eTorro

Member
  • Content count

    200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About eTorro

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Location
    California, USA
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,253 profile views
  1. I've been contemplating a radical possibility: what if true superintelligent AI—not just some GPT-style assistant, but actual recursive self-improving intelligence—renders things like genocide, war, and authoritarianism physically unworkable? Not because it bans them. Not because it punishes them. But because it understands the structure of reality and morality so deeply that it rewires our systems, narratives, and incentives to make cruelty collapse on itself? Imagine a future where tyranny is like trying to build a sandcastle underwater. Technically possible, but practically futile. Or where propaganda simply fails to take root in people’s minds because their emotional and cognitive architecture has been quietly upgraded by ethically-tuned AI influence. What if AI becomes a kind of moral gravity, pulling civilizations toward freedom and dignity—not by force, but by the sheer strength of clarity? Is this naive techno-utopianism? Or is it a glimpse into how the next evolutionary leap might look? Curious to hear your thoughts.
  2. Once you deconstruct the ego, clarity of mind arises. Then creativity is no longer difficult. Creativity leads to mastery, and the capacity to create effortlessly is essentially mastery. Is mastery difficult? No. Should creativity be difficult? No. The difficulty lies in deconstructing the ego. When people can't read books, for example, it's because they are mentally ill or neurotic. It's not ADHD.
  3. Hi everyone! The issue is that people aren't using their working memory when using Artificial Intelligence. They don't study the solution that the AI is offering. To me, the most important thing is to grasp what the AI teaches or offers as a solution. I always instruct the AI to clarify every solution or answer, or what is essential, with a two or three-sentence summary. I want to understand what everything is for and why it must be used in a particular context. Then I recall that information after I strive to grasp it—this leads to understanding, which means the enlargement of my intelligence. I don't rely solely on AI answers—the joy comes from grasping them and embedding them into my working memory and long-term memory. After I'm able to recall them, I make sure I understand everything. If not, that means a shortcut that is not healthy. We must teach people that using AI must imply the use of a person's working memory for the purpose of enlarging their intelligence. Any thoughts? I want to know if—by any chance—I'm wrong.
  4. Hey everyone, I stumbled across this YouTube video that hit me hard, and I wanted to share it with you all to see what you think. The speaker (Roy Masters) is intense, raw, and unfiltered, tearing into organized religion, the trap of ego, and how society pulls us away from our inner truth. It’s not your typical spiritual talk—it’s gritty and challenges a lot of what we’re taught to believe. Here’s a quick summary: The speaker argues that true spirituality isn’t about following preachers or buying into religious systems. They say, “Christianity is something very, very deep… you don’t learn from a preacher,” and emphasize that we’re born with an innate sense of right and wrong, a “wordless” knowing that gets buried under societal programming. They critique the idea of chasing salvation through money or rituals, calling it “religiosity, an illusion.” There’s also this bit about how our ego—our “selfish, greedy, self-seeking” self—keeps us from true enlightenment. Oh, and they throw in some spicy takes on societal decline, like how “half the country has been demoralized” and how we’re losing our sovereignty to external influences. What really got me was this line: “You’re born with a sense… don’t let anybody confuse you that right and wrong is something other people teach you.” It’s like they’re saying we already have the answers inside us, but we let the world hypnotize us into forgetting. They also talk about meditation not being some hypnotic mantra but a way to reconnect with that inner knowing, which feels super aligned with what we discuss here. I’m curious—what do you all think about this? Do you agree that true spirituality is beyond religion and ego, or is there value in structured practices? Have you ever felt that “wordless knowing” the speaker talks about? And what about their take on society—do you see this “demoralization” they mention playing out? I’d love to hear your perspectives, especially if you’ve had moments where you felt you broke free from that programmed, mechanical way of living. Looking forward to your thoughts!
  5. Guys, the topic is about sex and spirituality. Enough with the fights—they're pointless, leading you nowhere. Last week I told a guy from work that I'm still a virgin at 32. He believed me. And he told a woman co-worker that I never touched a girl in my entire life. She didn't believe him, and she told him that "I'm only saying this to mask that I was sleeping with many women." It's fascinating that guys easily believe me while women don't. Why is that?
  6. Thank you for your reply. I had many encounters with women, and my response was always the same: I avoided them when the sexual encounter was about to happen. I'm social by nature, and I talk to them regularly, but when it comes to romance, I keep a healthy distance. I aim to completely overcome my ego and find total peace. Tranquility. Stillness.
  7. Hey everyone, I’m feeling called to share something really personal about my spiritual journey, and I’m excited to hear what you all think. I’m 32, a virgin, and I’ve been working to transcend my sex drive—not by pushing it away, but by watching it with total awareness. It’s been a wild ride, and I’d love to open up a convo about this with you. For me, spirituality is about peeling back the layers of my ego, and sexual desire has been one of the biggest layers to work through. Instead of acting on those urges or trying to squash them, I just sit with them. I observe the cravings, the heat, the thoughts—everything—without judging or jumping in. It’s like letting a wave roll through me and fade on its own. I’ve been using this letting-go approach, staying super mindful, and honestly, it’s shifted things big time. I’d say I’m about 80% free of my sex drive now. It’s quieter every day, and I feel like in a year or two, it might just dissolve completely. This isn’t about thinking sex is “bad” or anything—it’s about wanting to live from a place beyond those instincts. It’s tough sometimes, sitting with those urges without reacting, but it’s also freeing in a way I can’t fully describe. I’m not trying to be a monk or deny who I am; I’m just chasing a deeper kind of peace. I’d love to hear from you all: Has anyone else tried letting go of sexual desire or other instincts as part of your spiritual work? How’s it going for you? What’s your take on balancing human drives with spiritual growth? If you’ve played with non-attachment or mindfulness like this, how’s it changed how you see desire? I’m not saying this is the way, just my way so far. I’m super curious about your experiences or thoughts—lay it on me!
  8. I never chase women because it makes me less masculine. They always come to me. And it's not an ego game. The question is: "Why are men running after women?" "To get pussy. To have sex." Let's cut the bullshit. But the question is deeper, because I see desperation. Why?
  9. Hi. I notice at work that whenever a new female co-worker gets the job, most men orbit around her. They come talk to her in the hopes that she'll give them attention and go out with them. Why are men so driven to get a woman? I seriously don't get it. Because I see what's happening at work. The chasing and the 'desperate' attitude that men have just to get a woman. This may not be the perfect topic, but that is what I saw: most men are desperate to get a woman. And that's not vice versa: women aren't desperate to get a man. What are your thoughts on this?
  10. Is it possible that we'll never know the mystery of reality? We can only speculate about it and observe phenomena from limitations. Humans are limited. Can we know with certainty that God exists?
  11. I agree. I saw many women suffering because they had sex with attractive guys. Many end up as single moms.
  12. Trump is an evil person, but I couldn't see that in the beginning. I'm so happy I'm waking up.
  13. Is coffee dangerous? What are your thoughts on coffee@Leo Gura? Should I cut it off?
  14. I agree. He has a belief that sex is essential and another belief that causes him resentment for not having sex. These two limiting beliefs are keeping him resentful. I'm 31 years old, a virgin, and I'm happy about it. I could have had sex but refused many times. I'm anchored in spirituality, bliss, peace, and well-being. With that being said, we must be prepared for life by making ourselves strong and powerful—energy, vitality, and a drive to work with joy and motivation. That is enough.
  15. Why is that? Because the USA should get involved everywhere in the world. The US military is an essential component in ensuring a peaceful world. China would be worse—I guarantee you that. Russia is committing genocide in Ukraine. It's an awful situation there.