Anger is not always wrong

[Joseph Maynor]

15 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Okay this is why you are quite charged. Read what I wrote again - at no point did I say it was unrefined. More that we can always refine our views. Not you per se. All of us. The conversation is an opportunity for me to refine my thoughts also !

I didn't say it was unrefined - you assumed.

I don't think I'm charged.  I'm actually tired and getting ready for bed.  Good night.

[Natasha Tori Maru]

3 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

I don't think I'm charged.  I'm actually tired and getting ready for bed.  Good night.

Then 'tis not so

Have a nice night

[gettoefl]

You have to see that anger is self harm. The other is not affected. To see this makes for re-evaluating. Why do I insist on punishing myself for no positive worldly outcome. I should get serious and heal my madness. The opposite of anger is forgiveness. Everyone is doing what I would do in their shoes. They are helpless to do otherwise. I however am not helpless. Because I value truth. And anger is a blockage to truth. Since if I say I am angry. It's a self-deception. I am deluded and as a consequence see not truth.

[Human Mint]

Anger is not separated to being contempt in my view. And contemplating further, it is tied with truth. As a mechanism to align with truth.

6 hours ago, Joseph Maynor said:

Tell me where I'm wrong again please.

You're wrong in giving a fuck, probably.

Is a good thing to contemplate. Anger is a function of your level of consciousness for sure. If you have a limited perspective on things is almost as if you're calling anger in your life. And of course, most can't help themselves but to have a limited perspective on everything.

Edited 2 hours ago by Human Mint

[No1Here2c]

4 hours ago, Joseph Maynor said:

You said you definitely disagree with me and now you're denying disagreement.  I don't want to start a conflict here but this is what I'm referring to when I mention denying anger.  Minimizing conflict while engaging in it.  I get it, it's important to get along.  I'm all for that, but nobody does that 100%.

How much of this may simply be interpretation?

Does internet disagreement automatically come with perceived anger for you?

Why would you assume the typing of word behind the other end of the web are driven by anger?

Edited 1 hour ago by No1Here2c

[No1Here2c]

4 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

we can always refine our views.

an opportunity for me to refine my thoughts also !

I didn't say it was unrefined - you assumed.

Assumption & interpretation is a killer

4 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

I just couldn't see where you argued a clear case that anger was arising outside of ego. I felt like that conversation went by the wayside and didn't even get started.

Id like to hear this one too... must be challenging to describe.

@Joseph Maynor

Edited 1 hour ago by No1Here2c