Absolute Truth Contradiction (?)

[Natasha Tori Maru]

@Joshe so to understand @Sincerity you might have to ask him for his definition. Before slapping yours on him.

13 minutes ago, theleelajoker said:

NOBODY TRULY KNOWS WTF HE/SHE IS TALKING ABOUT.

Yo 🫠🫠🫠🫠

[Sincerity]

7 hours ago, Joshe said:

People mistake the practice of channeling awareness for expanding.

Thanks for your perspective. What practices expand awareness, according to you? Does self-inquiry channel or expand awareness?

Where did you get the distinction from? Have you validated it in experience?

In my experience, focused contemplation on eg. „what am I?” leads to expanded awareness. After I shift in state (having focused for some time), I can let loose and bask in the glory of self-recognition (expanded awareness). Or go deeper.

Edited 5 hours ago by Sincerity

[Ziran]

2 hours ago, theleelajoker said:

NOBODY TRULY KNOWS WTF HE/SHE IS TALKING ABOUT.

^^ Paradox ^^

If this is true, then:

Nobody truly knows... or not.  It's a nonsensical statement.

[theleelajoker]

2 hours ago, Ziran said:

^^ Paradox ^^

If this is true, then:

Nobody truly knows... or not.  It's a nonsensical statement.

You mean: How can he know that no one knows?

How can he say that nobody can make a claim such as "no individual person can make big metaphysical claims about enlightenment" while as an individual, he makes an generalized statement about others?

Hehe yes that's a valid question 😎

And the answer is simple: others say "it's like this and that". They pretend to have "facts". I have subjective experiences and opinions.

And my opinion: The maximum you can do is say "my experience is....XYZ" and that's about it. Fuck the rest you're just pretending to know to gain some false safety and security in this fluid world  that you're continuously co-creating  and changing 🌎 

Edited 1 hour ago by theleelajoker

[Leo Gura]

5 hours ago, theleelajoker said:

NOBODY TRULY KNOWS WTF HE/SHE IS TALKING ABOUT.

And that's where you're wrong.

[Ziran]

12 minutes ago, theleelajoker said:

You mean: How can he know that no one knows?

 It's essentially the "liar's paradox".  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox

If nobody knows, literally nobody, then the author of the assertion is included and is equally clueless.

If the author of the assertion is equally clueless, then the assertion is not an assertion.  It's a coin-toss in disguise.

When an assertion unconditionally asserts unknowing, the assertion is inverted into unconditional ambiguity.