Challenging Leo on women

[Schizophonia]

3 hours ago, Asayake said:

A woman cant get pregnant with multiple guys at once, evolution favors that the child has the best chances of survival, if a woman gets with a predator who makes her pregnant then tags out, historically the child would have poor survival & thriving probability. 
 

Getting reproduction is easy for women, finding a good father isnt.

1 hour ago, LordFall said:

In this case the predator is a toxic man or a low value man pretending to not be one. Even for a man, association with low-value men is ruinous as they literally don't offer value to your life and nothing is really neutral so often times they really lech value from you until you're drained to the point of exhaustion or worse.

For a woman it's the same thing except if she makes the error of getting pregnant by such a man, her life will now be disastrously impacted compared to having found a reliable man that she can count on.  

Just because a woman is less attractive doesn't mean she is any less likely to be a potential victim of a sexual predator.
On the contrary an attractive woman is more likely to attain a higher social status and when you have a higher status you are better protected against predators.

The fact is that when you are more attractive whether man or woman you have a better chance of reproducing and reproducing with people who are themselves and more attractive.

It is true that what is considered an advantage and thus ultimately attractive depends on the environment; however behind this "left-wing relativistic post-Darwinism" there is also a coping mechanism, a shadow.

That is what bothered me and probably bothers her and makes her metaphor shaky, as it is forced in order to address a psychical contradiction;  believe.

 

[LordFall]

That claim doesn't hold up under scrutiny. Highly attractive women deal with far higher volumes of opportunistic, disingenuous attention and deceptive tactics—which is precisely the predatory dynamic being discussed.

Asserting that higher attractiveness automatically shields someone from being targeted ignores basic filtering realities. Until you can point to actual data showing high-visibility targets face fewer predatory interactions, dismissing direct female observation as "coping" is just projecting your own assumptions.

Edited 3 hours ago by LordFall