We Need to Start Bullying AI Slop Again

[AerisVahnEphelia]

55 minutes ago, zurew said:

Change AI to a human and you immediately realize that your line of thought doesnt hold up.

"When I picked Leo to win arguments for me and to speak for me, I just chosed Leo to express myself bro and when Leo won, basically I won".

There cant be amplified expression, when there isnt any expression in the firstplace.

The expression amplification only makes sense if there is some kind of substance that can actually be amplified. 

you need way too much contemplation to start to get it, nothing I can tell you, will help, you're helpless.

 

there are no human, no self, no you, no human expression, there is only god expression.

[Natasha Tori Maru]

@AerisVahnEphelia LLMs have no lived phenomenology

[zurew]

1 hour ago, AerisVahnEphelia said:

there are no human, no self, no you, no human expression, there is only god expression

Good way to destroy a conversation by switching to the Absolute.

None of your previous crticisms makes any sense then, since there is no one who could pick any AI, there is no one who is expressing themselves and  there is no AI, and there are no others who could use AI to amplify things.

1 hour ago, AerisVahnEphelia said:

you need way too much contemplation to start to get it, nothing I can tell you, will help, you're helpless.

You would rather give this pompous nonsense, swing around your spiritual dick, and abstract your way out of the conversation (destroying the necessary frame within which talking about AI-related problems is still meaningful) by switching to the absolute, rather than actually engaging substantively with the points.

Edited 1 hour ago by zurew