Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

[Terell Kirby]

@Leo Gura how much of your shitting on science is fun/entertainment vs. changing society? You’ve carved out quite a niche for yourself as a teacher and influencer. one of a kind 

[Yimpa]

On 7/15/2026 at 3:39 PM, TheEnigma said:

I feel taken advantage of, gaslit and scammed by Christianity growing up. How can I make it so that others don't suffer from what I have in the future?

I highly recommend referring back to old post, it is really potent:

 

[Leo Gura]

10 hours ago, Terell Kirby said:

how much of your shitting on science is fun/entertainment vs. changing society?

It is not really shitting. It is pointing out things that have been arrogantly denied.

Our goal is to take science to a new stage of its development. Not to destroy it.

But in the meantime a bit of fun will be had along the way, since they will resist like a stubborn mule.

Don't take my poking science too seriously. There are some good scientists.

Edited 6 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Joseph Maynor]

10 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

It is not really shitting. It is pointing out things that have been arrogantly denied.

Our goal is to take science to a new stage of its development. Not to destroy it.

But in the meantime a bit of fun will be had along the way, since they will resist like a stubborn mule.

Don't take my poking science too seriously. There are some good scientists.

What is a good scientist in your opinion?

[r0ckyreed]

9 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

What is a good scientist in your opinion?

One who has deconstructed science. Until then, the scientist is a rat in the maze chasing cheese.

[Joseph Maynor]

6 minutes ago, r0ckyreed said:

One who has deconstructed science. Until then, the scientist is a rat in the maze chasing cheese.

Seems like the goal is an attempt to help scientists by transforming them into something different.

[Leo Gura]

19 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

What is a good scientist in your opinion?

One who is openminded to mysticism and takes philosophy seriously.

[Yimpa]

1 hour ago, Joseph Maynor said:

Seems like the goal is an attempt to help scientists by transforming them into something different.

Majority of scientists used to be religious. Now they non-religious. Now we gotta evolve them to be spiritual without the dogma. They need psychedelics to open the minds. Less MIT and more 5-MeO-DMT.

[Joseph Maynor]

People are nasty when they can operate behind the scenes.  

[Jirh]

I think science is in its best forms right now. It just has so much corruption on the inside.

Just like religion; the shell looks so idealistic, but the core is rotten.

That's not a failure of science. That's just human corruption.

[Uddi]

@Jirh True because the ego always has a survival bias. Ironically science does not understand the ego enough because IT is being controlled by the very ego it cannot understand or prove.

[Jirh]

52 minutes ago, Uddi said:

@Jirh True because the ego always has a survival bias. Ironically science does not understand the ego enough because IT is being controlled by the very ego it cannot understand or prove.

Exactly! 💯 

And this is not exclusive to science or religion.

Spirituality suffers the same problem. Spiritual ego is a corruption of spirituality.