now is forever

Member
  • Content count

    3,747
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by now is forever


  1. 3 hours ago, Yahya said:

    @Danioover9000 If you have watch Leo video for several years then why do you only have six posts on this forum?

     

    because the forum is not obligatory to selfactualize. you wouldn’t probably wonder how many people never be part of the forum while stil watching the vids. i never wanted to be part of this forum, although i was fond of the vids some years ago to add some more actuality to my selfactualizing life. self actualization in that sense is not new, but realizing it can be teached online specificated as what it is with a longterm spiritual awakening goal behind is new. no connection to the forum required. although it’s certainly an interesting aspect to discuss what it ultimately is about. if we are talking about processing you are already doing it without being aware of it anyways. so you selfactualize any second any minute - question is always the content of actualization and how it is aligned with your spirituality, you can actualize yourself in so many directions that you can actualize into a monster or a human, but you always start out being a monkey.


  2. On 9.6.2018 at 1:56 PM, now is forever said:

    i thought the same watching the video. but for me since longer time it was always: the path is the goal. because the now never stands still, there is always movement. you can rise up to some insight but you always have to go on, taking another happening another insight. if we want to stand still we would have to make the whole world stand still forever - we can't make the world stand still, but we can be close to empty to recive new insights. insights that shape our view or let them pass unnoticed.

    sometimes we have to realize we where going up a hill, but on top of the hill is only the top of the hill, it all looks different than expected. but you finally see some things from above, you haven't noticed yet and you also see some things you were looking out for the whole time. we are also a little overpowered by our own strength because we walked long and fast and fear that we might not make it down again, and we might never reach that top again.

    i think that's what happened to leo at that point. but isn't it strong to show it?

     


  3. 1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

    God decides that! God decides for maximum Goodness and Love.

    If you were unlimited, why decide anything less?

    A being of unlimited intelligence and consciousness would not hate itself, as that would be foolish.

    that would mean we only ever hate what we are not identified with, if we are identified and still hate or feel attacked we start a process of disintegration. that’s why even oneness is mostly always a partially integrated oneness where an otherness still exists.

    it‘s also interesting how we fragment otherness to keep our own oneness alive. or how we create oneness of fragmented otherness in sense of responsibilities.

    another question is the difference of feeling of hate and how hate looks from the outside. as hate usually comes out of a place of vulnerability and wrong coaping mechanisms. from the ego perspective hate sometimes doesn’t even look like hate from the inside, it is also only a survival mechanism, to protect other survival mechanisms. that’s why people don’t understand how they look from the outside. how they project hate through their feelings of fear or suffering or loneliness that reaches others in form of hate. and there are also people who can discern and know but feed their hate like animals and pet them. of course the sensitivity and reaction of the person who is the fear/hate projection aimed at does matter, too. sometimes people seem like being hateful but instead they just stand up to protect what needs to be protected in its right to live against hateful survival mechanisms aimed at them or others or nature. hate and fear and suffering are a codependency, it can be broken only if both people or participating parties step out of the circle of suffering/hate/fear infliction.

    absolute hate absolute love dynamics can only be understood through mirroring processes. i really liked the video about how to deal with toxic people. although i recently got into a situation where i was protected by a male against another male who inflicted psychological and physical hate onto me where i really felt that sometimes hate is pure unconditional love without any other reason that absolute love must be protected through hate against absolute hate because of what you choose will be your kingdom.


  4. On 7.6.2018 at 8:18 PM, now is forever said:

    no consciousness can be high in a place but low in yourself. it doesn't mean because there is only consciousness everything is leveled.

    it is a matter of what takes place in consciousness.

    or do you know any aspect of the food you are buying? any aspect of the cosmetic you are using? any aspect of the people you are talking to?

    if you are conscious about that you can rise the level of consciousness.

    deleting some conciousness matters... it’s all past i can’t cling to past thoughts - i just imagine how it would be if i had to take a backup audio recording of everything i would say and then going through it a second time. how hilarious. how much data we leave behind online... although some data i try to keep longer than others, i can delete them in the end like the reposting i‘ll just delete the reposted stuff with hiding the whole journal, as a final step.


  5. spirituality is not the religion it is what you spiritually embody towards another person or towards the world. how you treat another person how you value living beings. there is not more spiritual or less spiritual it is about the quality of spirit and awareness you have towards another person. there is no perfect person, no person without fault but how can you value another person while not forgetting yourself? why is it so important to value yourself, you might ask. the answer is the way you value yourself is deeply connected to the way you value others - and the way you value others might influence the way you value yourself - there is no either or in this example, no better or worse. they could probably both work on themselves it‘s not their religion that makes them human or not, it’s their concept of humanity that does - you can find humanity in both religions. the religion is not what makes the human, the human is.

    although i know of more devilish deeds of christian priests than of buddhist priests.


  6. 1 hour ago, mandyjw said:

    xD When I got groceries yesterday the cashier was Thomas. I've never had someone shame me so much for not bringing my reusable shopping bags. But you know what? I put them back in my car that very day so I can't forget them next time. 

    sounds like the same person.

    i always know when he’s right, it’s very uncomfortable then because i know i could do better - mostly i forget though that he could do better somewhere else - that’s why usually i get to learn and he doesn’t.


  7. 1 minute ago, mandyjw said:

    "There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." Galatians 3:28

     

    oh goddess i didn’t make it soon enough, now i have to attend sunday school.


  8. 5 minutes ago, tsuki said:

    Sexuality is suffering. That's what I came to realize recently. The mere fact that there are men and women is cruel.
    The fact that we're biologically predisposed to certain polar behaviors is horrific.
    The fact that we're unaware of them and that they drive our lives to such extents is nauseating.

    no sexuality is only suffering if you think of it in a victim mentality, you are always the predator if you think you are unaware of them. don’t be - you can be with women in a very friendly manner without sexuality getting much involved if you start to notice them differently. the best friends of a friend of mine are guys she slept with though - they got over it, realized they don’t fit and everything was fine. doesn’t work out every time though. what i want to say - yes sexuality can be a problem especially in communication and how open we communicate with others.


  9. english is a wonderful language for metaphysics, really beautifully simple. also some words exist in english that other languages can’t say in one word, like the word commitment. but it is not able to grasp some other words quite well. words like „reason“ in german there are two reasons „grund“ and „vernunft“ it’s basically the difference between reason and Reason. 


  10. On 3.6.2018 at 8:46 AM, now is forever said:

    well ok, i wanted to say disconstruktion but the word doesn't exist in english ? or i couldn't find it.

    i'm talking about the coming and going in a much smaller perspective than dinosaurs and humans. disconstruction usually already starts with construction. they are quiet dynamic.

    well but of course even small forces, they can act through higher organized forces, as the constructed force being deconstructive. like a tornado is constructed leading to disconstruction.

     


  11. On 7.6.2018 at 10:30 AM, now is forever said:

    a song about real friendship, real partnership and really meeting each other in our illusions, it's about coming closer to enlightenment, too. it's about the moment and the moment how it passes.

    actually the video of this one is also very good if you don't whey it in good or bad, just as reference referring to itself:

     

    there was nothing and nothing ever happened because it was all for nothing - it didn’t make a difference.


  12. On 3.6.2018 at 1:44 AM, now is forever said:

    what about not thinking in evil or good but in deconstructive and constructive forces? they interact in multiple ways. sometimes deconstruction is needed as path maker for reconstruction. what we perceive as evil is a form of deconstruction of something that was whole into something that is in our perception somehow not whole again and in our perception disfunctional.

    by labeling it evil we neglect it. 

     

    On 3.6.2018 at 3:37 AM, Leo Gura said:

    @now is forever There is still a problem with calling something "deconstructive" because there is an implicit assumption that deconstruction is bad. And whether something is decontructive depends on your self-agenda. Hitler's Holocaust was constructive from his POV. And the meteor wiping out the dinosaurs was constructive for many species, but destructive to the dinosaurs.

    When you judge whether something is destructive, you are effectively saying, "That is destructive TO ME and the status quo that helps my survival."

    There is no such thing as Absolute construction or destruction. The death of one universe gives rise to another.

     


  13. i guess in the end we can still hear the bulldozers coming in - i hear them. it’s really hard to delete one after the other posts, why do these words feel so important sometimes? they are not they served a reson for a simple moment in time. i‘m creating some voids in my akashic records. the part where i ever existed.


  14. 11 minutes ago, jbram2002 said:

    There's a lot to glean from the Bible without having to delve into the legalistic side. A ton of very interesting non-dualistic things if you're looking.

     

    probably... i already have so many books i didn’t read yet. and they don’t have them lying around in hotels anymore. so i‘d need to buy one and think that’s very unchristian.

    i know that’s something to burn for. but then i‘d prefer to burn in shivas ring of fire. i‘m not sure but maybe jesus would laugh about this, as he probably was one of the most heart open people in history.


  15. @jbram2002 i‘d need to read the bible for that... i read it once when i was younger, i think it was a child’s version and it was quite readable like a fary tale. but i liked the first testament more... and i almost can’t remember anything. there where a lot of sheep and shepards. but i‘ll probably never discuss the bible seriously...as i really am not a person who likes to stick to rules just because they are written in stone they can be written in the wind or in the air but stone is to heavy to carry around.


  16. 25 minutes ago, Zigzag Idiot said:

    @now is forever @jbram2002  

    There is also the idea that the act of Judas' betraying Christ was a spur of the moment sacrifice he made to buy a little time so that this Ritual could be carried out. That's why Gurdjieff said that sometimes when he got drunk, he would pray to Judas instead of that little skinny Jew and he also didn't want to bother God especially when he was drunk.

    xD he didn’t want to bother her, how funny is this.


  17. but he made water into wine. didn’t he say it was his blood? also the holy grail metaphor... the dragon. there is much room for interpretation. the thing is i don’t care much about religion, but if he was a non dualist, he probably had integrated the female side. the bible has always been a matter of interpretation. what we learn as a religion is the history of the religion. if we would discuss if it’s catholicism or protestantism who is right, then wouldn’t it be the catholicism that would be the older religion and even wouldn’t it be the jewish belief as the religion jesus was probably part of... so why not having a 2.19 version of beliefs. i don’t know i‘m playing the witch again. the devil ignores me though.