Solipsism Question - Are Dreams Identical To This Right Now?

[Max1993]

@Mellowmarsh I don't have access to what you are seeing now, but you do, could you elaborate on your visual field in relation to mine?

[Yimpa]

7 minutes ago, Max1993 said:

@Yimpa I am sure that I will get all of my questions answered, in the meantime I was just wondering how our visual fields co-exist or what relation do they have with one another?

I will contemplate this while on a trip. That’s the way to go. A change of state of consciousness is required. 

[Nemra]

1 hour ago, Max1993 said:

I don't have access to what you are seeing now, but you do, could you elaborate on your visual field in relation to mine?

Try to find something visual outside of your visual field. If you find it, where would it appear?

What makes your visual field unique?

Knowing that a thing is both a whole and part of another thing, why would there be another visual field that coexists with yours independently?

How is it possible that characters of a story are aware of some other part of the story that is not theirs?

Edited 16 hours ago by Nemra

[Mellowmarsh]

13 hours ago, Max1993 said:

@Mellowmarsh I don't have access to what you are seeing now, but you do, could you elaborate on your visual field in relation to mine?

Whenever you think of another, namely “me” here, “you” there create a distance between the observer there as “you” and the observer here as “me”

This apparent distance is an artificial separation that doesn’t actually exist in reality, as the observer is omnipresent infinite space. Omnipresence is another word for “conserved ENERGY” that’s neither created or destroyed. 
 

You may be interested in the one electron theory… 
 

 

Edited 4 hours ago by Mellowmarsh

[Mellowmarsh]

It’s just a hypothesis but what isn’t a hypothesis 

 

 

[aurum]

The universe is not an electron.

The part about Oneness is correct though.

[Mellowmarsh]

16 minutes ago, aurum said:

The universe is not an electron.

The part about Oneness is correct though.

I agree that all human made theories are not. ( hypotheticals )

 

Oneness is. 

[Nemra]

39 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

It’s just a hypothesis but what isn’t a hypothesis 

That's reductionistic. It's a poor way to interconnect reality. It still assumes that electrons create the universe.

The theory also assumes that a finite thing can have its exact same in the universe. However, it's not possible because the universe would not contain any form which invalidates the theory itself.

The universe is holistic.

Edited 3 hours ago by Nemra

[Mellowmarsh]

14 hours ago, Max1993 said:

@Mellowmarsh I don't have access to what you are seeing now, but you do, could you elaborate on your visual field in relation to mine?

Behind the face mask of difference don’t we all look the same?

The observer looking through each skull is the same observer. But from the perspective of each face mask, what is being looked upon is the only thing being looked upon. There’s nothing else being viewed for that face mask, yet behind all masks is the same observer. Still, motionless and imageless. 

 

 

[Mellowmarsh]

@Nemra Nondual oneness is not a theory, I agree. 

[Joseph Maynor]

This right now is also theory.  But it is a good pointer.  

[Mellowmarsh]

9 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

But it is a good pointer.  

Yes, it’s good because it’s the only way pointing can point, it points to everything but itself. Pointing can’t point to itself. No more than a tooth can bite itself. If it could point to itself it would be in separation realm which is illusion.