yetineti

Boo-hoo. All of your comments haven’t been exactly ‘relevant’ and you do not get to gate keep what is. If it’s here: it’s relevant. Besides it wasn’t the most off topic, painful comparison known to man. It’d be better to just address it. Make us look dumb that way.

@Something Funny Because companies do not exist in a vacuum. That’s a choice, not a law of nature. This is incredibly defeatist. It has nothing to with anyone getting free money or even CEOs in particular. It’s about structural inequity. There are countless ways to better allocate funds. People do leave when they can. But also some jobs are essential. And if everyone just quit because they were feeling unfairly treated… essential industries would break… At a certain point things must be rebuilt from the inside out. You cannot just tear down and move around whatever doesn’t work. And does a woman enable a rapist with her dress in your world too, I suppose?

This quote is the fundamental difference in our takes here, I realized. I do not care about business. And for that reason, I will inherently understand it better than you. You’re a fish in water, talking about elephants and mice.

@Leo Gura Yeah, I’m willing to address my bias. Why haven’t you addressed yours? Care to engage honestly? You’re not just making assumptions about me—you do this to everyone. Instead of engaging with arguments, you shut them down with condescension and deflection. Someone brings up a valid comparison, and you call it “childish.” Someone questions CEO pay, and you tell them they don’t understand business. Someone mentions psychopathy rates, and you call them “distorted in reality.” That’s not reasoning, that’s dodging. You assume what people earn, what they know, and how much “audacity” they have. But how do you know? You don’t. You just assert. Ironically, you criticize people for speaking from ignorance while making blind assumptions yourself. An argument stands on its own, not on personal credentials. And if we’re talking about who does what, you run a few things yourself. No surprise you’d defend a system that benefits you. But if your only argument is “this is how it works,” then you’re not making a case—you’re just defending the status quo by telling people they don’t understand how it exists. But that’s not the point. We’re not just talking about how something exists, we’re questioning whether it should. Captain Obvious. And the hypocrisy? It’s unreal. You dismiss others as ignorant while assuming things about them with zero basis. You posture as if you’re above bias while being completely entrenched in it. You tell people to understand a system before critiquing it, while your own defense boils down to “this is the way it is.” That’s exactly what you’ve been doing. You’re not being intelligent. You’re posturing—clinging to authority, dismissing dissent, and avoiding real engagement. What you’re doing isn’t deep, rational, or enlightened. It’s hollow.

@Leo Gura Treating people like cancer cells is a slippery slope. Who decides who’s a “bad actor”? History proves this kind of thinking leads to abuse. If it’s just an “ugly job,” would you do it yourself, or is this just theory? Moderating a website is not akin to this. Luigi is not a psychopath.

@Leo Gura A realtor getting 5% doesn’t justify CEO pay—it just points to another broken system. If real-estate commissions are outdated and unearned, why use them as a defense? That’s not an argument, just pointing at another flaw. If a CEO job requires insane pay just to attract candidates, maybe the role itself is the problem. Why concentrate that much power in one person? If a company thrives, it’s usually due to market forces and collective effort, not just the CEO. Performance-based pay sounds fine in theory, but in practice, it’s often disconnected from actual value creation. If a system is flawed, questioning it isn’t “cope.” It’s rational. Aren’t you a CEO of sorts yourself or am I mistaken?

Leo is the greatest speaker of all time. He is the bar.

@Thought Art How crazy is it to have such a great speaker at your finger tips that you can critique the act of repetition within a presentation? If you held anyone else to that standard they would evaporate. Leo says, ‘It was bad’ and carries on lmao. Amazing shit.

@Hardkill Do monkeys not fuck in the trees?

This is the conversation Elon would want us to have.

🙃

@Leo Gura Damn you’re good.

@Leo Gura Right - but you engaged with it on a technical level. That was his whole point. Answer to that.

@Something Funny Yes, it is.

@Emerald Will you always ignore my clever responses? You have engaged with me before and the more questions I ask the less answers you’ll give. You’ll just double down on other parts of the conversation instead of actually engaging and keeping the insights/conversation moving. Why do you think you can read people so much better than most? I am an ‘INFP’ / insert great justification for me to convince you all I know how to do is read people’s vibe. Your ratios are off. You seem to have a great disdain. You are clearly atypical, and what you’re calling a vibe check is more of you analyzing things from a far and deciding on courses of action ahead of time.

@Emerald you do not actually think I disagreed with you in that sense do you? I am wondering why this seems to be such a frequent thing for you. Do you really believe that more than half of men and whatever have this issue or do you think that that bubble you described that you put yourself in is causing you to exaggerate? because you said more than half of men have this issue or similar.

@Emerald Do you think there’s a chance that being so quick to read and dismiss men might actually mirror the same kind of judging and categorizing you’re frustrated with? Like, isn’t it kind of funny how focusing so much on spotting these vibes could feel like the flip side of what you’re calling out? Could it end up being two sides of the same coin—both jumping to conclusions and making assumptions about people without really getting to know them? You seem to talk about men a lot. Are you in a relationship? Have you maybe had trauma with bad men?

@Gidiot Do you think that would solve something? Practically everyone; society. Could it be any other way? What are you upset about?

@NewKidOnTheBlock Yeah… even had my heart broken with this old gem. Really thought I had something. Nope - still just old men. And darn it too.

@Ero I also worded it the opposite of Leo - a bit confusing of me. I was just trying to express how I felt the school system - while obviously not maxed to effectiveness - is almost maxed in ineffectiveness. I love public schooling - I am not pushing for a right wing private school agenda. I graduated about five years ago and I was honestly more interested in teachers unions, curriculum, ‘standards based grading,’ etc. than I was getting a good GPA. We are due for change.

@Lews Therin Maybe OP is trying to consider a Yellow perspective, from a different perspective?

@NewKidOnTheBlock Have you considered looking for some to focus on? I’m sure there’s a few. They might even have better arguments than non-big tittied right wingers. 😉

@Ero Yeah - did you read my whole post? It was about how education is about to be sideswiped by AI, Open AI’s voice mode, cultural implications, etc. I was agreeing with Leo - and what you just said. Again, did you read the post or?

The structure of the current education system is somewhat maxed out - leaving endless room for whatever is next for education. And I do think AI hive mind has become more than plausible. Perhaps ‘replace’ will actually just be ‘convert.’ OpenAI’s Advanced Voice mode, for premium users, now sustains something like 45min to 1hr of talk time. Within the past few months, other features have been incorporated into the ‘Advanced Voice mode,’ specifically. The features now include: real time internet access, the ability to ‘video chat’ live stream video, have it describe or translate, upload photos, screen share, memory, analysis… - and doing it all in most languages - verbally. If I had this growing up, I could’ve dropped out of school after 8th grade and been better than I am now. Once time limits increase, speeds increase, local processing, activeness of models, humanoids, etc. - People will gain the option to keep their education independent from others. It will stabilize itself like it always has. The independent individuals and entities will lead and the dependent individuals and entities will follow. Except standards will change. Star Wars is a good example. The way the hive of the clones or the droids coincide with the smaller divisions, with more independent droids (like R2), or people who have kept their sovereignty. Or Cyberpunk and the trade offs to each modification, for society or the person. The resources game. The information resources game. Not everyone will have to hive mind. Maybe you want to stay you, fight the hive mind, think the way it can not… Or maybe it’s time to download Kong Fu and break people out of the matrix 😎.