The Legend of Zelda Remake Discussion

[Natasha Tori Maru]

22 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

I have noticed that there are two types of gamers: those who play games for story, and those who don't. I am the second type.

This is such a total false dichotomy! I am both! 

If story isn't your thing, then these legacy games (OOT, Majora) will hit like a wet noodle compared to say, BOTW.

Edited 27 minutes ago by Natasha Tori Maru

[kavaris]

(See my previous message)

Its sortve why that really dumb Vampire game got so big, the one with nothing but like, mouse movement, or keyboard arrows or watever it is, vampire survivor, cause they just stripped away all the bs, and just said to theirselves "wats the most essential pieces here — rhythm, and — insert-whatever-else', like they just got down to the bare bottom of that rhythmic thing im talkin bout, and made something somewhat different.

Edited 27 minutes ago by kavaris

[Leo Gura]

8 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

This is such a total false dichotomy! I am both!

If you are both, that means you care about story in games. But then many gamers don't.

Quote

If story isn't your thing, then these legacy games (OOT, Majora) will hit like a wet noodle compared to say, BOTW.

I would prefer a Zelda game with no story at all. Just let me wander Hyrule at my own pace in my own way.

The reason I really disliked The Witcher is how they force the story on me. So I quit playing Witcher because of it and have no interest more. I wanted to play Witcher my own way but it would not let me.

That's also why I dislike Bioware games.

Edited 19 minutes ago by Leo Gura

[kavaris]

Now granted, i dont know how many xtimes you can strip away things, before it starts turning into like, older sortve, E.T. or tetris, and things like this, Like weve already done many simple games, in our past...  And i guess, its not obvious as to how much room is left in that category of like, simple, simple — meaning, in the like Baaaare - baare basic - basics, Like theres certainly lots of little mini games you could think of (im thinking of puzzle pirates typeve thing) but that is like, an anomoly, cause its iterating over an idea, and each puzzle is inside of a larger idea, So thats something different. I just mean more like, 'how many games can be as simple as possible, And really get big for being As simple as possible... Ideas are sortve like, in my head, they start out in a sega dreamcast, like they are unique cause they are tryina play with data, and think of data as a way to move things around...

You could also think of like, just a totally open world game -context, and make it like, An engine that is itself fascinating too, Like firget the content and just make it am engine, and that is then the interesting part,showing off the possibilities, how theres 2d metadata attached to 3d, how each thing is like, a symbol that can become anything you want, Like thats where many games left off at, in rpg lands

 

[Cubbage]

This thread has made me realize that I like every type of game 🤣

[kavaris]

Or you know wats funny? The youngest generations, they dont even care or realize... So like, if they accidentally make E.T. Phone Home, the Sequel, theyll be like "We just like it", Like they wont even care what happened in the past, like Roblox i believe is wat reminds me of it, cause wat the heck is roblox? i thought it was a virus. Its like, An example of something that already existed, but a generation just said, "We just like it now".

[Leo Gura]

12 minutes ago, Cubbage said:

This thread has made me realize that I like every type of game 🤣

I dislike puzzle games the most.

[kavaris]

I like riddles, but its not really a thing that many games are tryina stress, As it starts competing w/ that \*rhythmic element, that "constant", but if there was ever a way to remove the puzzle, and insert the riddle back in, id go for something like that, i just dont even know what that is, right now, outside of normal rpg kinds of "solve the things".