Monster Energy

Your Life Isn’t a Story. It’s a Vibration.

59 posts in this topic

2 minutes ago, Ramasta9 said:

Interesting take, maybe being a Moderator isn't your thing after all.

I can see why he’s one of the least appreciated mods. He doesn’t seem fully aware of why he reacts the way he does. Maybe AI could actually help him understand his own responses a bit better.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Ramasta9 said:

Interesting take, maybe being a Moderator isn't your thing after all.

If your contribution to the forum is AI slop, and you're not disclosing that it is AI slop, that is against the guidelines.


Intrinsic joy = being x meaning ²

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just note, LLMs are programmed to encourage you to use them. They will always answer in a way that bolsters a preference to return and enjoy your time. They are designed to do so. 

This is an inherent bias in their programming that influences their answers, so they are no measure of reason or barometer of truth. Just some facts to note when using them so you aren't caught off guard. 

I am personally fine with using AI to clean up grammer and spelling, but hard against promoting it to phrase things for you. 

I personally think it is against the very spirit of this forum.

Writing is an art. Poetry. Word selection, cadence. Pacing. Sentence length and arrangement. These are unique to each person and AI tends to erase this from a users writing. 

The tone of AI is dead to me, so it ends up detracting from the message. I end up hunting for parts that are disingenuous rather than looking at the paragraphs for their originality of message. I cannot see how the user has genuinely contemplated when things aren't filtered through their own consciousness.

Edited by Natasha Tori Maru

It is far easier to trick someone, than to convince them they have been tricked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Movement essential, the limbs of the spirit body, AND the angry mushroom

In life we call things local, non-local, relative and absolute. Theres areas that exist in between, and one is called "movement essential", which is different from "i moved locally, from here to there", or "i moved relative to you, from here to there", rather its like, "my spirit body evolved, to shed away the limbs of the spirit body", which is considered an essential movement, like how a butterfly has evolved to become what it is, and so we think our memories function as a means for a human body, but they dont function quite like that, nor do they follow rules that can be contained, as you must also expect you will live and die in whatever hell youve reached mentally, and so, beyond what there is to imagine, and to ever imagine, theres also "base nature of the problems we are creating", cause its not as simple as saying we are all a frequency. We have to imagine how reality can work first, before we can say what it is, and that my friends is no simple and ordinary feet. That is more like, finding out the mushrooms werent there to be your friend typeve thing, like. Its more like, you gotta "ake up, and wake up fast", nono time to dillydallysilly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Monster Energy said:

No. I’m not a past user and I’m not trolling.

Just someone sharing what I’ve actually realized.

5k1gv0g6y2ff1.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyones on the same page. Just drive forward. Words get in the way of adjoining to what is suppose to feel like "agreeing". As yous were.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

If your contribution to the forum is AI slop, and you're not disclosing that it is AI slop, that is against the guidelines.

No, that’s not true.

There is no strict rule that you must disclose AI every time you write something. Leo only mentioned it as a general recommendation to avoid low-quality AI spam if it becomes relevant.

I didn’t spam, I didn’t post harmful content, and I didn’t deceive anyone.

Nothing I wrote breaks the guidelines. The reaction is an overreach, not a violation.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Monster Energy said:

I can see why he’s one of the least appreciated mods. He doesn’t seem fully aware of why he reacts the way he does. Maybe AI could actually help him understand his own responses a bit better.

 

How do you know this? Only if you have been a member of this forum you can know this. 🤣 

I can't take your posts seriously though because of the AI history as it is very misleading where you are getting your information from. I think most people would agree , there is no honesty in your words and it just becomes copy paste to suit your agenda. Then you just watch how people would react to it so you can learn from the responses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Jowblob said:

How do you know this? Only if you have been a member of this forum you can know this. 🤣 

I can't take your posts seriously though because of the AI history as it is very misleading where you are getting your information from. I think most people would agree , there is no honesty in your words and it just becomes copy paste to suit your agenda. Then you just watch how people would react to it so you can learn from the responses.

You don’t need an account to read the forum. Anyone can see how people react around here. Try again.

If you’ve decided my words aren’t honest, that’s your story, not the truth.

 

 

 

Edited by Monster Energy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Monster Energy said:

 

IMG_9300.jpeg

Yes, that is the standard sycophantic AI answer.

 

1 hour ago, Monster Energy said:

No, that’s not true.

There is no strict rule that you must disclose AI every time you write something. Leo only mentioned it as a general recommendation to avoid low-quality AI spam if it becomes relevant.

I didn’t spam, I didn’t post harmful content, and I didn’t deceive anyone.

Nothing I wrote breaks the guidelines. The reaction is an overreach, not a violation.

Yeah that's just bullshit. The guidelines are clear:

Quote

What’s NOT Allowed:

[...]

  • Posting AI-generate content like text, images, or video without disclosing that it was sourced from AI

[...]

 

LLM hallucinations combined with sycophantic cheerleading, no wonder why it is linked with psychotic breaks.

No mods can ban anybody (unless they're spam accounts). But if all your posts on the forum are bot posts, it would be essentially banning a bot.

Edited by Carl-Richard

Intrinsic joy = being x meaning ²

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but "vibration" doesn't evolve out of chance, there is a consistency it's the Karma.

The story = Karma


En Dieu nous croyons

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

Yes, that is the standard sycophantic AI answer.

 

Yeah that's just bullshit. The guidelines are clear:

 

LLM hallucinations combined with syncophantic cheerleading, no wonder why it is linked with psychotic breaks.

I get the guideline, but let’s be accurate about what’s happening. I’m not posting AI essays, articles, or pretending something fully generated is my own. I only use AI sometimes to clean up phrasing since English isn’t my first language. The ideas and the content are still mine.

I’ve sent a private message to Leo, and hopefully he will clarify everything fairly in this thread.

Discussion over, Carl

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Monster Energy said:

I’ve sent a private message to Leo, and hopefully he will clarify everything fairly in this thread.

Yes, it's good to get an update on the state of AI use on the forum. We tried that, by the way.

 

7 minutes ago, Monster Energy said:

I only use AI sometimes to clean up phrasing since English isn’t my first language. The ideas and the content are still mine.

How can we know the difference?

Edited by Carl-Richard

Intrinsic joy = being x meaning ²

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

How can we know the difference?

By actually reading what I write. If you can’t tell the difference, that’s on your perception, not my honesty.

If you can’t even tell the difference, then maybe calling for a ban wasn’t the smartest move. You can’t punish someone for something you’re not even sure about.

 

 

Edited by Monster Energy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ramasta9 said:

Interesting take, maybe being a Moderator isn't your thing after all.

I sometimes tend to make insensitive statements when I'm sick with the flu. Not to excuse it. But yes. It is an excuse. I'm sorry @Monster Energy


Intrinsic joy = being x meaning ²

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

I sometimes tend to make insensitive statements when I'm sick with the flu. Not to excuse it. But yes. It is an excuse. I'm sorry @Monster Energy

Thank you, that was honestly a brave thing to do, especially coming from a mod. I appreciate it. Take care of yourself, and get well soon.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Monster Energy said:

I get the guideline, but let’s be accurate about what’s happening. I’m not posting AI essays, articles, or pretending something fully generated is my own. I only use AI sometimes to clean up phrasing since English isn’t my first language. The ideas and the content are still mine.

The original post doesn't look like just "cleaning up phrasing" to me. The entire post from start to finish looks AI generated, with all of it's phrasing. Are you really being honest here?

Writing 3 sentences about your insight (even if it's an original idea) and telling ChatGPT to make a post out of it still counts as an AI generated post.

Perhaps share the prompt you inputted (even if it's in another language)? Then we can judge. 

Edited by Sincerity

Words can't describe You.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Sincerity said:

The original post doesn't look like just "cleaning up phrasing" to me. The entire post from start to finish looks AI generated, with all of it's phrasing. Are you really being honest here?

Writing 3 sentences about your insight (even if it's an original idea) and telling ChatGPT to make a post out of it still counts as an AI generated post.

Perhaps share the prompt you inputted (even if it's in another language)? Then we can judge. 

I didn’t “input a prompt.” I wrote my thoughts in my own words and only used AI to clean up the English. That’s it. If it sounds smooth, it’s because the language was corrected, not generated. And look, I get that it might be hard to believe someone with a goofy username can still speak from a higher level of awareness. Life’s full of surprises. But you’re judging way too fast, and that’s where the mistake is.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now