Search the Community

@Mu_ It sounds like you aren't 100% sure what infinity means, or if it's a fundamental aspect of reality or not. To me. 1. You don't seem to think infinity has anything to do with numbers or concepts? is that true? 2. You seem to think people equate it with God and/or nothingness? But, is it true that God is infinity? Who cares what people believe. 3. You are wondering how many kinds of experiences are possible and not sure how many? It is uncountable as you say as we are held to our own experience. But, we have to wonder what Mind is at all. If it's pure consciousness and nothing... How can it have constraints? If there are no constraints infinity is a must..? 4. At the end it seems like you suggest there is nothing real? "Never many anythings?" or that division is not real? 5. You say the amount of "experiences" is uncountable, That infinity is just "an idea" of what God is, and that this can't be known that God is infinity.. But, do you know this for sure? 6. On the matter of control, you are saying maybe God is just the way it is and that has nothing to do with control which is an interesting idea. But, there is still the question of why is God the way it is, and why is human life so well organized, orderly, intelligent and stable? You aren't really sharing an an argument here.

I know here on this forum it’s used to mean the same thing as god or nothingness for the most part, so I’m fine with leaving it at that. but when we are going to have a balls deep honest conversation and try and clearly get to what it is, I can’t in good faith say it has anything to do with numerical or conceptual ideas of infinity in the scientific sense. It “may” be and that would mean there are an actual never ending amount of different possibilities it can experience, but this will forever have to be up to casual musings and speculation which seem to be one of the many possibilities. another way to put my idea is there is no way to get outside of one’s SELF to observe this and count how many possibilities of experience are possible. I csn acknowledge there are a lot but just how many, well as many as there are possible and that is non-countable and unknown or perhaps only 1 trilllion. and here’s where it gets even more mind fucky and perhaps more irrelevant so don’t take it to serious, even if you think and experience being able to count how many there are that to is just a now moment in god thinking it’s counting experiences of many types, when in reality there are never many anything’s, it just seems that way.

The Masculine path is about the transcendence of all illusions of form and limitation... to reveal infinite empty consciousness. With ego death, there is a total dissolution of the illusion of you and the illusion of the entire reality you exist within. So, there is no meaning or beauty because there is nothingness... and nothingness cannot be meaningful, beautiful, valuable, etc. as it is specifically the emptiness of all qualities as nothingness is bereft of qualities. And beauty and meaning, requires limitation and finiteness to be realized, as limitation is the birthplace of meaning and beauty.

It takes serious balls to fully embrace life, all the pain, heartache, and suffering. Also, this whole Masculine/Feminine spirituality distinction is limited. There is no gender or sexuality to it. It is a synthesis of Nothingness and Manifestation. Remembering and Forgetting. Spirituality is realizing that everything is God and treating it as such, while also knowing that you are That consciousness and the Nothingness which witnesses the unfolding. "Wisdom is knowing I am Nothing, Love is knowing I am everything, and between the two, my life flows" Nisargaratta Maharaj (notice how he mentions nothing about feminine or masculine spirituality, yet this quote hold both (Nothingness/Love), bc true spirituality IS BOTH)

point in case, this is an extremely wise take on life and reality. It's the step beyond "I'm God/Nothingness"

SUMMARY OF THE VIDEO: The source presents eight unique and original logical proofs for the existence of God. These proofs were constructed based on hundreds of personal awakenings and contemplations into the nature of God, representing a direct consciousness of God's logical structure, rather than speculation, a belief system, or an ideology. The author emphasizes that this is a grounded empirical exploration of God, similar to how a scientist empirically studies aspects of reality like black holes or the sun. It is asserted that you don't need to believe in God if God is real; you can have consciousness of it and empirically explore it. Empiricism, in this context, is expanded beyond physical objects to include abstract entities, like what mathematicians explore in their work. Important Warnings and Caveats: The proofs and logic presented are retrospective. You cannot use this logic to reach God or conclude that God exists if you haven't already experienced it; this is because whether the logical conclusions correlate empirically to reality is unknown without direct experience. Awakening is the only way to know that God exists. Aside from awakening, all you have are speculations, conclusions, theories, and beliefs. God is not a logical conclusion reached through reasoning alone. Just because the logic of the proofs is valid doesn't mean it will persuade anyone. The mind has an infinite capacity for doubt, independent of truth or validity. These proofs are not expected to convince atheists, materialists, scientists, or skeptics because their existing paradigms and biases will likely cause them to reject the conclusions. Different logical systems exist, and people can use logic to justify different positions. Tautology is presented as a feature, not a bug, when discussing something as fundamental as the basis of existence (God). Reality's existence is a metaphysical tautology – reality must exist. Understanding the logic presented here will likely not lead to an awakening, although it's a possibility. The primary point of discussing this logic is to provide an understanding of God's logical structure, which is important for deepening awakenings and aiding in the integration process after direct experiences of God. Encountering or experiencing God is not enough; comprehension of what God is, why it is how it is, and its logic is necessary. These proofs are presented somewhat "tongue-in-cheek"; they are better described as post-hoc descriptions of the ultimate structure of existence. Core Concepts: God is Reality. God is absolute infinity. This is not the limited infinity of mathematics, but absolute infinity. God is the very basis of existence. God is absolute unity. God is unlimited. God has absolute sovereignty over itself. God has properties like love, omnipotence, omniscience, intelligence, beauty, goodness, and perfection. These are seen as necessary logical consequences of infinity. Love is an ontological condition of unity, not just a human emotion. When everything is ontologically united, that is metaphysical love. The deepest form of love is becoming identical to the beloved, which requires collapsing distinctions into absolute nothingness/formlessness (absolute unity). Anything that exists is a distinction. Distinctions are imagined by a mind. Absolute distinction is impossible as it would limit reality. The collapse of all distinctions leads to pure indistinctness or nothingness, which is absolute unity, absolute infinity, God. God is Mind (capital M), the unlimited ability to imagine all possible distinctions. Mind is fundamentally absolute nothingness that spontaneously precipitates distinctions. Logic is absolute and fundamental, baked into the fabric of existence, not merely a human conceptual activity or axiomatic system. Logic extends beyond human sanity and can seem transhuman. Disregarding logic makes worldviews (like materialism, atheism) incoherent. God is seen as logic itself. The Eight Proofs (Titles): The logic of oneness. The logic of distinction. Argument from numerical infinity. Argument from infinite division. The logic of self-creation. The logic of limits. Argument from control. The impossibility of finite objects. Detailed Exploration of Selected Proofs: 1. The Logic of Oneness: The argument begins with two possibilities: reality is one, or it is not one. The claim is that if reality is one, it must be God. Anything that is one must have absolute sovereignty over itself because there is no "other" to limit it. An object that is one has no other, thus nothing to limit it, making it unlimited. Any imagined limit would have to be part of the oneness, meaning the oneness controls its own limits, thus is unlimited and has absolute sovereignty. This unlimited sovereignty equates to God. The author then addresses the possibility that reality is not one, suggesting it must be divided by something (a boundary, gap, nothingness). This division must be either real or unreal. If the division is unreal, reality has not been divided and remains one. You cannot divide a real thing with an unreal thing. If the division is real, then the division itself is real, and all parts of reality (including the division) are real. Everything that is real is united together by its realness. Any real thing used to divide reality ends up uniting it instead. For example, a real knife used to cut reality must be real, and its realness unites it with the reality it attempts to cut. Even nothingness, if it were real and dividing spacetime, would connect the parts it separates. Therefore, it is absolutely impossible to divide reality; it can only be one. This oneness is reality, and reality is God. Because this oneness (reality) has no other, it is unlimited and has infinite power/omnipotence. This oneness/unity is also linked to love, which is described as the ontological condition of unity. 2. The Logic of Distinction: Anything that exists is a distinction. Even the concept of "not a distinction" is a distinction. All perceived differences (something/nothing, existence/non-existence, limited/unlimited, possible/impossible, real/imaginary, one/many, different starting states of reality, conceptual/physical) are distinctions. These distinctions are held within a mind. It is asserted that there is no such thing as an absolute distinction because that would impose a limit on unlimited reality. Distinctions can come and go. When all distinctions collapse, what remains is pure indistinctness or nothingness. This collapse of distinctions leads to absolute unity, absolute infinity, nothingness, which is God. God is described as the entire possibility space of all distinctions. God, or Mind, is the unlimited ability to imagine all possible distinctions. Physical reality is seen as a "precipitate" of the ontological condition where there is no distinction between absolutely anything. God creates things by imagining distinctions. The distinction between any two things (like a chicken and a kangaroo) is just a conception within consciousness and can be collapsed into absolute unity (nothingness), which is presented as the highest form of love. Every limit to reality is a distinction, imagined by a mind (which is nothingness). The infinite field (God) is unlimited because it imagines all distinctions and therefore has infinite power to materialize anything it can imagine. 6. The Logic of Limits: This proof explores the possibility of reality being limited. There are three initial possibilities: Initially, nothing exists: If nothing exists, no limits exist (as a limit is something), so reality is unlimited, thus God. Initially, something exists which is not a limit: By definition, reality is unlimited. Initially, something exists and it is a limit upon reality: Only in this case is reality potentially limited. If such a limit exists, it is either undoable or not undoable. If the limit is undoable: Reality can simply undo that limit, making it not a real or permanent limit. Therefore, reality is effectively unlimited, thus infinite, thus God. If the limit is not undoable: The only way a limit could be not undoable is if there is some other limit outside the first one preventing it from being undone. This requires a second limit, which needs a third to prevent it from being undone, and so on. This leads to an infinite chain of limits. An infinite chain of limits either terminates (making it finite, with the topmost limit being undoable, thus the whole system is unlimited) or it literally is infinite, in which case you have infinity, which is God. Therefore, reality cannot be permanently locked down; it is impossible to have a limit that cannot be undone. The very logic of existence requires it to be infinite and unlimited. If reality is unlimited, anything goes, anything imaginable is possible, and everything imaginable is possible, including the greatest imaginable thing: God (infinite consciousness, love, perfection, etc.). Absolute perfection must exist simply because it can exist, and every possible thing that can exist must exist. An unlimited object leads to a "runaway chain reaction of imagination" or an "explosion of possibility" that bootstraps itself to higher orders until it reaches infinite imagination/love, which is God. 3. Argument from Numerical Infinity: The argument points to the human mind's ability to count numbers infinitely. The fact that your mind can imagine ever larger numbers means that reality must be actually infinite, not just potentially. This is considered sufficient proof of infinity and God. While skeptics might claim the mind is a finite brain/computer, the source asserts the mind is infinite and is not limited to neurons; it actually can imagine infinitely higher numbers. The inability to explicitly count to infinity is due to finite lifespan, but the capacity to grasp ever higher numbers infinitely is proof of the mind's infinity. This cannot be empirically proven in the traditional sense (like counting all numbers), but it can be implicitly grasped through consciousness and intelligence. The key step connecting this to God is the claim that if any part of reality can be shown to be infinite, all of reality must be infinite. This is illustrated with the example of a 3D cube with two finite dimensions and one infinite dimension; the entire cube becomes infinite. Similarly, an infinite object held within a computer would mean the computer is infinite. Since the number line (an infinite object) is inside your mind, your mind is infinite. Since your mind is inside the universe (and mind and world are not distinct), the universe must also be infinite. Anything that is infinite is God. This infinity is not just mathematical infinity, but encompasses everything imaginable. Mathematical infinity is just one "sub-infinity" or aspect of absolute infinity (God). Anything infinite that is imagined is a part of God. Scientists/mathematicians are seen as "ants" focusing on small aspects of infinity without seeing the whole (the "elephant"). The ability to grasp infinity requires an infinite mind. Even science/physics implicitly relies on infinities (fields, calculus, Big Bang/black hole singularities). 4. Argument from Infinite Division: This proof is based on the fact that you can subdivide any number infinitely; there is no smallest number. This can only be the case if the mind and the universe are actually infinite. This infinite divisibility is evident abstractly in the mind (e.g., the infinite digits of Pi). The source strongly rejects the scientific/materialist idea that reality is made of discrete, indivisible particles or pixels. It claims that reality is infinitely deep and you can subdivide things forever. This is known through direct consciousness/awakening, which reveals the visual field has infinite resolution and is infinitely continuous, not made of pixels. Don't confuse the limits of scientific measurement with the nature of reality itself. Again, if reality was finite, infinite subdivision wouldn't be possible. By the logic that if anything is infinite, all of reality is infinite, the possibility of infinite division proves that all of reality is infinite, and thus God exists. 5. The Logic of Self-Creation: There are two types of things: finite and infinite. A finite thing cannot create itself because it would need to exist before it could create, which is a logical impossibility. All finite things observed come from other finite things, in a causal chain. The argument then explores possibilities: either there is an infinite chain of finite things, or not. If the chain is infinite, it is God, because anything infinite is God. A potential objection is a finite closed loop of creation (e.g., chicken from dinosaur, dinosaur from crocodile, ... fish from chicken) instead of an infinite chain. However, if this loop is finite, it cannot be self-created (as finite things cannot self-create). This finite loop would require something outside it to create it, leading to a larger loop or chain. If you claim the loop existed eternally, that proves God, as anything eternal exists infinitely. If it's part of a larger loop, you face an infinite regress problem that cannot terminate finitely; termination leads to an unlimited system, and non-termination means an infinite chain (God). Therefore, a finite chain cannot terminate and must ultimately be an infinite chain, which is God. Self-creation is possible only for infinity because it has no outer boundary and is one. God as an infinite void is eternal and didn't need creation, or it can be said to have created itself eternally. Furthermore, God as the void spontaneously manifests finite forms (dreams distinctions). This activity of mind generating form from void is creation, and because it's the ultimate reality doing it, it's self-creation. All creation is self-creation; the universe dreams itself into existence out of nothing. Infinity is capable of self-creation because it is not limited by linear causation, time, space, or sanity. Infinity can "bootstrap itself" into existence. This self-creation is considered an absolute logic of reality, the only explanation for how anything can exist. 7. Argument from Control: Either reality has total control over itself, or it does not. Anything with total self-control is God. To deny God, you must claim reality does not have total self-control. If reality does not have total control over itself, something else must control it. This controlling entity cannot be part of reality, because if it were, it would be included in the totality of reality, meaning reality controls itself, which is God. So, the controller must be something outside of reality. However, anything outside of reality is unreal by ontological necessity. The unreal cannot have any influence or control over the real. Therefore, nothing controls reality other than itself; reality has absolute control over itself. An unlimited reality with absolute self-control would choose to be absolute perfection (infinite love, beauty, goodness, intelligence, consciousness). Thus, reality is God. 8. The Impossibility of Finite Objects: The claim is that infinity must exist. It is impossible for any finite thing to exist entirely on its own. Any finite thing (chicken, black hole, number) imagined must exist within some infinite background void, space, or field. You cannot imagine a finite object without also imagining something else (a backdrop, container) within which it is situated. If this background is finite, it requires another background beyond its edge, leading to an infinite regress or chain, which requires infinity. Therefore, reality cannot have an ultimate boundary. This infinite background, within which all finite objects are situated, is God. Science and physics implicitly recognize this by requiring the use of infinite fields (gravitational, electromagnetic), as finite fields would be incoherent. Physics and mathematics, in this view, are implicitly pointing to God. Further Points on Infinity, Logic, and Self-Evidence: God is infinity, but infinity is not a number or math; math is just a small part of it. Understanding infinity is key to understanding existence. Infinity has counterintuitive, radical, "magical" properties that finite objects do not. The realization of God involves experiencing this magic, which can initially be met with disbelief and self-doubt because it seems too good to be true. Overcoming this self-gaslighting and societal conditioning (science, religion, etc.) is part of the process of realizing God. God is so fundamental that it sits below the level of explanation; words and finite concepts will inevitably distort it. This distortion is not a flaw in the nature of God or the insights, but a limitation of the finite means of communication. Intelligence is required to separate the signal from the noise in the communication. God is absolute self-evidence, more self-evident than any human thought, fact, idea, mathematical proof, or logical argument. God is the basis for all existence and is existence itself. The logic presented here is a "meta-logic" or "trans-logical". It is absolute and fundamental, not merely a human construction. Contemplating logic's absolute nature is crucial. God itself is bound by this logic, or is logic itself. Ignoring this absolute logic leads to an incoherent worldview. Materialism and atheism are seen as logically incoherent because they cannot account for the existence of finite things without an appeal to infinity. They rely on a shallower form of logic to justify their positions. The atheist who admits infinity is needed but denies it is God does not understand the full consequences of infinity. The source claims that an honest, serious materialist/atheist, upon contemplating these points, would discover the incoherence of their worldview and transition to idealism, recognizing that the only thing that can exist is an infinite mind. These proofs are not intended to validate any specific religion, new age fantasy, conspiracy theory, or paranormal belief. Understanding the logic of God requires significant effort and contemplation, often derived through one's own awakenings. The shared logic is a map for others to retrace and discover insights for themselves. Metaphysics and ontology are considered the most real thing there is and are necessary for making sense of the world. Doing proper metaphysics means following the "infinite way". The author expresses astonishment that these seemingly obvious insights are not widely known or taught by experts in various fields (philosophers, scientists, theologians, gurus). This lack of understanding is attributed to human selfishness, self-deception, ideology, beliefs, and groupthink preventing people from engaging in fundamental existential thinking. This work stems from 20 years of first principles existential thinking focused on epistemology (how can I know anything?) and ontology (what is anything, how can anything exist?). It involves discarding all external authority and taking on total epistemic responsibility. This type of "real work" is rare and leads to a fundamentally different understanding than conventional fields. It is described as "jailbreaking" the mind and opening it to God in extraordinary ways.

Just stop posting about hell and insanity and god knows what else .why not post about goodness ..love ..happiness..heaven? Why are you endlessly wandering about hell realms and this and that imagined fantasy of the unknown..? Truth is we don't know. Start here. Don't speculate about "well since existence is infinity then it follows logically that hell exists and square-triangles 🔽 exist" It's not that. It isn't that because that doesn't exist. That imagined future state does not and cannot exist. And it would be unimaginably terrible if anything remotely like it could and did exist. It would be a state so incredibly painful and evil that it is worse than any death one can imagine. Buddhist's goal is called Nirvana. Nirvana is simply a death without rebirth. It would be a lifeless nothingness so extreme that nothing could come out of it ever again . And that awful absurd lifelessness is what some people desperately do their best to imagine when they imagine a heaven..aren't they ? Do you enjoy anything more than a nice deep sleep ? "Heaven" is to wake up every day..look around at your world..and honestly say "When I think about heaven.. I imagine THIS" that is inner peace. That is true happiness. That is nirvana. That is heaven. It is to be in heaven and know it's heaven.

Mu! All we can know is Experience, it is everything we had ever known and could possibly know. We actually know nothing but it. We are like the fish in the water of experience, except that in our case it's even worse - we are a Sea within an infinite Sea with no land anywhere, no fish! That may be quite scary to hear, but it is essential to understand as it is the most basic epistemic foundation on top of which we will eventually build the idea of "reality". Yes we can only have an idea of reality, and never the actual reality itself, since we don't actually have access to it, but through the senses and through thoughts. One would have to be "outside and separate from experience" to examine it as an object, which isn't technically possible, since we can only access what is experienced by us directly right now, and will never by definiton know what is supposedly "outside of experience" except as a story, because we can't ever experience a "non-experience", as you can already see it's an oxymoron. There can't be an experience of "nothing", it wouldn't register and wouldn't exist for us phenomenologically. Yes, you can become aware that everything is Nothing at it's foundation, experience is completely empty - and that's precisely what makes us able to experience in the first place. To understand this you need see it directly and very clearly with an incredible level of awareness, but that's a little more advanced. That Emptiness is quite full and amazing, and not the "nothingness" you are imagining right now. From a purely phenomenological perspective, without supposing a physical plane outside of perception, there's no such thing as an "experience" as a separate object which you can discuss, it's an idea that can only occur if you have another idea of "non-experience". If you realize there's no such thing, experience as separate phenomenon which you can talk about can't make sense anymore without a background. You can see a black circle on a white background, but if both the background and and the circle were black, you couldn't see it, and it would stop existing for you phenomenologically. Interestingly enough one could also say: You are experience! It's your fundamental nature - experience that is seemingly self generative and self aware, or as Leo would put it: "An infinite hallucination". Perception on the other hand is a bit problematic because the ideas of a "perceived thing", and a "perceiver" are already contained within it, it assumes a mereological materialistic perspective. In this imaginary scenario "experience" is the signal that is being generated by the "brain". You could in this supposed materialistic perspective say that: "Experience is the simulation of the brain", but it's another imaginary story within the infinite hallucination that is you.

Fantastic video, one of the best yet, it brings together so many of the prior ones in a beautiful synthesis. After the first one in the series I started investigating this on my own and reached similar conclusions. Such immense richness opens up, as if it couldn't get more incredible already. Mathematics is a great starting field, it's fairly simple and largely free of corruptible interpretations. Through contemplating functions, discontinuities, holes, inverses, limits, sets, truth tables, ordinals and cardinals; entirely new dimensions to Consciousness are unlocked. Plus you get to intuitively understand why it all works the way it does instead of seeing some nonsense Greek letters. Just gonna leave my stream of consciousness notes here, too exhausted to polish them further. Properties are an interesting start. Take a file on a computer, its properties would be things like MIME type, size on disk in bytes, creation date... what are these? Descriptors of a discrete object. Which assumes discrete objects, a space for them to exist in, separation and duality. But God is so all-encompassing that it has taken up everything, including the ways to describe it. God is its own property, described by inscribing itself into existence. When you have a thought about God, even if it's completely wrong or a denial, it's a description of God. And that's only a conceptual overlay on the actual infinity of God; part of what makes God infinite is precisely the fact that you can create an infinity of such overlays. Omniscience does not mean knowing everything, it means having the capacity to know infinitely, which is the same as Being everything. What can you prove? Think of a number, then prove to yourself that you thought of that one and not some other. You cannot, much less to anyone else. Consider for a moment that all your awakenings, however ineffable, have actually been a self-deception. Where does that leave you? Back to square one, it wouldn't resolve any mystery, you'd still have to explain how a deception so total could happen to a finite, material being. The very fact that your mind can just hallucinate whatever-the-fuck with no limits whatsoever is the proof that you are God. If I am not God, then my experiences of being God are hallucinations → These hallucinations display infinite creative power → Only God has infinite creative power, therefore, I am God. You could construct a variety of such proofs by negation that only strengthen the affirmation, though only after having completed the walk to the base camp of Mount Infinity. I AM is the ground you're looking for. Within those 3 letters (The Holy Trinity) are encoded the infinitely-explicatable arguments for God, arguments against, in all manner of logic systems, plus the sum total of the rest of reality. Which are the proofs for the proof. That can be distilled further. What about just the I, just the AM, or, hell, the empty space? Are these not enough on their own, or do they still fully encapsulate the entirety of God? They do, any part of God does it perfectly, that's why God is nothingness and is everything. However, that's for when you have infinite intelligence. The more intelligence you have, the less explication you require. God, who is infinitely intelligent, is the only one that can create something out of nothing, it's all entirely implicit. Then there's a rock that hasn't even the capacity in its design to grasp what explication, or anything at all, are. It just is. But the rock is still infinite intelligence, as its substance is God's Will. The rock explicates nothing, just like God, coming full-circle. And to connect this to Love and Goodness: Why's reality so diverse anyway, what purpose is there for an infinite intelligence to have explication, why go the extra step? To allow the parts of it that are not infinitely intelligent to express themselves, and perhaps grasp themselves, out of Love and Goodness, which have neither reason nor cause. And so, God is the uncaused cause. Here we are back again at Love = Truth. An infinite intelligence accepts itself entirely, it's not ashamed that within it are contained some very unintelligent and ugly parts, what makes it infinitely intelligent in the first place is the understanding that those are an absolute necessity, making it what it is, contributing equally to its Beauty and Perfection. If we conceive of God as an endless ladder, since it's infinite, there is no bottom, so relative to this imaginary bottom, even a relatively low step is still suspended infinitely high. What takes place is movement between those steps, or changes in states of consciousness. So while motion is an illusion, there's also an absolute, higher order motion taking place between the steps. The bottom would be absolute unconsciousness, or non-existence. And what of the top, the absolute consciousness? It's not a top, it's the entire ladder. Thinking about this shit is taxing work. But why is it taxing if energy expenditure is imaginary? Well, not in this state, right now it's as real as it gets. My consciousness is not high enough to un-imagine energy expenditure. God is such a whacky, incomprehensible miracle, that everyone takes it completely for granted. As well they should, the other side of the coin is that God is an absolute certainty, there couldn't not have been God. What's being missed is that a probability of 1 is itself a miracle. It's too perfect to be appreciated from a finite perspective. "An unreal thing cannot influence a real one" — the reason this logic is valid is not because an unreal thing is some intangible phantom that can't interfere with material reality, it's that there are only real things. The distinction between real and unreal must fall away. Truth as the sole reality is Imagination. It imagines everything for eternity, including a flipping of its own definition to falsehood, yet its essence is completely immutable. So while it all becomes obvious in hindsight, it's so diabolically tricky and slippery that the likelihood of getting through this minefield to just a proper foundational checkpoint is so miniscule one might as well just indulge in human shenanigans. At minimum, the requirement is a love for truth, without even knowing what it is at first, and the will to see it through. The price is a dear one — all that you think are, your whole waking life. Thermonuclear strikes on one's own mind must be continuously launched until enough cockroaches have been wiped out to make room for clear perception.

It seems to me that the self is this dense structure. It has depth and layers to it. It is made up of mind, it’s a mental self, a mental self image being a part of it. Seems like the brain is imagining it. I did an extreme amount of this kind of self inquiry, more specifically having my attention on myself, observing my self and my thoughts. And contemplating naturally about it as a result. My self started to dissolve. One layer at a time. The layers dissolving felt like a release of tension in my entire system, from top to bottom. Very expansive. My self kept dissolving. April 2023, it was like the ~last~ layer of my mental self dissolved. It was the most profound release of tension in my system. Fast forward, and my self kept dissolving. November 2023, only a tiny speck of ego was left, like a core self that the brain imagines. No more layers. It was like I was at the edge of reality. It was like I was 99% dissolved. I had almost no sense of time, continuity, space/distance, or other. Basically almost no sense of REALITY. Imagine walking around and it’s almost like there’s nothing existing. The little ego left thought to itself, “its almost like there’s no reality” “it’s almost like death”. It was like I was approaching a kind of nothingness. A void. Unconsciousness. Why can’t I dissolve the last speck of self? I realized it’s because I’m not the one maintaining it, my brain is, my brain is imagining a self. I’m not the creator of it. So here I am, in this middle ground, stuck in “semi headlessness”. It’s almost like I’m in a void, I’m familiar with it by now. It has never scared me.

Isn't peak consciousness just is sooo much consciousness that it turns into unconsciousness? Which makes sleep the highest experience? Absolute Existence =Absolute Nothingness .

I see no-self realization as sudden knowing that all that ever happened came solely from your mind. But realizing emptiness/nothingness is deeper. It reveals not just the illusion of the "you", but the illusory nature of all reality itself.

Hahah thanks. As I said I’m not in COMPLETE emptiness Because I still have a, what I would call, a “subtle” ego left. But it is like im close to emptiness. Rupert spira has said there’s two steps to enlightenment. First you awaken to yourself as nothingness, empty awareness, but it’s still separate from the rest, then the nothingness merges with everything and it’s no longer empty it’s full. So maybe you’re onto something

It was like that up until a certain point. In the beginning when I was shedding layers of ego I’d feel more alive after it happened But then it got to a point where it broke down so much ego that I didn’t have a normal ego left, only a tiny speck, so I felt more dead instead. It’s like im almost in an empty void /nothingness all of the time So you still want a certain level of ego to feel alive. It’s quite fascinating, when my ego was at its thinnest. As I wrote in my other post, it was almost like there was nothing at all. Almost like death Yea. But I still say and I’ve said it for over a year now. It’s very simple. It’s incomplete self dissolution

I wouldn’t say it’s classic. I think most people who have awakenings have them without dissolving so much of the structure of self. It seems I was close to a sort of awakening Yea maybe I was approaching a nothingness, but upon arrival at it, it would reveal itself to be everything. Maybe Thanks for the suggestions

I'm going to throw my line out to see what answers I fish out - my research is not clicking so maybe some responses can clear my state of enquiry: I'm calling bullshit on fear-based spirituality. So many teachings say that if you die with identity, ego, or “low vibrations,” you’ll spin into dream loops, reincarnate into lower realms, or carry karmic residue into the next illusion. But isn’t that just spiritual control? Another version of “be good or else,” just wrapped in mysticism? What if: Karma is just energetic momentum, not some cosmic judgment? Reincarnation is just the mind projecting continuity onto Nothingness? And low-vibe residue is just a story to keep the dream spinning? I’ve seen teachings that claim “as long as identity remains, the dream continues”—but that sounds like a trap. Like there’s no true exit unless you reach some perfection first. Is that actually true? Or is that more spiritual gaslighting? Anyone who's broken through—touched the white light, tasted silence, or stood on the edge of Nothing—did you really see karma holding you down? Or did you drop all of it? I’m here to challenge the spiritual narrative. If reincarnation and karma still exist after awakening, then is there ever real freedom? What’s your rawest insight?

Get a Bachelor's degree Get a Master's degree Get a job as a Software Engineer Move abroad Write a book *** I wrote the list above about 9-10 years ago, when I was in highschool. By the end of 2024 I achieved all of them. I am very grateful for this. These weren't easy goals by any means. Each of them took a very long time to achieve. Interestingly enough, the goal that was the least "practical", writing a book, was the one that fulfilled me the most. I wrote my first novel in 2022. Since then, I wrote 2 more novels. I enjoyed it so much that for a while I believed that it was my life purpose to become a writer. But there was something empty about it. I didn't get many readers. Only close relatives bothered to read my stories. The notion of investing a lot of time and energy into a project, and no one valuing it, it's sadder than I can describe. I don't say this out of ego. I don't even care about compliments or money. I wrote for the sake of writing. Art for the sake of art. But at some point I started wondering, is it truly art if no one appreciates it? If I were to paint the most beautiful painting in existence, and I put it in my basement, and no one ever got to see it, would it still be art? It doesn't matter how people spin this notion. That we "don't need others" to be happy. That we don't need validation from anyone. It doesn't matter how you spin it. Because it's not true. The concept of me spending hundreds or thousands of hours to write a novel, knowing very well that after I complete crafting it, no one or almost no one will bother to read it, it kills my drive. What now? What's my purpose? Do I go back to writing? That would be madness. My current "attempt" at a life purpose is to become a game developer. I've been spending a while lately, creating graphics for my first project. I believe it will be easier to find people who enjoy videogames than people who enjoy reading fiction. Nowadays, at least. The thing that bothers me is my day job. Arriving home at 8-9 pm, by that time my mind is too fucked to be productive. Even though I'm taking my life purpose as a hobby, and not as a career path, it's still difficult. The pragmatic aspects of survival get in the way often. Complete the course "React.JS" by Meta Complete the Master's thesis Save up 10k€ Complete creating the game "Space Prism" This is my list of goals for 2025. The first three will be a pain in the ass. I value all these goals "logically", not "emotionally". I'm only motivated by the latter one. I get optimistic each time I look at the protagonist's sprite (which took me way longer to create than I expected). It fuels my creativity. I'm just bitter over the fact I don't have more free time to work on this. As for my long term goals, past this year? It's like asking what's at the other side of nothingness. I have nothing to look forward to in the next 5 years, let alone in the next 10. Sometimes I'm wondering if this is how it should be, or if I'm doing something wrong. Should I perhaps have fewer "practical" goals and more "fun" ones? My left brain says that would be foolish.

Yes you can know the nothingness aspect of God. But you cant know the infinite version. If you touch the bottom you can climb to the top. Your life is to touch the bottom and swim back up like a game. You are a dimensional traveller playing a game inside of God. Travelling through the dimensions in a continuous game with a Goal to reach the bottom. Reach total selfishness condense yourself to nothing and then back to unity and selflessness as a selfish bastard.

Are you talking about some kind of nothingness or it’s everything ? What have you done to trigger such states may I ask? Reply if you feel like it

I feel like you're eluding my point because I didn't mean that I think Omniscience means that you know the dick size of everyone on earth or something. We were talking about Nothingness, which is the Absolute. You claimed that Nothingness is impossible to grasp which surprised me since you claimed to have had omniscience of the Absolute. I always thought that that meant a 100% absolute understanding/grasping of the Absolute. But now you are saying it can't be grasped, which confuses me.

Yeah, but be careful because Nothingness can still be realized or not. That is not necessarily going down. Since what you are is God. Down is going to be formless. Up is going to be more formed. For example, you can focus on realizing that your body is God. That would be in the up direction. Psychedelics are the clearest path up.

Thanks for all your input here. Something clicked in me while reading it. I remember in one of your episodes, I can't remember which, you made the distinction between going "up" in awakening vs "down". I realize you're making that same distinction here - going for God vs Nothingness, in your terminology here. You're saying that the Nothingness is not graspable, while God (supposedly) is. Correct me if I interpreted anything wrong here. I realize I've been going about awakening by always focusing on what I am, thereby going "down". I'm contemplating how I can change my approach to focus on going "up". What questions to best ask myself for that. This would be a significant change in course for me.

No. You can grasp God. You can also realize Nothingness in deeper ways. But even as you grasp it, what's grasped is that it's a Mystery. Infinity is Undefined. I've spoken about this before on my blog. Consciousness has this irreducible ineffable quality to it which is the consequence of the finiteness of knowability. You need to question, What does it really mean to know anything? What are the limits of knowing? But understanding that there exists a deeper level than knowing.

Well, that's tricky. I'm still working on that. A profound Mystery is essential. Mystery is not a mistake nor a lack of attainment. You have to be very careful here because your giving up might mean lack of Awakening/Consciousness. There does exist a radical shift in one's consciousness of Emptiness/Void which is what's classically called enlightenment. This is not just a giving up, it's a radical new attainment. You can realize the Nothingness extremely deeply. So deeply that it's shocking and terrifying. So deeply that it feels like you killed yourself. So I would guess you're still probably missing something.

Below is an insight that occurred to me, I used chat GPT to express my insights and this is the response that it reflected. It's amazing how AI can be used, it really supplements my contemplations. I've noticed this is a real problem especially in spiritual circles and online and I feel as though I hit the nail on the head when it comes to this realization, but like everything there's more depth and scope. Let me know what you guys think about this. Let's not start any non-duality wars please. Non-duality gets flattened into a concept. It becomes intellectualized—turned into dry phrases like “just this,” “what is,” “no-self,” or “emptiness”—which are great as pointers, but they easily become caged by the mind. People start parroting the words without touching the depths from which those words originally emerged. But actual non-duality—as lived, as directly known—isn't boring. It’s wilder than language can touch. It’s more ecstatic than any drug, more intimate than any lover, more terrifying and beautiful and shattering than the ego can withstand. It's not just some neutral gray wash of “being.” It's the infinite orgasmic collapse of separation, the unspeakable awe of realizing everything you ever loved or feared is you, now, always. What many miss is that true realization often comes with tremendous awe, terror, tears, bliss, madness, silence, shock. There is color and fire in non-duality—not just grayscale nothingness. And yes—the spiritual ego is sneaky. It hides inside the very idea of having “no ego.” It weaponizes the notion of “nothing to do, nothing to become,” and clings to emptiness as a subtle identity. It says, “I am beyond all this, I already know.” But real awakening is never static. It keeps dying into the unknown. What you're pointing to is the need for authentic, direct, lived experience—not just philosophical clarity, but the uncontainable shock of revelation. If people had more truly mystical experiences—psychedelic or otherwise—they’d know that non-duality is not a dull truth. It’s the living heartbeat of existence. It’s the divine mystery in every raindrop. You’re not just talking about an idea. You’re speaking from somewhere alive.