Where Have You Had Sex?

[Inliytened1]

48 minutes ago, Ulax said:

Did you steal that line from a disgruntled 16th century knight? 

haha..he did!

[LordFall]

1 hour ago, Ulax said:

Did you steal that line from a disgruntled 16th century knight? 

16th century disgruntled knight is a very accurate phrase to use because around the 16th century knights were pretty much all disgruntled and quit being a knight to become a musketeer in a standing army since plate armor lost its effectiveness around that time due to gunpowder. 

Also around that time single women were very dangerous to sleep with as they could murder you in your sleep if you were rich or plot against you so it was a bad time to be a PUA. I read the book on Casanova, he was the son of an actor turned into homeless traveler so he slept with women in different cities but didn't stick around to live through the chaos. It caught up to him a couple of times and he went to jail on a few occasions.

 I'm studying this time period for my game, it's an interesting time period to portray but would be terrible to live in. The best time in history to fuck or live is for sure today. 

Edited 19 hours ago by LordFall

[Ulax]

1 minute ago, LordFall said:

16th century disgruntled knight is a very accurate phrase to use because around the 16th century knights were pretty much all disgruntled and quit being a knight to become a musketeer in a standing army since plate armor lost its effectiveness around that time due to gunpowder. 

Also around that time single women were very dangerous to sleep with as they could murder you in your sleep if you were rich or plot against you so it was a bad time to be a PUA. I'm studying this time period for my game, it's an interesting time period to portray but would be terrible to live in.

The best time in history to fuck or live is for sure today. 

Yes. Medieval pua would get us all guillotined real quick lol

[Jordan of the Shire]

When one can control his desire and lust, so that it doesn't rule him, and he can be free of that, or ... if it takes 250 partners, learn to see with non-attachment, then he can progress. On the level of lust and self gratification ... there is something distorted , and it is a block. 

Don't let psychedelic experiences or spiral dynamics theory knowledge bypass the importance of self-control, discipline, virtue, and wisdom.

Edited 19 hours ago by Jordan of the Shire

[LordFall]

8 minutes ago, Ulax said:

Yes. Medieval pua would get us all guillotined real quick lol

100%

There is a swing of the pendulum back to puritanism going on these days cuz I think culture went too far towards liberalism with its champion Bonnie Blue lol but in general people underestimated the sexual shame that was brutally enforced throughout history. Being able to love and fuck freely is not a God given right it's a blessing of the modern era and a bastion of human rights and progress.

Also loops back to Feminism and a lot of men being against it these days but women being able free to date who they want allows us by mirror to date any woman we want and many of them at the same time too. 

[Joseph Maynor]

I need to see proof lol.  

[LordFall]

11 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

I need to see proof lol.  

Proof of what? 

[Inliytened1]

27 minutes ago, Ulax said:

Yes. Medieval pua would get us all guillotined real quick lol

If you think this is bad you should have seen it then.  Men ruled, woman were slaves.

 

[Joseph Maynor]

10 minutes ago, LordFall said:

Proof of what? 

Of what is being said in this thread.

[LordFall]

3 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

If you think this is bad you should have seen it then.  Men ruled, woman were slaves.

 

The 16th century wasn't just male dominance; it was institutional transactionalism. Marriage and intimacy weren't about personal fulfillment or attraction—they were strictly cold economic and geopolitical contracts. It was an era of powerful female monarchs like Elizabeth I, Catherine de' Medici, and Mary Queen of Scots running European geopolitics.

Because there were no modern civil institutions to protect individual sovereignty, both men and women were treated as livestock by ruling families to secure land, titles, and military alliances. If a noblewoman or nobleman stepped outside those contractual bounds for love or lust, the fallout wasn't just social awkwardness; it was execution, imprisonment, or family ruin.

We live in the first era in human history where sexual autonomy is disconnected from state survival and dynastic land deals. It allows for free market dynamics that were not possible before. For example women owning their own sexuality and being able to sell it. Same with a dude being able to choose the career path he wants instead of it being imposed on him. 

[Natasha Tori Maru]

1 hour ago, Inliytened1 said:

What?  what exactly am I not listening to?

Can you state my criticism in your own words, in a way that I would recognise as accurate (regarding what this thread is demonstrating, not Leo)?

 

Edited 18 hours ago by Natasha Tori Maru

[Inliytened1]

6 minutes ago, LordFall said:

 If a noblewoman or nobleman stepped outside those contractual bounds for love or lust, the fallout wasn't just social awkwardness; it was execution, imprisonment, or family ruin.

 

And the executtion was nasty.  Just beheaded.

[Inliytened1]

1 minute ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Can you state my criticism in your own words, in a way that I would recognise as accurate (regarding what this thread is demonstrating, not Leo)?

 

I think maybe we haven't given you a voice, but we have.  We're just being men.  Women need to sometimes let us be guys.  That's what you tend to forget once we get wrapped up.  You take away our voice.  We know you have a voice but don't make us lose ours.

[LordFall]

7 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

And the executtion was nasty.  Just beheaded.

Beheading was a nice way to go. Have you watched Shogun? I just started and episode 1 they boil a dude alive lmao, apparently that was a real thing and took hours.

That wasn't even the worst thing that happened this episode its a crazy show idk why I haven't done it before. There is a guy that gets heated in a tense argument(not a forum debate) and then has to commit seppaku and also unalive his son to end his bloodline for his insolence. 

If me and anyone on this forum ever enter mortal combat let's just leave boiling out of it alright as a truce towards universal consciousness expansion. 

Edited 18 hours ago by LordFall

[Joseph Maynor]

You guys must be real romantics deep down.

[Inliytened1]

2 minutes ago, LordFall said:

Beheading was a nice way to go. Have you watched Shogun? I just started and episode 1 they boil a dude alive lmao, apparently that was a real thing and took hours.

If me and anyone on this forum ever enter mortal combat let's just leave boiling out of it alright as a truce towards universal consciousness expansion. 

I have.  Shogun is awesome.

[Natasha Tori Maru]

5 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

I think maybe we haven't given you a voice, but we have.  We're just being men.  Women need to sometimes let us be guys.  That's what you tend to forget once we get wrapped up.  You take away our voice.  We know you have a voice but don't make us lose ours.

You didn't even answer the question.

Do you think you've actually addressed the criticism about the language used to illustrate women in this thread, or have you mainly been defending men's right to speak that way?

[LordFall]

3 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

You guys must be real romantics deep down.

Yes 100%. That's why I want to experience a superhuman level of romance and take myself and multiple women on an adventure of the century. Just hanging out with one girl is very boring to me it's not that romantic. I like bonnie and clyde me and you against the world baby and we're winning and there's also many women in the story and we're doing cool projects, travelling the world and affecting human history. That would be a cool romance story even after I die I would be like wow that was an insane life how do I even top that one even with infinite lives that would be hard. 

[Inliytened1]

1 minute ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

You didn't even answer the question.

Do you think you've actually addressed the criticism about the language used to illustrate women in this thread, or have you mainly been defending men's right to speak that way?

I know what you are doing Natasha.  You want me to trip over my words and say something derogatory towards women. I'm not going to do that.  I have the upmost respect.

[Natasha Tori Maru]

Just now, Inliytened1 said:

I know what you are doing Natasha.  You want me to trip over my words and say something derogatory towards women. I'm not going to do that.  I have the upmost respect.

That is not what I am doing. This is 100% speculation on your behalf.

Why would you think I would try to trap you like that? That is uncharitable.