Carl-Richard

My dreams are about future real life events?

185 posts in this topic

2 minutes ago, cetus said:

Interesting. So, you're saying I dream of an event then make it happen? Never thought of it that way.

Yes, and it applies to nightmares as well and really generally in life.

Our beliefs can have real but unforeseen consequences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Jirh Thought = form. If that's the case, I'll be sure to dream good thoughts for all.:x


When the secret is revealed to you, you will know that you are not other than God, but that you yourself are the object of your quest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is, is easy to see that your dream is your imagination. But can you see that about your waking life? That's the hard part.

 


I am the impossible made reality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Human Mint said:

The thing is, is easy to see that your dream is your imagination. But can you see that about your waking life? That's the hard part.

 

Ever awaken from a dream that is so real you're not sure which is the true reality?


When the secret is revealed to you, you will know that you are not other than God, but that you yourself are the object of your quest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

We should be aware of how we can frame the same things different ways. For example, a healer who can put their hands on someone and seemingly speed up healing, in the materialist epistemic paradigm, they will say "the sensual touch induces endorphinergic signalling which synergizes with the placebo effect which increases the innate regenerative mechanisms of the body". It's a very roundabout and "inside/outside" way of putting it. Meanwhile, a psychic will say "the healing energy leads to healing". It's a more elegant way of putting it; both may agree on the underlying effect, but they describe it differently. 

These are not the same things said in different ways. Not even close.

"The sensual touch induces endorphinergic signalling which synergizes with the placebo effect which increases the innate regenerative mechanisms of the body" is simultaneously infinitely more truthful (epistemically correct) and useful (pragmatic) and magical (ontologically correct) than the bland ignorant mythical "healing energy leads to healing".

Notice that the scientific explanation offers many things that the psychic explanation doesn't:

  • A clear unhidden mechanism.
  • Epistemic humility.
  • Openness for being wrong.
  • Clarity.
  • Capacity for criticism.
  • Possibility of development.
  • A whole bunch of established terms.

The magical part is that each of those terms/components is inexplicable ultimately, yet somehow, we can spot it and make use of it.

The psychic explanation is vague and closed. Nothing to find there. Nothing to discuss. Nothing to improve. Purely mythical and dogmatic. It offers nothing. It proves nothing. It says nothing.

Edited by Jirh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now