Am I totally inferring the link between two events? Causation question...

[LastThursday]

Every cause is unique, every outcome unique. It's never the same dog yelp, it's never the same step on the dog. Causes are categories of things, which needs you to connect things into "sameness". Causation also needs separation, the process of stepping needs to be separated from the process of the dog yelping. Without sameness and without separation what do you have?

[integral]

@Natasha Tori Maru this is hilarious

Quote

What the pigeon experiment actually shows: Skinner put pigeons on a timer that dropped food at fixed intervals regardless of what the bird did. The food was uncorrelated with behavior — pure coincidence. But whatever the bird happened to be doing when food arrived, it started repeating — head-bobbing, turning counterclockwise, pecking a corner — because it had formed a false belief about cause and effect. It built a ritual on a correlation that wasn't there.

 

[Someone here]

Some ancient Islamic theologians and mystics have denied causality as well before David Hume was even born . They said things don’t actually happen because of the previous causes but because of god’s will through apparent causes . For example if you burn in fire what’s actually burning you is God’s will not the fire.. just as in a dream a bird might shit on your suit and you would believe that the cause of the dirt on your suit was caused by the bird dropping the shit on you ..but actually the actual cause is your will as the dreamer. 
ultimately you must deconstruct all of reality . All of logic and mathematics and science are not absolutely true . They are not absolutely untrue as well ..they are just conditionally true .