Posted January 13, 2019 38 minutes ago, Preetom said: @Arhattobe Thanks for answering. Saguna and Nirguna Brahman is basically form and formlessness of heart sutra. They must collapse into not-twoness. In Buddhism there is no oneness. Form is dependent upon formlessness. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 32 minutes ago, Anton Rogachevski said: @F A B If you even ask such a question you are either depressed, or you are deeply within suffering. Why did you state that so confidently? I'm an ordinary guy with ordinary sufferings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 (edited) 46 minutes ago, Leo Gura said: No, you are just misunderstanding their teachings. THIS is the kingdom of God! Heaven is EVERYWHERE! Just lose that ego. There is no salvation elsewhere unless you find it right here, right now. Nirvana is ego-death. Well i didn't say heaven is somewhere else. What i'm saying is: In Indian theology and philosophy Samsara is what you call "oneness" or "Infinity". Buddha says Samsara is suffering and we are trapped in it. (check out the four noble truths) Jesus says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." You are saying: Nirvana = Samsara - Ego Kingdom of God or Heaven or eternal life = My life - Ego Right? Edited January 13, 2019 by Sockrattes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 8 hours ago, F A B said: If we are in a big dream, if we are an idea, why should we master this dream, this idea? If I am an idea, there is no one to make the choice whether to master something or not. There is no one to take the actions to master something. How can an idea master something? If I am an idea, the question of whether I should master something disappears. There is mastering, yet no one that takes ownership of being a master. Rather than asking if an idea can master something, what if we explore what comes prior to that idea of "me". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 @Preetom Certainly not. The nirguna aspect is, but that isn’t all of me. Within the saguna aspect of reality. I still have cleansing to go through. @Emanyalpsid don’t get your point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 (edited) 35 minutes ago, F A B said: Why did you state that so confidently? I'm an ordinary guy with ordinary sufferings. Because to not see the incredible nature of reality in front of you, can only be resulted from these causes. Otherwise you would be awe struck, you would cry "Thank you god, thank thank thank you!" There would be deep bliss and pure oness. The only thing preventing you from seeing it is deep unconscious sleep within maya, which results in full attachment to thought, and therefore your attention is taken from direct experience. The problem is that you call your suffering ordinary. You think it's inherent to existence, but it's far from truth. Suffering is caused only by delusion, it's unnecessary. Edited January 13, 2019 by Anton Rogachevski https://antonsjournal.home.blog Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Arhattobe said: @Emanyalpsid don’t get your point. Do you believe in Brahman? Edited January 13, 2019 by Emanyalpsid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 @Emanyalpsid Brahman is the totality. With that in mind I find your question odd. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Anton Rogachevski said: The problem is that you call your suffering ordinary. You think it's inherent to existence, but it's far from truth. Suffering is caused only by delusion, it's unnecessary. I think each of us experiences suffering at some point. But if you never suffer then good for you bro ahaha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 @F A B Surely I'm not free of it entirely, but I'm on the way there. There can be pain without suffering, and that's the beauty of it. I do have pain, I'm human, but I don't have to add unnecessary suffering on top of it. I allow it to be as the will of god, and so it goes through me. https://antonsjournal.home.blog Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 @Anton Rogachevski Pain is suffering lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Anton Rogachevski said: There can be pain without suffering That's the key I was missing. For me, pain implies physical suffering Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 Can you explain to me what is difference in real and non real, how exactly it changes something to you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 Just now, F A B said: That's the key I was missing. For me, pain implies physical suffering Suffering = Resistance to what it https://antonsjournal.home.blog Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Serotoninluv said: If I am an idea, there is no one to make the choice whether to master something or not. There is no one to take the actions to master something. How can an idea master something? If I am an idea, the question of whether I should master something disappears. There is mastering, yet no one that takes ownership of being a master. Rather than asking if an idea can master something, what if we explore what comes prior to that idea of "me". I'm sorry, it seems quite complex to me. What comes prior in your opinion? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 6 minutes ago, Anton Rogachevski said: Suffering = Resistance to what it But if I have pain, and this pain is caused by a disease, then is it resistance when I try to treat that disease in order to stop the pain? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 15 minutes ago, purerogue said: Can you explain to me what is difference in real and non real, how exactly it changes something to you. Actually, I never used the word "real" cause I can't define it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Arhattobe said: @Emanyalpsid Brahman is the totality. With that in mind I find your question odd. The totality of what? I will elaborate as to why I asked these questions. When you reach Nirvana in Buddhism you realize that no-thing exists, but this is not nothing. It is the relative space between something and nothing. You realize that everything is of dependent arising and that there is no totality. So this Brahman, even if not labeled, is still there in your mind as something. This means that you are still attached to something and are not fully enlightened by the Buddhist standard. You see, there is a difference between enlightenment in Hinduism and Buddhism, but it seems that Hinduists do not see this and if you have not attained Nirvana in Buddhism you will also not be able to see this. I had two interesting discussions about this with two Hinduists, you can find them here. https://www.actualized.org/forum/topic/27518-i-am-enlightened-sincere-seekers-ask-me-anything/?page=103 https://www.actualized.org/forum/topic/28840-differences-between-hinduism-and-buddhism/?page=5 So although you act like you got it all figured out, it seems your own words apply to yourself: "Ramaji postulates that the reason people get stuck at a specific level of enlightenment is due to the fact that they start teaching at that level. They believe they see truth. Their perception and interpretation starts to become rigid. Their understanding of the world untouchable. This might seem like progress but in fact it’s stagnation. In Buddhism there are many stories of monks who overestimated their level of understanding, and due to false understanding got stuck." I was also under the assumption that I reached enlightenment for some time in the past, until I gained the final insight and saw my own ignorance. At higher levels of enlightenment, just before Nirvana, appearances of the ego are very subtle and hard to detect because you lack the final insight. Edited January 13, 2019 by Emanyalpsid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13, 2019 (edited) 44 minutes ago, F A B said: But if I have pain, and this pain is caused by a disease, then is it resistance when I try to treat that disease in order to stop the pain? On the contrary, treatment is the best thing to do, It would be extremely irrational not to help yourself heal. One shouldn't take literally any spiritual principle, because their meaning is metaphorical and isn't always related to everyday things. Resistance in this case would be: to desire not to be sick, and not to have pain. Anything that appears before you should be embraced with love, so it could heal. The positive thought "I am healthy. And getting better." Is really good, and isn't considered resistance as long as you say it with full conviction. It's like aikido really, you use the force of the pain to let it pass by instead of resisting it head on. Say: "I welcome you pain. Stay as long as you wish, I love and embrace you." Good luck to you dear fellow, I wish you well. Edited January 13, 2019 by Anton Rogachevski https://antonsjournal.home.blog Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 14, 2019 @Emanyalpsid I never said I’ve attained nirvana. My username is arhat to be. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites