Sri Niagaradasti Enlightenment Story

[Wilhelm44]

1 minute ago, Breakingthewall said:

What is magic? What we don't understand? I would recommend you some serious research and study about physics. Relativity and quantum physics as deep as you can. As you seem seriously interested in the reality, you would find it amazing. Using the IA is let's say, not an absolute mess. You can start with relativity, then Emmy norther, plank, Feynman, Maxwell, etc. The fields theory and how the retardation, the time, arises from the mass. How the relativity is essential for distinctions , and how an universe is a mathematical equation. I would recommend reading Tegmark theories 

Thank you.  You don't think that science might be slightly off when it comes to the deeper mysteries of reality ? 

[Mellowmarsh]

17 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

What I'm pointing is that non duality is essentially mistaken. Mistaken means that closes the mind and doesn't allow or help to the openess to the absolute. 

How is mistaken? Denying what is real and affirming what is an idea. Maybe you don't understand what I'm pointing 

But the point would be: Is your mind and your heart open to the absolute? 

 

There’s no such thing as nonduality, because nonduality is not a thing. Unmistakably.

 

 

[Ajay0]

On 7/17/2026 at 5:37 AM, Someone here said:

I know it’s hard (almost impossible)  for most people to wrap their minds around the notion that the ego itself doesn’t actually exist in physical reality . 
We can speak loosely about overcoming or weakening the ego by spiritual practice like meditation or fasting but in the ultimate Analysis it should be clear there is no ego in the most literal sense possible. The “I” is a thought instead of a physical entity . Whenever the thought “I” arises it comes delayed after the act happens and it claims ownership of thoughts and deeds . The body eats and breathes and sleeps and then the i-thought arises and claims dowership “I slept or I dreamt or I ate etc “

Eloquently and coherently articulated. 

Thank you for this. 

[Mellowmarsh]

57 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

How is mistaken? Denying what is real and affirming what is an idea. Maybe you don't understand what I'm pointing 

You’re doing it again…listen, no one is denying anything.

 

There’s not a personal “someone” denying they exist. The personal “someone” is the illusion. The personal arises and falls away like a cloud. Yes, it exists as a cloud exists, but it has no fixed identity or location. Illusion doesn’t mean nothing ever arises and falls away, because even that is known, in this immediate direct knowing that cannot be known.

 

There is no separate individual and personal you. However you are and I am. The I everyone refers to every time they say it is the formless, attributeless present awareness we all are at our core.

[VeganAwake]

It's incredibly shocking just how rarely this "self illusion" is seen through.

It's endlessly needy, never becomes satisfied and uses a ridiculous amount of energy to uphold.

The body will literally be flopping on the ground, tapping out, and it's like: "seek seek seek" "more more more" "answers around the next corner, I can feel it" ♻️ 

The most stubborn is when it truly believes it already knows (spiritual ego)..........it's a real bitch to see through!

The NSE...........Narcissistic Spiritual Ego 🤣

[Mellowmarsh]

@VeganAwake On point. 👊

 

The moment reality is defined, it becomes something shaped by the concepts used to describe it.  From transparency to opaque. 

[Wilhelm44]

14 hours ago, Mellowmarsh said:

I just say God is the everything without an identity. The everything that’s infinitely unfolding from within and out of itself, it’s only self, as in the spider and the web analogy. That’s how I personally interpret God.
 

I have no idea what God is being seen for someone who has used psychedelics to reach God realisation, because that’s never been my personal experience. 

Personally, I believe we’re each our own universe, and never the Twain shall meet. When two universes collide, in my opinion they become one universe together. Or something like that, it’s just how I’m able to describe the way I see it.

 

Its going to be different for each individual universe, obviously. When I say individual, I mean different strands of the same infinite web. 
 

 

I was just thinking, it would be a bit strange if reality worked such, that you were only allowed access to God, if you took psychedelics.

God is powerful enough to 'return' itself to itself, through the Grace of God itself.

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Wilhelm44

[VeganAwake]

30 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

The moment reality is defined, it becomes something shaped by the concepts used to describe it.  From transparency to opaque. 

Yup, and conceptual thoughts only SEEM to shape and describe it.

But it's always only what it is, regardless of thoughts and concepts about it. 

[Breakingthewall]

3 hours ago, Wilhelm44 said:

Thank you.  You don't think that science might be slightly off when it comes to the deeper mysteries of reality ? 

Science never claims that they know what the reality ultimately is. They try to understand how the reality works in this universe, but any serious scientist would admit that they don't know nothing, just some properties of this universe 

The point is that when you start to understand how this reality works , relativity, quantum physics, you start to perceive the pattern, the intelligence that any relationship intrinsic is.

It's not that intelligence creates relationships, but rather that relationships are intelligence.

Edited 2 hours ago by Breakingthewall

[Wilhelm44]

1 hour ago, Breakingthewall said:

Science never claims that they know what the reality ultimately is. They try to understand how the reality works in this universe, but any serious scientist would admit that they don't know nothing, just some properties of this universe 

The point is that when you start to understand how this reality works , relativity, quantum physics, you start to perceive the pattern, the intelligence that any relationship intrinsic is.

It's not that intelligence creates relationships, but rather that relationships are intelligence.

Yeah, it's interesting to note that a little over a hundred years ago, quantum physics wasn't even a thing. Would be fascinating to see what science will be saying about reality another hundred years from now. Maybe some pattern interrupts on the way.