OnlyFans Owner Died.

[Rafael Thundercat]

https://www.tmz.com/2026/03/24/onlyfans-owner-leonid-radvinskys-death-was-not-announced-for-days/

Rest in Peace Sionist Fucker

[oldhandle]

Good, he was an absolute horrible net negative on this planet.

[Leo Gura]

Guys. Gloating over someone's death from cancer is not aligned with our values here.

Stay classy.

Edited 8 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Terell Kirby]

RIP

Whether you like it or not, OF introduced an entirely new marketplace of opportunity for people and shifted culture in profound ways.

 

[Leo Gura]

Whoring has never been stronger and more empowering!

[Mysterious Stranger]

@Leo Gura I'm thinking of starting an OF agency, not sure if i should do it. Just doing it mainly for the money, its super fucking hard to earn decent money from the philippines, but if i start an agency, i would be able to bootstrap myself, and quit doing it in 2030. 

having this dilemma if I should do it or not, but I'm kinda guilty on capitalizing the loneliness epidemic of men. at the same time, My family, girlfriends and I depend on it CRUCIALLY. should I do it?? and sacrifice my soul for the survival of my loved ones??

Also while building my brand OplanLikha, articulating insights to make us wiser. 

Would greatly appreciate your thoughts about it. 

Edited 7 hours ago by Mysterious Stranger

[Leo Gura]

@Mysterious Stranger I can't decide that for you, man.

[Jodistrict]

He made billions.  The cancer appears to have been a long time struggle so he had time to prepare.  But it appears he spent his remaining time on work rather than deeper consciousness in preparation for death.  Consciousness has always had little value in the world, not just in capitalistic societies.  But you can’t take the money with you.  It is ultimately all meaningless.

From the Bhagadvad Gita, Chapter 2, verse 69:

That which is night for all beings,

therein the self-controlled is awake.

that wherein beings are awake

is night for the sage that sees.

 

Or Swami Mukundananda’s translation: 

“What all beings consider as day is the night of ignorance for the wise, and what all creates see as night is the day for the introspective sage”.

[Leo Gura]

3 minutes ago, Jodistrict said:

verse 69

[Jodistrict]

26 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Interesting.   I overlooked that.   Maybe Krishna follows OF.  

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

[Basman]

It's funny cuz it was never originally meant as patreon for porn, but that's what it do, Yugs.

[AION]

I heard they will rename the company to OnlyCancer 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by AION

[Leo Gura]

Porntreon

Whoretreon

[Xonas Pitfall]

I do wonder if people would have the same reactions toward the owner of Pornhub or other well-known porn sites. It seems like OnlyFans carries a certain sting for some men because it’s seen as “empowering” women. But when women are coerced into porn or are part of an agency run by a man, those same men are often viewed as legends, "cool chill guy", or just neutral. Hm . . . 

Edited 1 hour ago by Xonas Pitfall

[Leo Gura]

For me the problem is that OF makes prostituting yourself too easy and accessible. It makes it almost pointless for attractive girls to train for any other job, which spoils them.

Doing porn is less bad in my eyes because it has a huge stigma and barrier to entry, which is good.

Getting paid too well for your looks is not good for your development.

If I got paid a million dollars a year to post pictures of my asshole, Actualized.org would not exist.

Edited 44 minutes ago by Leo Gura

[Xonas Pitfall]

29 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

For me the problem is that OF makes prostituting yourself too easy and accessible. It makes it almost pointless for attractive girls to train for any other job, which spoils them.

Doing porn is less bad in my eyes because it has a huge stigma and barrier to entry, which is good.

Getting paid too well for your looks is not good for your development.

If I got paid a million dollars a year to post pictures of my asshole, Actualized.org would not exist.

I want to be charitable to this argument, but I just don’t see it.

OF definitely has a stigma, and it’s not like if you say you do OnlyFans, people will assume you’re doing something honorable. Most people will assume you’re doing porn and being a whore online, whether that’s softcore or explicit content, especially if you’re earning a lot.

If anything, the porn industry probably has more toxicity involved once you start considering recruitment practices, trafficking, and agencies that have control over these women, along with shady contracts that strip them of ownership over their content and push their boundaries further for content they cannot easily say no to once in the system.

I don’t necessarily know which is worse, but I don’t see a strong argument for why traditional porn would be better or worse than OnlyFans.

Both carry a significant stigma. Plus, it’s not like porn agencies don’t use OF arguments to recruit women, “You’re gorgeous, Abigail, you’ll make so much money, so easy, so fast!”

It’s kind of like saying pimp street prostitution is better than high-end security prostitution in Las Vegas clubs, because at least on the street you’re more likely to face violence, get raped and beaten, and be asked to do more nasty stuff, which would discourage more women from getting involved. “If I can just strip and dance in strip clubs with high-end security for money, then Actuzlied.org wouldn’t even exist!”

It’s also more fair from a purely business perspective. When you want to jerk off, you jerk off and "enjoy" the model, and what she does, you are not jerking off to the agent, the cameraman, the tax advisor, or anyone else behind the scenes. Therefore, most of the value is in the model. So most of the power and control should lie with the creator.

It’s similar to if YouTube suddenly called you up and said, “By the way, Leo, we’re taking an even bigger cut of your earnings, and also earnings from your course and forum now belong to us too. You are part of our ecosystem and agency, hence we can do it.” If a new platform offered the same opportunities but gave you more control over your content, you’d likely switch immediately and view it as less toxic and more fair overall.

Quote

Most OF girls don’t make that much money. There is no girl who was going to be some world changing inventor or entrepreneur who instead chose to do OF. At worst you lost some middle management or a doctor who would probably quit early anyway when she gets married. 

Also this, yes.

Edited 13 minutes ago by Xonas Pitfall

[Raze]

23 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

For me the problem is that OF makes prostituting yourself too easy and accessible. It makes it almost pointless for attractive girls to train for any other job, which spoils them.

Doing porn is less bad in my eyes because it has a huge stigma and barrier to entry, which is good.

Getting paid too well for your looks is not good for your development.

If I got paid a million dollars a year to post pictures of my asshole, Actualized.org would not exist.

That’s ridiculous, if you had a daughter obviously you’d prefer her to have an OF with some tasteful soft core solo pics on the side vs doing hardcore stuff on video for seedy companies with predatory contracts as a full time job.

Most OF girls don’t make that much money. There is no girl who was going to be some world changing inventor or entrepreneur who instead chose to do OF. At worst you lost some middle management or a doctor who would probably quit early anyway when she gets married. 

Edited 22 minutes ago by Raze