TheEnigma

What if an individual puts in insane effort but they simply just don't have enough intelligence or energy?

Generally the higher up in spiral dynamics on the tiers that one is, the higher their net worth would be as well? Hm, but then I see many stage greens have much less than many stage orange people. And many stage orange people have less than stage green people as well. So is it not necessarily? Because a stage orange individual will also likely be wealthier than people In stage turquoise or yellow because those individuals would also have given lots away or surrendered to not needing to make so much. So at any stage including purple, or turquoise, can someone be very well off or very poor? Or generally the higher up the individual is, the richer on net worth?

Okay then at what point can someone be trusted? Because aren't psychedelics also related to drugs? So why is say crystal meth or cocaine demonized and 5MEO DMT not? Couldn't they all fry someone's brain and couldn't they all be dangerous? So what's the difference that would make someone that takes psychedelics more likely to be trustworthy?

Okay I saw your entire video. But how come some people just have better intuition than others? Is it to some degree luck and what you are born with?

Okay but isn't Leo judging too when he says McDonald's is serving poison to people?

Intuitively I know that Leo would say that Walmart does evil. But how so? (besides teaming with McDonalds and Leo has said McDonalds serves poison). Can't the Walmart CEO still say, "look... we sell products and serve many people, plus can keep the costs down and make things so efficient to customers, plus we bring shareholders lots of value, Win Win." Is it because they mistreat employees and pay them so little? What is really evil to even begin with?

Isn't a Chainsaw itself consciousness? So how can consciousness be killed?

The thing is you once said look at the country's corruption index as an indicator. But these are the problems I can think of with the Corruption Index. AI said this... It measures perception, not reality. The CPI scores are based on the views of experts and businesspeople, not direct measurements of actual corruption. Since corruption is deliberately hidden, hard data is difficult to obtain. However, critics note that this reliance on perception can perpetuate existing biases and stereotypes about countries. It creates an "elite bias." Because the CPI relies on assessments from experts and executives, it reflects their perspectives, which often focus on large-scale bribery and may not capture the day-to-day corruption experienced by average citizens. Other indices, like the Global Corruption Barometer, attempt to address this by surveying the public directly, though they face their own methodological challenges. It oversimplifies a complex issue. Boiling down a country's corruption problems into a single score can be misleading. Corruption varies greatly in its type, scope, and severity, and a single number cannot adequately capture this complexity. For example, a country might have low-level bribery but high-level political corruption, and a single score may not reflect the distinction. It focuses only on the public sector. The index does not measure corruption within the private sector, such as tax fraud, money laundering, or major corporate scandals. This can present an incomplete picture, particularly for countries where private sector misconduct is influential. It may reinforce stereotypes and have perverse consequences. The focus on perceived corruption and public rankings can lead to aid and investment being withheld from countries with low scores, creating a "corruption trap" that penalizes developing nations already struggling with limited resources. I will also add, for example UK and Canada is now way overpriced, has so many homeless, and unaffordable real estate for average people etc and might even have more stabbings than say the Philippines. Record unemployment... So you are basically paying way more, to get less and to also have more chance of being stabbed. Dating is horrible for both genders, there's so much paranoia, individualism and unhappiness. Healthcare is worsening and they're cutting the staff, yet the government just makes it's citizens pay more taxes. When you say "in a very corrupt country, a person can be raped, and complain to the police and the police rape them too." That's taking the worst from the poorest third world countries. And comparing it to the best situation in America. When you said America is more like paradise. There is so much mental illness, powerful recreational drugs, unaffordable healthcare, loneliness, poverty and overspending in the Western countries. I don't fully buy it. I have been to Mexico, and aside from the Cartels, it is mostly peaceful and even less homeless on the subway compared to Toronto. It may have even less stabbings and gun violence than in Canada and the US. I just feel like the corruption index is missing a lot of things. And I haven't even gotten into the meat of many of the details.

Okay but if truth doesn't care about any specific individual's feelings. How is Truth compassion then? Isn't that a contradiction?

You guys are all just arguing and playing with words and getting nowhere. And it's all just a bunch of perspectives.

You said "Truth" is compassion. Yet you said ""Truth" doesn't care about specific individual's feelings." So how are you so sure that "Truth is compassion"?

In your video you said if the individual wants to chase a materialistic life, they can, and of course they will also cause themselves a lot of suffering. So In absolute terms, isn't it okay and nothing is stopping Trump from doing this? You just said there's nothing particularly wrong with that.

In absolute terms isn't Trump a beautiful thing? Trump is God. Trump is reality. And had to exist because reality is perfect just the way it is. It's our own ego that wants to protect itself and others. If a person had a high enough consciousness, wouldn't they see Trump as absolute love and consciousness? If they were in front of Trump, cockroaches and centipedes, they'd still feel infinite joy in their presence.

So are humans existing a good thing? I have wondered this since I was a child. People always went "Save the poor people in Africa!" And I would think to myself, who says saving people is a good thing? What if humans are actually bad for the universe? That's why I've contemplated, "who says getting married is a good thing? Who says having kids is a good thing?" My ex would say "a life is inherently a good thing." And I thought to myself, how are you sure about that? What if the world already has too many people or life forms? What if a life is a bad thing?... because It impedes and deprives on other lives or just other parts of the universe? Why is anything good or bad?