What are your top 10 values?

[kag101]

1. Self-Expression

2. Deliberate Imperfection

3. Agility

4. Eclecticism

5. Essencialism

6. Life Purpose

7. Cooperation

8. Self-Confidence

9. Authenticity

10. Vitality

 

what are yours? 

Feel free to ask me to talk more about a certain value of mine

Looking forward to hearing your values

 

[oOo]

Good idea @kag101 .

 

1. Truth
A. How? By seeking and subtracting falsity to disarm cognitive biases: certainty by anomaly. 
B. Why? It funnels the ordering of every subsequent value. 

2. Discernment. 
A. How? Critical thinking.
B. Why? It orders the metrics of truth and its use as a funnel, along with providing the pipeline by which every subsequent value is fed through.

3. Awareness.
A. How? Practice x journalling on practice to refine the how, inclusive of theorisation. 
B. Why? As above: moulded for the context.

4. Judgement.
A. How? Training, theorisation and the diligent practice and refinement of how the first three meet reality.
B. Why? Every moment is a judgement, thus simultaneously, we are the teacher and the student of our own reasoning; and sometimes our own detention centre. Our judgement determines our values, and the scripture we bare that holds those values to our chest; thus, it is the fortune teller of precisely how we will leave this earth relative to our impact and the actions met from our values resolve. 

5. Love.
A. How? Practice heart activation exercises x refinement, again inclusive of theorisation.
B. Why? It is the highest emotion, therefore the most encompassing. Love is not the absence of struggling with lower emotions, it is the metric, the challenge to bring them to that baseline and to deepen the understanding of love through that process. Love is not a bumper sticker when it is encompassed by the first four values mentioned, instead they become the methodology by which your understanding of love becomes truly empirically yours. As much as we live in an interdependent social reality, we abide by the compass organised by loves interdependency within our own being; our shackles that reflect our estrangement of love reflect the shackles we will want to hold the world to, and vice versa. At every intersection then, we tell how we want every other intersection to generate feedback in return. This gives practicality to "circle of life" idioms and the first 4 values expecting further groundedness. Stated in this way, love becomes the compass for intentionality to not only try to follow or live up to, but to ground only to what is meaningfully possible as encompassed by values 1-4. Thus even without a model, much less a proper one, love becomes the intentionality of how our being meets the world, which is the essence of the purpose of meaning itself; where and what is our meaning formation that we are always bound to, tied by and to? 

6. Modeling.
A. How? Mapped by 1-4.
B. Why? Like love, its a measurement of baseline epistemic reality, but cognitively; it mirrors the karmic "the circle of life" in the emotional sense by understanding that everything that we encompass cognitively, must first be held by us as a cognitive object, even all that is beyond words but can be sensed. The mere memory of the sense itself is the cognitive artefact of there being something more to explore, even if that exploration is the deeper emotional. Everything is encircled by a model by the postulator or in the personal, as the subjective. 

7. Unity & Integration.
A. How? Mapped by 1-6. Subsequent practical training practices built and earned through challenge completion.
B. Why? If baseline emotional reality is a circle. If baseline cognitive reality is also a circle. Then their unitive progress is of course, a circle; and every full rotation, an integration point, that is for better or for worse depending on how our meaning formations mould to become the intention that creates the world of meaning we respond to. 

8. Meaning organisation.
A. How? Mapped by 1-7. More specifically to my point regarding interdependence, by its very consequence "meaning closure", as in the point by which we act to justify a choice or vice versa, is governed by the interdependence between cognitive and emotional trees reaching their own closure points to synthesise into what we call "our reason for creating something into existence the moment our mind utters it". Indices inclusive but not limited to: physiological, mental, spiritual, environmental intersections. 
B. Why? If meaning formation is an inescapable reality, the meaning that we must contend with then is either discernment of otherwise and the terms upon which that reality supposedly lives, and acceptance nevertheless, of the reality that infers its advance. 

9. Intelligence.
A. How? Mapped 1-8. Theorisations synthesised into embodied practices refined by all inclusively 1-8.
B. Why? Values 1-7 have already self-validated that intelligence must become an operative working definition for moving through existence, even if its only ever implied. That said, much more than just the mere action of intelligence, its already justified itself as a self-referential reality that co-created all of the above identities not just through a sentience, but on identifying the intelligence at work in creating the sentience itself and the subsequent patterns discerned here. A pattern implies order and an order implies an order to be discerned by an intelligence that grasps it.

10. Connection & interconnection; Synthesis.

A. How? Mapped 1-9.
B. Why? Any connection implies something that it is connected to, and therefore implies a circle it is encompassed by that interconnects all. Connection and Interconnection, or "to interconnection", as they dance between each other, are the system, the structure and the rail-tracks by which trains of function move through that their limits are encircled by. These encirclements are those are those baseline epistemic realities, determining the position and action, or at the very least, intention of refinement, along with the love of imperfection in that slow graduating process. Meta-interconnection as well, embodies synthesis, and synthesis is the model that remakes models into the new forms that defines the continuous purpose of having any intelligence at all to create and live by these or any meaning.

[Human Mint]

Thanks for sharing. I always wanted to see the top values of y'all. The following are in not any particular order for now. 

1. Courage.
2. Open-mindeness.
3. Patience.
4. Creativity.
5. Leadership.

 

1. To me this means that I face fears and. To develop a sensitivity to spot my fears. With time this develops maturity and resilience. It is a commitment to not fearing Consciousness since is the only thing that I have.
2. I look for new perspectives as much as possible. This would look like I listen to different audiobooks, read different books and listen to different experts. This is a source of motivation. It means I will encompass new ways of thinking and acting. The way to avoid getting into a rut.
3. A must for growth. This means making short-cuts is not an option and that I enjoy being patient. It develops in tranquility since I don't have to rush, while at the same time I am deep into my work, relationships. Slow = fast.
4. This means I must acquire the skills, the education and take the actions necessary so I develop a creative mind. I value creativity as a baseline. It is my north star. A source of happiness.
5. I produce the space so others can express themselves authentically. The skill of seeing the intelligence in others and bringing it foward. To be a unitor.  

@kag101 What do your 4th and 5th values mean?

Edited 7 hours ago by Human Mint

[Human Mint]

@oOoIs your life purpose writing by any chance?

[oOo]

@Human Mint If it was, I am failing at it. Not yet where I was, or where I should be heh. I'll take that as a compliment though, so thank you.

What have you defined as yours, and what was your process for determining your use of Life purpose as a category to follow?

Genuinely interested.

[Natasha Tori Maru]

You guys young chaps?

Surprised health isnt no.1 

Nothing matters without it.