Women are attracted to relativity

[Xonas Pitfall]

12 minutes ago, LordFall said:

Status is one of the reasons top reasons where a woman would instinctively throw away her long term strategy for a quick result. Have you not heard of what happens backstages with musicians? So common

https://www.reddit.com/r/CheatingGF/comments/xr0a8g/looking_back_at_the_time_i_accidentally_helped/

https://www.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/1ee2k6a/my_20m_girlfriend_18f_danced_with_her_favorite/

Women and regular people are stunned by status and social media it short circuits our brains. I used to do a street interviews and I've had a blonde girl that I was originally nervous to approach be super stunned and like giggly that she was now getting interviewed and be on social media. If she was a fan of mine and her boyfriend was not there I mean good luck to buddy. 

A really hot girl I knew went to fuck Tristan Tate in Romania, it happens so much. 

All of the examples you gave are people who are already attractive, no? Wouldn't many men do the exact same thing if it were a really attractive pop singer, actress, or model? "Bro, if I had a chance with Megan Fox..." I'm sure plenty of men would gladly fly across the world for that opportunity too.

So I'm not sure those examples are all that relevant, given that they mostly involve attractive celebrities.

I also think celebrities are a tricky example because they have a massive numbers advantage. When millions of people know who you are, you're naturally going to have a much larger pool of potential partners to filter through. Eventually, you're bound to find people who want to be with you simply because of the sheer volume of people you have access to.

It's similar to that guy who made the "My Experience Being Ugly" video. He ended up finding a girlfriend. So I don't think celebrity examples are necessarily that informative when discussing general attraction dynamics.

I think I also watched a video discussing dating app statistics, and the conclusion was similar to what I was saying. Women's standards for casual partners tend to be higher because they're evaluating based on physical attraction and personal preference. When it comes to long-term relationships, they're often willing to place less emphasis on looks and consider many other qualities as well. I doubt this is very different from how the average man operates. It's just that men tend to both want more and be more comfortable with casual sex than women.

Edited 5 hours ago by Xonas Pitfall

[Leo Gura]

42 minutes ago, Jirh said:

10 is a very weak number

10 impregnations of random women is a weak number?

Lol

And those are only the ones we know of. God only knows what crazy things Musk has done in private.

Edited 5 hours ago by Leo Gura

[LordFall]

14 minutes ago, Xonas Pitfall said:

All of the examples you gave are people who are already attractive, no? Wouldn't many men do the exact same thing if it were a really attractive pop singer, actress, or model? "Bro, if I had a chance with Megan Fox..." I'm sure plenty of men would gladly fly across the world for that opportunity too.

So I'm not sure those examples are all that relevant, given that they mostly involve attractive celebrities.

I also think celebrities are a tricky example because they have a massive numbers advantage. When millions of people know who you are, you're naturally going to have a much larger pool of potential partners to filter through. Eventually, you're bound to find people who want to be with you simply because of the sheer volume of people you have access to.

It's similar to that guy who made the "My Experience Being Ugly" video. He ended up finding a girlfriend. So I don't think celebrity examples are necessarily that informative when discussing general attraction dynamics.

I think its really helpful because even if lets say only 1% of women are open to dating you because you're not particularly attractive so dubar's number is 150 that's probably the amount of people you know let alone available single women so chances are you're single. Now let's say you do cold approach a few times a week and talk to 100 women a week so now you can go on 3 dates a month and after a few months get a girlfriend.

Now let's say you run ads/have a personal brand brand and you get 1M views a month with 40% of your audience women now that's 4000 women that would be open to you. That's probably across North America so you need to host local events(like a music show) to meet them but there you go.

Depending on what type of content you do you'll have women more or less into you but it's a viable strategy for any man. Women aren't that interested in men that are lower earner than men so for them having millions of viewers male fans is not a particularly stellar dating strategy but I mean give me all the broke hot fangirls you got lets go.

I recommend every man to start a brand and post content its a medium to long term strategy but especially because it helps you self-develop and introspect on your desired life and what you enjoy it's a great tool. Most men also have way more than 1% of women that would be open to them especially with a refined brand so its a phenomenal ROI. 

Here is how you run ads to target local women for whatever event you're hosting btw. That's also why learning to throw events is so important to dating. You can't exactly run an ad to your bedroom but you could try one just looking for dates in general might work idk I haven't done the most test on dating ads. Instagram ads are phenomenal I've sold like $20k of photoshoots through them. God bless the Zuck. 

 

Edited 4 hours ago by LordFall

[Joseph Maynor]

5 minutes ago, LordFall said:

I think its really helpful because even if lets say only 1% of women are open to dating you because you're not particularly attractive so dubar's number is 150 that's probably the amount of people you know let alone available single women so chances are you're single. Now let's say you do cold approach a few times a week and talk to 100 women a week so now you can go on 3 dates a month and after a few months get a girlfriend.

Now let's say you run ads/have a personal brand brand and you get 1M views a month with 40% of your audience women now that's 4000 women that would be open to you. That's probably across North America so you need to host local events(like a music show) to meet them but there you go.

Depending on what type of content you do you'll have women more or less into you but it's a viable strategy for any man. Women aren't that interested in men that are lower earner than men so for them having millions of viewers male fans is not a particularly stellar dating strategy but I mean give me all the broke hot fangirls you got lets go.

I recommend every man to start a brand and post content its a medium to long term strategy but especially because it helps you self-develop and introspect on your desired life and what you enjoy it's a great tool. Most men also have way more than 1% of women that would be open to them especially with a refined brand so its a phenomenal ROI. 

The end run around this nonsense is you need to meet people one on one.

[LordFall]

21 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

The end run around this nonsense is you need to meet people one on one.

How? Cold approach? I already answered this I don't like the variable quality and I'm an INTP it's an exhausting way to meet people. 10 years ago you could not get laid by sitting in your room but now you can do anything from a laptop/phone technology has really blessed introverts. 

Also I have a new theory of true love if we are all one I think you can pick your soulmates so I made a list of a few influencer and celebrity girls I like. I think everyone should do a list like that and literally DM them so your brain is used to taking action and not putting anyone in a league above you. I think you should be able to meet anybody on your list at least once and shoot your shot. If you don't have the access to meet a celebrity your status game sucks you need to keep statusmaxxing and host more events.

Andrea Botez is one of them for me; now it's timestamped on this forum so I can show our kids this is how I met your mother. Pure brain power; play chess not checkers. 

Another one of them is Lauren Southern, that girl is really cool and funny. She is also conservative and has bad political takes but to prove @integral wrong I will spiral wizard her and help her develop her consciousness 

 

Edited 4 hours ago by LordFall

[Xonas Pitfall]

@LordFall I was arguing against the original post, so that above response isn’t really relevant.

Nonetheless, I fully agree with the tip. I would even argue that, for both men and women, it can be useful to do this, either by setting up as many dates as you can, promoting yourself, or using social media. Essentially, you’re creating a kind of “brand” around who you are, so whatever you’re looking for is more likely to find you. This is very helpful advice to people.

Although I think Andrea wouldn’t be that open to being in a harem, haha. If you want a specific type of girl, most want to be in a long-term monogamous relationship.

Edited 4 hours ago by Xonas Pitfall

[Jirh]

You guys are crazy.

I'm out.

[Natasha Tori Maru]

32 minutes ago, Jirh said:

You guys are crazy.

I'm out.

Tapping out is often the most sensible option.

People aren't actually putting effort into understanding what is actually being said by each party. No interest in getting closer to the truth of the matter. Only interest is service to ego (ie winning). You can tell as no one is asking further questions.

Was a good brainrub session with you while it lasted

Edited 3 hours ago by Natasha Tori Maru

[Basman]

5 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Yeah so, just repeating "It clearly does."  isn't further advancing your point. It's just repeating the same claim with nothing else to add while ignoring the counters I raised (and support points, mind you, if you read carefully). You also don't even go into further elaborating on your point then come out that no one is arguing subjective/objective attraction being binary? So how about clearly laying out your claim? 

I even raised that "fairly" could be doing a lot of heavy lifting in your original statement - prompting maybe some more elaboration on your part regarding where you sit there?

Are you interested in trying to discern the truth here (wherever it may be, usually half way between in cases such as these) or just winning???

There's little to debate. Your just wrong.

[Basman]

I really dislike how post-modernism is abused to qualify nonsense. It's probably one of the most abusable philosophies. A lot of the time it's used to justify ideology. It's why Russia loves it.

Wokies atleast are a little genuine, but even there it's used for gaining leverage over people (for the upper middle class+ primarily). 

[Natasha Tori Maru]

17 minutes ago, Basman said:

There's little to debate. Your just wrong.

Wrong about what? Can you summarise your understanding of my points?

Edited 1 hour ago by Natasha Tori Maru

[Jirh]

2 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Tapping out is often the most sensible option.

People aren't actually putting effort into understanding what is actually being said by each party. No interest in getting closer to the truth of the matter. Only interest is service to ego (ie winning). You can tell as no one is asking further questions.

Yeah, I guess so. I got triggered and lost my temper eventually and flipped out. It's not ideal, but I'll improve. I'm actually amazed at your level of maturity. How are you not even slightly offended?! I'd imagine this topic to be triggering to most women.

And I wouldn't actually mind them being low effort as long as they engage with the point and make sense. Instead, I get responses so out of touch with reality that make me question my sanity. I mean kings in tribal societies used to impregnate a higher number than that of Elon Music's, and he's the richest and most famous man alive, with the highest population of all time. I don't understand how that magically proves that fame or money are objectively attractive metrics. If anything, it proves that they are not.

2 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Was a good brainrub session with you while it lasted

Glad you feel this way. I feel a bit mind-fucked 

But I'll recover. Hopefully 

Edited 1 hour ago by Jirh

[Natasha Tori Maru]

16 minutes ago, Jirh said:

How are you not even slightly offended?!

Lots and lots of arguing all the time, where the stakes are high (IE if I am not calm, coherent, rational and able to present a clear case I generally lose) at work. 

Where if I can't argue effectively without emotion I stand to loose lots of money. 

Also, I don't rush to answer. I don't feel a huge compulsion to defend myself. But I will engage to argue a point to get toward truth. I take my time to think and brainstorm and mostly that's about understanding the other argument more than my own. 

Also I tap out real fast if I figure out 1) someone is just wanting to win 2) they are being uncharitable or arguing in bad faith 3) they just flat dislike me and can't get the fuck over it 🤣

Sometimes I also just like to verbally joust for fun, and get snide and a bit sly. Like having AI fights with people 😁

Edited 45 minutes ago by Natasha Tori Maru

[Sugarcoat]

Spiritual men want a woman who’s not attached to her appearance but she’s still very much good looking 

Show me the most non dual man around …..if he ever thinks of this I promise he’s not thinking of some hairy yogi with sagging breast and atrophied gluteus maximus…..

 

Edited 33 minutes ago by Sugarcoat

[Schizophonia]

40 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

Spiritual men want a woman who’s not attached to her appearance but she’s still very much good looking 

Show me the most non dual man around …..if he ever thinks of this I promise he’s not thinking of some hairy yogi with sagging breast and atrophied gluteus maximus…..

 

Lol femcel 

[Schizophonia]

@LordFall She responded yesterday, still in an enjoying way.

I will say that the notion of time, of what is anxious or not, communication tragedies etc. vary greatly depending on the person.

I'll end here about my dating life then I'll keep this to myself.

Edited 4 minutes ago by Schizophonia