Israel / Palestine News Thread

[Nivsch]

14 hours ago, Lila9 said:

But unlike Israel who is currently fight to maintain its democracy

Also a war we will never hear from aljazeera 😉

Edited March 26 by Nivsch

[Raze]

14 hours ago, Lila9 said:

You will not hear it from Al Jazeera.

 

Wrong, they reported it

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/program/newsfeed/2025/3/26/hundreds-of-palestinians-protest-in-gaza-against-the-war

46 minutes ago, Nivsch said:

Also a war we will never hear from aljazeera 😉

They’ve reported on the judicial reform and protests extensively 

[Raze]

On 3/25/2025 at 9:08 AM, Nivsch said:

@zazen She can funtasize how much she want (I bet she didn't visited here even once) 

How many Palestinians from Gaza or the West Bank have you talked to about their experience?

[gettoefl]

14 hours ago, Lila9 said:

You will not hear it from Al Jazeera.

Hundreds of Palestinians in Gaza are protesting against Hamas and for peace.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g71lk09npo

They have been controlled for years by extreme right-wing, worse than Ben Gvir, terrorists (Hamas), who play with their lives and receive significant international support through manipulation.

But unlike Israel who is currently fight to maintain its democracy, Gaza don’t have a liberal party to oppose Hamas, they are literally stuck between their extremists and Israel's extremists.

 

 

 

Fatah is the ruling party of the Palestinian Authority and the party of President Mahmoud Abbas, but in Gaza, it has been significantly weakened, mismanaged, and marginalized since Hamas won elections in 2007. While some Palestinians do oppose Hamas - evidenced by protests like the one mentioned - there is no strong, organized liberal opposition within Gaza. Given the ongoing war and the lack of alternatives, it seems that a majority of the population either supports Hamas or sees them as the only viable resistance against Israel. In contrast to Israel, where internal political opposition still exists despite democratic backsliding, sadly Gaza is effectively trapped between Hamas’s authoritarian rule and Israel’s military policies.

[Lila9]

20 hours ago, Raze said:

Wrong, they reported it

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/program/newsfeed/2025/3/26/hundreds-of-palestinians-protest-in-gaza-against-the-war

It does not mention that the protest is specifically against Hamas or that Hamas was shooting at the protesters.

In reality, they were protesting against Hamas, and Hamas was shooting at them too.

Al Jazeera has a clear pro-Hamas bias. What is so difficult to acknowledge? They never dare to say anything negative about Hamas, ever.

Isn't it suspicious?

[PurpleTree]

22 minutes ago, Lila9 said:

It does not mention that the protest is specifically against Hamas or that Hamas was shooting at the protesters.

In reality, they were protesting against Hamas, and Hamas was shooting at them too.

Al Jazeera has a clear pro-Hamas bias. What is so difficult to acknowledge? They never dare to say anything negative about Hamas, ever.

Isn't it suspicious?

Al Jazeera also never says negative things about Qatar their home country. Which is weak and one sided.

Yet a lot of US news don’t criticise Israel and Bibi.

Edited March 27 by PurpleTree

[Lila9]

20 hours ago, gettoefl said:

Fatah is the ruling party of the Palestinian Authority and the party of President Mahmoud Abbas, but in Gaza, it has been significantly weakened, mismanaged, and marginalized since Hamas won elections in 2007. While some Palestinians do oppose Hamas - evidenced by protests like the one mentioned - there is no strong, organized liberal opposition within Gaza. Given the ongoing war and the lack of alternatives, it seems that a majority of the population either supports Hamas or sees them as the only viable resistance against Israel. In contrast to Israel, where internal political opposition still exists despite democratic backsliding, sadly Gaza is effectively trapped between Hamas’s authoritarian rule and Israel’s military policies.

The opposition to Hamas is still weak, with only a few hundred openly opposing them in the largest protest since October 7...

However, as the war continues, more voices will emerge, tired of the conflict and angry at Hamas for leading them into this tragedy.

They call for Hamas's downfall, with the slogan "Bidna Na3eesh" meaning "We want to live"

Pro-Palestinian supporters should back these voices, as should every conscious person.

Sadly, many are blinded by Hamas's ideology, believing terrorism against Israel is the only way to "liberate Palestine," even though innocent Gazans will suffer as a result.

They sacrifice Gazans' lives to advance their ideology and justify terror attacks on Israel.

When Israel responds, they feign concern for the casualties, but in reality, they care more about the ideology than the actual lives of Palestinians. They ignore the fact that Hamas hides among civilians in places like hospitals and schools and don't criticize it, despite claiming to care for innocents.

These individuals are happy when Gazans die in Israel’s response, as it allows them to blame Israel and America, reinforcing their ideology.

But when innocents are killed by Hamas or other Arabs, they remain indifferent.

Pro-Palestinians support violent resistance from the comfort of their homes, far from Gaza or the West Bank, willing to sacrifice Palestinians for their cause.

.

 

 

 

[Lila9]

20 minutes ago, PurpleTree said:

Al Jazeera also never says negative things about Qatar their home country. Which is weak and one sided.

Yet a lot of US news don’t criticise Israel and Bibi.

This is the nature of news and media, being biased and presenting reality in a way that confirms their bias and political agenda, often by omitting important details or avoiding necessary critique.

Some people don't realize it.

Yes absolutely, the same goes for the US.

That's why people shouldn’t rely on just one news source.

It seems that many here rely too heavily on Al Jazeera as the ultimate source of truth about this conflict because it confirms their bias.

However.... if they are serious in their attempt for a better understanding of the situation, they should at least acknowledge the pro-Hamas bias present in their coverage.

Al Jazeera is like Channel 14 in Israel, the most right-wing news channel here, and most people in Israel don’t even take it seriously.

It would be absurd to base my perception of the conflict on this channel. I'd end up more ignorant, misinformed, and radical by relying heavily on it.

Even if the most right-wing channel in Israel is seen as relatively liberal in other countries because of how they frame their ideologies and present them in a way that appeals to liberals (like Al Jazeera does), it doesn’t change the fact that it’s a highly biased source.

[Twentyfirst]

3 minutes ago, Lila9 said:

This is the nature of news and media, being biased and presenting reality in a way that confirms their bias and political agenda, often by omitting important details or avoiding necessary critique.

Some people don't realize it.

Yes absolutely, the same goes for the US.

That's why people shouldn’t rely on just one news source.

It seems that many here rely too heavily on Al Jazeera as the ultimate source of truth about this conflict because it confirms their bias.

However.... if they are serious in their attempt for a better understanding of the situation, they should at least acknowledge the pro-Hamas bias present in their coverage.

Al Jazeera is like Channel 14 in Israel, the most right-wing news channel here, and most people in Israel don’t even take it seriously.

It would be absurd to base my perception of the conflict on this channel. I'd end up more ignorant, misinformed, and radical by relying heavily on it.

Even if the most right-wing channel in Israel is seen as relatively liberal in other countries because of how they frame their ideologies and present them in a way that appeals to liberals (like Al Jazeera does), it doesn’t change the fact that it’s a highly biased source.

What about the UN as a source? Which clearly tells how many international laws and war crimes are being broken and committed. Israel is illegal 

[Nivsch]

1 hour ago, Lila9 said:

Al Jazeera is like Channel 14 in Israel, the most right-wing news channel here, and most people in Israel don’t even take it seriously.

Yes Channel 14 is just as horrible to my opinion.

[PurpleTree]

Channel 14 seems worse. Fox news type rubbish.

At least Al Jazeera have some cute reports and debates.

[Nivsch]

9 minutes ago, PurpleTree said:

Channel 14 seems worse. Fox news type rubbish.

Luckily we have 11,12 and 13 who are distinctly Anti-Netanyahu (especially 12 and 13).

[Nivsch]

[Lila9]

3 hours ago, Twentyfirst said:

What about the UN as a source? Which clearly tells how many international laws and war crimes are being broken and committed. Israel is illegal 

The UN has its biases and agenda as well. Even the UN is not developed enough to be a truly unbiased, uncorrupted, truthful, and wise source of information.

Aside from some UN employees participated in the October 7 attacks, whether directly or indirectly, UN peacekeepers literally can't keep their dicks in their pants, especially around children from vulnerable places, but women as well. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_abuse_by_UN_peacekeepers

In my opinion, they are actually white supremacists and racists, but covert. disguised under the guise of progressivism and wokeness.

[Lila9]

2 hours ago, Nivsch said:

Luckily we have 11,12 and 13 who are distinctly Anti-Netanyahu (especially 12 and 13).

Yes, there are more anti-Netanyahu channels and news sources than pro-Netanyahu ones.

Netanyahu often mentions this to portray himself as a victim and an underdog in the eyes of his supporters.

He markets himself as a scapegoat lol.

He presents this as if people criticize him not because he is a corrupt and Machiavellian leader, as he is, but because those who criticize him are evil and corrupt themselves.

[Nivsch]

32 minutes ago, Lila9 said:

He presents this as if people criticize him not because he is a corrupt and Machiavellian leader, as he is, but because those who criticize him are evil and corrupt themselves.

And the Courte, the media, the Shin Bet, the Left, the Elite, the Deep State...

Edited March 27 by Nivsch

[PurpleTree]

34 minutes ago, Lila9 said:

The UN has its biases and agenda as well. Even the UN is not developed enough to be a truly unbiased, uncorrupted, truthful, and wise source of information.

Aside from some UN employees participated in the October 7 attacks, whether directly or indirectly, UN peacekeepers literally can't keep their dicks in their pants, especially around children from vulnerable places, but women as well. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_abuse_by_UN_peacekeepers

In my opinion, they are actually white supremacists and racists, but covert. disguised under the guise of progressivism and wokeness.

Wow smh

If the UN is so evil as you portray it. Then what is Israel?

Edited March 27 by PurpleTree

[Nivsch]

10 minutes ago, PurpleTree said:

Wow smh

If the UN is so evil as you portray it. Then what is Israel?

I saw in the past a video on Youtube which says that the UN has started as a more neutral organization but gradually has been taken over mostly by Muslim and communist countries.

 

Edited March 27 by Nivsch

[PurpleTree]

7 minutes ago, Nivsch said:

I saw in the past a video on Youtube which says that the UN has started as a more neutral organization but gradually has been taken over mostly by Muslim countries.

 

Who was the source of “this video”?

[Nivsch]

8 minutes ago, PurpleTree said:

Who was the source of “this video”?

Jerusalem Institude is the channel so maybe it is the source. You don't have to believe it but just listen and decide for yourself how it sounds to you, and then cross reference your intuition with Google, Chatgpt etc.

Edited March 27 by Nivsch