Peter Ralston On LOVE - Newsletter Response

[Jirh]

1 minute ago, Joseph Maynor said:

God i hope not for you lol. 

Why not?

[Joseph Maynor]

2 minutes ago, Jirh said:

Why not?

Because that's just following some leader.  You're being a follower not a leader.

[Mellowmarsh]

8 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

If I knew you in real life I would take this seriously, but I don't so I won't.  You're just an online fool to me.

My God I even made a thread in your name out of concern for your absence here. I was shocked too at the ban from other forum, just for being myself the real fictional character.. you’re familiar with this terminology, yeah?

 

In my world, the online cyberspace presence of human interaction is identical to real life human interaction . Unless Joseph is pretending to not be a human online,  believing a human is only a human when in real life. Lol

 

And you think I am a fool.

[Someone here]

@Mellowmarsh you asked Leo to unban Joseph?

[Joseph Maynor]

3 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

My God I even made a thread in your name out of concern for your absence here. I was shocked too at the ban from other forum, just for being myself the real fictional character.. you’re familiar with this terminology, yeah?

 

In my world, the online cyberspace presence of human interaction is identical to real life human interaction . Unless Joseph is pretending to not be a human online,  believing a human is only a human when in real life. Lol

 

And you think I am a fool.

I'm not banned from Phil's forum as far as I know.  

[Mellowmarsh]

13 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

Okay Jane.  

 

Okay, well it’s been nice not knowing you.

 

See you on the next one, because if it wasn’t recorded, it never happened. 

[Mellowmarsh]

1 minute ago, Joseph Maynor said:

I'm not banned from Phil's forum as far as I know.  

I was referring to the ban you were dealt on this forum, not Phil’s forum. Please listen carefully.

[Jirh]

2 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

Because that's just following some leader.  You're being a follower not a leader.

Oh, okay. Didn't catch the humor until I went back and got some context from the comments 

Anyway, I guess I'll have to live with this disgrace of being the black sheep (but, nevertheless, sheep) for the rest of my miserable life.

[Joseph Maynor]

This is just really stupid.  

[Mellowmarsh]

5 minutes ago, Someone here said:

@Mellowmarsh you asked Leo to unban Joseph?

No I didn’t. Go back and read the thread, oh wait…Joseph wanted it hidden, strangely, 🤔 hmm. What evvs.. 

[Mellowmarsh]

1 minute ago, Joseph Maynor said:

This is just really stupid.  

Spoiler ‼️ Alert ..there’s no leader without a follower. No follower without a leader. 

[Joseph Maynor]

Just now, Mellowmarsh said:

No I didn’t. Go back and read the thread, oh wait…Joseph wanted it hidden, strangely, 🤔 hmm. What evvs.. 

You made a thread about me in the friendship forum asking everyone about me after you were banned from Phil's forum, which I defended you on and they decided not to let you back because you were seen as overly aggressive.

[Mellowmarsh]

2 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

You made a thread about me in the friendship forum asking everyone about me after you were banned from Phil's forum, which I defended you on and they decided not to let you back because you were seen as overly aggressive.

Okay thanks for letting me know the reason, I always wondered the reason. They didn’t tell me to my face why, but to your face yes.

 

Okay, I own it, no problem.

[Joseph Maynor]

I argued that you should be let back on believe it or not.  And it was declined.

[Mellowmarsh]

17 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

I'm not trying to shame you, I legitimately asked that you be let back on.  That's a fact.  I went to bat for you to be le back on.  The persons who know could vouch for this. 

Honestly I believe you. I didn’t think for one second you were shaming me. All I did was try to defend my human self, but I was repeatedly told I didn’t have a human self. And so I said okay, if you deny me my human self then I’ll think about migrating to a Jesus forum, and at that moment everything I ever stood for on that forum went blank and disappeared down a black hole.

 

But I was already registered here anyway. It’s not like I joined this forum just because I was banned from the other. I was already a member here, before the ban.

 

I love Leo Gura 

Edited 22 minutes ago by Mellowmarsh

[Mellowmarsh]

1 minute ago, Joseph Maynor said:

I argued that you should be let back on believe it or not.  And it was declined.

Well thanks then. But looking back, I’m now thinking I’m well rid, tbh. 

[Joseph Maynor]

Just now, Mellowmarsh said:

Well thanks then. But looking back, I’m now thinking I’m well rid, tbh. 

Not only did Phil ban you but they wiped out all your content.  

[Joseph Maynor]

27 minutes ago, Someone here said:

@Mellowmarsh you asked Leo to unban Joseph?

Nope.

[Mellowmarsh]

4 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

I argued that you should be let back on believe it or not.  And it was declined.

The thing is…When I first joined that forum, Phil specifically said to me that he thought I was an Angel. 👼 

 

Yes, I did become aggressive, but I cannot change my true nature, I guess Phil just didn’t want an aggressive angel on his forum. That’s his prerogative, I have no problem with it. 

[Inliytened1]

14 hours ago, JoshB said:

It sounds like Ralston is completely wrong and is denying any sense of reality being love

He isn't just playing semantics to avoid confusion his understanding of Truth and Reality are corrupted 

Your personal love is a flower in the infinite garden that is LOVE

Yes there are two different things going on so let me be clear.  One is  before we decide whether Love is part of reality or not we should make sure our metaphysical definition of reality is correct in the first place otherwise we don't need Ralston to corrupt it.  We are doing that all on our own.