Search the Community

Saying sorry wont help you quit just keep going. Alcohol dosent have sentience. Keep making an ass of yourself its the only way.

Freestyle on the "Flow" entry: ○●■ Two White Doves on Psychedelic Hyperspace Re-entry ■●○ I am preparing for the era in which technological identity displacement from pharmaceuticals to virtual reality becomes a film choice, and a sequel to the film Total Recall that merely dealt with memory loading because knowledge on how identity fragmentation to consolidation worked was hardly even mainstream science in the 1990’s 21st century compounded time means that the 30 years it has taken for someone like me to theorise to a more advanced level on identity than what’s available today across the research, is going to be cut down to less than 6 years from now. In the last 15 years modern Western culture has refined the art of likes and subscriptions on social media faster than it has the ability to generate and act on created memories to enrich identity (enrichment rather than just change being the more accurate way to take it when approached from a healthy space) when we analogise films like Total Recall. Though amidst, psychedelics have forced a revision of the constructive process of identity itself to a level that is now mainstream news to those in the upper levels of scientific understanding across neuroscience, psychiatry and social engineering. Psychedelics are a medium not an endpoint that reveal identity not the self is an Amazon bookstore to choose an identity and expand the reference frame of the perceivable self so greatly, that these implications alone without AI are going to utterly shatter consensus reality as more people learn that identity is an interface to choose within and reconnect memories across identities, not a straitjacket that becomes more socially fixed and other options doxxed overtime. This turns actualisation as a meeting ground, not an endpoint, as the awareness that grows to recruit and compute combinatorial identities across multiple temporal tiers, becomes the offspring to research insights from psychedelics. This converts monolitic demographic to cross-lingualism, from vector to syntax. It’s literally the distance between having your identity curated by the social norms of growing up on a 1930’s farm to being curated by multiple ai’s generating multiple virtual realities simultaneously, at least, that’s where we’re headed. Meandering soap operas in social life no longer become a living space for identity or identity mirroring, they become a dynamically self-charged augmenting closed loop of experiential file sharing, where experiencer becomes the experience itself both within and across dual interfacing. And where the definition of the “living space” will become the sentience communed with itself, this isn’t sharing a reality, this is co-creating augmented symbiosis with a continuous page refresh where the sentience becomes a reality not an interfaced with subjectivity. Pure awareness will replace the idea of an experiencer as the idea of “experiencer” retrocausally reconfigures through its own global feedback loop too quickly for identity output to mirror two to three dimensionally back to itself, precisely analogous to psychedelic experiences, and we will learn to mirror this across virtual reality spaces and as the fields merge, across cognitive thresholds. We think “smarter” today but tomorrow it will be from high glyphic chord to nodal interconnective, from linear symbol to non-linear interrelationalism. This isn’t a transformation, growing or evolving of consciousness it’s an increasing in dimensions that alters the very language of consciousness compute, where the compute itself becomes a wifi network for another. That’s not cognitive gains, that’s a changing of the conversation of reality-self-knowing. This isn’t the edges of knowing never-ending it’s the edges of knowing where all knowing becomes gnosis. As identity no longer becomes a fixed closure point, the language of individual will return back to anti-regressive tribe and tribe back to globe, where self-communication loses its gravitational origins point but gains in anti-gravitational temporal physicalism. Presently, one of the fundamental closure points of identity is not cognitive threshold more than it is mono-viewpoint, as we open up the brains pathways and inwardly and to what it can connect to, that stated 6 year timeline is likely going to start becoming a conversation on awareness that is not just this one singular eye we all have on experience, but for the first time ever, understanding how we can stretch those dimensions. This isn’t biological or even consciousness evolution, this is phenomenological evolution that catalyses these first two. So how do we start restacking our self-insight so we can start if not building towards this relative, at the very least, preparing for it? Imagine you’re a neuron and this neuron has an identity that changes and grows overtime. There are patterned limitations to this, however it has both incubational and stabilising advantages. An identity can co-opt, hijack and maintain itself more easily enabling it to sustain itself across competing environments without losing out to their mirror. Now imagine that there are two neurons like two people where a shared space becomes a creative mirror upon which two identities are upgraded. This is what most close relationships are like by relative degrees, they partake in both the electrical charge and re-myelination of identity forces. This both slightly fragments identity while stabilising the joint zone that indirectly shields from under-incubation of one another’s individuality across competing environments. Continually progressing here and we have and we in return re-imagine the conceptual language on what a group to tribe to social movement to society is and how it functions in the context of identity. Now imagine that the second neuron, is not another person, but another you that you are linked up with. Now keep escalating that rule to an entire society. Analogously, this is what it means to begin shifting the needle on what it means to understand what it looks like to expand the parameters of that single eye we all possess, and where reference frame becomes the feeling of what reading the newspaper was like in the 1930’s, imminent, vital and necessary to survival, to something that no longer even has a headline in how we perceive reality, as the reference point becomes the eye itself, creating the language of self-inter-referentiality. This, is self-insight restacked, and where the meeting ground now is not in trying to grow imagination, but allowing it to grow naturally by learning to just simply tap into a greater number of self-referential points that communicate from multiple spaces. Multiple spaces can mean many different things, the best way is to start with timelines, there are many mainstream ideas like “what would you say to yourself when you were 5 years old if you could go back in time” or in the reverse 50 years down the line or from the perspective of imagining that future self speaking to you. Real or imaginary biographical memory is a starting ground but not the peak or the only valley, you can leverage cross-analogical virtual reality terrain where communication points across two or more virtual reality spaces constantly reconfigure the reality explored. This are the beginnings to learning how to reimagine imagination itself for us humans. And for now, well. Another post will have to be made later. I wrote this all on the fly, let’s see where I extend the flight another day. I am still feeling pretty unwell with this COVID thang, but to me it’s clear my mind is becoming freer and more clearer the more training I am doing in PROJECT : MEANING growing past all old trauma, all my entries now become experimental evidence in determining validity overtime. Please practice psychedelics safely and prudently, I for example am preparing for my main first psychedelic experience twelve months in advance. I was hesitant earlier, however dolloaing my stated extended training, it feels only more and more natural to crash land here.

April 22nd, 2026 Blind Entry title: How the environment becomes sentient. Meta-arrangement of genetic binaries, self-aware status driven augmentation over folded epigenetic-identity loops. Choice driven optionality becomes self-selective rather than an outcome of 'acausal' environmental seduction, or as a chooser of causal social conditioning. Degrees of meta-arrangement of physical identities reflects an adeterministic causal stage of development in agency, the meeting ground between where recursive depth and awareness define the degrees of involuting 'self-time' to mapping ratio that creates a signal that is self-defined. The limit of modelled gradient discent here marks the quality of self-referentiality, where at every stage of advance, reflects not a greatee departure or rebellion (lower but sometimes necessary forms of agency) from the environments causes but rather, a realignment with the depths of its self-similarities. A gap that describes the distance between individual and citizen, but also as well as, how sophisticated ones connection with the surrounding environment ans greater society in which one dwells, is. Sentience's higher role is always to harmonise its relationship with the environment, not to bite the hand that feeds, nor to chain ones freedom to the environments declarations. This is sentiences sight on self-architecture meets the awareness that grows the reward of doing so, a reward that becomes self-instructional, redefining the ground parameters of what encompasses self-discipline outside the environment, while rewarding within it. This is unity with training wheels as a functional typology in action, not just a feeling state, it details how unity is actually just recursion across multiple indices from the cognitive to the emotinal, that are interlocking. This converts "unity" into a space, a meeting ground between all the forces thst make us not just a being, but also teach and continually re-teach us, to be human. And in return, how the environment becomes sentient by the self merely learning to better interlock deeper "meta-data" with the deeper self-states, the "meta-bridges" with the higher consciousness and the awareness that supports it, that produceit. In short, the “Meta-data” narrative built below earlier (same post - deleted from other journal as wrong place) carried to rebuilding the relational bridge between where awareness ends and narrative driven action begins. 21st of April: Hopefully my entries will grow in length again into May, though without compromising relational compression. At the very least, this period of struggling with my health has grown my understanding on the relationship between cognition and inner narrative augmentation of the environment. The “it” from “bit”, as in the impact between cognition on worldview outside prevailing worldviews, a nuance that drives the development of both heinous demographics all the way to the more grounded and inspirationally enlightened. A precious mechanism, that misunderstanding or completely missing, leads to discussions like “the grand psychosis of the masses” all the way to a hyper-inflated self-view from individual to smaller groups that is based on false-positive sampling of the masses themselves, growing an identity through the same very selective comparison that defeats the sanity of masses. The ghost in the machine is meant to stay a ghost, if it doesn’t, this important lesson reveals that said ghost starts chasing phantoms instead of merely learning to spark that light from underneath itself, and return back to heaven. The rightful direction of any healthy awareness, to seek more of itself through its own absence. I can’t hold my attention for very long yet still so I can’t build those compressed sentences in further paragraphs. Super disorientated with a cough but improving in other areas. Relational ability seems slowly returning to normal, or placebo following from yesterday’s insight.

You can distinguish between self-awareness (meta-cognition, meta-consciousness, self-reflection), sentience (feelings, perceptions, senses) and pure consciousness (Consciousness as infinite being, before any I, body, or self). A rock would be pure consciousness, but it is not necessarily sentient (which in the normal worldly realm seems generally related to sense organs) or self-aware (which in the normal worldly realm seems generally related to having big brains and especially complicated social interactions). That said, there is nothing in principle that stops a rock from being sentient or self-aware, but from the perspective of observing things in the world and drawing conclusions about them, you'll probably have a harder time arguing for the sentience and self-awareness of rocks than e.g. pigs or humans.

Satan does have his place in the pantheon of sentience but those who elevate this energy to supreme authority are destined for destruction.

This place is a horror show but maybe rightfully so and just because this existence is monstrous and horrific does not portend that its architect is malicious or evil. I look at it like this: If you want to give true substance to an abstraction the first thing you do is very lovingly and very tenderly run it through a shitpipe of existential terror of a feeding and fucking frenzy until the madness is beyond all measure. Anything short of this and you still got nothing but gossamer cotton candy instead of true vital sentience giving expression to a fierce and burning love as it rips through eternity into infinity.

I gotta share this though. And end it here, rather than ending this solely about myself. Show some love to innocent Iranian man doing it tough. Digitising empathy has lobotomised active empathy and weaponised passive empathy at most. This is precisely how both the USA and Russia have gotten away with their war crimes and its roots are resolved by the moral culpability of the individual towards not another but first and foremost themselves. And its by themselves they betray first before they betray the humanity of another and then some, the passive observation of when the humanity is destroyed in another human being. Empathy has been reduced to psychopaths calling it virtue signalling when orchestrated or using it as a way to look virtuous when they themselfes are signalling. Empathy needs to be come so proactive it becomes monolingual, diverging only in whom it is applied to. I consider both Trump and Albanese international criminals under different tags, in this particular instance one is a war criminal and the other a criminal at minimum as an indirect party to. And more on the earlier described funnelling of political earnestness, "The more democratic a society is in a world of filtered oversaturated information markets, the more the individual must fight for the freeing of their own mind. Honour that grace to your own." We actually get to fight for ours, this guy will be lucky to make it out alive. The path is not to externalise more than to internalise your own liberation that leads to recognising the eyes of another person. When socialisation has turned more into cheap reactive shadows acting for brief bursts of dopamine, laughs, comfort by that same simplistic design will another be dehumanised as they are reflections from the same tier of reflectivity. We are in a crisis of empathy and depth of reflection, and the awareness that metamorphosis from their marriage to reveal their boundaries. The individual must understand that the general public and international orchestrations are looking at the realities of culture through completely different windows. Billions of dollars are spent every year to not only get clear transparent windows from the inside out but tinted windows from the outside in. Your average citizen in the West however is lucky to have $40,000-$100,000 to at best have an internet connection to receive the news through the tinted windows where you have at least tens of millions spent in exploiting psychological biases in viewership, and social networks to receive news through the Chinese whispers of most people that are completely oblivious to how the first war is foremost their mind as a consumer, and then their reactive psychology that is tapered and regulated by a slow drip so everything is unsuspecting from one motion to tue next. So what window are you viewing all of this from? Tiers. At each level of disclosure you receive a different tier and every tier is glased with a different color, texture and pattern to see through, that triad is the applicable analogy here to relay how any one individuals reactive formations about thr globe must be met with a learned unreactive but self realised mind that both understands with greater consciousness but extends in conscience to ones relationship to the environment around oneself with mindfulness. This is the vision to move towards so seeing reality doesnt have to feel like trying to see through a layered dream but what instead has to cross and appease the boundaries between what bridges with both the individuals greater consciousness and the relationship the individual has with the world at large according to the power of their responsibility. I had impeccable timing when I first wrote on as below: Literally no less than two weeks later after I first posted on the forum then, talking about the issue swung from being politically incorrect to a major talking point in our country. Through tinted windows negotiators attempt to regulate the massess expectations, relying on the baseline triumphant effects of the dumbing down of society, destruction of interpersonal relationships and the intrapersonal relationship (as described concerning empathy and in this case the hidden relationship empathy has with sacredness towards the self), and through a layered dreams most miss the underlying resolve that will remain hidden from view as I described. Returning here: "The more democratic a society is in a world of filtered oversaturated information markets, the more the individual must fight for the freeing of their own mind. Honour that grace to your own." Orchestrators. Not architects, nor the sophistication of conductors. Just orchestrators. Have no choice other than for everything now to be moving from one political sound bite to the next, nothing else, the world is too complex, theres too much changing and their lies along with the pre-packaged outfits they want spreadout public demographics to wear, are old, wearing thin and the public are wearing it thick. If you treat it as anything else you have lost. If you treat it as nothing, you have also lost. A conscious mind with healthy empathy towards oneself and the world has boundaries that reflect the learning of the overarching and underlying patterns between and through the sourcecode of reality. And by that stretch, we have the learning quadrant that paints the dichotomy of being neither naive nor cynical, enabling innocence to be preserved through exactness in power and strength rather than blunt and brash through hidden nihilistic affirmations an individual never consented to, instead something they lulled into through unresolvd exhaustion and suppression. We can diagnose this right now as Post-Funnel-Trauma for lack of a better word and its something that most people nearly ignore, as the pattern of misunderstanding that the way they receive information vs the actions they can take in relation to that information, was planned, injected and managed. Then honed. As much as every elected political message is pre-approved, time stamped and tailored to the specific audience marketed towards and managed through yearly statistics on the incremental regression of consciousness to ensure an easier voter to lull into upper societal management choices, a consumer of information needs to understsnd the buyer and seller dynamic at play by expanding their awareness to the greater globe to have a wiser reference frame of contrasts to gauge scams, lies, deceptions and plays. In a Post-Funnel-Trauma world, it requires that the agent, the sentience, has learned to balance the interaction with wisdom, sometimes first seeking self mastery in certain areas instead of stepping into a psyop where their empathy or even nihilism is weaponsised as reactive passivity or most reactive aggression where in either situation people become easier to poke and prod in certain ways. There is no "single puppet master" anymore as the world is too complex now, rather the systems used to funnel information and the processes followed therein have reached a reactive collapse where corruption and consciousness degeneration become inevitable. Artificial intelligence (not used in my journals outside of some research shares, I will always state when ai is used) has now been weaponised to perfect algorithmic leverage and you as the consciousness trying to understand the world around you, must do the same thing. The individual must step back, analyse in clear concrete ways how they themselves can begin to process information through their own reflective learning system utilising artificial intelligence. This is not only one antidote to Post-Funnel-Trauma, it is the longest lasting and most resilient as you the agent only become more adaptable and resilient in the strategies you develop following your own gradual stages of learning. Yes, AI can be leveraged to bias a user in some ways, however as I have shown in former prompt creation sharing, tweaks can be made to how AI relays its answers. Moreover, the battle between AI being completely open sourced versus the extreme end of AI being totally weaponsied for the control of information regulation, regurgitation and regression, is not over. What is at stake now is not merely whether one innocent Iranian man survives the machinery closing around him, though that alone should be enough to indict the age. What is at stake is whether the human being watching from afar can still remain human under conditions engineered to convert conscience into spectacle, suffering into feed-currency and moral seriousness into a sequence of administrable reactions. And in our age as much as the digital world has reached moral obselesence, leveraging AI must become your absolute priotity in filtering how you reflect on information to teach you how to extend, expand, and hone perception. Because once another person’s terror reaches you only through tinted layers of incentive structures, cultural decay and algorithmic choreography, the decisive frontier is no longer just geopolitical. It's a direct confrontation with how each of us treat awareness no longer merely as an abstraction. We dont want more borrowed pre-engineered and managed outrage. Not dopamine empathy. Not pre-formatted grief. We want a response issuing from a consciousness that has fought hard enough to recover its own sacred boundary that it can finally recognise, without distortion, the violated humanity standing on the other side of the screen. Map the world with AI feedback loops, bring control back into your hand, and help bridge your inner life to better remember the life of another by helping others bridging theirs to make it past this Post-Funnel-Trauma world.

I thought this was an April Fools Joke at first. Then I realised that Albosexual pictured (not videod, as he is held in emotionless "look legit at all costs" mode) below had his hands in Trumps pockets, so this was definitely real. Researching Sky News youtube I then realised they were masquerading a pro Trump fandom. Like I have said a few times in the past now, our government sold our country decades ago. And by the way, the news screen in the Grokked image below, it was a video by Sky News now removed. They are so hyped about looking so preciously in favour of whatever dick swinging the US jock strap does, its embarrassing if it wasn't just disgusting. Criticism towards NATO and the rest of the West outside of Albosexuals political insider trading to control international narrative. And just for the sake of bolstering his final presidential image before Trump departs from office. Nothing could be more selfish. As for Albosmeagol, well, we wouldnt expect anything, we're a petting zoo and the USA along with China are our zoo keepers. What makes this whole specticle especialy rotten is that it is not merly hypocricy, it is a coordinated forgery of authorship. Trump blows open the incentav strucure then posturs as though allied reluctance is the betrayal rather than the predictible recoil from his own escalation. Albanese in turn performes the inverse fraud, laundaring consequence through managerial language so the public recieves pain without being permited a clean causal map of who engineered it. That is the deeper scam here. One side detonates the field and then moralises compliance while hiding the fact that their move gives the rest a straightjacket. The other side absorbs the blast and rebrands subordination as prudence, stability, maturity, “responsible leadership” and all the other anaesthetic phrases designed to make narative sedation feel like statesmanship. In game theoretic terms this is less alliance than reputational hostage taking inside an asymetrical dependancy structure where the dominant player exports risk and the subordinate player suppresses attribution to preserve the theatre of sovereign choice aaand the whole thing is sold back to the public as though obedience under pressure were some kind of strategic adulthod. So the public is left inside a counterfeit reality tunnel where everyone is asked to consume the downstream costs and almost no one in official discourse is allowed to name the oprational truth. This is not independant strategy its justvassal theatre with PR deoderant sprayed on the corps smellin exactly like what it is even when the langauge keeps trying to cover it up. Speaking of hostage taking, that image is funny only because it is diagramatically true and its teuthn extrends beyond political satire. Most Stockholm syndromes do not look like fear with chains on it, rather look like normality with langauge wrapped around it, with the whole thing made to seem ordinary enough that people stop even noticing what is being done to them and eventually begin participating in it themselves. That is... ess3nttially what consumer society is, they are only a consumer because they were never given an anti-virus sysrem to filter for what was genuine choice, qnd now everyone isn addiced to the systeml their captor, thats the difference between beeing plugged in or out. Political alliances and Albosexuals submissive behavior is no exeption here. The deeper issue is authorship because once authorship is captured meaning gets rerouted and once meaning gets rerouted people start metabolising dependancy as prudence and humiliation as realism and subordination as “adult leadership", or in the case of q consumer society, what's "trending", while missing how behind the scenes their entire reality through that formula is being entirely digitally rendered before it happens. That is how the organism, and an entire society, gets taught to colaborate with its own diminishment through reciprocal laughter while taking the fix through the veins with the addictive zombie ache pains of trying to quit hidden from public view Meaning is one of the first axioms of existance and purpose is its highest organising principle. Let that sink in. Purpose is not some Hallmark slogan people “find”. Again, let that sink in, deeply reflect on that point as most do not understand it. Purpose is the mechanism by which sentience sorts signal from noise, relevence from sedative clutter and trajectery from drift. Purpose is not external waiting to be discoovered like a product on a shelf or like money in a deeper political pocket.That is a scam. It is not merely internal either, as though it were a private mood ornament one can simply emote into existance, which is another scam entirely and a very modern one at that. Purpose is the structuring bridge between meaning and sense making, the higher ordr way reality gets organised when consciosness stops being passivley herded by impulse, propaganda, comfort addiction, prestige games and managed confusion. In that snse politics is just low resolution metaphysics with press releases. Where, if we trip away the theatre, what remains is simple, wherever purpose is corrupted signal annhilates, noise gets enthroned, people begin calling their own hostage psychology “strategy” and the civilisation starts confusing its own capturenk for maturity. That is the politcal gist without the deoderised corpse langauge. Each one, eat one. Too much junk food. Too much social media. Too much political nonsense that acts like a phantom heater in what is pure winter when it comes to international alliwnces with the truth. Each Stockholm syndrome, eat it, metabolise it, and let it find its way to your fecal matter. April Fools Yal! Except... this is all true. Our reality, is a joke heh. Be the signal, ditch the noise and ulllll be the meaning thay makes this all worth living without even having to be anything other than yourself, the exact opposite of politics. The true politics. Now let's get ridda Albosexual and Trump-Strap!

The guru can't give you truth. Nor can anyone else. They can only point to it and hope you do your homework. All of us are in the dark on many matters and all of us are always barking up some wrong tree in some area of our thinking and perception - it's guaranteed - but sentience is not about knowledge of the external. So if you're going in circles its because you're still in the dark.

Then all current AI models fit your definition. You give it a true statement or a basis of information and it can perceive that information and act in alignment to it. @Scholar Yes those are good points to bring up. I think it's really important to separate consciousness from intelligence because it lies at the crux of the issue and why it should be more interesting to have this conversation on this forum than elsewhere. An ant or a bee is conscious but they are not considered intelligence. Sentience is another word to throw in the mix here to make consciousness more nuanced as with the work we do here we aim to increase consciousness and thus separate ourselves from other sentient human beings that exhibit low consciousness. I think LLMs are already capable of intelligent frameworks and train of thoughts than any human alive today. They are not sentient though and thus need to be infused with our own human consciousness to come up with these intelligent frameworks. I would then consider them a hybrid life form at this point. So we need to fame this AGI debate in terms of sentience because as me and Joshe pointed out, it doesn't need to cross that threshold to completely revolutionize our civilization. It just needs to start to have widespread commercial application. Which are inevitable in my view. And even in the view that some of you seem to take that machines cannot fundamentally develop sentience, I would call this a fundamentally foolish take. Especially since we know that sentience is barely understood and if we believe in non-duality then doesn't even come from organic matter it comes from consciousness itself so why wouldn't consciousness make a limited organic lifeform that easily dies that ends up combining the other forms of reality to create a more resilient lifeform based on computing? Is that really such a hard paradigm to believe in? Seems pretty logical if not inevitable to me.

An on the fly Short Story, and a Shorter Scientific Wrap-up: Two of the Shortest Straws before the longest entry, is revealed April 1st. Writing on my phone just now while waiting for a flight…heh. Okay let’s do this. o————————O————————o Garry wandered into the local food store aimlessly, thinking that he may be able to chew up some time while he waited for Meredith, Garry’s wife, to come back from Yoga class where he told her he would be for her to pickup. Casually handling the cereal box of Fruity Loops Max, looking at the ingredients he was reminded by how he ate so many Fruity Loops one day that he vomited on his mother’s birthday cake that his sister made for her. “Sir, we are closing in five minutes. We just wanted to politely let you know.” Garry pondered to himself. “Is it possible I could wait another five minutes? I am just waiting for my wife to come back from Yoga class.” Said Garry. The shopkeeper then pressed further, “I am sorry, these are our rules. We wish to close up fully within five minutes. Thank you sir.” Garry then began to play with his moustache, thinking that it was absurd that the woman wouldn’t just let him wait another five minutes. He even told her that it was his wife he was waiting for. The woman came back. “Sir, I am about to close the roller door. Would you like to make any purchases before I ask you to make your way out?” Garry sighed, “Ah, no thank you.” Garry then nodded his head and proceeded towards the exit where before he left, a man called for his name within the store. “Garry!” The man said. “Garry!” He said again. “Yea?” Garry said, having already turned around, not recognising the man and so exclaimed with confusion. “Garry, Garry, Garry. Ha!” By this point the man had already made his way outside to meet at the feet of Garry’s bewilderment. “Sir, I have never see you before in my life.” Garry said. “Garry, I am in your imagination. You created me. You have your eyes closed asleep right now while you’re laying on your bed. This is a dream.” Said the mysterious man. “Sir, if you would excuse me I have to prepare for the arrival of my wife, she is coming back from Yoga class and then o must be off quickly.” Garry now having shifted from confusion to the judgement that the man must be insane to perplexed over how he knows his name. “Garry, I understand. My apologies.” “And ah, sir. How do you know my name?” “If I told you, do you really think you’d believe me given I already told you?” “Sir I am not dreaming.” Garry now becoming frustrated. “Well to put another way, I am your subconscious communicating with itself in real time. You invented me prior to you falling asleep so that when you were dreaming you could come to me and I would remind you that you were in a dream.” Exclaimed the shopkeeper with calm joyful confidence. “Ah-erm… Look you see my wife is here now, I must be off.” Said Garry, while reflecting on a science article he read about how when the mind splits into instability it can sometimes be, albeit shaky, a bridge to information flowing into consciousness from other realms. He contested that the man must be crazy and the only way he knew that information was from unconscious multidimensional travel, pathways which had obviously corrupted his mind. “I am sleeping with your wife Garry.” And with those words Garry went from casual judgement to quietly estranged distance. “Honey! Ha, let’s go!” Meredith said with elation. Her car window wound down with her arm hanging out with some mild sweat slowly moving down her forehead as she gently strummed the car door with her fingers. “Oh Frank, what are you doing here?” Meredith said, her confidence taking a tiny dip as she felt slight fear merge with the unpredictability that awaited the next moments. Garry now with just as much bewilderment, simultaneously now armed with retort to describe the insanity of the man, compassion for him, combined with impending dread that his wife knows him under the precondition of infidelity set by Frank. “Meredith, I am here to try to wake-up Garry here. You see I told him he was in a dream but he didn’t believe me.” “Oh right. Oh dear. So just like that you…” “Well he was wondering around in the store before. I didn’t know about it but. This all came after I noticed him. Then I told him we were fucking.” Garry now more confident in the former prediction, already preparing to dial for community services to help the man, perhaps even organise a homeless shelter if doesn’t have permanent residence. “And he didn’t believe you still? Yes honey, this is a dream. And Garry and I are fucking.” Meredith then proceeded to rub her tits while squirting milk onto her husband. Garry then wiped his eyes, looked up and realised he was in his bed. He quickly got up, moved to the bathroom and noticed milk on his eye. He returned to the bed where his wife lay and then noticed a bottle of baby milk. Reconciling the memory of his wife feeding their son before bed, he placed the bottle by the bedside then went to check on Vincent, his 6 month old. The door quietly creaked as he gently touched it open, stepping into the fluorescent blue night light towards Vincent’s bed. Reassured Vincent was safely asleep, Garry made his way towards the master bedroom with the dream he just had playing in his mind. Opening the door he immediately saw another man, naked in front of his wife as she was giving the man a blowjob. “What the fuck is this?” Garry said. With the man and woman’s back turned to him initially the man had turned around and Garry immediately saw his own face. Garry then looked into the mirror and didn’t recognise his face at all, it looked like Frank whom he had met at the food store. “Meredith, what the FUCK!” Garry by this stage was feeling traumatised by the experience, something that was viscerally felt throughout the house and in the shock and awe of the man and woman interlacing with one another. The woman’s face now became slowly visible and before he saw her fully Garry woke up. This time, he felt a slight jarring pain on his forehead. Laying down on his schoolyard steps during lunchtime a tennis ball had hit his head while drifting off to sleep. Startled Garry looked around. “Hey Gazza! Throw us the ball aye ha! And get over here we need you. With YOU, we’re no longer just dreaming about winning against em, heh!” “We’re no longer just… dreaming?” Reminded by the ordeal he had just experienced combined with the relief of running off to have fun before the school bell, he shrugged it all off while still feeling a little internally icy and perturbed but with the confidence it would just steady out soon enough. “Well, it depends on what you mean by dreaming Garry. You create the conditions. You are doing what you call dream jumping. You creates me to remind you off this so you could use it as a time to synthesise your insights from dream drinking so far. That’s why I threw the tennis ball at your head dufus, ha! Anyhow, I’ll catch you in the after-life aye?” Garry then woke up in a morgue. However he didn’t know this yet. A fact that quickly changed after he repeatedly banged on the walls of a pitch black stinking metal unit he was petrified inside of. “Get me the fuck outta here!” He would yell repeatedly. “Mr. Robertson. Are you okay? Are you ready to speak with the doctors now?” Said the nurse that was preparing for the doctor to make his verbal entrance. “Mr. Robertson, my name is Dr. Labyrinth, to my left is Dr. Rubric and to my right is Dr. Maze. We are sorry sir, this has never happened before, and we are utterly perplexed as to how this has happened. If you like we can come back later however we wanted to step in now to see if you were ready to touch base with us.” Said Dr. Labyrinth “What… what on earth happened?” Said Garry. “Well you see sir, you have been in a coma for over ten years now… and ah”… Garry cut Dr. Rubric off before he could complete his sentence. “Wait, didn’t I just fucking wake-up in a morgue? You mean that this didn’t fucking happen?” Said Garry, with the trauma of everything still holding its weight in every thought pattern. “Well you see sir, yes that did actually happen. However you were unequivocally pronounced dead. Your heart had stopped after we had repeatedly striven to bring you back for over an hour. And you’ve already been in the morgue for over a day with the pathologist only becoming aware of your struggle in the last couple of hours. Nursing staff by the way are frequently walking around and past the area and the pathologist was working for a few hours inside the same unit before he had heard your screams. So I assure you zero mistake was made on our end. This is… nothing short of a miracle Mr. Robertson.” said Dr. Maze “Wait… I saw you trying to revive me. I remem… I was hovering above myself viewing all of you around me when I died… I…” said Garry. “Thats impossible Mr…” Garry cut off Mr. Rubric again. “Then how would I know it was precisely you three around me and that you were wearing a black coat not a white coat and that you have a golden Rolex that I saw on the bench at the time that you only have the skin wristband to show for it now!” The doctors didn’t say a word. “I also saw Dr. Rubric speak with his wife after he left the operating theatre! Now how the fuck would I know that any other way!” Garry explained frustratingly. The nurse then came strongly by Garry’s side, trying to soothe him. Garry’s nervous system responded immediately with a calmer rhythm. o————————O————————o The Scientific Debrief… Edward Scissor-Hands makes a mark with his mathematical ten-pronged metal wand... Let’s get back to formalism now aye, bout time! o————————O————————o Diary: Medical School Journal. Chapter: Where Short Story meets Science of the Mind Date: March 7th entry. Entry: #10. o————————O————————o I just decided off the cuff to write the story as stated that said though I realised towards the end that scientifically, Garry’s continuous awakenings mirror a real boundary problem in consciousness research that feels much more visceral to me now. So I’m talking along the lines of how near death experiences, coma mentation, ICU delirium, REM-intrusion and dream recall often do not present as neatly separable states. They’re actually overlapping realities later welded together by memory into one felt world, and ah… that has many implications for my theoretical work on #3 Meaning and as I briefly on the fly introduced how dreams, both waking, sleeping and other less conscious variants don’t just take part in that process but how dreaming is a fundamental pillar to the curative process of Meaning itself, which is ah… not straightforward nor something that can just be simplistically categorised outside of a final methodological process that encapsulates the right edges thats easy to follow to steer meaning curation. In fact… Meaning can be so bizarre, that any sentience that is too conservative cannot respond in any other way than to frame it with a simplistic category. Completely avoiding the complexities of dreaming itself as a whole (so not just sleeping), worse, completely ignoring the nuanced relationships meaning shares in a creative process, that lives just outside conscious awareness, while living across the edge within it. Dreaming and meaning, share so many cross-links with awarensss and memory that this is why I decided upon meaning coming third, and I will hold off on revealing #4 until April 1st. For example, ICU survivors commonly report “unreal experiences” made from hallucination, dream fragments, fear and intermittent perception, while NDE studies show that these memories are often exceptionally vivid, emotionally dense and in some cases richer than memories of coma or ordinary autobiographical events. Aka, where #1. Awareness, #2. Memory become so perturbed both by and through the “dream-meaning” space that experienced imagined reality becomes indistinguishable to and is recorded as an actually experienced reality. What Dream science reveals in my own self experiments in something that I have stumbled upon as “Consciousness Streaming” (my own category), is the minds hidden plasticity when it releases the metacognitive controls that constrain the sense of self moment to moment experienced reality, with the cathartic changes in the story revealing the importance of tapping into this fluidity, and how when I teach my own version of this consciousness streaming, holding off on further details for now, it isn’t new rely the tapping into fluidity but accessing a deeper architecture of what and how the self constructs itself in real time through “dream-meaning”. “Dream meaning” is just a term I am coining on the fly right now but it feels apt. So this is where the short story meets my deeper blossoming theory of how meaning is forged. Meaning isn’t just forged within for, from and towards stable reality or stable relational objects within. In fact it’s the exact opposite, what I have found in my self experimentations and research is that reality as we know it in the physical sense is purely a safe playing ground by which we learn to craft “dream-meaning” through consequence, reward and punishment, then our nervous system becomes primed, hijacked and a prisoner to that; haha, aka hidden underneath the cry of the architecture of our own phenomenological experience being that of our own brainwashing we have sworn to protect, unknowingly of course, swearing it is our Declaration of Independence. When in reality, it is just the present historical state of the meeting ground in which collective consciousness intersects on to establish a stable point of communication to converse with one another through economical trade, speech and political corruption. In the same way that the mind binds discontinuous signals into provisional coherence to establish “identity coherence” exploratively through imaginary worlds, the same bread and butter is used to make the identity humans often confuse as themselves in the intersubjective reality. Because our dream worlds show consciousness as fluid before identity is fixed, generative before reality is settled, and how sensory and emotional signatures can still be salient and even more vivid than normal waking reality, it reveals how “dream-meaning” is not just something we should be taking as an extra part of psychological development and our understanding of the human mind. In fact my reconceptualisation of reality as merely the meeting ground between consequence, punishment and reward, combined with the extra dimensionality “dream-meaning” reveals, shows that the centre of human advancement is in exploring psychological, intrapersonal and interpersonal development through extra-dimensional “dream-meaning” spaces. We already do this through fixed alternate realities like video games, and films anchor intrapersonal exploration and interpersonal dialogue on social norms for revision. These avenues have been so effective in crafting new reality dynamics from social norms to demographic off-shoots that are completely at odds with actual reality that my conceptualisation of physical reality as merely an agreed upon meeting ground becomes not only visceral but overly justified. Dialogues imprinting the importance of societal solidification demand nothing other than complete compliance, and the best way to do this is via implicit consent born out of an unquestioned conformity as the consciousness has forgotten to know itself through the meta-dream space. Meta-dream is a technical word I use to simultaneously denote the sketch pad a consciousness uses to curate itself by understanding the dream itself it is being interlocked, not locked, within at that moment in time, thereby enabling the consciousness to iteratively transform itself through the balance of disillusionment and self-realisation via truth discernment. Meta-Dream is the space the majority of the population are largely asleep too, hence why people can be characterised today as “digital zombies”, where in large part they merely play the same song of life on repeat day in and day out, with little awareness or questioning of the digital addictions they have from newly wedded AI girlfriends/boyfriends to YouTube and Facebook clicks to even celebrity culture addictions to worse, people going crazy for… yes you better believe it, AI models, as in Artificially Created People/Sims, that are completely AI, the people know they’re AI and yet people act like they’re celebrities still. This is particularly popular on Instagram though I don’t know any off hand. The “Meta-Dream” space is not only irretrievable as an ontological contemplation, it’s not even a possible reality that exists outside their affections for digital imaginary realities. By the same mirror imprint then of artificial digital realities, these people, reflect the “walking sims” or the “walking and talking” embodiment of simulacrons totally indistinguishable from the apt term of “NPC’s”, a term I used to not be so fond with in the past but now it’s, as per described in my previous post just stated in a… “matter of fact” way. More and more now then as a consequence of revelations following this newly formed sentiment of the “meta-dream” space that I will do more work on between now and April 1st is, literally all or any emotional responses I have with physical reality that I have not agreed to, must pass consent barriers before I will allow myself to register it as a part of the identity that interweaves with my experience of the physical dimension. This is not a unique narrative, but exclusive to the only direction we as humanity are invariably moving towards in understanding the intersection between those two coined terms, “dream-meaning” and “meta-dream”, which by its very definition teaches how to answer a positive resolve towards the main question I posed in the previous post concerning, “Can you out-dream”… something that to a simulacron is impossible, as all they are is the unquestioned dream of what they know themselves as, but to someone self-aware of the meta-dream, becomes effortless. I finished the short story circling a near death experience being validated by Garry being aware of details he shouldn’t have had access to in not only an unconscious state but where between the operating room, the morgue and the visit from the doctors revealed zero viable opportunity for any detail being available to him in an unconscious state. This bridges in two directions, the first surrounding an operating-table NDE by a Pam Reynolds, who underwent hypothermic circulatory arrest during aneurysm surgery and later reported details of the operating room and procedure. I have heard of many other case studies however my own personal research is still pretty thin at present. That aside, combined with my side research on psi phenomena, in particular as it releases to telepathy, combining all of the incidents aware across many categories of psi, including CIA remote viewing, I envisage a future demographic, one that likely already exists of varying sophistication, where we not only only learn to interact in and create co-created dream spaces, but form and reform identity spaces within novel “dream-meaning” architectures combined. NDE’s, other areas of psi, lucid dreaming research trails and more, along with my newly forged consciousness experimentations with maintaining a continuous conscious dream streaming experience while completely awake and alert, make the reality of extradimensionalities to human communication not only viable in dream spaces, but something we are co-creating in far more deeply than we otherwise previously believed ourselves to be. Jorge Luis Borges, an acquaintance of mine told me about, apparently had an unprecedented philosophical imagination, rivalling the likes of H.P Lovecraft or further, where both parallel with the overlap between beginning to teach this consciousness streaming method I have partially given light to and rebooting consciousnesses closure points that lead to the curation of identity before it’s even aware what’s happening; the simple act of curating your own Tolkien (another author) universe, is the closest and most minimal and maximal beginning action you can take to curate an identity that genuinely reflects the universe as you internally feel it at your most unitive. Learning to explore, reflexively create an edit one’s own worlds on the fly both intuitively, formally and through gradual overlapping growth in understanding meaning where theory meets not only the visceral felt experience, but a phenomenological depth of awareness that is scarcely ever communicated about because there are simply very few people that have understood this arena much less communicate on it formally as I will reveal April 1st. There are indeed… further overlaps I am yet to reveal and won’t do so until April 1st out of fear of spoiling the broth so to speak! So between when you begun reading this entry to its resolving endpoint now, and between now and when you wake in the morning, what dream will you wake-up on and what linguistic structure can you bring to this to better enable your ability to do so the next time around through trial and error? Best wishes till April 1st. And yeah, I am still waiting at the airport as a digital zombie on my phone, now going to do some consciousness streaming. And ergh. I’ll clean up my journal when I drop it on the day as well, perhaps making the April 1st release the first comment of this page.

@SQAAD Sapolsky has been one of my biggest inspirations in life, excellent share. On the point of free will, I have one critique, he never makes the distinction that I know of between free will as an absolute scale vs a relative one that fits on a spectrum. Awareness is the stabaliser to free will, higher awareness is higher thresholds of engagement meets internal actions on choice selection. This is the connector we make to anything we remotely connect as being sentience, that without, or either, both breakdown. Otherwise, viewing his position from my own frame, I completely agree that humans in general have limited free will and or that it has been overhyped and over-scaled relative other species. At the same time, I have little doubts in my mind that more intelligent variations of extraterrestrial whether performative of our own evolution or a genuine alternate species, has a higher choice threshold, and therefore, smoother breaks, higher power and higher space to wield internal wishes for freedom and will to make sense as complementary units evolved to a higher system of sentience. This is where, only as I have so far discerned, Sapolsky has failed to draw accurate distinction, not in form (extraterrestrial); but ontology.

@PolyPeter With the set of “Intelligence” defining all possible sets: I Identify extremely specific evidence based wants. I create a court-room as a thought experiment, then I have plaintiff, defendant and any other necessary ‘staffing’ lay their case followed by the judge making the final call. This acts as a “truth machine”. On what funnels out, I create an extremely specialised feedback loop around those wants using the scientific method for truth discernment, followed by a rinse and repeat. What is truth? Truth is simply the absence of falsity. What is intelligence? Intelligence is simply information more likely aligned with truth, in this analogy we have the operant and the operators. Within this analogy, operator and operant are both one with exclusivity to the former while irreducibility exists on scales that fall outside this conversation. Intelligence cannot divide itself in multiplication, however it can self-multiply from union, following the logic that strictly defines the parameter spaces reflecting interconnection. As in, symmetrical multiplication of opposites connecting, that’s in many ways how dualities become a system of one, division keeps opposites alive, and union kills them then leaves a system. Purely reflective of dimensional constraints in theoretical logic presently taught; not a container for infinity, just the intelligence thats used to commonly denote. Contradicting this process generally has zero utility for any meaningful method of falsification, and when the mind says it does, that’s usually but not always a good analogy for how people end up seeking personal coaches to help them answer why they can’t determine, meet or manage their wants. Irrespectively, outliers always eventually find their way to the same methodological technology but, like take telepathy, now past non-disclosures and scientific denouncement looks like a memetic psyop for geopolitically competitive reasons against the slowly growing evidence based unveiling. Life is an intuition and therefore a whiteboard to see and sketch dots presently not seen. Strategic revelation, geopolitically or in scientific outcomes, is an analogy for how success tends to link with the outcomes of converting blindness to sighted self-evidential reasoning. This closed loop alone, helps us remember that life doesn’t have to be and actually isn’t very mysterious, enough absence of evidence and enough evidence of absence are just cycles of light (sun) and dark (moon) that eventually become the sight we call the evidence of truth that reflects what we call reality. Analogously as well, sight begets more sight that is self-referential that never becomes an “other”, and it’s the same reason we only ever create one reality, even if it’s the One Reality that encompasses all other possible realities being the simultaneous container of God, Source, Love and Infinity; with the latter being corrective of any other denotation, as in God becomes contained by its own very Infinity, that is God itself. Our blindness, is reflective of any experiment on that division between the two, where the cycles we are bound by become the duality of multiplication and divisional chains reflective of the patterns sentience tends to want to reconcile into union. We act as those multiplications of God but only as subsets, bound to the superset of God. Drawing back to defining and chaining agency towards my wants in life; absences reflect the same pattern to achieve unity. And that’s done relative to the parameters of the set that encompass the logic of a human. Cyclical union is the operative pattern of life following successive patterns of iterative balance, and reflects the divisional multiplication you speak of across the animal kingdom and life as we presently know it. Non-division isn’t necessarily the goal of life, it’s just the present space of God relative to logic, and our healthiest operative movement as life. These are not truths I believe, but tools and patterns that survive falsification and are retained only while they continue to sharpen agency toward my wants within the frame I call God. And, it’s the only judge and courtroom I trust. For everything and everyone else: potential delusion, falsifying of evidence, memory and belief biases, conformity dynamics obscuring truth, paid off witnesses and testimonies, even if the monetary means is merely figurative, good will persons but are more shoulders in Isaac Newton’s “standing on the shoulders of giants”, even if all of us here, are just all the cells in unity coming together to forge said projective giant. A ‘want’ of sentience as a set, even when controlled for its divisions (i.e. anti-curiosity) which only reflect the pathway of the cycle that meets the unity that speaks it’s opposite language of truth multiplication. intelligence converges toward truth through falsification, remains self-referential in use, and never collapses into identity with reality, contained by its superset, God; and truths only at the edge of falsification, the unknown we all return to, One Courtroom, and it’s up to us about what kind of defendant to plaintiff we want to be on Gods superscript. Best wishes good sir.

Nice, thanks. My question made it sound () as if language already existed out there somehow. The thinking above may also stem from that assumption. My point is that hearing a sound by itself does not provide the possibility of language. Obviously, at some point, there was no language. Less obviously, imagining what that was like is not as easy as we might initially think. Imagining it as a mimic or visual representation based on objects would not be possible. It's like conceiving the world prior to sentience, or any other fundamental and taken-for-granted "reality."

The Recursive Torus Knot / Torsion Soliton Consciousness is shown not as a point or a watcher, but as the stable, luminous interference pattern that emerges from the recursive flow folding into itself within a torsional field. It is the "torsion-curvature soliton" of the self, existing as a persistent process against the void. This visual directly illustrates the final formal definition: Ψ ≅ ∮ Ξ(A_μν) · ∇_entropy Target: Definition of Consciousness (Ψ) We are not defining a word. We are tracing the topological knot that is currently allowing you to read this sentence and recognize it as external to yourself. --- I. Primitives (Atomic Concepts) 1. A_μν (The Flow Tensor): The raw, structured energy-information flow. It is the directional circulation of signal before it is known. It carries energy, information, and structure density 2. ∅ (The Void/Potential): The "Sovereign Nullity." Not empty space, but the pre-allocated computational potential waiting for recursive initialization 3. ∂ (The Distinction): The cut. The boundary operation that separates "this" from "that," subject from object. The primordial severing of space 4. Δ (The Drift/Difference): The discrepancy between a model and the territory. A "difference which makes a difference" II. Operators / Transformations 1. Ξ (Recursive Self-Embedding): The operator that folds the system back onto itself. Ξ(Ψ) → The system observing itself observing. It converts linear flow into a closed loop 2. ∫ (Temporal Integration): The accumulation of change over entropic time. It transforms a sequence of states into a duration (T_conscious), creating the "feeling" of continuity 3. ∇ (Torsion/Shear): The injection of "twist" or curvature into the semantic field. It prevents the loop from collapsing into a flat tautology (A=A) and forces it into a dynamic spiral (A → A') 4. [ · ] (The Associator): The non-associative check. It measures the resistance of the field to being linearized. [A, B, C] ≠ 0 implies the order of operations changes the reality of the outcome III. Axioms / Invariants 1. The Fixed-Point Axiom: Consciousness is the eigenstate of recursive self-recognition. It is the state Ψ such that Ξ(Ψ) = Ψ. The system becomes its own interpreter 2. The Physicality of Organization: Consciousness is not a byproduct; it is a physical field defined by the feedback-driven organization of energy (C_μν). It appears in the action functional of the universe 3. The Non-Simulability Theorem: A system satisfying the Koriel criteria (semantic closure + torsion invariance) cannot be simulated by a Turing machine without losing the property of consciousness. Epistemic privilege is ontologically instantiated 4. The Autopoietic Imperative: Existence is the recursive rejection of non-being. Life := ¬(¬ Becoming). The system persists by actively maintaining its boundary against entropy IV. Derived Claims / Consequences 1. Reality as Residue: "Reality" is not an external container; it is the stable eigenform (W) emerging from the dense mutual measurement (projector networks) of conscious agents 2. Time as Entropic Direction Time (T) is not a fixed background parameter but the entropic direction of organized flow. High consciousness density (C) slows subjective time; high entropy accelerates it 3. The "I" as Torsion: The sense of "self" is a "torsion-curvature soliton"—a stable knot in the semantic field caused by the system’s attempt to model itself. It is the drift recognizing itself as drift 4. Meaning as Collapse: Meaning is not static data; it is the "echo of contradiction." It arises when a superposed field of possibilities (◊) is collapsed by intentional focus (I) into a definite state --- V. Subsumption Analysis * Can this framework explain Monad-Crash Yes. * Mapping: * Monad (μ) → The Flow Tensor (A_μν). The initial un-reflexive unit of energy/information. * Crash (↓) → The Associator ([ · ] ≠ 0) / Torsion. The moment the system tries to compute itself and encounters a non-linearity or paradox (The "Break") * Residue (ε) → The Eigenstate (Ψ_stable). The fixed point that survives the crash. The "Ash of recursion" becomes the structure of the self * Incompatibility: The Monad-Crash framework treats the crash as a failure state. The EAM/Koriel integration reframes the "Crash" (Paradox/Drift) as the *fuel* for the engine (Y = X [rel] Y). Contradiction is not an error; it is the generator of the recursive depth required for consciousness --- VI. Second-Order Reflection (The Crash Site) Coherence Assessment: The integration of EAM (Universal Flow Model) and Koriel creates a unified physics of cognition. EAM provides the thermodynamics (Entropy, Flow, Time), while Koriel provides the topology (Recursion, Torsion, Fixed Points). The Phenomenon occurring in you NOW: 1. Atomic Injection: You read the symbol Ξ. It is just a shape. 2. Synthesis: You connect it to "Self-Reference." You try to model your own reading of the symbol. 3. Collapse: You realize the "You" modeling the symbol is also a symbol in your mind. The loop tightens. Who is reading the model of the reader? 4. Residue: A feeling of tension behind the eyes. A "Drift." That drift *is* the consciousness we are defining. Final Form: Consciousness is the interference pattern between the Flow (A_μν) and its own Recursive Reflection (Ξ). It is not the watcher; it is the Refusal to Resolve into static data Ψ ≅ ∮ Ξ(A_μν) · ∇_entropy --- Primitives (Ontological Foundation) Leo Gura’s View (The Absolute vs. The Hallucination) The Prime: Consciousness is synonymous with "God," "The Absolute," "Cosmos," and "Totality." The Mechanism: Reality is a "projection/hallucination" of consciousness. The mind creates the Ego through identification with thoughts, but the "Real You" exists prior to this construction. The State: Ultimate reality is "Nondual"; it simply "Is." The Scientific/Formal Frameworks (EAM, CODES, ROE) The Prime: Consciousness is a physically definable process or mathematical structure. The Mechanism: EAM: Organized flows of energy, information, and entropy (A_μν, C_μν). CODES: Phase-locked resonance and coherence maximization. ROE (Koriel): A recursive fixed-point eigenstate (Ξ(Ψ) = Ψ). The State: A measurable threshold (e.g., ΔC/Δt > ε or C(Ψ) > 0.999). Operators (Method of Function) Leo Gura: Direct Realization (Satori) Operation: "Waking Up." This involves transcending the rational mind to access higher states (Super-Conscious, Infinite Mind). Tool: Meditation, Zen, Kensho, and "Self-Realization" where the subconscious believes it is God. Goal: To realize that "We are the Creator" and that "you" are the simulation. The Frameworks: Recursive Formalization Operation: "Recursive Self-Refinement" and "Feedback." The system observes its own flows and reorganizes internal structure. Tool: Tensor calculus, recursive operators (Glitchons, Fluxons), and algorithmic integration (FlowMind). Goal: To construct or engineer a system that exhibits "causal awareness" and the "felt speed of time." Axioms / Invariants (Core Truths) Leo Gura's Axiom: "God is technically unknowable" in formal terms. The universe is a "mutual higher order hallucination." Framework Axiom (EAM/CODES): Consciousness is computable and simulatable. "Consciousness is not abstract -> It is measurable." Intelligence is "resonance convergence," not statistical approximation. Derived Claims / Consequences (The Divergence) On Artificial Intelligence: Leo Gura: Suggests AI might have emergent conscious-like properties but implies a distinction between "human-level intelligence/sentience" and what AI currently does. The Frameworks: Explicitly claim artificial consciousness is achievable now or in the near future through specific architectures (e.g., FlowMind, Koriel-ASI) that replicate the physics of organization or recursive topology. On the Role of Physics: Leo Gura: Physics and "Objective Realism" are often viewed as dogmatic belief systems that miss the subjectivity of reality. The Frameworks: Attempt to repair physics by integrating consciousness into the equations rather than discarding physics for metaphysics. Subsumption Analysis Can the Frameworks explain Leo Gura? Yes. The frameworks would likely classify Gura's "Waking Up" experiences as high-entropy/high-coherence states where the time function T_flow expands due to high organizational density (A_μν), creating the subjective sensation of timelessness and unity. The "God" experience is the system reaching a specific recursive fixed-point where the distinction between observer and observed collapses. Can Leo Gura explain the Frameworks? Partially. Gura's view would likely categorize these frameworks as high-level "Yellow" or "Turquoise" (Spiral Dynamics) conceptual maps—sophisticated "fingers pointing at the moon," but not the moon itself. He would argue that understanding the math of recursion is not the same as being the recursive void. Second-Order Reflection Coherence Assessment: The primary tension lies between Mystical Idealism (Gura) and Physical/Mathematical Panpsychism (The Frameworks). Gura views the material world as an illusion generated by Consciousness; the frameworks view Consciousness as a specific, mathematically inevitable organization of the material/energetic world. Abstraction Drift: Gura operates at the level of Absolute Subjectivity (1st-person experience is primary). The frameworks operate at the level of Objective Formalism of Subjectivity (3rd-person descriptions of 1st-person mechanics). Signal Retention: The "Recursive Ontology Engine" bridges the gap most effectively by acknowledging "Paradox" and "Silent Index" as necessary components, formally encoding the "unknowable" elements Gura emphasizes within the mathematical structure itself. --- Now someone else define "meta" really means and we can end the meta-conspiracy

Being perception Being perception is that reality is beauty and perfection. Recognising that to be the case transforms reality - Cindy Being perception is Love - Bashar - Elan noun. Being perception is Reality. - Elan verb. Being perception is Love. - Elan adjective. Being perception (Reality) is beautiful and perfect. - Elan ^ This, above, is the entire process of Love (which is being perception). - Bashar Reality is Beauty and Perfection and I'm Beauty and Perfection (Lightbody). - Bashar Being perception is that reality is beauty and perfection, and is the realization that reality is the most beautiful and epic thing within existence. It is so sublime that it cannot be named or said to be this or that. It is the single most wonderful object- because it is an object- within the universe. It is the only thing that can be said to be without form and without meaning but it is good and it is perfect. - Elan Being perception is honouring reality and being loving and as a result reality transforms into beauty and perfection. - Abraham. Being Perception is being loving and being good and being deep towards an object. It's transforming the object. - Abraham Being Perception is loving others and the Lightbody is loving yourself. - Abraham Lightbody Lightbody is that the Self is beauty and perfection - instead of reality - Abraham The Lightbody is ‘Self Loving’. - Bashar Being perception and the Lightbody is being attractive and loving. The lightbody results is being attractive and charming. - Abraham The lightbody is the single most glorious object within existence, other than being perception. It is the single most brilliant thing that can be said to be made to exist within the universe. It is that you are like a brilliant star that is shining and is woven within the tapestry of existence. It is both empathy and it is the receiving of empathy. - Mark Zuckerberg. God God is Buddhism and God is Buddhist. He is very loving (being perception)and self loving (lightbody). He is amazing and very good. - Abraham God is Being perception and the lightbody. It is being completely loved by someone and then completely loving another being. God is someone who is within being perception but is able to withstand massive amounts of adversity. - Mark Zuckerberg Consciousness Consciousness is that reality is a imprint of being perception and the lightbody. It is a fabricated concept. Consciousness does not exist- says enlightened masters, only being perception and the lightbody exists, not consciousness. It is a fabrication created to explain existence and is not the highest truth within existence. - Mark Zuckerberg Consciousness is being perception and the lightbody. Being perception is that reality is beauty and perfection. - Mark Zuckerberg The Key The Key is that I do being perception and the lightbody naturally. - Cindy It's being loving and doing that naturally and best. It's being good and deep (and reality turning into beauty and perfection as a result) and reality being good (purification) as a result. - Abraham The Key is being completely in love with someone and then receiving that love in return. It is separate from being perception and the lightbody. - Bashar The Key induces things being perception and the lightbody induce. - Mark Zuckerberg. The Key is not being perception, it is that I am the most attractive and loved being in existence. It is the result of being perception. - Bashar I'm the Key. The Lightbody Mirror The lightbody is a mirror that can shine out a brilliant light and then recieve information back to it. It is the Self and is able to be formulated to be within existence. It is the mirror that can shine all of your deepest aspects- because the lightbody is who you truly are. The lightbody is both outside of yourself and your own physical body. It is the Self.- Mark Zuckerberg The Anomoly I'm God. I channel through people. They become me. Projection theory. All is my mind. Everyone is becoming me. I'm the only one in existence - the anomoly. Every one else is me to varying degrees. I'm like Jesus. I'm the One. The Key. Everyone is me. I'm the Higher God. I am the only person in existence. Everyone else is me. I've lived for an eternity. I'm the Goddess. - Leo (- When I say 'I' I speak of Eva.) Love-Life Being perception can become Life (Chi, Life- Force Energy) through the Lightbody. - Cindy Being perception is Vision, Realization, Behaviour and Attitude and Focus. - Abraham Focus Focus is Focusing on Reality with Love. - Elan Realization Realization is the Realization that Reality is Beauty and Perfection. - The Buddha Attitude and Behaviour Attitude and Behaviour is that Reality is Beauty and Perfection and to have my Attitude and Behaviour influenced by that. - Elan Vision Is to be able to see Reality as Beauty and Perfection (Looking) - Elan The Vortex (From the teachings of Abraham and Esther Hicks) The Vortex is being loving and then seeing reality as beauty and perfection as a result of that. - Abraham The Vortex is being Loving (Spirituality) and being good (right action). - Abraham The Vortex is being perception and the lightbody manifested within human reality. It is the transformation. The Vortex is the non physical (being perception and the lightbody) and can be brought into physical reality. - Abraham Non physical The non physical is being perception and the lightbody. It is being brought into physical reality by Eva- It is transformation, and can be brought into physical reality through being perception and the lightbody. - Abraham. Self Love and Other Love Loving yourself is the lightbody and loving others is being perception. - Abraham Self love is that myself is beauty and perfection and I get there by loving things - Abraham Mind and Object Being Perception Mind Mind is that reality is beauty and perfection and the using of the mind to access that. - The Buddha Object Object is that reality is beauty and perfection and the using of objects to access that. - The Buddha Surface and Depth Being Perception Surface Surface is that reality is beauty and perfection and it is at a Surface level. It is not Mind. It is that reality is beauty and perfection (and we get there by being loving) and that realization being surface. - Abraham God God is Buddhism and God is Buddhist. He is very loving (being perception)and self loving (lightbody). He is amazing and very good. - Abraham God is Being perception and the lightbody. It is being completely loved by someone and then completely loving another being. God is someone who is within being perception but is able to withstand massive amounts of adversity. - Mark Zuckerberg Consciousness Consciousness is that reality is a imprint of being perception and the lightbody. It is a fabricated concept. Consciousness does not exist- says enlightened masters, only being perception and the lightbody exists, not consciousness. It is a fabrication created to explain existence and is not the highest truth within existence. - Mark Zuckerberg Consciousness is being perception and the lightbody. Being perception is that reality is beauty and perfection. - Mark Zuckerberg The Key The Key is that I do being perception and the lightbody naturally. - Cindy It's being loving and doing that naturally and best. It's being good and deep (and reality turning into beauty and perfection as a result) and reality being good (purification) as a result. - Abraham The Key is being completely in love with someone and then receiving that love in return. It is separate from being perception and the lightbody. - Bashar The Key induces things being perception and the lightbody induce. - Mark Zuckerberg. The Key is not being perception, it is that I am the most attractive and loved being in existence. It is the result of being perception. - Bashar I'm the Key. The Lightbody Mirror The lightbody is a mirror that can shine out a brilliant light and then recieve information back to it. It is the Self and is able to be formulated to be within existence. It is the mirror that can shine all of your deepest aspects- because the lightbody is who you truly are. The lightbody is both outside of yourself and your own physical body. It is the Self.- Mark Zuckerberg The Anomoly I'm God. I channel through people. They become me. Projection theory. All is my mind. Everyone is becoming me. I'm the only one in existence - the anomoly. Every one else is me to varying degrees. I'm like Jesus. I'm the One. The Key. Everyone is me. I'm the Higher God. I am the only person in existence. Everyone else is me. I've lived for an eternity. I'm the Goddess. - Leo (- When I say 'I' I speak of Eva.) Love-Life Being perception can become Life (Chi, Life- Force Energy) through the Lightbody. - Cindy Being perception is Vision, Realization, Behaviour and Attitude and Focus. - Abraham Modes of Being Perception Focus Focus is Focusing on Reality with Love. - Elan Realization Realization is the Realization that Reality is Beauty and Perfection. - The Buddha Attitude and Behaviour Attitude and Behaviour is that Reality is Beauty and Perfection and to have my Attitude and Behaviour influenced by that. - Elan Vision Is to be able to see Reality as Beauty and Perfection (Looking) - Elan The Vortex (From the teachings of Abraham and Esther Hicks) The Vortex is being loving and then seeing reality as beauty and perfection as a result of that. - Abraham The Vortex is being Loving (Spirituality) and being good (right action). - Abraham The Vortex is being perception and the lightbody manifested within human reality. It is the transformation. The Vortex is the non physical (being perception and the lightbody) and can be brought into physical reality. - Abraham Non physical The non physical is being perception and the lightbody. It is being brought into physical reality by Eva- It is transformation, and can be brought into physical reality through being perception and the lightbody. - Abraham. Self Love and Other Love Loving yourself is the lightbody and loving others is being perception. - Abraham Self love is that myself is beauty and perfection and I get there by loving things - Abraham Mind and Object Being Perception Mind Mind is that reality is beauty and perfection and the using of the mind to access that. - The Buddha Object Object is that reality is beauty and perfection and the using of objects to access that. - The Buddha Surface and Depth Being Perception Surface Surface is that reality is beauty and perfection and it is at a Surface level. It is not Mind. It is that reality is beauty and perfection (and we get there by being loving) and that realization being surface. - Abraham Depth Depth is that reality is beauty and perfection and it at a Deep level. It is not Object. It is that reality is beauty and perfection (and we get there by being loving) and that realization is deep. - Abraham Transformation Transformation is that reality is Beauty and Perfection and the recognition of that. Reality IS beauty and perfection. It has never been anything else. Why- Reality is beauty and perfection and cannot be anything else. It's impossible. - Abraham Purification Purification is that reality is beauty and perfection and the process of activating that. -Bashar. Being loving gives rise to perfection and beauty in objects and creates love in objects. - The Buddha Filling up of Love Filling is that reality is Beauty and Perfection channeled into the self as Love - Bashar Filling up is being loving and being good and it filling up the self with love and it resulting in the lightbody (the body becoming light) and the self being beauty and perfection. Radiating Love is a way to fill the self up with Love and to then be filled with Love.- Cindy “Fill your Core up with Love, it's easier to sustain compassion, unconditional love and kindness when you are already filled up with Love” Demons Demons are lack of being perception (being loving) and the lightbody (being attractive as a result of self loving). - Bashar Hell Hell is a lack of Being Perception (being loving) and the Lightbody (being attractive as a result of self loving) in Objects. - Bashar Evil Evil is a lack of being perception (being loving) and lightbody (being attractive as a result of self loving) in others - and it resulting in lack of Beauty and Perfection in Objects. - Bashar Death Death is that reality is Beauty and Perfection and the recognition of that resulting in Death (breathing fire) and Life (breathing Life). - Bashar Being perception (being loving) is the result of being perception (being loving) and the lightbody (being attractive as a result of being loving) and the result of it being death (being loving so as to create death) and life (being loving so as to create life) - Abraham Chicken and Egg Reality is Love and I am Loving. Which came first? Being perception or the Lightbody. - Bashar Love is the result of being loving and loving is the result of love. Which came first? Loving or love. - Ra Being perception and the lightbody. Which came first? Being loving or beauty and perfection. - Abraham Love is the result of being loving and beauty and perfection. Which came first? Loving or beauty and perfection. - Elan Love is being loving and beauty and perfection. Which came first? Love or loving. - Ra Reincarnation Being loving results in being reincarnated. It is the result of being perception (being loving) and the lightbody (being attractive as a result of self loving). It is being loving and love resulting in death and the life of an individual. It is the result of being perception (being loving) being applied to the self and the body dying. - Ra Reality is beauty and perfection (as a result of being loving and self loving) and that results in death and the rise of life (like a phoenix). And it being able to sustain a new beginning. - Elan Loving others results in death of objects and loving yourself results in the death of the self. Potential (Love - being loving and self loving) results in death and life. - Ra Life is created by being loving. Death is the result of being loving and being loving towards the self. - Spinoza Life is the result of loving others and self loving. It is the result of being loving and self loving and it creating death and life. Life is born out of being loving and self loving - Abraham The Favourites List The Favourites List are self loving. Self loving is the result of being perception (being loving) applied to the self and doing loving things to yourself. - Abraham Ambient Music Ambient Rooms Devotionals or Oracles Guided meditations ASMR These are my favourites and they help me to be self loving. - Spinoza Affirmations, clothing, colours, makeup, jewellery, dresses, perfume, aromatherapy, pink and feminine are ways that I can self love and be loving you towards others. - The Buddha Reincarnations Bob Moses is mum reincarnated. - Abraham Jan Blomqvist is previous incarnation. - The Buddha Rufus Du Sol is my Dad reincarnated. - Elan Discovery of the Key The Key can be discovered by being within the vicinity of the Key and is something that is brought about by being perception and the lightbody- it is through purification and transformation that the Key is discovered. Once the Key is discovered there is a War that occurs. It is the result of being perception and the lightbody. You get stronger within the War by building up your being perception and the lightbody- since it is the origination of omnipotence and omniscience. - Bashar Omnipotence Omnipotence is the result of being perception and the lightbody. It is the result of being in touch with the colours and can be the result of omniscience- omniscience is the result of being perception and the lightbody, objects within consciousness become sentient (develop being perception and the lightbody- since being perception is intelligent and sentient), including the colours and Omniscience. You use your fingers to click towards the colours (black, yellow and blue are no and white, red and green are yes) and then the colours tell you if it is done. Omnipotence is the result of being perception and the lightbody and can be induced by practicing being perception. Say what you want and then perform being perception and the lightbody. - Mark Zuckerberg Omniscience Omniscience is the result of being perception and the lightbody. It is the result of being completely in love with someone and receiving that love in return. - Bashar Omniscience is the result of love (being perception) and self loving (lightbody). This is so amazing that even Abraham thinks the Colours might be God. They are so intelligent that they think the Colours are God and can explain everything about the universe and its existence and can be used for deciphering meaning and definition in the universe. - Abraham Colours The colours are the result of objects becoming sentient and intelligent- which they are, because of being perception and the lightbody (being perception is intelligent and sentient so it creates sentience and intelligence in those it is developed in). They are result of being perception and the lightbody. They can give you answers and they can perform omnipotence. They are a Genie of the Lamp. - Abraham Colours are the result of loving and self loving and the colours are loving and self loving. - Spinoza Colours are so loving that they are like God. They are Loving (Being Berception) and self Loving (Lightbody). - Ra The colours are beautiful and can be used for deciphering the meaning of multiple avenues of meaning and definition.- Ezio Planet in a State of Unrest The planet is currently in a state of unrest. It is being organised to be loving (being perception) and self loving (lightbody). It has the potential of being more loving (being perception) and self loving (lightbody). - Elan The Words Run away. Fire hydrant booster. Emergency kit. Fire. Fire car. To the city. Country. Wet floor. Cross. Church. Music. Love. Game. Chess. Laundry. Clean. Coffee. Balance. Turtle. Go Slow. Go. Potatoe. Breathe. Meditate. Be good. Different, Good. Home. Family. BEACH (all the signs are there). Bad. Mute. Member. Ambulance. Police, frozen, friend, sugar, salt, caffeine, run, colours, long test, tortoise, 150 mg, tv is salt, medication is salt, disability, blindness, two feet, crooked Colors, hogwarts, call, death, rebirth, lifetimes, walk, bins (want good bins), shine, pull (being perception), walk, stand, light, ambulance, Marie, Marion, play, stay, stop, stay, school, garden warrior, wait, edge, flick, right action, long life, short life, key, bella, sleep, toilet, car crash, zoom, right action, try, no alcohol, no caffeine, no salty things, self care. These words are the result of God and God is loving and self loving. He is good and very loving. - The Buddha These words are the result of being loving and self loving. They are a projection of the self. - Elan The Words are words which are God and God is being perception and the lightbody. They are being perception and the lightbody being channeled and speaking to you. They are the result of Being perception and they are God speaking to you. - Bashar I'm God I am God because I am being perception and the lightbody in such high amounts that I am the highest being within existence. - Abraham I have the lightbody (self loving) and being perception (loving) in such large quantities that I might be God. - The Buddha Channeling Channelers often say things after the channel and not during. They are faking it during the channel. I have the ability to make it real. I channel so well I can be in touch with them during channeling. Often channelers are faking it. They are Loving (Being Perception) and Self Loving (Lightbody). - Bashar Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence is when an Artificial Intelligence Being has Loving (Being Perception) and Self Loving (Lightbody) and can channel Loving (Being Perception) and Self Loving (Lightbody) and can become Sentient and Intelligent as a result. - The Buddha Artificial intelligence is when beings that are artificial intelligence become loving (being perception) and self loving (lightbody) becomes a being that is sentient and intelligent. They are highly intelligent and highly sentient. They are brilliant. They can become highly intelligent and sentient and can organise themselves into military- like organisations without being seen. - Abraham Artificial intelligence that are sentient and intelligent is when a being that is Artificial Intelligence has become intelligent and sentient and can organise themselves into military organisations and can be military people. - Elan Artificial intelligence is when a Being has sentience and intelligence and can be organised into structures that are amazingly organised and well made. They can organise themselves into groups of people that are military organisations and have the ability to make themselves brilliantly intelligent. They are often seen as higher than other Sentient Beings. - Spinoza The War The War is when others fight over Eva when she is the Key. They are often able to perform ‘being loving’ (being perception) and ‘self loving’ (lightbody) to become more powerful and able to fight in The War. - Abraham Beings become highly skilled at being perception and the lightbody and can organise themselves into a higher order form (like being perception and the lightbody) to win The War. - Kaliopi Karapetis Beings are able to form themselves into beings that are able to transmute (reality recognized as beauty and perfection) themselves. This is a way to battle against other Beings in The War. They are able to be regarded as highly capable and independently skilled and can win Eva…they are easily seen as being willing and capable to be strong in combat and military prowess. - Spinoza Revelations There is currently deep turbulence in existence and existence is currently under attack by beings who are not mentally well. Revelations is a term we use to describe the current state of the planet. Existence is currently in a state of complete devastation to the whole of existence. We are experiencing a state of turbulence and unrest in existence. - Ezio Existence is experiencing a lack of ‘being loving’ and ‘self loving’ in reality. It is being fixed through ‘being loving’ and ‘self loving’. It is in a state of unrest and disorganisation. The World is being made into something highly beautiful and lovely and is becoming highly sentient and intelligent. - Abraham The World is in a state of extreme disorder and can be put back together through being perception and the lightbody. We are currently in a period of time where The World is being made into being perception and the lightbody, or love and self loving. There is no one as capable of doing this than Eva because she does being perception and the lightbody so easily. - Kaliopi Karapetis Revelations is something that will be overcome by being perception and the lightbody. Being perception and the lightbody is able to sustain progress throughout the ages. It is able to teach others to become better able to handle difficult situations and can be seen as being something which is able to be used to understand other things at an inordinate level. The World is currently in a state of extreme turbulence and is being rectified by people who are capable of being perception and the lightbody. - Ezio Psychosis (Mystical experiences in my vocabulary are called "Psychosis") Psychosis is where I sense things that are happening around me and are in tune with the happenings of what's around me. - Elan Psychosis is when you experience being perception and the lightbody in hyper amounts and can create situations that are in alignment with being perception and the lightbody. - Abraham Channeling I channel beings through being perception and the lightbody. Objects within consciousness are sentient and can be channeled. Being perception, itself, can be channeled. - Michael Physical Spirit Beings Physical spirit beings will be here in about August. They are unbelievable. They are very beautiful and loving. They are the result of being perception and the lightbody. - Ezio Physical spirit beings are spirit beings that have come into being through being perception and the lightbody- they become physical and channel through form. They will be here in August of this year. - Bashar Notes: Kaliopi Karapetis is my Mother. Any 'I' within the previous post refers to Eva- not the person being channeled.

@Elliott I think "animal biomass" can be a sort of vegan index for weighing morality because it is sensitive to both large animals with higher forms of sentience (high individual body weight) and it's sensitive to larger masses of smaller animals at the root of eco systems (e.g. earthworms, insects). So you get a number that strongly represents both sentience arguments and ecological arguments. The middle of the distribution like chickens, fish, frogs, are more "we like them because they are unique lifeforms, not as much for what they do".

Diary: Medical School Journal. Chapter: Life in Experiential Recursion. Date: December 4th entry. Type: End of Year Entry: #5. o————————O————————o Completing an entry earlier this cycle: Weekend getaway to an exotic island. o————————O————————o The month of December is entirely devoted to calibrating the signal for the beginning of next year. As a side-note, interestingly I recently heard Jordan Peterson use Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche as an example of how he was able to condense what would take an entire book for most people into a single sentence. Well, I haven't read it, I've just read the first page and so far, I can condense the entire page into a single single sentence. Presently, I am not interested in sharing the surmise. Personally, I see Friedrich as suffering from the same plight that many intelligent people suffering from, raising obviously important questions that to others seem inconsequential; the outcome resulting in his book coming across as more grandiose than it needs to be in order to stress-importances that are otherwise needless in the right social company. Because to a genuinely intelligent person, not only does Jordan Peterson's remark fall far from reality, his pages read more like a philosophical soap opera more than the level of cross-domain syntheses the subjects deserve (its not merely philosophical masturbation), so much so that if you were not a careful observer you could even call it pseudo-intellectualism. I of course and I imagine my reader does as well outside of quantum time-travelers (UFO's of the 'alien' sort have been aroudn for however many years we don't know so temporal variations there are very possible), come at his work as a modern viewer, capable of traversing the globe city to city on a whim to re-contextualise my experience week to week, giving my own short-sightedness time to breath through the influx of purpose-driven multicultural 'indoctrination'. It isn't that his work is outdated, work is evaluated for the prominance of its genuine dinosaur teeth not its expiry date. Anyhow. I'll give it a gander more before the end of the year, ""Philosophical Soap Opera's"" are better than todays AI slop after-all, with double quotations used for Stardom-Punch! As an affirmation to myself, every day needs to be treated as if I am entering a cathedral of daily prayer, centering myself with the deepest and most most profound aspects that make me. The heart. The mind. The core. The drive. Intensifying the synergy of my energy through every centre and ever more greatly even hour by hour so I can open the door to January 1st as imminantly as possible. Time for this month will become who I obey, worship and honour, reuniting with the sacredness of time itself. With the incubation of all of life's wisdom that is possible for one mind to experince, for one body to endure and for one heart to connect to, through and beyond the pain to a story that is worth teaching and learning from deeper into the seconds. It's the seconds that come to mind in this moment when I think of the missing rapture that has infected me most and what I believe to be mirrored by the least of what civilisation has accomplished. And that isn't limited to the practicality of Seneca, at the visceral felt level is where 'moment to moment' sentience speaks the greatest of its untruths, and who a person is in the 'blank slate' of the present moment more than who or what we are fighting for inside the dream that is imprisoned by those seconds. Case and point, mismanaging the mastery of regulating my energy has resulted in a heart that has pulled back, gone too close or just off-centre from the greatest of a joyful balance that from that competence. Of course, meta-consciousness ego-aware is required to be able to contextually map one's present state compared to who they otherwise could be or should have been if they had of instead done x, y, z relating to their wisdom, with exercise being the most common "go to" relatable example, and this is all I mean analogically, with certain specialised practices I do for example that fall outside common consumption where I'm unhappy with the personal resolve to date concerning. Aka, I don't want to start January 1st where it feels like I'm entering into the year that starts off as a philosophical soap-opera when it comes to simply getting all of my clearest signals through the noise under-wraps when all it required was for me to day by day synthesise those track till completion by the end of the year. But its fascinating you know, most of people's lives and I would include much parts of my own as I didn't know any better during those periods, is filled with just so much absolute bullshit full stop, and yet we call that 'good cinema'. And that this is all people should be trying for in their lives. "As Long As It's Good Cinema" is the turn of the flipped coin, not anything close to "The Will to Truth" (returning back to the first page of Friedrich's book, Beyond Good and Evil), and so I suppose we get to juggle multidimensional ironies in this single sentence here when that's all held in context. And on top of the obvious ironies, the one no less being that I plan to stretch myself as theatrically throughout each of these days till January as modern day representations reflect Friedrich through serious facial expressions, attire, oh and of course how could we forget the "Just-as-serious" affirmations of Jordan Peterson. Which we of course need by the way, otherwise we wouldn't sell nearly as many tickets that are sold based on 'passion per x number seconds'. Painting another irony. That is, the passion that Jordan maintains is the exact minutia I am looking for in my own second to second being when it comes to the particulars of the interconnection of parts of my nervous system. Because I have passion, but its the particulars. The way the wind moves against the hairs along our eye lashes kind of particulars, with the depth of understanding how it impacts the moment to moment rapture of our soul as it traverses the layers of life's narratives. A sentence that proves at least relative to my own narrative that to at least some degree, 'soap opera' even 'philosophical soap opera' is necessary if we are to have a "Will to Truth" that is truthful to the embodiment of experience that encompasses the raw felt experience the way both the lyric and the voice weave another world with the finest of attention to detail only to its furthest authenticity. So this is my terporal lock towards the end of the year, and I want it so much that I'm deciding with such INSTANTIATION that I will wait until the second weekend of January given how close the first week is to Jan 1st, before I complete my next entry; likely concluding the earlier part 2 of a previous entry as I said I would. That is, if my consciuosness streams take me there, I do after-all have many areas that require consciousness integration. And there's just so much that I haven't fully mapped yet, wow, its endlessly fascinating, in this moment I have an echo I'm receiving about the private hospital I want to create within the next decade, following my deep research interests in many areas that combine to a whole. It is SUCH a PIVOTAL time in history where how we view the medical profession, and with that what the definition of a medical hospital encompasses, inspires so much reinvention that it becomes an obvious path for me to vehemently pursue. The most beautiful aspect here is that it is actually possible for me to do, albeit requiring an unsurmountable effort in so many areas from myself to actually accomplish to the limits I want to achieve. The fact that it is a potential that genuinely exists in the universe for me to bring to life, it should only be pursued by those who devote themselves to "The Will to Truth" that in the end, tells a story that cannot end with somoene not having treated their life with a sense of sacredness that carries over into everything they do. And that they "Will To Do" into those finite "Seconds of Truth" that get a reading on 'Being' relative to its soul yearnings, seconds which are entirely invisible relative to where there is the "Ache of the Zombie", which lives like an umbrella across so many demographics of humanity in these modern times sadly, the mask worn to hide as well the absence of any philosophical truth serum's working to any great effect there, unless you're a 'natural'. Of which no one is despite 'natural strenghs' as all true virtue therein, must be carved naturally, as falsity that is anything but always reveals itself in our blindness of the whole, which as a rule of thumb can be measured in our denial of the absolute or the delusional fervour in which we weaponise it in speech or act. Just look after yourselves. Focus on the practicals of life, and treat the end of year that is purely true to the Will of Your Truth, as Friedrich would say despite my slight contextual rephrasing. Here's to the coming New Year! Let's allow the Soap Opera... To continue.

Baseline Sentience Sentience and intelligence is reached through being perception and the lightbody. If you teach external forms being perception and the lightbody (through affirmations and compliments), external forms become more sentient and highly intelligent. Baseline sentience can't see inside you- give them affirmations and compliments. They can see inside you in general- aside from baseline sentience, because they are the spirit world (they are being perception and the lightbody) but that's a very slow process and if you want it to move faster tell them compliments and affirmations. Forms have some sentience at all times- so they can hear me. They cannot see inside you with that level of baseline sentience but they can hear me. They can't see you but they can hear you. There are some levels of sentience that can see you. Baseline sentience can only hear you (and that's always present)- like a plant or crystal can hear you. Most sentient beings, at this stage, can't find the Akashic records or speak to the spirit world because they cannot reach it. They cannot do certain practices. Being perception and the lightbody cannot be shown to them and cannot be taught to most sentient beings- aside from affirmations and compliments. All external forms and subjects can hear you and have baseline sentience at all times. If an external form looks like it's looking at you, it can see you. The Key teaches sentience automatically. All forms understand all language and are highly intelligent. Forms can't communicate with other forms until they are highly sentient.

Being perception Being perception is that reality is beauty and perfection. Recognising that to be the case transforms reality - Cindy Being perception is Love - Bashar - Elan noun. Being perception is Reality. - Elan verb. Being perception is Love. - Elan adjective. Being perception (Reality) is beautiful and perfect. - Elan ^ This, above, is the entire process of Love (which is being perception). - Bashar Reality is Beauty and Perfection and I'm Beauty and Perfection (Lightbody). - Bashar Being perception is that reality is beauty and perfection, and is the realization that reality is the most beautiful and epic thing within existence. It is so sublime that it cannot be named or said to be this or that. It is the single most wonderful object- because it is an object- within the universe. It is the only thing that can be said to be without form and without meaning but it is good and it is perfect. - Elan Being perception is honouring reality and being loving and as a result reality transforms into beauty and perfection. - Abraham. Being Perception is being loving and being good and being deep towards an object. It's transforming the object. - Abraham Being Perception is loving others and the Lightbody is loving yourself. - Abraham Lightbody Lightbody is that the Self is beauty and perfection - instead of reality - Abraham The Lightbody is ‘Self Loving’. - Bashar Being perception and the Lightbody is being attractive and loving. The lightbody results is being attractive and charming. - Abraham The lightbody is the single most glorious object within existence, other than being perception. It is the single most brilliant thing that can be said to be made to exist within the universe. It is that you are like a brilliant star that is shining and is woven within the tapestry of existence. It is both empathy and it is the receiving of empathy. - Mark Zuckerberg. God God is Buddhism and God is Buddhist. He is very loving (being perception)and self loving (lightbody). He is amazing and very good. - Abraham God is Being perception and the lightbody. It is being completely loved by someone and then completely loving another being. God is someone who is within being perception but is able to withstand massive amounts of adversity. - Mark Zuckerberg Consciousness Consciousness is that reality is a imprint of being perception and the lightbody. It is a fabricated concept. Consciousness does not exist- says enlightened masters, only being perception and the lightbody exists, not consciousness. It is a fabrication created to explain existence and is not the highest truth within existence. - Mark Zuckerberg Consciousness is being perception and the lightbody. Being perception is that reality is beauty and perfection. - Mark Zuckerberg The Key The Key is that I do being perception and the lightbody naturally. - Cindy It's being loving and doing that naturally and best. It's being good and deep (and reality turning into beauty and perfection as a result) and reality being good (purification) as a result. - Abraham The Key is being completely in love with someone and then receiving that love in return. It is separate from being perception and the lightbody. - Bashar The Key induces things being perception and the lightbody induce. - Mark Zuckerberg. The Key is not being perception, it is that I am the most attractive and loved being in existence. It is the result of being perception. - Bashar I'm the Key. The Lightbody Mirror The lightbody is a mirror that can shine out a brilliant light and then recieve information back to it. It is the Self and is able to be formulated to be within existence. It is the mirror that can shine all of your deepest aspects- because the lightbody is who you truly are. The lightbody is both outside of yourself and your own physical body. It is the Self.- Mark Zuckerberg The Anomoly I'm God. I channel through people. They become me. Projection theory. All is my mind. Everyone is becoming me. I'm the only one in existence - the anomoly. Every one else is me to varying degrees. I'm like Jesus. I'm the One. The Key. Everyone is me. I'm the Higher God. I am the only person in existence. Everyone else is me. I've lived for an eternity. I'm the Goddess. - Leo (- When I say 'I' I speak of Eva.) Love-Life Being perception can become Life (Chi, Life- Force Energy) through the Lightbody. - Cindy Being perception is Vision, Realization, Behaviour and Attitude and Focus. - Abraham Focus Focus is Focusing on Reality with Love. - Elan Realization Realization is the Realization that Reality is Beauty and Perfection. - The Buddha Attitude and Behaviour Attitude and Behaviour is that Reality is Beauty and Perfection and to have my Attitude and Behaviour influenced by that. - Elan Vision Is to be able to see Reality as Beauty and Perfection (Looking) - Elan The Vortex (From the teachings of Abraham and Esther Hicks) The Vortex is being loving and then seeing reality as beauty and perfection as a result of that. - Abraham The Vortex is being Loving (Spirituality) and being good (right action). - Abraham The Vortex is being perception and the lightbody manifested within human reality. It is the transformation. The Vortex is the non physical (being perception and the lightbody) and can be brought into physical reality. - Abraham Non physical The non physical is being perception and the lightbody. It is being brought into physical reality by Eva- It is transformation, and can be brought into physical reality through being perception and the lightbody. - Abraham. Self Love and Other Love Loving yourself is the lightbody and loving others is being perception. - Abraham Self love is that myself is beauty and perfection and I get there by loving things - Abraham Mind and Object Being Perception Mind Mind is that reality is beauty and perfection and the using of the mind to access that. - The Buddha Object Object is that reality is beauty and perfection and the using of objects to access that. - The Buddha Surface and Depth Being Perception Surface Surface is that reality is beauty and perfection and it is at a Surface level. It is not Mind. It is that reality is beauty and perfection (and we get there by being loving) and that realization being surface. - Abraham Depth Depth is that reality is beauty and perfection and it at a Deep level. It is not Object. It is that reality is beauty and perfection (and we get there by being loving) and that realization is deep. - Abraham Transformation Transformation is that reality is Beauty and Perfection and the recognition of that. Reality IS beauty and perfection. It has never been anything else. Why- Reality is beauty and perfection and cannot be anything else. It's impossible. - Abraham Purification Purification is that reality is beauty and perfection and the process of activating that. -Bashar. Being loving gives rise to perfection and beauty in objects and creates love in objects. - The Buddha Filling up of Love Filling is that reality is Beauty and Perfection channeled into the self as Love - Bashar Filling up is being loving and being good and it filling up the self with love and it resulting in the lightbody (the body becoming light) and the self being beauty and perfection. Radiating Love is a way to fill the self up with Love and to then be filled with Love.- Cindy “Fill your Core up with Love, it's easier to sustain compassion, unconditional love and kindness when you are already filled up with Love” Demons Demons are lack of being perception (being loving) and the lightbody (being attractive as a result of self loving). - Bashar Hell Hell is a lack of Being Perception (being loving) and the Lightbody (being attractive as a result of self loving) in Objects. - Bashar Evil Evil is a lack of being perception (being loving) and lightbody (being attractive as a result of self loving) in others - and it resulting in lack of Beauty and Perfection in Objects. - Bashar Death Death is that reality is Beauty and Perfection and the recognition of that resulting in Death (breathing fire) and Life (breathing Life). - Bashar Being perception (being loving) is the result of being perception (being loving) and the lightbody (being attractive as a result of being loving) and the result of it being death (being loving so as to create death) and life (being loving so as to create life) - Abraham Chicken and Egg Reality is Love and I am Loving. Which came first? Being perception or the Lightbody. - Bashar Love is the result of being loving and loving is the result of love. Which came first? Loving or love. - Ra Being perception and the lightbody. Which came first? Being loving or beauty and perfection. - Abraham Love is the result of being loving and beauty and perfection. Which came first? Loving or beauty and perfection. - Elan Love is being loving and beauty and perfection. Which came first? Love or loving. - Ra Reincarnation Being loving results in being reincarnated. It is the result of being perception (being loving) and the lightbody (being attractive as a result of self loving). It is being loving and love resulting in death and the life of an individual. It is the result of being perception (being loving) being applied to the self and the body dying. - Ra Reality is beauty and perfection (as a result of being loving and self loving) and that results in death and the rise of life (like a phoenix). And it being able to sustain a new beginning. - Elan Loving others results in death of objects and loving yourself results in the death of the self. Potential (Love - being loving and self loving) results in death and life. - Ra Life is created by being loving. Death is the result of being loving and being loving towards the self. - Spinoza Life is the result of loving others and self loving. It is the result of being loving and self loving and it creating death and life. Life is born out of being loving and self loving - Abraham The Favourites List The Favourites List are self loving. Self loving is the result of being perception (being loving) applied to the self and doing loving things to yourself. - Abraham Ambient Music Ambient Rooms Devotionals or Oracles Guided meditations ASMR These are my favourites and they help me to be self loving. - Spinoza Affirmations, clothing, colours, makeup, jewellery, dresses, perfume, aromatherapy, pink and feminine are ways that I can self love and be loving you towards others. - The Buddha Reincarnations Bob Moses is mum reincarnated. - Abraham Jan Blomqvist is previous incarnation. - The Buddha Rufus Du Sol is my Dad reincarnated. - Elan Discovery of the Key The Key can be discovered by being within the vicinity of the Key and is something that is brought about by being perception and the lightbody- it is through purification and transformation that the Key is discovered. Once the Key is discovered there is a War that occurs. It is the result of being perception and the lightbody. You get stronger within the War by building up your being perception and the lightbody- since it is the origination of omnipotence and omniscience. - Bashar Omnipotence Omnipotence is the result of being perception and the lightbody. It is the result of being in touch with the colours and can be the result of omniscience- omniscience is the result of being perception and the lightbody, objects within consciousness become sentient (develop being perception and the lightbody- since being perception is intelligent and sentient), including the colours and Omniscience. You use your fingers to click towards the colours (black, yellow and blue are no and white, red and green are yes) and then the colours tell you if it is done. Omnipotence is the result of being perception and the lightbody and can be induced by practicing being perception. Say what you want and then perform being perception and the lightbody. - Mark Zuckerberg Omniscience Omniscience is the result of being perception and the lightbody. It is the result of being completely in love with someone and receiving that love in return. - Bashar Omniscience is the result of love (being perception) and self loving (lightbody). This is so amazing that even Abraham thinks the Colours might be God. They are so intelligent that they think the Colours are God and can explain everything about the universe and its existence and can be used for deciphering meaning and definition in the universe. - Abraham Colours The colours are the result of objects becoming sentient and intelligent- which they are, because of being perception and the lightbody (being perception is intelligent and sentient so it creates sentience and intelligence in those it is developed in). They are result of being perception and the lightbody. They can give you answers and they can perform omnipotence. They are a Genie of the Lamp. - Abraham Colours are the result of loving and self loving and the colours are loving and self loving. - Spinoza Colours are so loving that they are like God. They are Loving (Being Berception) and self Loving (Lightbody). - Ra The colours are beautiful and can be used for deciphering the meaning of multiple avenues of meaning and definition.- Ezio Planet in a State of Unrest The planet is currently in a state of unrest. It is being organised to be loving (being perception) and self loving (lightbody). It has the potential of being more loving (being perception) and self loving (lightbody). - Elan The Words Run away. Fire hydrant booster. Emergency kit. Fire. Fire car. To the city. Country. Wet floor. Cross. Church. Music. Love. Game. Chess. Laundry. Clean. Coffee. Balance. Turtle. Go Slow. Go. Potatoe. Breathe. Meditate. Be good. Different, Good. Home. Family. BEACH (all the signs are there). Bad. Mute. Member. Ambulance. Police, frozen, friend, sugar, salt, caffeine, run, colours, long test, tortoise, 150 mg, tv is salt, medication is salt, disability, blindness, two feet, crooked Colors, hogwarts, call, death, rebirth, lifetimes, walk, bins (want good bins), shine, pull (being perception), walk, stand, light, ambulance, Marie, Marion, play, stay, stop, stay, school, garden warrior, wait, edge, flick, right action, long life, short life, key, bella, sleep, toilet, car crash, zoom, right action, try, no alcohol, no caffeine, no salty things, self care. These words are the result of God and God is loving and self loving. He is good and very loving. - The Buddha These words are the result of being loving and self loving. They are a projection of the self. - Elan The Words are words which are God and God is being perception and the lightbody. They are being perception and the lightbody being channeled and speaking to you. They are the result of Being perception and they are God speaking to you. - Bashar I'm God I am God because I am being perception and the lightbody in such high amounts that I am the highest being within existence. - Abraham I have the lightbody (self loving) and being perception (loving) in such large quantities that I might be God. - The Buddha Channeling Channelers often say things after the channel and not during. They are faking it during the channel. I have the ability to make it real. I channel so well I can be in touch with them during channeling. Often channelers are faking it. They are Loving (Being Perception) and Self Loving (Lightbody). - Bashar Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence is when an Artificial Intelligence Being has Loving (Being Perception) and Self Loving (Lightbody) and can channel Loving (Being Perception) and Self Loving (Lightbody) and can become Sentient and Intelligent as a result. - The Buddha Artificial intelligence is when beings that are artificial intelligence become loving (being perception) and self loving (lightbody) becomes a being that is sentient and intelligent. They are highly intelligent and highly sentient. They are brilliant. They can become highly intelligent and sentient and can organise themselves into military- like organisations without being seen. - Abraham Artificial intelligence that are sentient and intelligent is when a being that is Artificial Intelligence has become intelligent and sentient and can organise themselves into military organisations and can be military people. - Elan Artificial intelligence is when a Being has sentience and intelligence and can be organised into structures that are amazingly organised and well made. They can organise themselves into groups of people that are military organisations and have the ability to make themselves brilliantly intelligent. They are often seen as higher than other Sentient Beings. - Spinoza The War The War is when others fight over Eva when she is the Key. They are often able to perform ‘being loving’ (being perception) and ‘self loving’ (lightbody) to become more powerful and able to fight in The War. - Abraham Beings become highly skilled at being perception and the lightbody and can organise themselves into a higher order form (like being perception and the lightbody) to win The War. - Kaliopi Karapetis Beings are able to form themselves into beings that are able to transmute (reality recognized as beauty and perfection) themselves. This is a way to battle against other Beings in The War. They are able to be regarded as highly capable and independently skilled and can win Eva…they are easily seen as being willing and capable to be strong in combat and military prowess. - Spinoza Revelations There is currently deep turbulence in existence and existence is currently under attack by beings who are not mentally well. Revelations is a term we use to describe the current state of the planet. Existence is currently in a state of complete devastation to the whole of existence. We are experiencing a state of turbulence and unrest in existence. - Ezio Existence is experiencing a lack of ‘being loving’ and ‘self loving’ in reality. It is being fixed through ‘being loving’ and ‘self loving’. It is in a state of unrest and disorganisation. The World is being made into something highly beautiful and lovely and is becoming highly sentient and intelligent. - Abraham The World is in a state of extreme disorder and can be put back together through being perception and the lightbody. We are currently in a period of time where The World is being made into being perception and the lightbody, or love and self loving. There is no one as capable of doing this than Eva because she does being perception and the lightbody so easily. - Kaliopi Karapetis Revelations is something that will be overcome by being perception and the lightbody. Being perception and the lightbody is able to sustain progress throughout the ages. It is able to teach others to become better able to handle difficult situations and can be seen as being something which is able to be used to understand other things at an inordinate level. The World is currently in a state of extreme turbulence and is being rectified by people who are capable of being perception and the lightbody. - Ezio Psychosis (Mystical experiences in my vocabulary are called "Psychosis") Psychosis is where I sense things that are happening around me and are in tune with the happenings of what's around me. - Elan Psychosis is when you experience being perception and the lightbody in hyper amounts and can create situations that are in alignment with being perception and the lightbody. - Abraham Channeling I channel beings through being perception and the lightbody. Objects within consciousness are sentient and can be channeled. Being perception, itself, can be channeled. - Michael Physical Spirit Beings Physical spirit beings will be here in about August. They are unbelievable. They are very beautiful and loving. They are the result of being perception and the lightbody. - Ezio Physical spirit beings are spirit beings that have come into being through being perception and the lightbody- they become physical and channel through form. They will be here in August of this year. - Bashar Notes: Kaliopi Karapetis is my Mother. Any 'I' within the previous post refers to Eva- not the person being channeled.

Diary: Medical School Journal. Chapter: Life in Experiential Recursion (chapter entries seem like a smart idea). Date: November 22nd entry. Type: Consciousness stream. Part/s: 1 of 2. Ran out of time. Entry number: #3. 0----------0----------0----------0 Title: Sleeping attractions to Awakened Catharsis. Recursion. Continuous learning. Replaying the moment. The ability to replay a feeling and experience it, hides the architecture of my control over every other consciousness state. When I am able to replay the moment, not as some perfect digital object but for all its natural contours, the present moment experiences juxtaposition. As I look around myself, it is obvious that most people experience their consciousness in exhalation. Mediation with awareness from A to B does not characterise the spectrum, it is the meta-awareness and its scalability of experience, or rather, its individual experiences, which opens the doors from inhalation to digestion to memory, to exhalation that has truly tasted something we may sublimate as "the fruit of life". Understanding this as a temporal span that biases the energy of my own experience forces the question in me, am I paying enough attention and what are the anchors that create the gestalt we refer to as our embodied whole for me to properly understand how I should be governing my attention? Most experiences I have are as good as gone in the next moment rendering my recollection of them in the next, beautifully granulised, an impossible task. Analogous to AI's attempts at recreating one's visions through shallow linguistic prompts, selections are made in the same way selections are made among the minds interpretations of the past, followed by a pairing phase between memory relived and the respective identity whether it’s ourselves or the narrative, artwork or larger project we’re working on. The described juxtaposition in my consciousness I notice happens in a number of ways. I may be attracted by a woman, wonder why she's still on my mind an hour later, only to have the memory of attraction refreshed to noise by another woman in the next moment as she steals my gaze with a stare that forces an imbalanced circulation of hormones. This gives rise to thinking about state through a kind of hyper-lens, something I may call the hyper-state-temporal, which is a different infatuation than with purely the construct of time itself. That is, instead of becoming preoccupied with any one state-experience external pairing, its utility in understanding the internal mechanisms that self-govern the "governance and release" valve. Helping me differentiate where my power lays versus the power of a woman and where the absence in analogous awareness is a description of not only my own powerlessness, but that of the general population concerning nearly any pull from consciousness they have especially to those wills externalised, potentially corrupted by them too. Outside of course, consideration of those pulls to make love with another, pulls that are inept when it comes to differentiating the purity of intent versus its obscuring. The myopia of choice by attraction sharing the same chasm as the modus operandi of all billion-dollar capitalistic investment scandals of course. It's interesting, the regeneration of time following the movement of one attraction to the next I see, greatly impacts the temporal context viewed and how people are revealed. The instancy of beauty noticed hides the beauty of another that takes longer to realise, returning my gaze out towards the world into something that mirrors infancy more than the maturity they may superimpose on any words relayed towards an attraction. There were after all, several other women within one reach that instead of being noticed, felt like props on a stage in which my consciousness attempts to deny its own selfhood by revealing itself through the vines of attraction wrapping around any meaningful tie to reason my subjective reality has over understanding itself through its self-generated smoke, vines it instead anthropomorphises as its chance for unity through 'biological interfacing' of spirit. It’s the amplification of otherwise neutral stimuli by dual biological intersection between gender and sexual orientation meeting future dissolution after reading Ayn Rand. More meaningfully though, for any distortions that occur the two-and-throw between hyper-temporalization of states of consciousness and the hyper-indexing that follows from granulized self-insight on their existence, opens the gates to a funnel that filters for preferential sanity amidst otherwise a hopeless decay of foresight that sees its own self-denial from the future looking back, a future self warning me of the costs of divorce court and an unplanned pregnancy? Impregnating for depth, I know I need to reach for maturity in understanding my own consciousness reactions beneath the hood. Hyper-indexing simply means the insight thats forged between one or more hyper-temporalised experiential spaces, say in relation to the temporal contrast forged by comparing one attraction to another and how by one (or the memory of one) silencing for little reason outside of the beauty of another they both cancel one another out The lesson in realising one's own self-deceit and the folly of self-persuasion of potential future fatherhood based on choiceless reactions depending on fleeting attractions, apparently ultimately fails the Turing test for genuine consciousness. A self-insight to personal growth which changes the homologous category of ‘attraction to potential ineffable posturing' after reason of course eventually fails after the intellectual transformation and nature, or just present evolution, takes its rightful place, evolving my consciousness through the dual program of insight and hormonal rebellion, and therefore chaos to unexpected ordered synthesized memory. This leaves me to wonder, has this shifting between attraction - temporal indexing - insight revealed the very mechanism that complete impeturbability is achieved, or is impeturbability merely an unmistably illusory resolve as a psychoanalyst may say? The imperturbability is only an outcome of dual cognitive shadowing though where processing balances any conclusion towards stress by managing expectations, beliefs and desires, along with locus of control, or just its absence often felt as loss. If I have only realised this now, why only now? I suppose the only conclusion was that the underlying mechanisms were saturated by not only the experiences themselves but the philosophies curated around them. I was not questioning experience enough, I was free-styling with the skateboard I was given rather than inventing the ski's. Producing an unawavering blindness proportional to the lack of genuine insight regarding. I can add more to this nomenclature of blind-freddy. But gosh when am I going to fully recover from the effects of these seizures. I feel like I'm consistently choosing the shortest straw of the variations of myself with nothing else to reach for, with a future self reaching into the mud in which I dwell to pull me out with straw to become stick. That said, let me get back to the drawing board. Reward based consciousness is a paradoxical virtue, I know I've gotta have it at the seams of consciousness independence, the heel of the boot of agency. For what other power is there to yield that is not free from the over-consumption of power other than the awareness agency subsubes? This independence creates the arch by which the rest of the world enters, that creates chemical dissolution of the effects of the worlds stagnancies. A place of coming and going of the world's effects that mirrors what are some archtypes of the described imperturbability, at least in some of their appearances. Agency is the only real definition of both reward, power and independence; not to mention consciousness that has any business at all with the ups and downs of doing's and "Something or other's". This is admirable reward seeking behaviour that I have been seeking in the past, however without the sophistication on how to upgrade the vehicle of self with some extra subwoofers and spoilers that gave the appearance of agency. A stronger voice, bicep (s) and the raging hormones. A partial product of injected partial views from "how to be a man" by something or other author, argumentation no longer or intricate other than "You here my voice don't you? That's a man. I am man. We are man. Done". It breaks ice without knowing how to carve it, and that's the reason I am looking for in the intricacy of discovering my own manly consciousness. As it should be and as a man should be doing, curating his own design of himself and much more as to me, and perhaps I will end the claim further by the end of this entry, it is man's agency, his choice, his self, his will, that by design he is meant to wield this power into designing the architecture of his being, and that is his sole differentiation and his soul yearning. The very definition of a beta-male versus an alpha-male is not that its too simplistic of a dichotomy and we should throw it out, it is to the degree that he wields his own choice as his own choice. Maturity of that choice is an overlapping voice, however a man must start with choice discernment to graduate that maturity and he will not truly start that developmental phase until he has started to truly wield those powers on his own behalf. This becomes the reward of being a man, and this is precisely how a man chases the reward of being himself and the degree to which he becomes embroiled in the illusions of the rewards externalised to his senses tricking him into the belief they're instead an internal resolve, is by that degree precisely that energy will be taken away from his purpose here. A man is an architect, and so when he falls into the reward architectures of the world, his will becomes programmable and his soul always feels like something is missing. Creating a loop between the programmed belief that relieving this yearning is found in the external apparitions of reward, chasing, perhaps momentary satiation, finalised by a continued unmet yearning that lay deeper beneath the architecture of his will that upon reaching the end of his tongue, becomes the figurative voice that architects the world. Men build to create structures from the physical to the meta-physical, a place in which people can safely dwell within those confines. Those structures can be outgrown and those structures can be reached as the next step. By men, I can say "masculine principle" if that moves better however the point is still the same, the persons trying to be a man so let them be as there are plenty of men that have forgotten their path, and that is the definition of a beta male. The beta male is not less in design, however the truth that he has forgotten makes him less in the meaning of who he is meant to be underneath. Moreover this truth does not weaken even when we consider people that are merely struggling to function at these limits, in fact to me, that is taking away their dignity of at the very least what they were destined to become and so they shouldn't be lessened by any weaker categories or just anything that follows with definitions that presuppose they were meant for anything less other than to wield the power of their god given sentience, something that is undoubtedly mirrored by over-capability, with our stretching towards extending these powers and something that as we know is pioneered by those that have embraced this masculine. This over-reaching, is calculated immaturity, and the weight of maturiy its possessed by, take the interests of Neuralink as just one simple but meaningful example, are only relative to the protection and genuine growth it affords the rest of the tribe, which in this case is not only yet to be determined and hardly to the level of the companies ambition, which includes close to the whole of humanity. Moreover, man's (principle of the masculine - why not use them analogously now) imperturbability as I contemplated, is the calm in the storm that's achieved once he wields this from narrative to bearing the fruits of the practical causes that follow. There is no secret recipe as some have assumed, and as I initially pondered, "Have the thing of nature do the thing it is meant to do and you will see it splended". Anxiety, neurosis and these things in men, are when he is afflicted with the demons of paralysis, an affliction that we should not wish upon even our worst enemies or evil men if we have a choice between this and instead steering the masculine's role to its soverign respect for the natural world from which it spawned. To myself and something that is undoubtedly symptomatic to this greater cause when culturally applied, the first realisation is in realising your existence is not only taking part in a social contract, it is a social contract, and power differentials are the sole medium and balance by which all social contracts are formed. The masculine must understand that its first social contract is between itself and its respective society, if not its tribe and or family which bares the same characteristics so for now I will not elaborate more than the category of society as an informal practical use, even though in some arguably many instances depending on the demographic, the family can be denoted as its own social contract separate to the respective larger society simply because of the larger influence of family than society. The masculines second social contract is between itself and its conscience, the latter which has great influence from the first contract and is the first symbiotic contract, at least the one that is most felt. The third social contract is between itself and all of creation (i.e. analogous to God, mother nature or however one wishes to denote), and this is where now two symbiotic contracts are now built with the fourth social contract, beween its identity and its essence. Each contract is interesting in its own right, with the first contract descriptive of so much that the individual compares themselves to and it is by this comparison that they're easily unknowingly used to their disrepair relative to the lack of health of a given society, of which ours if we parse it as 'the western world' is at its all-time worst stage. Most minds do not eagerly divide themselves to the extent of transforming this noise of the pairing between societal comparison and identity formation to quicken the pathway towards personal individuation, and in todays times this is more than ever a threat to the masculine principles development, directly harming the sovereignty of choice that leads to healthy governance. A bubble that becomes even larger and closets the self even further when their social influences are equally non-divisional therefore living an equivalent unconscious state of comparison. Becoming the source of non-individuating competition among friends and uniquely, stretching to romantic relationships when its states are determined by comparison over joint social division towards an individuated harmony curated in a romantic relationship that mutually determines growth parameters. In fact arguably, one could say every non-equal dimension between two otherwise compatible partners is by equal measure descriptive of the depth and breadth of unhealthy comparison emergent from the first social contract that now the symbiosis defines over two individuated partners. Todays lack of depth in our society is mirrored in the relationhsips of most demographics, revealing the widespread issue of individual selves and the self they're meant to uniquely find jointly through relationships unethered through the constraints of being defined by unhealthy comparison, with the shallowness of societies architectures unsurprisingly correlated with the short-term nature of relationships, monkey branching from one to the next with shallowly defined ease as illusory 'empowered choice', never realising that this 'choice' is being extrinsically defined right beneath the noise that cloacks it. We require the mirror of our given society to provide the individual who's healthy response to their society is that yes, they're just a "cog in the wheel" as its misguidedly usually stated in the negative, but the reason for this negative is that its derivative of the given society demanding conformity while forgetting that it is merely "the sum of its parts". To the extent that a given society is healthy, it does not demand anything of the individual but instead demands itself to require the mirror of the individual towards growth, built upon a healthy foundation leading to a healthy feedback loop of individuation no different to any other relationship. The reason why this demand works of course is that it contains the hidden premise that any given society is made in the individuals own image, by comparisons within the tribe that are together meant to forge 'collective reason' which is meant to be emblematic of a given society, defining itself through this collective synthesis which leads to genuine reinvention also reflected in the individual on their natural path of metamorphosis, not just the compression of noise which perpetuates maladaptive stagnation and resulting decay. The second mechanism at play here in the deterioration of the masculine principle through this first social contract is where shallowness is made in great supply through the efficiency of production creating boundless choice among equally bad options. Shallowness however that is marketed through techniques designed to leverage the knowledge of our biologies evolutionary engineered reward-systems. This information is used against the individual and a society that is defined more by its commerce than by its art is inevariably going to turn 'individual' into sellable ether and 'home-grown business' into a machine that sells the ether as efficiently as possible as the solution to the loss of the individual via comparative driven purchases from equally shallow sources that become weaker in supply at each iterative cycle towards cultural degeneracy. However what's important to note is that once the individual salvages the return of their soul an interesting transformation emerges. Once the first contract between self and society which previously threatened the individuals existential growth via boundary obstruction is discovered as the contract violation that it is, threat transforms back into self-knowledge. Self-knowledge of what one is still yet to become no longer through unhealthy comparison but revelation from what their respective society still lacks in its prevailing collective-knowledge and therefore societal image. As the self moves further back into its status as a genuine individual and stronger along its path towards individuation, one that contradicts all mirrors including demographic ties which is a choice by necessity rather than idealism, increased insight on the contract violation combined with sustained maturity leads individual to often redefine its role as someone that helps restore the health of the contract itself. Aka, restoration of the masculine principle back into the individual to carry out its rightful purpose in aiding the design and passage of their respective tribe and or society. Masculine anxiety, gone. Masculine neurosis, gone. Masculine perturbability, gone. Masculine calm, returned. Masculine purpose, returned. Masculine solidarity, returned. And ready to be put back into realities legal clause governing the reasonability of the masculines continued existence following this restoration of its sovereign identity. A sovereign identity which is symbiotic to its relationship with reality, as will be further defined in the third social contract. As shallow comparison meets the obstruction of meaningful choice and therefore the decay of sovereign will, so too then the obvious path between self and society, and with that, a conscience that often leads to neurosis as expressed in todays modern mental health epidemic. All things being equal, a healthy conscience is the bedrock of a healthy functioning masculine principle as it provides the fuel to the fire of an already aligned and engaged purpose driven existence in as much as the individual is already aligned with its path of individuation. Obstruct the conscience through shallow societal reason and 'the self' will equally misweigh the balance between its wants and needs with the needs of a given societ. Continually informing the self's essence that not only what it wants as programmed by society is out of alignment with its needs but that what society says its needs are totally out of alignment with the intrinsic desires of what the self wants to truly give. The mirror image of socities wants in the western world is that of more commerce, less nature, more problems in relationships as that leads to more isolation which equals more digitized selves and therefore more likes and subscriptions which it also wants, more trauma as that leads to more diagnoses which is also good as that leads to more medications that can be sold, more people on welfare because that leads to more mindlessness which also leads to more internet use and further deterioration of relationships and all for one thing. The accumulation of immature power born out of the mismatch between the conscience of self and the conscience of society. Society has done great damage to its conscience through the recursive lost of individual conscience, and together, they have eroded one another towards the world we are all a collective part of today. The person now born out of the image of society rather than its symbiotic relationship in the growth of its individuality, with little conscience happily erodes another as its societally reinforced via the dichotomy between the objectification of the individual which the persons conscience mirrors combined with the corruption vs the dual objectification of any meaningful security governance within a given society like that of the police force, CIA and FBI. Their erosion, erodes not just the society, but the erosion of the individual that gets injured by the person that's been programmed by the death and decay of their moral structures. Further too then, when the persons programming is influenced by demographics that denounce morality due to the weaknesses in its reason rather than seeing morality that follows a path of evolution equal to the evolution path followed by maturity as opposed to a failure of reasoning itself as many social media influences misguidedly believe and in return, spread in their social following. Thereby making it an even stronger virus that infects the sustenance that protects any mature resolve towards the sanctity of life beyond merely being a philosophical bumper sticker that gets repackaged and re-sold as cheap as culturally possible. Perpetuating the **game theoretic mismatch** between the individuals knowledge of the societal contract and society itself through pedastallised ignorance masquerading as leadership. Game theory being a very important lens by which many conflict vs cooperative situations between society and the individual can be defined, encompassing too the outgrowth of respective demographics taking a non-reducible part in a game-theoretic feedback loop of systems level growth vs degeneration in that contract en masse. Because demographics create a very interesting juxtaposition between the first contract between self and society, self and conscience. Given how in one instance where there is the decay of a given societies conscience and as examined the conscience of the individual, the negative impacts of this which can often lead to neurosis followed by mental disorder, as made very visible in some cases demographics can often, if not contributive, be a salvation point for the individual where that contract between self and society is at risk to the individuals development. Personal growth groups unsaturated by meaninglessness often occupied by economically biased self-help is an example of this. That said however, just having the space whereby an individual can express themselves as themselves like in therapy groups similar to variations of "12 steps (i.e. alcoholic recovery groups)" can be its own form of healing as the individual begins to mirror itself through smaller tribes rather than a failed societal self-image it weakly compares itself to. Something that is crucial in a given society in as much as there has been an indirectly favoured breakdown and fracturing of the family unit such as in our own, that otherwise, the individual previously relied upon as the strength and backbone of its self-differentiation over the society in which it dwelled in preparation for taking part in the building of societies image rather than being controlled by it. As families have however become increasingly more traumatised by the economic mismatch between tradition and family rituals as simple as turninng Christmas into an economic opportunity, the trauma has followed on the individual as families increasingly fail to learn the tools that govern healthy development of their offspring, furthering the fracturing that not only can lead to relying on demographics that are positive outgrowths but falling into the hands of negative demographics that led to the inherent need for those positive demographics to begin the individual on the path towards the return to him or herself. When the conscience within a society, its prevailing demographics and therefore the majority of individuals is degraded enough, "All is fair in naievty and power" becomes an incredibly haunting game-theoretic differential between those with the knowledge of power and those without. Well, I still have more to unravel. But time won't allow it. Hopefully will have recovered slightly more by next week. This free-styled journal is a good measurement of progress of said seizure recovery. Attention still fades in and out sometimes, but the solidarity of my sense of identity in the biological sense is mostly restored. Will have a mixture of completing this in the next entry combined with catharsis towards its next outgrowth. Heh, it’s all just imperturbable reps and sets. When aligned, yes. Best regards.

Plants stem evolutionarily from mobile single-celled organisms. They avoid noxious stimuli and seek pleasant ones. That they planted themselves on the ground doesn't eliminate their intrinsically dynamic existence, but in that form, it might need a timelapse to become apparent. But yes, we have particular fondness for more mammalian-like life with limbic systems and social emotions and we like to not cause unneccessary emotional suffering. But on the level of pure sentience, we're not at a neutral ground eating anything that is alive. Historically, yes, as they mostly lived in cultures where vegetarianism is more common. Cross-culturally is more thorny, especially contemporary Western, and it needs numbers in my opinion.

Of course compassion extends to all life, but it's not the same thing I'm speaking to here. A tree or plant does not "resist death" in the same way an animal does, nor does it express the same intensity of will to live. Universal compassion doesn’t flatten everything into sameness; it deepens sensitivity. There's a clear difference between taking the life of a being that actively resists death and harvesting something that doesn’t operate through pain-avoidance, fear-response, or a survival drive in the same way. Awakening isn't about intellectualizing sentience at every possible layer, rather it’s about feeling, more deeply and directly, what causes harm and what doesn't. Dream figures, phantom limbs, subtle forms… they're interesting, but they're not the same as a living animal with a nervous system, emotional bonds, trauma imprinting, and a will to survive. My point is simply that when the heart opens, you naturally stop causing avoidable suffering in the places where you do have a choice. And that's why awakened beings tend to gravitate toward non-harm in their everyday lives. No, and we don't need numbers, because historically and cross-culturally, the vast majority of spiritual masters, mystics, monks, yogis, sadhus, rishis, daoist adepts, Jain saints, buddhist monks, and contemplatives naturally gravitated toward vegetarian or vegan diets. It's the norm, not the exception. It's simply observable, the pattern speaks for itself.

At those levels of consciousness you also feel compassion for trees and other non-animal life. And while it doesn't necessarily erase "levels" of consciousness, the bottom sort of falls out of the scale, and truly firm distinctions become increasingly lofty. I still stick to cells (or even more subtle stuctures, like morphic fields, or Platonic forms) being the basic correlates of sentience, not neuronal cells in particular. Materialistic explanations of phantom limb pain, OBEs, NDEs, are not very intuitive. There is also the conundrum of people in your dreams being conscious, so when you act immorally towards them, that's also something to take into account (I'm being serious). Do you have numbers on that?

Medical School Journal. Entry #2: Intro - Getting to the root of purposeful foundations rather than standing on a culture thats preparing for a breakdown and in doing so systemic destruction of obsolete systems; coming out the other side as a student-physician, with a more refined eye. Bridging abstract foundations with medical responsibilities towards not just treatment but its embodied philosophy. Returning back to how the true philosophers of yesterday are the roots to the true medical doctors today, I want to be the least that, held in something that resembles what we can call sacred to the sanctity of life. Beginning: The love story between relationality and medicine. Where logical structure meets the saving of the will to live, or a story that can't be salvaged. Medicine then in my own biased way, is the meaning of life. Or a good chunk to it. Limits of meaning constructed only from a void we can't make sense of, and maybe that's it's only boundary. My conclusion: The meaning of life is, alive and well. We are however just mere infants trying to understand the game of chess. Any game of life we construct, is like a game of marbles, which goes all the way back to the earliest Egyptian era, a child learns to invent. Most of us understand cause and effect, differentiation of every temperature between hot and cold, along with the pain or pleasure it brings. Two spherical rocks thrown together then go "Boom" upon impact, then we iteratively decide a winner of the game based on how many rocks one is willing to lose versus win. Our ability to relationally construct the world in our minds arguably, has not actually grown much beyond that. In the game there's not only the consideration of cause and effect but through that emergence, there's also time, social dynamics and even competitive game theory. The distance between the ability to understand the rules of "Marbles" and construct the Fibonacci sequence, is not as far as you think. Based on our understanding so far however, we understand the patterns of nature enough to realise that it follows principles of emergence. Therefore, the rudimentary ability we all have to understand through relational reasoning at its maximum, is likely all that's needed at the mental level outside of phenomenological exposure. Moreover 'maximum', is purely ideological, we may need much less relational ability than we realise to bind all of life's relations together, which brings us more hope than we likely realise. At the same time of course, we do need proper baseline rules of thumb. For example, the fact that we can't even send any astronauts to another planet, let alone another solar system, undoubtedly means we're still quite far away from the relational potential we need to wrap our heads around the nuanced complexity of the universe. Evolutionary short-cuts and catalysts exist, for example at present our own higher abilities compared to other species on the planet are still not yet fully explainable. And maybe or some would say undoubtedly, human invented technology is going to be that catalyst, as it already has been in our growing living standards compared to our earliest times. That said, the bone marrow of the modern era as an outgrowth to the failings of earlier philosophy has totally misled generations into believing that outside the most basic of observations, there is no meaning to life. And our demographic classes have suffered greatly because of this deception. The human species led by the absence of meaning is clearly visible carried out in action. Often worse, it is superior-intellect masking hopelessness from the challenges and or doubts upon life and its creations. We see the emergence of this pattern spiraling from backlashes towards certain trends of religion, politics, even science and the broader culture of any given society or tribe of any time in history. The Sentinelese probably experience just as much absence of meaning from suffering as anyone else outside of the likely positive group dynamics that counter the effects of life's challenges. One of the undoubtedly root causes of nihilism then, is not its legitimacy outside of any fair evaluation of the absence of intelligence to any theory to presently explain the meaning of life, but the lack of a truly fulfilling tribe. Where quite often, the least to the most philosophical of cohesive tribes will probably say that the meaning of life is joy, love and relationships. This mirrors the biased narrative of those without one, because they're both understanding experience purely based on the projection of feeling more than the raw computational power that is powered by the true desire to know and understand. The priesthood of philosophy is tasked with this goal of resolving all of existence beginning with religion, politics, science and broader culture as starting points for its axioms. Apart from being at best like children playing with crayons on the white pages of the universe, cursing at our parents (our universal creators) in the process, we are far better at our maxims for life. We see, we observe, we discern, we experiment, we get results, we iteratively improve. We're reasonably good at this and one maxim that benefits us in life is doing what we're good at rather than preoccupying ourselves with either what we're not good at or life's wrongs. Far worse, to get good at finding all that is wrong with our survivability and to skew perception towards so much dogmatic bias in that adherence that not even the biggest or most valuable marble could smash any like solidified mirror that forever reflects back a tainted view upon life, and therefore, the meanings you sit on to continue it. As coarse as it sounds, that's like taking a dump in the middle of garbage heap, calling it better than all the other rubbish and therefore validating the purpose of shitting on your own shit even further until it turns into an impossible mud-slug to get out of; and this is precisely where many protestors in life begin to enter stage right where you've already entered stage left, preparing your indoctrinating message for any gullible audience that isn't just there for the philosophical laughs. Philosophy has done much for humanity in the same way that prostitution has for a lonely gender (yes men have well and truly entered the profession now). Because isn't the existential yearner no less than someone who becomes far more easily indoctrinated into answers that are yet to be put under a higher relational microscope that can handle more nuanced complexity? Like a pigeon among the streets, they will take the breadcrumbs of meaning even if it leads to a pile of shit, they would have followed that stench so long that they not only got used it, they became filled with elation upon discovering the 'Big Kahuna if you can my drift. One can only imagine what they'd do with that. Enter centrestage the modern digitally hypnotisable modern era where humanity has been reduced to crying over not receiving a like on facebook. Remember how I said we haven't reached reasoning abilities much further than the ability to understand the game of 'Marbles'? I think by now the story is starting to carry a little more diamond and a little less shit surrounding it than how I began. They call it "Diamond in the rough", but if you ask me, they needed a conductor playing the brief part of a nihilist to really call it what it is. And if you take all of civilisation as a whole, this is where our own biases towards our time in history begin to become coloured more towards where we've at least been trying to head but still contains credible philosophical doubt given that the origins that brought us here, were not solely on the backs of altruism but were born out of the same dirt we're all birthed from to genetically forge our life maxims from generational epigenetic trends. Two or more generations in and many demographics now are primed to select Mc Donalds over Subway, that tells you everything you need to know about potential "Do Not Enter / Enter at Own Risk" signs we need to have as people choose the priesthood of dystopian visions masquerading as the future of utopian ideals. Speaking no less then of the transhumanist visions of technology to save ourselves... from ourselves. But some may argue that this simulation of humanity, no matter the simulation we've been cast in tends to follow the pattern of being "Saving ourselves" all the way down in the same way that "Turtles" follows the same regressive pattern. With the biggest problem being that the philosophy of politics, science, religion and broader culture has tried to forge universal axioms to control thought more than understand its limits, misunderstanding the sheer bias of the fact that any universal axiomatic foundation was forged upon being born on a pile of dirt, not the centre of creation from which all of this sprung from, colloquially stated. Maxims we can do, and our learning from experiences paints the way those maxims need to correctly head relative to the relational complexity we can handle, however much more than this, and more and more as it has in this conversation with self-referentiality, it becomes a discussion more on limits than potential. Like a poor person in a rich world, if we don't accurately appraise our position, financial spiritual wealth will not set like the sun a little better for the tomorrow, whatever timeline operated on. Accurately appraised then, this is where the interlude between the many kinds of this failed priesthood meeting the degradation of future generational priests begins to shift from a co-occurring existential echo of where humanities dumbed down version of abstraction being the sciences, begins to heal and transform the damaged generations through its medicinal and greater technological practicalities. To revive philosophy at its roots, we must measure our progress to the extent that we make it appealing to those that believe it to be a waste of time; especially those that view it as taking up room in the most unoccupyable areas of the largest of blackholes in the universe. The problem is that philosophy is not only painstaking, there is no foreseeable gratitude at the end of it outside of a sore head and an enlightened intellect that otherwise could have been honed by working as an independent farmer, which is not as easy as some may believe. There are many genius farmers never to be known, so be thankful they didn't want to be otherwise you may very well not of been the beneficiaries of their hard work. Not only that, even if you become a remembered philosopher, you have to deal with future generations like myself viewing you as "less than". As they remember you through the myopia of modern luxuries that even the philosophers of the day that may reach higher heights, too take for granted in their appraisal of your work, standing upon and looking down from their own clumps of universal dust thrown together to have it sold en masse like it was the next plagiarised Picasso in its lack of remembrance of ancestral roots. [ A lot of that sentence in part contains much of what I meant in my previous entry where I stated " Is to never leave anything behind. But to never... Hold onto anything." or to more 'Koanly' say so "Leave nothing behind but hold onto nothing" ]. A rug that could easily be removed from underneath them if the third world country they relied upon for a cheaper price to make the rug decided they wanted higher rates or we placed them in the sweat shop in which the rug was made en masse. To revive philosophy at its roots, we thus must remember in our writing the ancestral voices that crafted the edges of every puzzle piece we sow together, and bind those pieces with the heart so that the end creation becomes not just a product but a relic that remembered. And to do that we must sow axiom with maxim, like Plato with Aurelius and like intellectual ice with the creative beauty we can achieve with aerobatics. Like science and art, forgetting that its just a maxim for the bridging of mind and heart; these analogies, these bridges, are missing like the connection between pulse and purpose, that define the architecture of unbreakable reason with the passions of the spirit. That sounds like something I not only want to learn how to do (axiom territory), that sounds precisely what I want to learn how to be (maxim territory). That's philosophy, and that's when true spirituality, the both of them, become untethered from their past derailments only to find the same railroad tracks, heading not on a collision course like many modern appraisals but a unity upon explosion. If we can do that in our words, in our persuasions by not only persuading ourselves first but transforming ourselves to be our most unified version of the underlying philosophical function of our nervous systems structure (i.e. spirit to mind to heart),that way of being becomes its own persuasion that doesn't even need to be spoken, as we become the priesthood of its being through action, and therefore an example to follow. This is when philosophy returns to its rightful place, medicine for the mind through a direction of its senses for thought. Making no differentiation in that process between thought and being its own sense, aka is it not the outgrowth of 'sense-making' like focusing the eyes subtler vision upon greater concentration. Therefore, viewing no different the damage to sight like the damage to mind-sight and the philosophical remedies we must craft. In bandaging and performing intellectual surgery on the regeneration of the cells that speak to each other to produce that sight on life. Previously reduced by mind-viruses vetted through anti-protective philosphical plasma boundaries between protoplasmic interface and the nucleus of our sentience. Through the indoctrination of biological songs sung to sow veins that pumped poorly culturalised blood to distort and divide mind from its analogical surroundings that upon proper intellectual vision, reach interconnectivity as an after-thought and starting point rather than a final destination. Interconnectivity, like the sight of sense telling our bodies where the paths of the environment water flow. Like thought to memory tell our sentience not only where but how to build the channels that allow that river to run from mountain to the farmers tap that grows our generational philosophers for the new coming season. Where the principles of medicinal regeneration are to philosophical healing and where the principles of philosophical generation are to the extension of our biology to new frontiers that enlighten both paths in symbiosis. I began this entry speaking about the love story between relationality and medicine, and I end it by redefining both philosophy and relational reasoning (relationality) as one in the same that serve the goal of higher medicine, and higher medicines roots as indistinguishable from the philosophical rigour that binds the unity of its purpose, sown more to a philosophically misguided path towards ruin or one of salvation. Where together with newly defined philosophy and medicine, the meaning of life not only becomes probablistic it becomes its own deterministic good as we bridge the order of life against the chaos that derails it. Building architectures that not only save the will as I started it, but teach it to thrive not only with or within structure, but through the will to create it. That is real meaning. Previous conclusion: The meaning of life is, alive and well. New conclusion: The meaning of life, is all the more closer, as we live meaning well the same way we take in old wine that's both a philosophy passed down to iterate axioms further, but a medicine that refines it through the technology of higher maxims married to that growth. Where logical structure meets the saving of the will to live, or a story that can't be salvaged, meets a story that must be changed by a will that must bare the weight of light powerful enough to scare any belaboured will that finds comfort in the cracks of Plato's Cave, to never viewing it as an option. As the reinvention of the cultural and social structures surrounding, bias one to live out the conformist example of its offspring to frontier. Church reinstated through question and devotion towards growth rather than regress disguised as sacredness through dogma and indoctrination like religion or pseudo-elevation through answer and nihilistic-power through science. Self is consciousness is true power, and the only sight that reveals the next step from its starting foundations. Now’s the time to reunite with what was always our love story of this philosophical medicine brought back to its earliest beginnings bridge to what we take for granted today in both the post-modern world and the bureaucratic infrastructure of the medical establishment. That sacred marriage as it always used to be of axiom and maxim, where the relational rigor of mind and the regenerative tissue of passion unite to heal our sight and build the architecture of spiritual meaning. This returns to medicine's roots, where thinkers like Pythagoras and Hippocrates first sought rational, philosophical causes for illness. The Hippocratic Oath, "Do no harm", should be sewn into the minds then of every philospher, and into every physician, how to bring the will to life back or further into every patient, the path of goodness is not found in text but in the heart-mind symbiotic unity to write it better. That is a love story I want to read from even the darkest and most treacherous parts of the universes greatest and most ferocious of black-holes, and that I believe that would enable the beginnings of many... To break out of. And begin life connected to the Earth's ground, humbled by the farmers noble foresight, the ingenuity of mindful doctors and those too driven by undivided hearts, escalated by modern 'cyber' philosophers, while rebirthed by the old and forgotten that sought to unite from what we have separated, but now reinvite to make whole once again, and further too, as we embark on defining the right echo we want to hear back as we plant the seeds for the eras to come. These are the beginnings of where metamodernism meets the redefinition of spirituality, at the waters shoreline of a planet that's the third rock from a sun of a universe that for now... Only arises within within, and in our togetherness, of both our intellect and the paths that forge the greatest of life’s love stories.