Is ‘The Great Replacement’ really a threat?

[Seed]

And is it targeted at middle class, British , biracial (black/white) people? Eg. Are my kids safe to travel to America 🇺🇸? 
 

is this something that is currently being hyped up and will die down or is it going to create racial war ?! 
 

I just can’t believe we are actually complaining and fear mongering about something I just see as healthy evolution… 

And of course, I’m afraid where we are headed both in uk and America.

 

[MightyMind]

it's social engineering, not evolution. 

[Karmadhi]

It is a very populat conspiracy theory 

Personally I do not think it is intentional but simply a side effect of globalization and liberal/progressive policies when it comes to borders

 

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

You should understand that the Great Replacement is a conspiracy theory, you know. Better way to phrase that question would be: is diversity and multiculturalism a threat or a good thing? Well, depends, are you a nazi? There's an entire philosophical way of looking at reality that would claim that it is a bad thing

[Emerald]

The Great Replacement is a far right conspiracy theory that's been around since the late 1800s... and was originally invented by Camus and later adopted by Eugenicists in the early 1900s... and in the 1990s was adopted as a common talking point in Neo-Nazi circles.

The idea is to cloak more overt racist and antisemitic ideas in language that the average person would find more palatable in order to evoke in the average white person the fear of people of other races, ethnic backgrounds, and religious backgrounds... such that the violent and genocidal aims of Neo-Nazis and White Nationalists will be easier to accomplish.

Even your questioning of it is a sign that those Neo-Nazis have an effective strategy for drumming up fear of the "other"... as you seem to have more egalitarian values but seem genuinely worried that it's true. 

And it's good that you're throwing doubt on it. But even that seed of doubt that you have... that's how they weaponize SO MANY people towards regressive, violent, and genocidal aims.

That's why it's SO important to be very careful and very skeptical when listening to propaganda.

[MightyMind]

It's not a "conspiracy theory"

NEW REPORT ON REPLACEMENT MIGRATION ISSUED BY UN POPULATION DIVISION

https://press.un.org/en/2000/20000317.dev2234.doc.html

[Enigma777]

11 hours ago, Seed said:

And is it targeted at middle class, British , biracial (black/white) people? Eg. Are my kids safe to travel to America 🇺🇸? 
 

is this something that is currently being hyped up and will die down or is it going to create racial war ?! 
 

I just can’t believe we are actually complaining and fear mongering about something I just see as healthy evolution… 

And of course, I’m afraid where we are headed both in uk and America.

 

The so-called “Great Replacement” is less a geopolitical reality than a psychological projection

I think the Great Replacement is a theory born out of a primal, biological impulse to be defensive and paranoid about the survival and perpetuation of one’s tribe or familiar in-group.

We live in a globalized world, but we still carry the same set of instincts that our Paleolithic ancestors possessed. So we tend to operate on very primal, instinctive grounds — and then backwards-rationalize our irrational emotions through theories, mental constructs, and ideologies.

What’s really fueling this “Great Replacement” idea is a kind of fundamental animal paranoia. It comes from a deep sense of being threatened, from fear and insecurity. You also have to factor in personality types — some people are simply more “neurotic,” more prone to fear and distrust than others. This overlaps with the well-documented personality differences between conservatives and progressives: conservatives generally have higher threat sensitivity and lower openness, which explains why this theory circulates almost exclusively in right-wing circles.

So, psychologically speaking, the Great Replacement is a paranoia-fueled mental construct, behind which sits a very primal fear as its source.

Now, sure — the world is changing. Cultures, rigid national borders, and fixed identities are dissolving. Everyone’s mixing together, and yes, that means your idealized white nationalist Christian state is disappearing.

But… so what? Are the “evil Muslims” going to impose Sharia law? Are we going to devolve into third-world chaos because we imported all those uncivilized monkeys from the four corners of the globe? Those fears are baseless, irrational, and grounded in raw emotion, not fact.

So no, there’s no “great replacement.” It’s all just a collective ego backlash. Sit back, watch it all unfold. It’s just another distraction. 

[Enigma777]

1 hour ago, MightyMind said:

It's not a "conspiracy theory"

NEW REPORT ON REPLACEMENT MIGRATION ISSUED BY UN POPULATION DIVISION

https://press.un.org/en/2000/20000317.dev2234.doc.html

The mistake is in falsely assuming that this is some kind of organized effort to undermine *your* tribe and *your* culture, by some sort of evil globalist elite attempting to tear everything down. 

Like, chill bro, Klaus Schwab ain’t trying to erase white people from existence. 

This document from the UN doesn’t support the “Great Replacement” theory; if anything, it undermines it. It shows you that western politicians are, yes, trying to bring in more people from the four corners of the world, but not with some sort of nefarious purpose in mind, but for very straightforward socio-economic reasons.

There are very real statistics on fertility rates among native white westerners, and there have been for decades now; our populations in developed occidental countries have been shrinking for various(not intentional cause, that would be impossible) reasons for a while and politicians are trying to bring in more people to fill the gap.

Do you know why a smaller population is bad? Plenty of reasons; shrinking labor force which weakens the economy, shrinking tax base, high dependency ratio of retiree workers(toll on social funds and resources), smaller military etc. 

Life’s already hard and complicated enough as individuals, do you really think some group of “elites” has the time and energy to dedicate to…what? Tearing down civilization? There are a bunch of rational, data based, reality based concerns for why to bring in large numbers of immigrants. Your conspiracy theories just pull a veil in front of your eyes and drown you in fantasy. 

Your politicians(as flawed as they are) aren’t  trying to destroy civilization or social engineer anything man. Chill 

Edited Saturday at 11:37 PM by Enigma777

[enchanted]

10 hours ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

You should understand that the Great Replacement is a conspiracy theory, you know. Better way to phrase that question would be: is diversity and multiculturalism a threat or a good thing? Well, depends, are you a nazi? There's an entire philosophical way of looking at reality that would claim that it is a bad thing

Well said. 

[MightyMind]

1 hour ago, Enigma777 said:

if anything, it undermines it. It shows you that western politicians are, yes, trying to bring in more people from the four corners of the world, but not with some sort of nefarious purpose in mind, but for very straightforward socio-economic reasons.

Western politicians = representatives = what kind of representative chooses to dissolve of ones own culture instead of repopulating? That doc is from 20+ years ago...we'd be repopulating the working class by now...like we've always done 

 

Edited Sunday at 12:37 AM by MightyMind

[Enigma777]

1 hour ago, MightyMind said:

Western politicians = representatives = what kind of representative chooses to dissolve of ones own culture instead of repopulating? That doc is from 20+ years ago...we'd be repopulating the working class by now...like we've always done 

I get where you’re coming from, but you’ve gotta look at this in historical context — especially the global political shifts after WWII. Key things to research are globalism, free markets, liberal democracy, and how they emerged in the mid-20th century.

It’s not that our political leaders are sitting in a room plotting to “dissolve our culture.” Sure, you’ll always find a small group of ideological activists — usually in academia or social movements — who use extreme rhetoric like “abolish whiteness” or “down with patriarchy.” But the idea that this minority somehow represents most Western politicians is just paranoia pushed by certain right-wing circles. It doesn’t match reality.

And to be fair, the progressive side isn’t entirely wrong either. It’s easy to forget that racial segregation in the U.S. ended only about 60 years ago. We’ve only recently become a racially egalitarian society, and no reasonable person wants to roll that back. It’s not about “moral dogma” — it’s just common sense.

The broader shift toward globalization and multiculturalism has been happening for decades. It wasn’t started by “woke” activists or some shadowy cabal — it was largely a geopolitical response to the devastation of two world wars. Nationalism had just plunged the world into chaos twice, so international cooperation and integration seemed like the only sane path forward.

That’s why we saw the rise of organizations like the UN, NATO, the EU, and global trade systems. The underlying idea was that interconnected economies and multicultural societies would make another world war less likely. It was a utopian dream, maybe naïve in parts, but not an evil conspiracy.

So no — politicians today aren’t trying to erase Western culture. They’ve just inherited a system built on the post-war ideal of global peace and integration. Whether that ideal still works in today’s world is a valid debate — but saying it’s “proof of a great replacement” is a massive oversimplification of what’s really going on.

[Enigma777]

1 hour ago, MightyMind said:

we'd be repopulating the working class by now...like we've always done 

It’s really not that simple, man. People aren’t having fewer kids because they “forgot” how to repopulate — it’s because of a whole web of socioeconomic and cultural factors: the cost of living, housing prices, women entering the workforce, declining religious influence, delayed marriage, and overall lifestyle expectations in modern economies.

You can’t just say, “we’ll repopulate like we used to.” Society has completely changed. Families today can barely afford one child, let alone three or four. And what exactly would “repopulating” even look like in policy terms? Are we talking forced monogamy? Government-mandated births? Financial incentives so big they tank the economy?

That’s the thing — you can’t just will a demographic recovery into existence. Western birth rates have been below replacement for decades despite multiple government programs trying to reverse it (tax breaks, parental leave, childcare benefits, etc.). It’s not a moral issue — it’s structural.

So immigration isn’t some conspiracy to “replace” people — it’s literally how modern economies stay afloat when the native population is shrinking. It’s not ideal or utopian, but it’s pragmatic.

[MightyMind]

@Enigma777 "It’s not that our political leaders are sitting in a room plotting". I never said they were. 

In order to repopulate, you create incentives for families to have more children, this is easy to do and nothing new, not an original idea. Think, lower taxes to no taxes, depending on how many kids a family has. If we had a proper design of society we'd be producing an abundance of food and in turn you could offer healthy free food or discounted price, once again dependant on amount of kids. Same thing, dependant on how many kids a family has you could create incentives which lower costs of housing.

We send billions to other nations for war, and considering the level of sophistication, intelligence, and technology applied to it all, we could apply all of that energy, attention, intellect, and resources to building our nation. If we had real representation, broadly speaking, you wouldn't see phony's speaking to the importance of bankrupting our nations and future generations because it is the moral thing to do to give billions to other nations. We've been sold lies for generations just like we are today. The phrase "melting pot" comes to mind and it ain't a white thought.

While yes, there is a level of speculation on my end, there is also a couple decades of observation to the heaps information I've come across like the following two examples.

 - https://x.com/Aliathewhite/status/1968700194670674257

 - https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1656443176691937280 (Full context...Achieving Childhood Vaccination Success in the U.S. Expert Panel / 54:40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07v0Yp05snA )

1969 is the date of the image below

Edited Sunday at 04:03 AM by MightyMind

[Hojo]

Sometimes I think that if you want to manipulate reality you put an idea into the minds of every citizen that its happening when it isnt and then that manfiests infor reality at a later date. Like the news or something.

Edited Sunday at 05:27 AM by Hojo

[Twentyfirst]

"The Earth is littered with the ruins of empires that once believed they were eternal," - Camille Paglia

[MightyMind]

@Twentyfirst

5 hours ago, Twentyfirst said:

"The Earth is littered with the ruins of empires that once believed they were eternal," - Camille Paglia

"and so it's okay that immigrants are being used a pawns. While yes, they will think they are getting a leg up, in the end they will be governed by Blackrock and Vanguard. Many of them hail Allah but in turn they will be ruled by us. Just accept it because it has happened before." 

Edited Sunday at 01:39 PM by MightyMind

[Twentyfirst]

6 hours ago, MightyMind said:

@Twentyfirst

"and so it's okay that immigrants are being used a pawns. While yes, they will think they are getting a leg up, in the end they will be governed by Blackrock and Vanguard. Many of them hail Allah but in turn they will be ruled by us. Just accept it because it has happened before." 

I was more speaking about the arrogance of people thinking that just because they are on top it means they will be on top forever regardless of cycles of nature 

I didn't create Blackrock. Go complain to them

[MightyMind]

@Twentyfirst I hear ya