Solipsism as a hallmark of consciousness

[Willy Phallicus]

The resident guru summed it up quite succinctly in his solipsism video which was taken down if Im not mistaken.  Great work really.  Well, at least the first 2/3rds of it or so.  He kinda lost me on the evil and demons thing towards the end there.  But yeah, its available for viewing if you need some kind of refresher course or something.  Nothing tops experiential gnosis so maybe you should aim for that.

In case you aren't sure you're God and its just God and nothing and no one else.  Its just you.  You are completely and utterly alone and that fact is not lost on you which is why you opt to get lost in the first place.

That voice in your head is the voice of God.  Uni-verse, One Voice.  You put the All Seeing Eye on the back of the ONE dollar bill.  You wrote, directed and starred in The Matrix.  There are no other Gods save you.  Youre the One.

The payoff for infinite loneliness and meaninglessness is that you are so goddamn infinitely powerful that you can convince yourself this shit is totally real and that's where your at.  Either you're locked up in some shitty script or you're not bored of human yet like you are when you get bored of being God and it looks like its probably both.

Edited 23 hours ago by Willy Phallicus
grammer

[PenguinPablo]

14 hours ago, aurum said:

That's an extremely high bar though.

You might as well dismiss everyone.

That sounds like something a solipsist would say. 

[Osaid]

16 minutes ago, PenguinPablo said:

That sounds like something a solipsist would say. 

Yeah of course he wants to dismiss everyone. Typical.

[vibv]

1 hour ago, Oppositionless said:

I assumed that when ppl talked about solipsism they were talking about the ego living in its own dream world , not literally the ego being the only thing that exits 

Not the ego, but I that functions like a mirror for WE and YOU are like a mirror for ME, the Eternal Being.

[Loveeee]

@Carl-Richard @Eskilon @Nemra   @Oppositionless

What exactly do you guys believe, that other minds exist or just that's it's impossible to know they don't ? 

[Carl-Richard]

2 hours ago, Loveeee said:

@Carl-Richard @Eskilon @Nemra   @Oppositionless

What exactly do you guys believe, that other minds exist or just that's it's impossible to know they don't ? 

I believe "other" is a concept. I believe "exist" is a concept. I believe "don't exist" is a concept. None of it is actual in the absolute sense. To pose that other minds exist or don't exist, it's philosophy, it's stuff you think about. But what "is" irrespective of thinking? That's what the Absolute is.

Edited 13 hours ago by Carl-Richard

[Eskilon]

7 hours ago, Loveeee said:

What exactly do you guys believe, that other minds exist or just that's it's impossible to know they don't ? 

From my current understanding, there's no my mind or other minds, all of that is just thinking. Before thinking, there is nobody home.

Reality is happening. An unfolding of a process.

Edited 8 hours ago by Eskilon

[Nemra]

11 hours ago, Loveeee said:

What exactly do you guys believe, that other minds exist or just that's it's impossible to know they don't ? 

There are functional resemblances of my mind within my mind.

Edited 4 hours ago by Nemra

[Oppositionless]

12 hours ago, Loveeee said:

@Carl-Richard @Eskilon @Nemra   @Oppositionless

What exactly do you guys believe, that other minds exist or just that's it's impossible to know they don't ? 

I don't disagree there is one thing. I just don't know if I'd call it a mind. When I was more into philosophy, pre having an awakening, I was comfortable calling it a mind, I read Bernardo Kastrup's books etc. But after breaking through a bunch, I honestly have no idea what it is.
I went into psychedelics hoping to get the insight into infinite mind and walked away not knowing what anything is .

Calling it a mind is comforting because it gives some kind of assurance, some kind of ownership. If you say it's a mind, you have to define what a mind is, and once you define what a mind is, you have to define all the terms you used to say what a mind is, and it goes on forever like that.

Edited 3 hours ago by Oppositionless

[Loveeee]

@Carl-Richard @Eskilon @Nemra @Oppositionless

You're omniscient, what you're conscious of right now, your current "human experience", is all of reality

Are you saying it isn't, or simply that it's impossible to know it is ?

[Oppositionless]

12 minutes ago, Loveeee said:

@Carl-Richard @Eskilon @Nemra @Oppositionless

You're omniscient, you're conscious of all of reality

Are you saying that's wrong, or simply that it's impossible to know ?

 

 

I don't disagree with that. Holographic nature of reality and all, the grain of sand contains the entire universe.

I'm just suggesting that, if you were in the middle of a 5 meo breakthrough (at least if you're me, ymmv), you're not going to be thinking "ah yes, it's all mind." No, all that shit goes out the window. There are no words when you take a high enough dose, and you walk away with nothing, but it's a liberating nothing.

[Nemra]

8 minutes ago, Loveeee said:

what you're conscious of right now, your current "human experience", is all of reality

I agree.

Edited 3 hours ago by Nemra

[Loveeee]

8 minutes ago, Nemra said:

I agree.

Welcome to Absolute Solipsism 🤝

[Loveeee]

13 minutes ago, Oppositionless said:

I don't disagree with that. Holographic nature of reality and all, the grain of sand contains the entire universe.

I mean what you're conscious of right now, your current "human experience", is all of reality

 

 

[Oppositionless]

8 minutes ago, Loveeee said:

I mean what you're conscious of right now, your current "human experience", is all of reality

 

the content isn't reality, the witness is. The content is just a temporary ripple.

There's no contradiction in other "minds" because the witness is always the same.

Edited 2 hours ago by Oppositionless

[Willy Phallicus]

28 minutes ago, Oppositionless said:

"ah yes, it's all mind."

Usually its "ah yes, its all me." followed by a huge sense of relief.

 

[Loveeee]

30 minutes ago, Oppositionless said:

the content isn't reality, the witness is. The content is just a temporary ripple.

There's no contradiction in other "minds" because the witness is always the same.

You're omniscient, is what I'm saying

This is what omniscience feels like, you reading these words 

[GodisOne]

On 4/1/2026 at 2:09 AM, Loveeee said:

When someone talks about spirituality, I automatically try and determine if the person believes in other minds

If they do, they're too lost in imagination for my taste, not realizing that God is you, nothing more, nothing less

If they don't they've got my attention 

How can you define "you" without defining its relational opposite, "others". The world of relativity is sustained by opposites. You can't have one without its opposite. "You", if defined as "individual self", has its opposite as the "Absolute"; but "you", if defined as "one of many", has its opposite as "others". So "you" and "others" exist in the world of relativity, just like "you" and the "Absolute" exist. The opposites seek union, just like in the yin-and-yang logo. 

[Willy Phallicus]

20 minutes ago, GodisOne said:

How can you define "you" without defining its relational opposite, "others".

You don't need 2 to define 1, you just need 1.

[Carl-Richard]

2 hours ago, Loveeee said:

@Carl-Richard @Eskilon @Nemra @Oppositionless

You're omniscient, what you're conscious of right now, your current "human experience", is all of reality

Are you saying it isn't, or simply that it's impossible to know it is ?

I'm saying that is not Absolute. There is no limitation to your experience as the Absolute. That's true Omniscience. Your experience as the Absolute is fundamentally beyond space and time, beyond immediate appearances. The mistake of making limited appearances Absolute is the mistake of taking the shadows as the Sun.

And it's understandable, as the human mind has trouble conceiving of experience beyond space and time. Even when having had glimpses into it, the mind can still make the conflation, because it inevitably tries to make sense of it. And as the Absolute is beyond space and time, beyond immediate appearances, there is nothing stopping it from creating experiences beyond those limited appearances.

What's stopping it? It's not bound by space and time, unlike the appearances you're pointing to. It can create "separate" bubbles that don't overlap (or partially overlap) with each other. Because the separation is not spatial, not temporal, you don't have to notice. Now, this is different from saying "there are" such separate bubbles out there, but from the Absolute perspective, nothing stops that from being possible.

Edited 1 hour ago by Carl-Richard