Women Are Drugs

[Emerald]

48 minutes ago, LordFall said:

@Emerald Careful, Emerald. If guys stop treating female validation like fentanyl, half the dating advice industry will go bankrupt overnight. That pops the AI bubble, triggers the prophesied Armageddon, and collapses the entire universe. You're playing with fire here.

(Read this in Daria's voice)

Oh nooo....

[Yimpa]

33 minutes ago, LordFall said:

Did your sex drive go down massively?

I log every single time I sexually satisfy myself via the Apple Health app.  

From September 2023-24, I had sex with myself 178 times. 

*From September 2024-25, I had sex with myself 50 times.

From September 2025-26, I had sex with myself 120 times. 

*It used to be massively down. I had to add a small dose of testosterone gel later on due to major health complications. Now I have the hormonal profile of a Unicorn.

Edited yesterday at 02:00 AM by Yimpa

[LordFall]

Wow fascinating. I rank porn videos /100 to find the best adult art on the internet and identify my interests over time but I never thought about logging masturbation. What is the use case for it? 

[Yimpa]

19 hours ago, How to be wise said:

Somebody forgot their own teachings.

Here’s two brains in one body  

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcuGQM5o4A5

[LordFall]

10 hours ago, Yimpa said:

Here’s two brains in one body  

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcuGQM5o4A5

Yimpa you've outdone yourself here. Now this is truly pushing the boundaries of adult art. I've never seen this type of OnlyFans girl before. 

Mankind truly has no limit. 

Edited yesterday at 03:43 PM by LordFall

[Kokorec]

On 05/09/2026 at 3:22 AM, Leo Gura said:

It is hardwired into your brain.

@Leo Gura what's a healthy relation to women then? in your opinion since you got strong views

[Kokorec]

17 hours ago, Eskilon said:

It's not that women are drugs, it's the sexual energy inside you who is running the show and hypnotizing you.

If you didn't have it, you probably wouldn't care at all about women. It would be a completely neutral experience just like your relationship to a table is.

Labeling like that helps in real time, kudos

[Yimpa]

On 9/5/2026 at 8:26 PM, LordFall said:

I imagine being high estrogen makes you feel things way deeper, avoid conflict more, be more anxious and not be as horny as the average male. 

I don’t want to fall into reductionism, even though, like I mentioned, hormones played a big role for me. It’s more than that. Women are not just hormones, not just body parts, not just sexual organs, not just social conditioning, not just reproductive capacity, not just sexual attraction, not just aesthetic presentation, not just legal classification, not just social roles, not just physical appearance, not just youth or beauty, not diminished by aging, and not even just identity . But these words probably just cute ideas and won’t be taken seriously.

tl;dr

Women are a beautiful mystery

Edited 10 hours ago by Yimpa

[enchanted]

On 05/09/2026 at 6:15 PM, LordFall said:

Well you do have a point but not the full point. Sour grapes just means disliking what you cannot get or I mean even if you can get it, you feel like perhaps it's too hard and rationalize it's not worth getting at all. It's a fair point to say that beauty is not everything but let's not demonize attractive people or talk ourselves out of attracting hot women. 

It's also about self-awareness and knowing what you want. If I walk down the street in downtown Montreal I can see dozens of really attractive women. I want to sleep with some of them. Perhaps it's not as important for others but usually men talk themselves out of beautiful women because their subconscious makes a calculation that they can't get them, or it's too hard might as well not try. Pretending that beauty is not real so you can sleep easier at night seems a bit silly and that's why I spend time working on my self-development, social circle and status so that I have an abundance of options when it comes to my dating life.

I encourage every man to do the same. 

This is gold. I needed to hear this thanks 

[LordFall]

9 hours ago, Yimpa said:

I don’t want to fall into reductionism, even though, like I mentioned, hormones played a big role for me. It’s more than that. Women are not just hormones, not just body parts, not just sexual organs, not just social conditioning, not just reproductive capacity, not just sexual attraction, not just aesthetic presentation, not just legal classification, not just social roles, not just physical appearance, not just youth or beauty, not diminished by aging, and not even just identity . But these words probably just cute ideas and won’t be taken seriously.

tl;dr

Women are a beautiful mystery

I don't enjoy mysteries personally; I like solving them. You can always add more complexity to your identity if that helps you in some way but we need definitions to make sense of reality.

What is a woman? Greatness. Easy-peasy lemon squeezy. 

4 hours ago, enchanted said:

This is gold. I needed to hear this thanks 

You're welcome brother. You got this! 

Edited 1 hour ago by LordFall

[Joshe]

On 9/5/2026 at 6:15 PM, LordFall said:

Well you do have a point but not the full point. Sour grapes just means disliking what you cannot get or I mean even if you can get it, you feel like perhaps it's too hard and rationalize it's not worth getting at all. It's a fair point to say that beauty is not everything but let's not demonize attractive people or talk ourselves out of attracting hot women. 

It seems there's an underlying frame that if something is desirable, there must be some sort of conquest mission to attain it.

It's a basic form of reasoning where people can look at something desirable and ask themselves how much they truly want it, then ask how much work goes into getting it, and then decide the desirable thing is better off not pursued, and to walk away without "sour grapes". 

So if I see a desirable woman who I would most certainly consider having sex with, I think of all that entails and almost always decide that it would be nice to have but I don't want it enough. I don't walk away from that with "sour grapes" or any negative emotion at all. 

@enchanted was talking about the benefit, not the cost. He was saying the stories that men tell themselves about the benefits are often bullshit, which is correct and a basic understanding of how the mind works. And those stories of status, conquest, accomplishment, etc, are scripts running on base instincts that are easy to understand upon observation. 

Can you see how having a "conquest" frame increases the benefit, thus justifying the cost of the mission? Obviously, the reward is higher for the conquest-focused person because they're getting a bonus on top of the thing (increased self-worth, status, high score, etc). The conquest-oriented person is running a ledger, and that ledger tallies their self-worth - that's why they do it - for the proof on the scoreboard. If one doesn't need self-worth from the scoreboard, the cost-benefit comes out differently. 

It would be like if you were a runner and completing a marathon gave you a great sense of accomplishment, and you told all non-runners that the only reason they aren't actualizing themselves is because they're rationalizing their laziness, but they can have the grand prize of accomplishment and conquest if they simply get off their lazy, rationalizing asses and run the marathon. The runner assumes that because the marathon fills a hole in him, that everyone has that hole.

If you deem the cost worth it, then by all means, do you. But if others don't see it as worth it, don't project inferiority or a hurt/broken psychology onto them, at least not as universally as you seem to. 

Everyone wants the candy bar bro. Some are more bothered by not being able to have it than others. 

Conquest is one way to make the pursuit mean something. It's not the only way. Conquest is obsessed with the scoreboard. Appetite gets fed and goes quiet. 

When I see a badass mansion or super yacht and think of how nice it would be to have such an easy and plush lifestyle, I don't have "sour grapes". I see something that would be nice to have, dream about having it, consider what it would take to get it, and then get back to life. 

A question to reflect on if you want: "Abundance" and "options". For what? What is the motive for abundance and options? 

"When a general takes a province, the province's qualities don't matter to him as qualities. Its rivers, its people, what it's like to live there — irrelevant. What matters is that it's his now, and what taking it says about him and his position relative to rivals. The territory is valued entirely for its function in the score."

Edited 2 minutes ago by Joshe