The observer

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    681

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The observer

  1. Posted · Edited by The observer

    @Leo Gura Do you enjoy avoiding the point of a different perspective? What you said does not change anything. It does not mean you're changing your ways. In fact, it means that you're insisting on being like you are. Who's more corrupt and who needs to fix themselves is not the point. We're all human beings and we all make mistakes. There are criminals out there that need to be controlled. Is it difficult? Sure. Is it directly relevant to my life? Probably not. But I can't see injustice and turn a blind eye to it.

  2. Posted

    Dude, it sounds like you have a clinical depression. At this point, I'm pretty sure that it doesn't have to do with the thoughts. From what I've read you seem to feel depressed almost all the time. I wouldn't worry about it too much, but I wouldn't also neglect/bypass it. Take whatever action you think is necessary. And any time you feel sad, remind yourself that it's just a state, and that it isn't permanent.

    Also, I would exercise if I don't already. It helps tweak your brain chemicals to degrees you can't even begin to imagine.

  4. Posted · Edited by The observer

    44 minutes ago, Galyna said:

    That is not actually my problem. For the past five or so years I have been aware of my thoughts. I know my inner motives, I try catching myself when ego manipulates and lying...I hear every single thought and it is drawing in my awareness.

    You don't need to do anything else. Just keep going further down this road.

    44 minutes ago, Galyna said:

    my problem is that I don’t have this Aha moment like people here. I am not aware enough to realize I am oneness. I can stop my thoughts , but not for a long time. I don’t think I have an overwhelming inner dialogue, in fact it is subtle. I just can’t break through. 

    I would be careful here. What others say is huge might seem peanuts to you. The reaction is different from one person to another, and psychedelics exaggerate your emotional state, so that's why you see people celebrating very ordinary things or insights. That celebration is simply more delusion. Don't buy into it. It's a red herring from the actual work. In that light, you have already broken through a lot of things, you're just thinking that's ordinary. If you talk to other people who are beginners or not even on the path, you can see how much more advanced you are and how much you're discrediting your efforts. You don't have to sit down in certain positions and repeat certain mantras to practice spirituality. Once you're on the path, spirituality is practicing you. There's no you anymore. Don't be surprised (or do ?) if you find out that you are even more advanced than most of the ones that claim they are awake. Most of them are deluded. Their ego is taking ownership of their insights, and therefore all their work is useless. In fact, the fact that you are not experiencing much of these aha moments is a sign you're doing things correctly. It means you are busy working through your stuff and not wasting your time on creating unnecessary distractions.

    44 minutes ago, Galyna said:

    oh God pls send me some psychedelics and a lot of enlightened people in my life so I get what I really wish for so many years. Amen! ❤️❤️❤️❤️

    Perhaps what you really wish is for you to lose that one wish.

  5. Posted

    3 hours ago, Galyna said:

    @WaveInTheOcean

    So I am Consciousness imagining this ego/world/other people/this POV, I got it. You said that it was imagining others POV simultaneously. You said they had their separate thought processes. 

    Not long time ego Leo said there was only one NOW and it is YOURS.

    I know I have been asking this question a lot on this form, I do apologize for this. But I can not image it fully. Other POVs with other NOWs implies objective reality, since they exist outside of this present moment this ego (my ego) experiences but since everything exists as a probability how is it possible? 

    Thanks. 

    Notice how much truth you're giving to the content of thoughts.

  6. Posted

    7 hours ago, Galyna said:

    I guess I am stuck.

    You aren't stuck. You are Galyna.

    7 hours ago, Galyna said:

    I was trying to describe what thought was for me.
    I know you want me to understand the nature of my thought to expend my awareness. Well, thoughts are certain sensations, auditory labels and visual images.

    Okay, so what does that make them? How does this fit into your puzzle? If thoughts are just certain sensations, auditory labels and visual images, how can one confuse them for reality?

  8. Posted

    1 hour ago, ivankiss said:

    @The observer to share a point of view that might just help ya in whatever way.

    Help who with what? I don't want help. Haven't even asked for it. I want truth and only truth. And I'm not asking for it. I'm trying to demonstrate it to you all. I've met worse than Lucifer. I've met myself. So, hi to you too.

    Anyway, thanks for the discussion. I can't go any further as I've been told to stop by Leo.

  9. Posted

    @smurf88 I have read chapters of that book and I have fallen in love many times both with animate and inanimate beings. I have even fallen in love with thoughts and concepts. Repeatedly. Anyway, I can't discuss any further (with you either @Parththakkar12) because otherwise Leo will ban me. I've received a clear direct friendly warning. I would love to discuss but I'm sorry. I don't want to risk it.

  15. Posted

    8 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

    Can you elaborate?  It seems either you mean that he is conflating Absolute with the relative or that the entire concept of Absolute/Relative is a fallacy.  The latter would be a fallacy in itself.  Ultimately the relative collapses into the Absolute as One.  But it also divides again.  Division to Unity and back to Division.

    The former. And the conflation is occurring on your side.

  17. Posted

    1 hour ago, Carl-Richard said:

    @The observer In the spirit of Ken Wilber, the originator of the pre-trans fallacy, I bring you the source of all spiritual confusion: the relative-absolute fallacy. That's what is going on here :)

    Exactly!

    39 minutes ago, SamueLSD said:

    Just wait until you realise love. I know you will. 

    You will fall in love with it. 

    No offence and I'm sorry, but I can't take you seriously, simply because of your username.

  19. Posted · Edited by The observer

    4 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

    Or i should say people are dyin' to understand...

    ?????

    4 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

    Infiniy IS Absolute Love!

    It's the same thing! How could it be anything else!  You have to die to understand :)

    No, it ISn't.

    Death is a release. That's why it feels like love. When a baby is born, a mother suffers. When it dies, that suffering returns back to source as love.

  20. Posted · Edited by The observer

    5 minutes ago, WaveInTheOcean said:

    Haha my man. It's so freaking obvious to me that even though you consciously see yourself as a spiritual dude/non-materalist, you are unconsciously still very much materalistic. Your bashing of pyschedelics as just "chemicals" clearly reflects that. Much love to you brother, you'll get there, no doubt.

    Haha my man. It's so freaking obvious to me that even though you consciously see yourself as God/consciousness, you are unconsciously still very much an ego. Your arrogant bashing of my point and your projection of me as a materialist clearly reflects that. Much love to you brother, you'll get there, maybe.

  22. Posted

    30 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

    A complete lack of bias.

    Love is bias. If you love something, that means you want it to be some certain way(s) and not any other way(s). And it's relative. It changes according to your pov. For example, manure is food for trees, not humans. Trees might love it, but humans don't. No one can love their children and want them dead. That's nonsensical.

    32 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

    acceptance of all of itself.

    Being does not require acceptance. Accept being, or deny it. It'll still be.

  23. Posted

    @WaveInTheOcean Whoa! Whoa! Whoa! Hold your horses, you went too far. I'm not a materialist.

    However, my point still stands, you will forget what you've realised, it won't even make sense to you. Remembering it will be like when you talk about it to a seeker. It will be just a thought.

    Or, maybe that won't happen and it will stick. Time will tell...

    Just giving you a heads up.

  24. Posted

    @Keyhole

    I'm sorry for tagging you here, but I can't reach you on the personal messenger. I know you're busy these days, but I wanted to ask you a question, since I know you're one of the few experts here on this topic. Feel free to ignore it.

    Recently, I've been getting arousals from thinking about narcissistic women. Usually, I don't specifically find the narcissistic trait attractive for itself, but for its ramifications, like confidence, passion, energy, etc... I even dislike narcissistic men, regardless of how their narcissism manifests. Right now, it's like I subconsciously subscribe to the idea that a narcissistic woman is actually valuable simply by herself.

    If you don't mind sharing; what are your thoughts on this? How does it all fit with me/my personality? Is this healthy or unhealthy? How should I act on this? Any other insights would also be much appreciated. Thank you.