Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

[Leo Gura]

2 hours ago, Nick_98 said:

if I am misunderstanding the concept , that's on me or on you ? 

If you are asking that question that already demonstrates a wrong attitude towards this work. It shows you are not taking responsibility for your truth-seeking work. As if I am the source of your truth. No. I am not. Finding truth or getting results in life is 100% on you. Even if I am say, Satan, it is your job to realize I am Satan and stop following me. It is not my job as Satan to tell you I am Satan.

It is your responsibility to figure out why techniques are not working for you. This may require trying new techniques or hiring an expert to coach you through your sticking points.

My teachings are extremely clear and straight-forward. If you have a hard time understanding them just conceptually, there is something amiss with you because almost any other teaching will be less clear with you. I explain things in unusual detail and clarity relative to Ralston or someone else. Of course this doesn't guarantee results, but at least you should be clear conceptually on what this work entails. For example, I go out of my way to stress how much effort and time this work requires.

This doesn't mean I am above criticism, but you can ask others here about whether my teachings are unclear or confusing.

You can also ask others here if they got results and what they did to get them.

Just in general, achieving any serious result in life -- whether in business, career, dating, art, or spirituality -- will require 10x-100x more work than you initially assume. Almost any serious project in life is way harder than it seems. Go try to direct a Hollywood movie and you will see how much harder it is than you imagine. Which is why great things are rare and valuable. If it was easy, everyone would be Awake, God would not be a controversial topic, and my channel would not exist because there would be no one round to pay me to create content. The only reason my channel can exist is because the work is so hard that 99% of humans will never do it. If everyone was successful in spirituality I would be out of a job.

Edited July 3 by Leo Gura

[Extreme Z7]

43 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

even saved them from depression and suicide.

Yeah, I can relate. Though, that's not even a tenth of the value I found from your work.

[Leo Gura]

YT comment posted today:

[Daniel Balan]

22 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

YT comment posted today:

This is in perfect alignment with what I experienced from your work. Except I started with a different video! The truth is even if you are the laziest person on earth, and all you do is watch actualized.org videos, you are still going to end up better than before! It shifts how your mind thinks and perceives reality! It adds a layer of genuine inquiry about how the world works! Your mind develops just by consuming this content, which I never experienced before! Just by watching actualized.org you rise above the center of gravity of your society in terms of spiral dynamics development 

[OBEler]

@Nick_98 @Nick_98 

Leo wrote in blog "Wrong State" following key insight:

"If you were in the right state you would need zero effort. And if you are in the wrong state no amount of effort will work. This is why you cannot think your way into Awakening. This is the #1 most important thing nondualists and spiritual gurus do not tell you. They keep wasting your time trying to get you to understand things you will never understand because you are in the wrong state. In this way these teachers waste decades of your life, getting you to chase your own tail in endless frustration, confusion, and disappointment. It’s not your fault. You are just in the wrong state. You are wasting years trying to do the impossible. Stop listening to gurus and figure out how to change your state. Spiritual effort is important but that effort needs to primarily go towards changing your state, otherwise it will not be effective."

 

2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

 

@Clarence 

@Leo Gura 

 

Edited July 3 by OBEler

[Rishabh R]

@Leo Gura Is daily meditating , reframing failures ,feeling uncomfortable emotions a part of your work?  By the way when you talked about fully feeling the suffering in the video - The counterintuitive nature of life I didn't understood back then but after years of suffering and being a failed optimist during emotional suffering I started accepting negative emotions since the last year which decreased my suffering even though it still there I fully embodied what was said in that video.

[Leo Gura]

21 minutes ago, Rishabh R said:

Is daily meditating , reframing failures ,feeling uncomfortable emotions a part of your work?

Yes

[Rishabh R]

@Leo Gura Is it better to be in the present moment at times of suffering or acceptance is better ? Do both align with your work ?

[Leo Gura]

5 minutes ago, Rishabh R said:

Is it better to be in the present moment at times of suffering or acceptance is better ?

What's better is becoming conscious of how your mind creates suffering.

Suffering is something your mind is doing. You can inquire into why and how your mind creates suffering.

Don't ask me how. Just observe and contemplate your suffering as you suffer. That is how.

Edited July 3 by Leo Gura

[Rishabh R]

@Leo Gura I have noticed that acceptance of negative emotions brings smile to my face while suffering. 

[Leo Gura]

2 minutes ago, Rishabh R said:

@Leo Gura I have noticed that acceptance of negative emotions brings smile to my face while suffering. 

That's good. But notice deeper why you are suffering at all.

[Rishabh R]

3 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

But notice deeper why you are suffering at all.

Because I am hurting myself by creating negative scenarios of the future and replaying old situations which hurted me. Thanks for guiding me.

[Guest Nilsi]

„An atheist starts by assuming that God is a silly idea held by dumb, indoctrinated, irrational people.“

Classic. Talk about strawmanning...

[Happy Lizard]

@Leo Gura I don’t have enough knowledge on this topic to put a strong argument for it, but what if reaching the truth for women is different form men? For example I heard a spiritual teacher say that a male sits in a cave and can reach enlightenment while a women connects deeply with the world and thats what her path to enlightenment is, which is very hard and requires much more freedom than sitting in cave. 

Edited July 3 by Happy Lizard

[Leo Gura]

11 minutes ago, Happy Lizard said:

a male sits in a cave and can reach enlightenment while a women connects deeply with the world

That's just not going to fly.

Enlightenment IS connecting deeply with the world.

What New Age women mean by "connecting deeply with the world" is not truth, it's fantasy.

There can be feminine notions of truth, but it still has to be about Consciousness and Truth, not just doing yoga for sport.

The bottom line is that you have become conscious of what reality is. There's no special womanly way around that. You don't have to live in a cave, but you do have to do the work to deconstruct illusion.

Edited July 3 by Leo Gura

[Twentyfirst]

In the masculinity and truth post you forgot to mention what I would say is the biggest thing. Women can't seek truth when they have to carry a baby for 9 months, then hold onto and feed the baby for another 1 year. Then even when the baby can walk the mother still needs to be there for like 5 more years. Then they need to do that process for every child they have. They are also more expected than men to take care of elderly, nephews/nieces, aging parents

My truth journey would get so messed up with a curveball like this. New course "How to get enlightened as fuck while breastfeeding your newborn for only $995 just 3 payments the price of a stroller"

Women also lie so much when it comes to kids. Because they don't want to hurt the kids feelings they have to gaslight everything. Whenever I would get in trouble with the school or police my mom would be in denial of the evidence and be like "no that never happened you didn't do anything wrong you are perfect". I never understood that. Sometimes I would even say "no I did do it" and she would be like "noooo nothing happened". So I think women stretch the truth more with certain social groups than others like her lover or her kids she will lie until the end of time to keep those social ties in tact

Edited July 3 by Twentyfirst

[Terell Kirby]

2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

The bottom line is that you have become conscious of what reality is.

No religions or New Age spiritual paths has this as an explicit aim. Which is fine- there are truths in religion and New Age but it helps to crest a hard distinction between those and Consciousness work (Actualized, Ralston)-two totally different things.

What helps me is separating spiritual work that is belief based (which most humans subscribe to) vs. direct consciousness/participatory/experiential based-which is grounded in metaphysics, epistemology, contemplation and deconstructing illusions, fantasies and biases. There are many tools and practices to do this-a lot covered in Leo’s content.

I also find the most religious and new age paths are more about feeling good in your body and emotions (healthy versions). Yet although it is healthy, it isn’t Truth — which transcends the need for good emotions, body and relationships. Survival can be healthy and unhealthy.. but it’s still survival. A big mistake or religions and new age is conflating what is good and healthy for survival with Truth.

Great video by Peter Ralston which summarizes this dynamic well:

 

Edited July 3 by Terell Kirby

[Daniel Balan]

3 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

That's just not going to fly.

Enlightenment IS connecting deeply with the world.

What New Age women mean by "connecting deeply with the world" is not truth, it's fantasy.

There can be feminine notions of truth, but it still has to be about Consciousness and Truth, not just doing yoga for sport.

The bottom line is that you have become conscious of what reality is. There's no special womanly way around that. You don't have to live in a cave, but you do have to do the work to deconstruct illusion.

Do you think that this is the reason all religions across the world were patriarchal? That put men on a moral pedestal while objectifying women? Could this be the reason why religions treated women like shit while allowing men to be like the women's owner? 

[Daniel Balan]

Hi Leo! As I was contemplating today about solipsism and the notion that I am God, In the news I read that a famous soccer player died in a car crash in Spain. 
As far as solipsism goes and me being God, does it mean that I killed him with my imagination? Why have I imagined precisely that soccer player to be killed and why not another one? I just began to learn about solipsism and God and I have no clue how it works. So far I am very skeptical of this being the case. 

[max duewel]

5 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

That's just not going to fly.

Enlightenment IS connecting deeply with the world.

What New Age women mean by "connecting deeply with the world" is not truth, it's fantasy.

There can be feminine notions of truth, but it still has to be about Consciousness and Truth, not just doing yoga for sport.

The bottom line is that you have become conscious of what reality is. There's no special womanly way around that. You don't have to live in a cave, but you do have to do the work to deconstruct illusion.

What about the feminine versions of spirituality when we were still living in small tribes? Being part of the great cycle of the Earth and Nature. Back then, women had Religious and Political prestige.