VeganAwake

Nothing important is happening

109 posts in this topic

On 6/3/2026 at 1:01 AM, Someone here said:

If someone in real life makes fun of me or insult me or scream disrespectfully on me I experience irritation in my body and I experience an urge to react negatively towards these insults . Yes I can and I do understand that that’s not what I should do but it’s not completely under my control. That’s my experience.

Yes, you experience the urge. The urge comes from you. Say you got angry because I insulted you just now, but I had the wrong person - I meant to call the person behind you an idiot. Are you still angry?

Just a simple exercise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, UnbornTao said:

The urge comes from you. Say you got angry because I insulted you just now

Don’t you see the contradiction? At least the urge arises because of both me and you in this scenario? Not just me.


 "When you get very serious about truth you accept your life situation exactly as it is. So much so that you aren't childishly sitting around wishing it were otherwise.If you were confined to a wheelchair you would just accept it as how reality is. Just as you now just accept that you are not a bird who can fly."

-Leo Gura. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/4/2026 at 3:05 PM, Someone here said:

Don’t you see the contradiction? At least the urge arises because of both me and you in this scenario? Not just me.

Have you ever been angry without apparent external triggers? You can actually do this. 

What does this say about your role in that? 

Edited by UnbornTao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

Have you ever been angry for no reason and without apparent external triggers? You can actually do this. What does this say about your role in that? 

Do you ever get angry?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2026-06-04 at 7:21 AM, VeganAwake said:

I would be suspicious of anyone describing reality that way. It would sound like a blind total denial of sorts.

Physical reality is wild and crazy, it's over the top radical and spontaneous.  The human languages can't even come close to doing it justice. An explosion of lights, colors, sounds, smells, crazy looking creatures, amazing plant life, infinite cosmos and the mystery of the unknown.

But simultaneously its empty of certain qualities which humans try to superimpose onto reality like importance or value and purpose.

It's empty and full.

Empty of meaning and purpose. It doesn't have an end goal or agenda to stick to. It doesn't need or require anything to be a certain way. It's already complete in other words. It's already everything and lacks nothing.

Full because it's all encompassing/all inclusive and excludes nothing.

As conditioned humans we attempt to understand and know what reality is. We try to force meaning onto reality by way of our perspectives/prerogatives.

The sense of self is that which experiences suffering and becomes defensive if another body calls it a stupid ass. 

Sit and write an entire page describing yourself in detail minus the physical body..........that's at least what I refer to as the "sense of self" 

Your description is almost just like the descriptions I’ve heard from these people I mentioned, except you didn’t include calling reality “nothing” here, but if I remember correctly I think you’ve said that before too (I might be wrong tho)

It doesn’t matter to me tho, those words don’t do anything to break my sense of self anyways. When I write it’s like I am just exploring some kind of expression, maybe you are too I don’t know. It’s a need. 
 

About the last part about describing your sense of self. lol just my immediate thought is that it would be difficult to fill entire page about it. In a way it’s too “direct” to describe in elaborate ways beyond just something like “it’s this sense of being here located behind the eyes”

Edited by Sugarcoat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

Your description is almost just like the descriptions I’ve heard from these people I mentioned, except you didn’t include calling reality “nothing” here, but if I remember correctly I think you’ve said that before too (I might be wrong tho)

It doesn’t matter to me tho, those words don’t do anything to break my sense of self anyways. When I write it’s like I am just exploring some kind of expression, maybe you are too I don’t know. It’s a need. 
 

About the last part about describing your sense of self. lol just my immediate thought is that it would be difficult to fill entire page about it. In a way it’s too “direct” to describe in elaborate ways beyond just something like “it’s this sense of being here located behind the eyes”

Yeah, I totally get what you mean, there's only so many words that seem like they match best to the situation. Probably sounds like a copycat. 

The sense of self doesn't actually break or die because it's not real. Those are just the words attempting to describe how it seems.

At least here, it was a clear recognition that carries with it the ability to slowly strangle/deflate the self illusion.

Writing a long example about yourself is kind of like an exercise to reveal how much of its concept is just assumed and in the head.

Interestingly here, a lot of the "sense of self" was descriptions heard from other people over the years and just assumed to be a me.


“Everything is honoured, but nothing matters.” — Eckhart Tolle.

"I have lived on the lip of insanity, wanting to know reasons, knocking on a door. It opens. I've been knocking from the inside." -- Rumi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, VeganAwake said:

The sense of self doesn't actually break or die because it's not real. Those are just the words attempting to describe how it seems.

At least here, it was a clear recognition that carries with it the ability to slowly strangle/deflate the self illusion.

Writing a long example about yourself is kind of like an exercise to reveal how much of its concept is just assumed and in the head.

Interestingly here, a lot of the "sense of self" was descriptions heard from other people over the years and just assumed to be a me.

I was thinking about what do you mean. Maybe for you the self was a kind of concept that was happening all time in your software and in some moment it got dissolved and your mind got free of that. 

But anyway there is still recognition of the fact of being, it's not that "someone" recognizes it, but that exist that recognition. For example, if you are in coma, that recognition disappear. Then in coma there is not self, but now it's self because there is registration of the change, and this implies recognition of the fact of being. 

The point is: who recognizes it? Well, we don't need to make mess with it: the human structure implies this recognition, and this recognition needs information, difference inside/outside. This recognition of the difference is the self, and it's absolutely real. It will finish when you die, but now it's real, and when you die this self reflexive structure will happen again and again, just because it's a possibility, and always it's "you" because "you" is the fact of knowing that reality is, it's a property in the reality that happens. 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's HOLY MAGIC ETERNAL FIRE ALIVE


There Is No Hope & None Of It Is The Truth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now