This Chinese prof is spilling all the tea

[Leo Gura]

Jiang got popular, now the vultures are circling.

Edited Monday at 09:26 PM by Leo Gura

[Elliott]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

Jiang got popular, now the vultures are circling.

They did this to my boi Andrew Tate too

[LordFall]

22 minutes ago, Elliott said:

They did this to my boi Andrew Tate too

No fucking way you're an Andrew tate fan while praising christianity, hopefully you're joking. 

[Elliott]

22 minutes ago, LordFall said:

No fucking way you're an Andrew tate fan while praising christianity, hopefully you're joking. 

We call it nuance here. I have no problem with muslims. Andrew Tate is a man of God

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMsipvgPnrr/?igsh=ZDRjenNxNnc5cDdz

 

 

 

Edited Monday at 11:13 PM by Elliott

[LordFall]

Bro that's wild you know he's a woman beater, sex trafficker and probably rapist right? 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Hasan_Piker/comments/w6jt5y/how_is_this_andrew_tate_video_not_more_widespread/

He's like one of the most unspiritual person there is, how can you say write this stuff without having an aneurysm? 

 

 

[Jodistrict]

2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Jiang got popular, now the vultures are circling.

He is good at Youtube entertainment and makes interesting connections, but a big red flag went up for me when he used that word "illuminati".

According to AI overview:

"Predictive History" YouTuber: A person named Jiang Xueqin runs a YouTube channel titled "Predictive History" where he styles himself as "Professor Jiang". However, this individual appears to be a high school teacher and commentator rather than a university professor, and he has been criticized for presenting inaccurate, "delusional" content.

[Leo Gura]

2 hours ago, Elliott said:

They did this to my boi Andrew Tate too

Your boi is a rapist, sex trafficker, and scammer.

[Rafael Thundercat]

Now I understand this @Elliott guy comment of a bible link in my last post about ICE in airport. Apparentlly there is more accounts with similar names here

@Elliot @Elliottdup @Elliott111 @Elliots Mind @elliotdowd @Elliot. Do you guys never suspect that this forum have no watcher from the system? I mean, agents? I don't  know is the rigth answer but as everything is anomymous all is possible.

[Rafael Thundercat]

Anyone knows the real situation in this Strait of Hormuz? How serious things may get this year around this Iran shit?

[Elliott]

4 minutes ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

Now I understand this @Elliott guy comment of a bible link in my last post about ICE in airport. Apparentlly there is more accounts with similar names here

@Elliot @Elliottdup @Elliott111 @Elliots Mind @elliotdowd @Elliot. Do you guys never suspect that this forum have no watcher from the system? I mean, agents? I don't  know is the rigth answer but as everything is anomymous all is possible.

That's my signature

[Rafael Thundercat]

@Elliott may I ask why?

[Elliott]

Just now, Rafael Thundercat said:

@Elliott may I ask why?

A joke

[WonderSeeker]

On 3/23/2026 at 9:04 PM, Elliott said:

Dave's expertise is the second half of the video, skip to that.

Jiang's intuition is in the right place, even if he misrepresented astrophyisics a bit (credit to Dave for knowing scientific gospel better here).

Even with that, Dave's just comes off as a materialist jackass who wants to talk crap because he got eclipsed.

15 hours ago, LordFall said:

I think he's doing the lord's work especially posting this publicly all on Youtube at the scrutiny of the americans, israel and CCP. I'm sure he's wrong on some things but his explanations generally make sense to me. All these conspiracy theories need to be put out and cross examined over the next few years and I think AI will help humanity get to the truth of our history. I don't doubt that there are plenty of cults and shady organizations manipulating reality for their selfish goals, I would be shocked if it wasn't the case in depth.

I believe mankind is about to transcend itself though so it's an honor to live through these revolutionary times. 

Excatly, if you just watch it and think it through there are plenty of gold nuggets to keep.

Problem with secret societies is they're secret for a reason.

The real question is how much they influence societies. Makes me wonder if we can look at other secret societies from the past, if there is such information on them.

-----

Just prompted ChatGPT with: Are there any books of high quality, well researched, truthful texts on the history of secret societies with examples? I am trying to make sense of modern day secret societies, for example, those that may be connected to USA, Israel, Iran, intelligence agencies, Epstein (or what's left of it), and of course anywhere else.

-----

It looks like the book "The Secret World: A History of Intelligence" might be a good starting place. What do you think?

[Jodistrict]

He is trying to become the new Alex Jones.  He is recycling Jone’s secret society grift.  Does he actually teach this stuff to his students instead of giving them real history? 

An example of real history would be “The History of Rome” podcast by Mike Duncan which was both entertaining and true at the same time.

 

 

 

[Identity]

Hee all,
Happy to see a thread already exists here on Prof Jiang.
Over the past week or two, I've gotten sucked into his sphere, as he has gotten popular.

I resonate with the whole mixed bag idea.
On the one hand, he is making all these interesting connections and seems to have a genuine take on spirituality.
The pictures he paints by pulling all these different lenses together, although grim, appear to be unique independent thought.
And the trends he is describing of moving from a US-dominated global system to a multi-polar world kind of makes sense to me.

On the other hand, I'm definitely getting conspiracy vibes from him as well. The excessive talk about secret societies, the people he is jumping on podcasts with and appears to make bonds with... definitely feels 'off'.

All in all, though, the underlying idea of this new video of his resonates. Unsure of how it will come about, and what it will look like, intuitively it feels wise to make sure to stand firmly on both feet and be ready for some potentially turbulent times.

Even if it may not be as extreme as he is describing here, how do you see it, does it not indeed feel like our global system is based on rather weak and unwise foundations, which could quite easily be disrupted by global events such as are taking place right now?

 

[Identity]

Okay, so, I'm following the big-picture arguments here and seeing if the steps of reasoning add up for me.

Main argument one: Pax Americana is crumbling
Due to the corruption of the foundational pillars of the US-based international system, America's position as the global hegemon is losing power and, ultimately, will crumble, thereby ending this chapter of Unipolar central power.
--> This is a pretty big claim, and there is some resistance in me about the exact reasoning for all this. Yet, I can't help but shake the intuition that there is quite a bit of truth to this. Just looking at how drastically corrupt and foolish the US politics looks to me under Trump, it feels like a collective ego's last attempt to flex its muscles and maintain its empire. So, yes, I can resonate with the idea that a cycle of global politics is coming to an end, and some kind of new global order, perhaps multipolar, will take hold.

Main argument two: Transition full of crises
Jiang predicts that the end of this unipolar moment will lead to a challenging period where populations need to be resilient in order to survive. Particularly, because the entire world economy and the abundance of wealth of our current system are based on cheap energy, which may no longer be available in the same way it is today.
--> For me, this connects some dots with a different podcast I saw a few years back, and that has stuck with me. In this podcast, the researcher argued that it’s cheap energy that is at the basis of current global prosperity, and not as often preached, technology. This energy is really ‘loaned’ from a history of earth storing in the form of fossil fuels, and we, as a foolish society, are burning through the reserves like a spoiled child that has found its parents' credit card. There is undoubtedly more nuance to this, yet this argument does further shift my perspective towards believing that the current system may not be sustainable.

Main argument three: Critical systems collapsing
The hugely inflated world population will no longer be sustainable when the old system collapses. Food systems are based on fertiliser, which will no longer be available to the same extent, leading to food shortages. Water could also become a problem. As well as other critical systems such as the energy grid and the internet.
-->  It sounds plausible to me that there will be stress on these critical systems and that adaptations will be necessary. However, here it does sound to me that he is throwing quite a few wild, bleak hypotheses together that take quite a dark turn, without the necessary support of argumentation. It seems more plausible to me that some of these systems will be under stress, yet not to the extent Jiang is speculating here.

Main argument four: A new world is born out of dire consequences
The amount of stress put on the world will cause a battle for resources, leading to mass migrations and possible wars. This new world will shift through different forms as it takes hold. Elements include the establishment of local international trade systems between nationalistic, deindustrialised nations. Due to the struggle for resources, all kinds of nasty things could happen, such as genocide, (some form of) slavery, an AI-surveillance state, etc.
--> Because of the excessively dark turn in argument three, argument four builds on these bleak assumptions to create an even worse picture of the future. One where the entire world truly falls back on extremely low-consciousness, selfish strategies, just to survive. This seems like an exaggerated, fear-inducing hypothesis.

Final thoughts
All-in all, I feel like the general direction of Jiang’s predictions of the next decade gives reason for concern. The extent to which he describes a dark future is not something I fully subscribe to. Yet, I can’t help but intuit that indeed we have a fragile global system, that is built on many unsustainable and foolish foundations, which could very well get shaken by a shift in geopolitical power structures.

Personally, I still very much stay in a positive mindset in terms of creating my own life and an abundant, conscious, spiritually connected world. Yet, I also recognise that there may very well be turbulence in the years to come, and it’s wise to have both feet firmly connected to the earth.

I would love to hear some other perspectives on this line of reasoning!
And honestly, I'm also curious what your take is on this @Leo Gura. You have been exploring geopolitics quite deeply over recent years, right. Do you think along similar lines for the next phase of the world, or would you draw a very different picture of the decade to come?

Edited 21 hours ago by Identity

[WonderSeeker]

13 hours ago, Identity said:

Okay, so, I'm following the big-picture arguments here and seeing if the steps of reasoning add up for me.

Main argument one: Pax Americana is crumbling
Due to the corruption of the foundational pillars of the US-based international system, America's position as the global hegemon is losing power and, ultimately, will crumble, thereby ending this chapter of Unipolar central power.
--> This is a pretty big claim, and there is some resistance in me about the exact reasoning for all this. Yet, I can't help but shake the intuition that there is quite a bit of truth to this. Just looking at how drastically corrupt and foolish the US politics looks to me under Trump, it feels like a collective ego's last attempt to flex its muscles and maintain its empire. So, yes, I can resonate with the idea that a cycle of global politics is coming to an end, and some kind of new global order, perhaps multipolar, will take hold.

As a 28-year old US-born citizen now living abroad, I am confident in #1 happening, and not because I 'want' it to.

It just seems like we crossed several major thresholds in the past decade that have made the American unipolar world irredeemable.

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

Idk bro is a little bit wacky, a little bit kooky to say the least. He's also spreading some missinformation like during that Tucker interview. Hopefully his predictions will turn out mostly wrong, though unfortunately they're not entirely baseless

[Leo Gura]

11 minutes ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

a little bit kooky

That's a good way to put it.

But at least he's doing some big picture thinking. He is thinking outside the box, but going into kooky territory.

Thinking outside boxes is dangerous. Gotta really have your epistemology down.

Edited 6 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Identity]

@Leo Gura Okay, so that's an assessment of his overall character and perspective.

What about the line of reasoning and prediction about the next decade of global politics and economics.

Do you see any validity to his concerning message, or would you see it very differently?