OnlyFans Owner Died.

[Xonas Pitfall]

2 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

It is like weed is more of a trap than heroin. Most people are too afraid of heroin but ruin themselves with weed thinking it's not so bad.

Sure, but you said this:

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

Doing porn is less bad in my eyes because it has a huge stigma and barrier to entry, which is good.

Doing heroin is less bad than weed in my eyes because it has a huge stigma and barrier to entry, which is good. 
?

[AION]

With or without OnlyCancer most women are ruined. Bimbo inflation is independent of that. The best you can do is just play the hypergamy curve. 

[D2sage]

Easy money.

They banned OF in Sweden, and it's illegal to buy material there.

The negative side effects of OF will show up in the future.

[Leo Gura]

Bring back the hijab!

[Leo Gura]

1 minute ago, D2sage said:

They banned OF in Sweden, and it's illegal to buy material there.

Really? That's surprising.

On what grounds?

[D2sage]

9 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

On what grounds?

You can access OF, but the law makes it illegal to buy interactive or custom sexual content.

They view it as digital prostitution.

Selling sex is legal in Sweden, but not buying. 

 

Edited 16 hours ago by D2sage

[Ulax]

13 minutes ago, AION said:

With or without OnlyCancer most women are ruined. Bimbo inflation is independent of that. The best you can do is just play the hypergamy curve. 

Women's worth isn't dependent on what dudes find attractive dude.

[Ulax]

12 minutes ago, D2sage said:

Easy money.

They banned OF in Sweden, and it's illegal to buy material there.

The negative side effects of OF will show up in the future.

Banning prostitution is too much government overreach imo

[Leo Gura]

16 minutes ago, D2sage said:

You can access OF, but the law makes it illegal to buy interactive or custom sexual content.

They view it as digital prostitution.

Selling sex is legal in Sweden, but not buying.

Interesting. Thanks for sharing.

[AION]

12 minutes ago, Ulax said:

Women's worth isn't dependent on what dudes find attractive dude.

I don´t know how you made that connection. Worth is in the eye of the beholder and has nothing to do what I said. I´m talking about the prospect of modern women being able to be mothers which is a matter of survival, not worth. Most women are too egoistic to sacrifice for a child. The greatest non/ego act is to bring a child into existence because it is a net loss in health, wealth and other metrics. It doesn´t make sense to get children from a toxic SD orange (feminist) point of view. 

[Ulax]

46 minutes ago, AION said:

With or without OnlyCancer most women are ruined. Bimbo inflation is independent of that. The best you can do is just play the hypergamy curve. 

17 minutes ago, AION said:

I don´t know how you made that connection. Worth is in the eye of the beholder and has nothing to do what I said. I´m talking about the prospect of modern women being able to be mothers which is a matter of survival, not worth. Most women are too egoistic to sacrifice for a child. The greatest non/ego act is to bring a child into existence because it is a net loss in health, wealth and other metrics. It doesn´t make sense to get children from a toxic SD orange (feminist) point of view. 

Bro you said most "most women are ruined" and then two sentence later said "The best you can do is just play the hypergamy curve". So I implied you were saying that because they have traits that make them low in romantic attractiveness they are ruined. 

Edited 16 hours ago by Ulax

[Natasha Tori Maru]

13 hours ago, AION said:

Most women are too egoistic to sacrifice for a child. The greatest non/ego act is to bring a child into existence because it is a net loss in health, wealth and other metrics. It doesn´t make sense to get children from a toxic SD orange (feminist) point of view. 

Most women I know want kids, but cannot ensure their own income and safety while doing so.

As soon as you have children, your income takes a hit. You become more vulnerable to financial abuse due to a lack of material funds for survival. If you face divorce with children as a stay at home mum, this introduces a huge issue. Most women would ideally drop to part time and raise children - but again the disparity in wages becomes a power dynamic in the relationship. If there is a breakup, you carry risk not having sovereign means. There are tons of good men who take equal responsibility raising children. But the work normally falls on the woman.

So it can be the total other way. These issues cannot be reduced down to one explanation.

And I will correct you - people - are selfish. People are egoic.

Edited 3 hours ago by Natasha Tori Maru

[Rafael Thundercat]

23 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Guys. Gloating over someone's death from cancer is not aligned with our values here.

Stay classy.

Well I thought that study of corruption was one of your favorite hobbies. Of course I dont give a damn for the pass way of Leonid, I will pass away as well same to anyone here, and actually I barely knew the guy, just hear about him via a message from someone  I follow, a woman involved in woman rigths whos text I will post here as soon as I translate. From a sort search about Leonid I found this: 

leonid radvinsky investigation

+6

Leonid Radvinsky

 (43), the Ukrainian-American billionaire owner of OnlyFans, passed away in March 2026 after a cancer battle. His ownership of the adult platform brought intense scrutiny, including a 2024 Reuters report on exploitative practices and a 2024 Ofcom fine of roughly £1 million for poor age verification. 

BBC +4

Key details of investigations and controversies regarding Radvinsky:

OnlyFans Content & Security: Under his ownership, British regulators investigated OnlyFans for failing to prevent children from accessing pornographic content, leading to a fine for poor age-verification standards, according to BBC. A 2024 Reuters investigation highlighted allegations of coercion and exploitative practices involving creators on the platform, notes The Guardian.

Early Business Career: Prior to OnlyFans, a Forbes investigation revealed Radvinsky operated several "ethically dubious" sites in the early 2000s that claimed to offer illegal, explicit content, which were found to be scams that generated millions from users, according to Inverse and Forbes.

Legal Issues: In his early career, he ran webcams like MyFreeCams, which faced lawsuits from corporations like Microsoft and Amazon for spamming campaigns, according to Forbes Australia. 

BBC +4

Radvinsky acquired OnlyFans in 2018, transforming it into a mainstream adult-content, subscription-based service, say sources including The New York Times. At the time of his death, he was valued at approximately $4 billion to $4.7 billion

Not being surprised if future reveals more about him and possible connections with Epstein Class. 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by Rafael Thundercat

[Leo Gura]

@Rafael Thundercat Okay, so what?

Doesn't mean we should celebrate his death.