Joseph Maynor

It's paradoxical because we half-live in this "dream" too.

I tried to listen to Peter Ralston the other day and got thru maybe 5 mins of the video. No offense to anyone who gets value from his work.

I can't even listen to most spiritual teachers anymore. I only listen to my friends now.

I agree with this too.

I feel like once you transcend teachers you got enlightenment.

But your game on your end seems real, not just like a game. When we think of others, it's much easier to use the game metaphor. You will allow things to happen to another, that you would not let happen to you or your tribe/family.

Thank you. I appreciate that.

My videos are awful but I made them and I don't have any shame about it. I try not to make this about me. But I've struggled to have a voice that is not total bullshit or avatarish in this format and I have to admit it has been a struggle.

When we're focused on Truth, we're serious. But we're not serious all of the time, only a fraction of the time. So we balance btw. seriousness with humor is an offset to seriousness. In fact,, someone too serious is insufferable.

Speak for yourself friend. Much Love!

When we realize we're a giant community is when Love can arise.

I appreciate you. You know me. We've communicated for years.

What doubles it up is when you can both laugh and understand at the same time! But this is hard for 99.9 percent of people.

Nice way to get at the crux of the issue.

I've read it multiple times. It's an interesting book. The chapters balance an off the cuff to carefully constructed vibe. Every chapter is different.

I think she's a female.

Anyone can come up with a list of at least 10 things they could ideally change that would significantly improve their own health, finances, and relationships just to make it concrete as a starting point. And even if these aren't done, making the list improves intention, which is valuable in itself.

I would say yes and no. On the one hand, I feel complete, but paradoxically on the other hand, I recognize ways that change could occur that would be good too. So, I don't see a brite-line conflict between Is and Ought. In other words, you can both Accept and have Intention to Change.

True. Not everyone will resonate with life purpose. And even if you have a life purpose, that doesn't mean changes are occurring that are aligning with it.

I sense a conflict here to he honest. But right on!

I've been reflecting on this recently too. Is there a duality between Is vs. Ought? In other words -- between acceptance, and striving to align with some ideal?