SoonHei

Can you solve this? Let your mind spin - part 2

30 posts in this topic

F. 200


“You don’t have problems; you are the problem.”

– Swami Chinmayananda

Namaste ? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Serotoninluv said:

It depends on how “lose” is defined. 

In the normal standard sense :)

Lol don't ask me how that's defined

 

Maybe this here on this forum can have multiple answers instead of just one haha :)

 

 

And so far. All wrong answers

 

Edited by SoonHei

Love Is The Answer
www.instagram.com/ev3rSunny

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A. 30

 


“You don’t have problems; you are the problem.”

– Swami Chinmayananda

Namaste ? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with serotoninluv, for me he just lost the first 100$. after It's just a normal trade so Nothing lost Nothing earned but if you count the trade so yes it is the first:30$

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, SoonHei said:

@Anna1 hope you're not just guessing haha

 

And no. Not A.

Funny...I wasn't ..lol...I figured he gave (lost?) $30

But, forget it (walks out of the room and slams the door) :P


“You don’t have problems; you are the problem.”

– Swami Chinmayananda

Namaste ? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming no opportunity profit for the storeowner, he lost $100.

For example, let’s say the guy bought $70 of vegetables, that nobody else would have bought and the storeowner had to discard them. If he paid $50 for those vegetables, he would have had to take that loss if the thief didn’t buy them. In this scenario, the storeowner’s net loss would be $50 ($30 if we factor in opportunity loss of the $20 profit).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

$100 loss to the store owner. 

 

 


INFJ-T,ptsd,BPD, autism, anger issues

Cleared out ignore list today. 

..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thief could have made the same profit by buying (basically stealing)$ 100 worth goods. 

 

 

 

Edited by Preety_India

INFJ-T,ptsd,BPD, autism, anger issues

Cleared out ignore list today. 

..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't get it...in my world u take $100 from me, then, take $70 of my stuff, then I give you $30 more, that's $200 

Someone explain?

Wait...no, took $100, gave back $70, then got back $30...oh $100

Hehehe???


“You don’t have problems; you are the problem.”

– Swami Chinmayananda

Namaste ? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Anna1 this is how i look at it

 

Take the first event and second as separate

 

If i go to a store and buy $70 stuff. Pay for it with a $100 bill and get $30 back. Is there any loss for the owner there?

 

No

That's just a regular transaction which takes place.

 

Now let's look at the first event by itself.

He took a $100 from the register.

 

That's it. $100 loss :)

The other is just buying something. Which is a normal transaction.

:)

 


Love Is The Answer
www.instagram.com/ev3rSunny

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Anna1 said:

I really don't get it...in my world u take $100 from me, then, take $70 of my stuff, then I give you $30 more, that's $200 

Someone explain?

Imagine the thief stole $100 and left the store. Then someone else entered, bought $70 of merchandise and paid with a $100 bill. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Anna1 said:

I really don't get it...in my world u take $100 from me, then, take $70 of my stuff, then I give you $30 more, that's $200 

Someone explain?

The thing is he takes a $100 bill but has to return it at the time of buying. The bill is back in its original place. But instead of the bill goods worth 70$ are with the thief along with the change of $30..a total profit of $ 100 to the thief and the same loss for the owner. 

In every situation it will be $100 only since the buyer or thief doesn't wish to spend his own money but utilizes the money he stole. 

So only $100 is exchanged each time one way or another. 

 


INFJ-T,ptsd,BPD, autism, anger issues

Cleared out ignore list today. 

..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SoonHei said:

@Anna1 this is how i look at it

 

Take the first event and second as separate

 

If i go to a store and buy $70 stuff. Pay for it with a $100 bill and get $30 back. Is there any loss for the owner there?

 

No

That's just a regular transaction which takes place.

 

Now let's look at the first event by itself.

He took a $100 from the register.

 

That's it. $100 loss :)

The other is just buying something. Which is a normal transaction.

:)

 

This assumes that the $70 of merchandise would have eventually been sold. If the thief bought $70 of perishable items that no one else would have bought and the storeowner had to discard the items, his net loss would be less than $100. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, SoonHei said:

The other is just buying something. Which is a normal transaction.

 

That's it!!! Your getting a warning ⚠️ this time! 

Hm, title of warning: "Frying my brain", 2 points, to never expire!

?


“You don’t have problems; you are the problem.”

– Swami Chinmayananda

Namaste ? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now