Deconstructing “Reality” - The most comprehensive non-dual meta-analysis

[samijiben]

By the way, you also know the Truth directly, you just don't know it yet!

So I can also flip the humility card onto you, or better yet the Chutzpah card, and I ask: what makes you so sure that you are arguing with a kid on a forum?

Bro, I EXIST IN YOUR MIND!!!! DIG IT!

[Anton Rogachevski]

@samijiben Bravo. The Nobel Prize Ceremony invitation is on its way : )

Edited Saturday at 05:59 AM by Anton Rogachevski

[James123]

4 minutes ago, samijiben said:

Bro, I EXIST IN YOUR MIND!!!! DIG IT!

I am sorry to interrupt, but this is the most funny part. 

Where is the mind, your mind or my mind?

[samijiben]

@James123 hajur, yes, that is the ultimate question, very good work. 

Now plunge your finger into the immeasurable depths of your own anus and SEE, for the very first time, that YOU, SIR, have won the greatest prize of them all: a ONE-WAY TICKET TO NOWHERE!

[samijiben]

@Anton Rogachevski man, this is too good.  Yall are the best. Such sweet illusions. Savory. Like milkshake. Yummyummm

[Anton Rogachevski]

On the Illusion of Infinity and the Confusion of Realms

It’s crucial to remember: experience only appears infinite.
But reality itself—whatever that is—most likely is not.

This is a common trap along the path: when someone awakens deeply into their inner world, they may feel as if they’ve touched something infinite, all-encompassing, eternal.
And they have—but only within experience. Within the dream, not outside of it.

Phenomenologically, the mind can’t find its edge.
So it assumes there isn’t one.

But this is not proof of actual infinity—
only the shape of a perceptual illusion.

When you’re standing in a dense fog, it wraps around you like forever.
The horizon dissolves. The silence is convincing.
You cannot see where it ends,
so it feels like it never does.
Not infinite—only dressed like it.

This illusion arises because experience itself is inherently limited.
It cannot perceive its own limits from within—so it interprets limitlessness.
But what cannot be seen might still exist.
Edges might be present just beyond the reach of awareness.

To confuse this apparent infinity with the structure of the physical world is a mistake—
a metaphysical leap that experience does not warrant.

Many have made that leap,
imagining their felt unity proves the universe is One, or boundless, or somehow “them.”
But that’s not insight.
That’s projection.

Let this serve as a warning and a reminder:
Do not draw ontological conclusions from phenomenological data.
Do not turn the shape of your dream into the structure of the world.

Experience is real. But it is not reality itself.
And what reality truly is remains unspeakable—beyond certainty,
beyond even this.

[samijiben]

@Anton Rogachevski I am mindfucked. Don't know what to say to this. Doesn't make a lick of sense. 

Ohev otcha habibi, adayin mamin sheata kayem btoch tarosh sheli 

[Anton Rogachevski]

@samijiben You're illustrating exactly the kind of fallacy I'm trying so carefully to help people avoid.
I truly wish you well, man.
My suggestion: read the entire text again—slowly, word by word—and then look deeply and honestly at your own experience.
Set aside everything you think you know.
You can always pick it back up later if it still makes sense.

Edited Saturday at 06:56 AM by Anton Rogachevski

[samijiben]

@Anton Rogachevski ok. 

[James123]

45 minutes ago, samijiben said:

@James123 hajur, yes, that is the ultimate question, very good work. 

Now plunge your finger into the immeasurable depths of your own anus and SEE, for the very first time, that YOU, SIR, have won the greatest prize of them all: a ONE-WAY TICKET TO NOWHERE!

Lol. That's the biggest illusion 😅 

[Breakingthewall]

5 hours ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

it's not that reality is logical, but that logic is built to make it easier for your brain to understand basic survival things better, and so it seems very coherent.

You mean basic survival things like relativity, quantum physics and the structure of the reality? All of them are mathematical relationships.

5 hours ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

The fact that perception is limited it can't perceive limits and so it seems to it that everything is "limitless",

Reality is limitless, any limit is relative, like anything that have definition. 

[Breakingthewall]

Spirituality is very simple in its structure. The absolute is unlimited; the relative is limited. If the absolute is, as its name indicates, absolute, what could the relative be? The absolute reflected in itself and creating an apparent limitation, change, movement, form. 

What is this limitation? Synchronicity, symmetry. Everything outside of this coherence does not appear; it is unmanifested potential.

So, what is spirituality? Self-observation. Step one is to be able, in specific moments, to break the limitation of your mind and access your unlimited nature. To do this, you will see that there are obstacles; these obstacles must be overcome. It seems simple, but it is very difficult. You have to open your mind and heart completely, surrender your mind, your understanding, your sanity, and your life. That is, empty your mind of any structure. Once you achieve this, a purification process instinctively begins, gradually making your structure less dense, making opening easier.

The Opening is unthinkable; it is impossible to remember and transmit it, precisely because it is the breaking of what is defined, of what is limited. If you remember it, it's happening now. There are mental movements that foster it and others that shut it down. The art lies in polishing your energy system so that this becomes easier and easier.

Then, you begin to navigate the world in an intuitive way, understanding that you must release the control while still giving your best.

Edited Saturday at 11:45 AM by Breakingthewall

[Anton Rogachevski]

4 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

The absolute

How do you define the "absolute"? 

[Breakingthewall]

1 hour ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

How do you define the "absolute"? 

Absolute means that have not opposite, what is without relation to anything else, what has no limits, no definition, the foundation of everything.

You can logically understand that reality is ultimately absolute; it's more or less obvious. There are infinite forms and dimensions, but they all have to have the same foundation: the reality. This means that you are that absolute reality. Then comes the real step: opening yourself to your true nature. To do this, you have to break the limits and dissolve all definition. Absolutely all. This is the goal of meditation.

Absolute reality can only be defined as the absence of limits, without dimension, without quality. It contains all dimensions, all qualities. It is what anything that exists is; it is not something; it is limitlessness. You can open yourself to it at will on a daily basis, but you cannot think about it or remember it. When you are open to it, it is obvious; you are that. Form is indifferent; one thing or another is all the same. When you return to limits, this makes no sense.

[tuku747]

Watch Into The Void (2009)

[Anton Rogachevski]

@Breakingthewall

Everything is limited, there is not one thing that is limitless and I presume that it can't physically exist.

[Breakingthewall]

12 hours ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

@Breakingthewall

Everything is limited, there is not one thing that is limitless and I presume that it can't physically exist.

What is limitless is the reality itself. The realization of your true nature is that it is unlimited. Reality exists because it is unlimited. The fact that reality has no limits is the reason why you exist. Reality is total because it has no bottom or edges. This makes it impossible for reality not to exist. Not existing would be a limit. 

[gettoefl]

13 hours ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

@Breakingthewall

Everything is limited, there is not one thing that is limitless and I presume that it can't physically exist.

Manifest a whole into fragments per the method of the materialist and each fragment is but a gateway to the whole.

What one thinks is just one's things.

[Anton Rogachevski]

@gettoefl The brain can unify all it's perceiving into one "whole" experience, but that's phenomenal and not noumenal. So "wholeness" along with "infinity" are both illusions caused by the inherent lack of ability to perceive the edge that stems from the apparent nature experience as seen from within.

"Wholeness" is a nice idea, but it stops there.

When you’re standing in a dense fog, it wraps around you like forever.
The horizon dissolves. The silence is convincing.
You cannot see where it ends,
so it feels like it never does.
Not infinite—only dressed like it.

Experience is non-dual within itself, but from a meta-perspective, it includes the appearance of a duality between experience and a probable external world. This duality is epistemic, not ontological.

Edited Sunday at 03:58 PM by Anton Rogachevski

[gettoefl]

55 minutes ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

@gettoefl The brain can unify all it's perceiving into one "whole" experience, but that's phenomenal and not noumenal. So "wholeness" along with "infinity" are both illusions caused by the inherent lack of ability to perceive the edge that stems from the apparent nature experience as seen from within.

"Wholeness" is a nice idea, but it stops there.

When you’re standing in a dense fog, it wraps around you like forever.
The horizon dissolves. The silence is convincing.
You cannot see where it ends,
so it feels like it never does.
Not infinite—only dressed like it.

Experience is non-dual within itself, but from a meta-perspective, it includes the appearance of a duality between experience and a probable external world. This duality is epistemic, not ontological.

Mind cannot grasp. Everything is a pointer laced with gentleness and grace. I don't exist. Taste and see that the Lord is good. 

Edited Sunday at 04:36 PM by gettoefl