Tori Maru]

@AtmanIsBrahman if you don't want to address the questions then just say it. 

I don't require your assumptions. I require answers. 

AI isn't an answer.

I want to know how you came the certain conclusions - all you are doing is proving you adopted someone else's, and cannot show how they got there with your own words.

I can relink my original question set if you like? You are making the claim that looksmaxxing is new. It's got validity.

I am questioning that. I want you to display how you understand it. I am not going to research this because I want to know how YOU came the the conclusion this was valid. Showing how you checked validity. All I can decifer is that you jumped on a trend and haven't thought about it, and taken on someone else's conclusion as authority IE group think 

If you can show me your own thoughts I wouldn't suspect the above.

Edited 44 minutes ago by Natasha Tori Maru