Breakingthewall

About limitless

24 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

Reality is limitless and as it's limitless it is. As it is and it has not limits, it takes on infinite structures, perspectives, relationships, dimensions.

Manifested infinity is unthinkable; the mind cannot intuit it. No mind, not even that of a cosmic interdimensional intelligence can even touch it, because it is infinite. But any being conscious of itself can open itself to it, since any conscious being is the infinite being in a configuration, a form, or node of consciousness from which reality is observed.

Reality doesn't need to be observed, but it does so because it is infinite. You, now, are the total being. You can open yourself to it; to do so, you must forget, dissolve, everything that defines you as human and simply be.

Limitless being is the infinite being; everything is contained within it. Forms are forms, beauty, magic, perfection, but the key is the essence, the material from which they are made. It is the infinite being; it is total, and it is you. The infinite being isn't alone in existence because everything is within it. It is infinitely abundant, infinitely full. loneliness isn't a possibility since Its nature is total expansion, because it has no limits, and total expansion translates into a dance with itself of infinite beauty. It is absolute, total sacred glory because it has no limits. Forms are just forms; essence is totality. 

Everything that exists is an emitter of potentiality, but its total potentiality is limited by the synchronicity of form. Everything that manifests does so by being a reflection of itself, synchronized with itself. Nothing non-synchronous to infinite power can appear, because everything that appears is a reflection. A reflection that fails in reflecting coherence simply isn't, it's not a possibility and any potential that gears with the totality is manifested. That's will, the inevitable expansive quality of that which has not limits . Form wants to be form, and in wanting that, it does not want to be the infinite. To truly open to the infinite, the form must renounce to its importance, at least for a while. 

The cause of infinite being is the absence of limits. The absence of limits makes my existence inevitable. I am the absolute being, in its total entirety. I am at once a part and the whole . as form, I am a part; as essence, I am the whole. Everything else is as well. If the form is transparent, the total being reveals itself. It is the infinity, and I am that.
 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

12 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

Reality is limitless and as it's limitless it is. As it is and it has not limits, it takes on infinite structures, perspectives, relationships, dimensions.

Manifested infinity is unthinkable; the mind cannot intuit it. No mind, not even that of a cosmic interdimensional intelligence can even touch it, because it is infinite. But any being conscious of itself can open itself to it, since any conscious being is the infinite being in a configuration, a form, or node of consciousness from which reality is observed.

Reality doesn't need to be observed, but it does so because it is infinite. You, now, are the total being. You can open yourself to it; to do so, you must forget, dissolve, everything that defines you as human and simply be.

Limitless being is the infinite being; everything is contained within it. Forms are forms, beauty, magic, perfection, but the key is the essence, the material from which they are made. It is the infinite being; it is total, and it is you. The infinite being isn't alone in existence because everything is within it. It is infinitely abundant, infinitely full. loneliness isn't a possibility since Its nature is total expansion, because it has no limits, and total expansion translates into a dance with itself of infinite beauty. It is absolute, total sacred glory because it has no limits. Forms are just forms; essence is totality. 

Everything that exists is an emitter of potentiality, but its total potentiality is limited by the synchronicity of form. Everything that manifests does so by being a reflection of itself, synchronized with itself. Nothing non-synchronous to infinite power can appear, because everything that appears is a reflection. A reflection that fails in reflecting coherence simply isn't, it's not a possibility and any potential that gears with the totality is manifested. That's will, the inevitable expansive quality of that which has not limits . Form wants to be form, and in wanting that, it does not want to be the infinite. To truly open to the infinite, the form must renounce to its importance, at least for a while. 

The cause of infinite being is the absence of limits. The absence of limits makes my existence inevitable. I am the absolute being, in its total entirety. I am at once a part and the whole . as form, I am a part; as essence, I am the whole. Everything else is as well. If the form is transparent, the total being reveals itself. It is the infinity, and I am that.
 

This is well said. I cannot dispute your mystical metaphysical insights here and it jibes tightly with my explorations if in different phrasing.

From my standpoint, reality is free of limits because it is changeless and whole. From the vantage of truth, there are no forms or structures or levels, only the eternal ever expanding outpouring of love. What is called consciousness is the illusion of perception, born of a thought that finitude sat next to infinitude is a different reality to infinitude. Yet even within this illusion, memory of wholeness though dim remains present, and through this correcting thought will I slide back to the awareness of my unchanged nature.

I am not a configuration of infinite being; I am as I always was and always will be, forever unphased by form or limitation. My life has no goal of merging with infinity, but solely to awaken from the dream of being one that got away, in order to see that I never left the ground zero. The Infinite love of my natural state is not something I attain, rather it is something I fix in mind and gradually remember. And in that remembering does this world bid its farewell.

Edited by gettoefl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 23/5/2025 at 11:55 AM, gettoefl said:

What is called consciousness is the illusion of perception,

Consciousness seems absolute from the perspective of current experience. "All is consciousness," "You are the silent witness," "I am God dreaming" are expressions that occur within limits. Without limits, there is reality relating to itself. The ultimate is not the relationship; it is just the expression. The ultimate is the absence of limits, which is unnameable and indefinable because any definition occurs as a limited relationship of reality to itself. You can call it Tao if you wish; it is the total.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not correct to simply say that the self does not exist. The self does appear, and it does so structurally: it is a functional center of perception, a coherent organization within the field of manifestation. It is not a substance, but it is a structured form.

This self has a paradoxical feature: on the one hand, it needs to affirm itself to sustain its local coherence; on the other hand, it can perceive that this affirmation encloses it and leads it to a dead end: it wants to be permanent, but it is made of the impermanent. It wants to be the absolute, but it cannot stop depending on time, relation, and perception. This contradiction is its trap: wanting to be what it cannot be, and at the same time rejecting what it is.

At a certain point, the self sees the trap. It does not struggle to sustain itself: it ceases to affirm itself as a center. It does not disappear, but deactivates itself as an affirmation. At that point, it can become transparent to the limitless nature that sustains it. There remains no emptiness, no silence, no witness, no consciousness: there remains centerless reality, infinite nature, which is no one, which wants nothing, but is in everything, without effort, without fixed form, without will. Infinity is not self, because self implies center, desire, intention. Infinity simply is. The self, then, is real as form, but false as center. It can close out of structural necessity, but it can also open. And in doing so, it finds expansion without axis. Form is deactivated as core, and boundless nature flows without contraction.

It's extremely challenging let go the self first times, because the unlimited is not a self. It's like you were living in room always, you want the room, you need the room . The thing is that you are the room, so it's very difficult opening the door 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again and I'm hoping I'm NOT being a put-dowm here but your use of words is extremely "watery " that there is literally no meaning or discussion that can happen here. I get the sense that you string together a bunch of nerdy words and make a meaningless word salad which is completely detached from anything actually REAL.


 "When you get very serious about truth you accept your life situation exactly as it is. So much so that you aren't childishly sitting around wishing it were otherwise.If you were confined to a wheelchair you would just accept it as how reality is. Just as you now just accept that you are not a bird who can fly."

-Leo Gura. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Someone here said:

Again and I'm hoping I'm NOT being a put-dowm here but your use of words is extremely "watery " that there is literally no meaning or discussion that can happen here. I get the sense that you string together a bunch of nerdy words and make a meaningless word salad which is completely detached from anything actually REAL.

Really? What I said is from direct experience of limitless. I see that nobody resonate, even don't understand. Strange. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Life Liminal Limitless Limitless Love Luffy Lucy

Edited by Keryo Koffa

    Iridescent       💥        Living Rent-Free in        🥳 Liminal 😁 Psychic 🥰 
❤️🧡💛💚💙💜🖤      Synergy     Your Fractal 💗 Heart     Hyper-Space !  𓂙 𓃦 𓂀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Someone here said:

Again and I'm hoping I'm NOT being a put-dowm here but your use of words is extremely "watery " that there is literally no meaning or discussion that can happen here. I get the sense that you string together a bunch of nerdy words and make a meaningless word salad which is completely detached from anything actually REAL.

There is something essential that if you would see it, you would understand: you are because you are limitless. The source of being is the absence of limits, the fact of that there is not bottom. Seems a logical construction but it's something that you have to experience. The reality is not conciousness, or love, or anything else, is absence of limits. It's absolutely, totally, 100% obvious. Right now you are expanded to infinity. It's a fact, it's the source of you, the atomic reactor that fuels your experience, the unfathomable energy that you are, that anything is. It's not easy to see, if you read adyashanty, even Ramana maharsi, Eckhart Tolle, Ralston, spiral, kastrup, all of them are limited. No one of them have really totally, absolutely, broken the limits. It's crazy, but it's real. 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For example, For Ramana Maharsi, reality is consciousness. The self doesn't exist; it's just a thought. And what appears is projected as consciousness, just like in a dream. He's absolutely confused; it's incredible. Reality isn't consciousness; consciousness is an appearance that arises in reality. It couldn't be more obvious. You're not projecting reality like in a dream, because a dream isn't a dream; it's reality. He's lost in a sea of dualities. Incredible 😅

The only spirituality that's limitless is the tao te king and the sufis in some ways, and there is a reading in Christianity that can leads you to the openess in certain way . All the others are closed, over all the Buddhist 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not a drop in the ocean, you are the ocean in a drop.

Rumi

This is a perfect resume of what I said above. If you want to understand it, you have to open yourself to the ocean and be the ocean. The ocean is total, you can't understand it before of being open to it. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Breakingthewall I think someone here meant your paradigm is too hermetic for him (and me too lol).

Maybe you have books or videos to share.


Nothing will prevent Willy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Schizophonia said:

@Breakingthewall I think someone here meant your paradigm is too hermetic for him (and me too lol).

Maybe you have books or videos to share.

Really? It's totally obvious. 

Maybe this video could be interesting,

Books I don't know, all of them are wrong I'd say 😅. I didn't read any but I ask to chat gpt about all the spiritual teachers and it's principles, and absolutely all of them have mistakes in their basis. It's not ego, it's obvious, you could check any and let's analize it. 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/25/2025 at 1:20 AM, Someone here said:

Again and I'm hoping I'm NOT being a put-dowm here but your use of words is extremely "watery " that there is literally no meaning or discussion that can happen here. I get the sense that you string together a bunch of nerdy words and make a meaningless word salad which is completely detached from anything actually REAL.

Nah, he summed it up perfectly. You're just not getting it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bluevinn said:

Nah, he summed it up perfectly. You're just not getting it.

I try using spiritual language instead of purely objective language, but objective is much better:

 without limits, stability is impossible. There can't be "nothing," since nothing means the absence of fluctuation, eternal stability and this implies a limit. At some point, fluctuation occurs, since nothing prevents it, and some point is always, since the absence of fluctuation is the absence of an event, "never".

Any fluctuation is a change of state, and a change of state is a change if it is reflected in a different state. If this fluctuation occurs, as it inevitably must, it occurs infinitely, so reality is not expanding; it is always totally expanded. Any expansion is a flow within the absolutely expanded. Everything that appears is a synchronized reflection of the unlimited upon itself, because the absence of synchronicity implies no reflection, which is the same as nonexistence. Reality and existence are different aspects: reality is substance, existence is manifestation. Reality includes that which does not exist, the unmanifested, the unconscious. Existence is manifestation, symmetry, synchronicity, what appears. What they call enlightenment is the opening to reality, to the total, unnameable essence.

A center of consciousness is a relational node composed of infinite relationships, infinite reflections of reality within itself and there are infinite nodes. Everything that exists tends toward expansion, sending potential in infinite directions, but is limited by what reflects back to it in infinite directions. Every movement is a relationship that finds its place of engagement: thrust, expansion, and contraction. The change of state of a subatomic particle requires the manifested infinite to allow that movement, to find the synchronicity for it to occur. Nothing is by chance; everything is pieces of a perfect and inevitable puzzle that flows upon itself.

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

Really? It's totally obvious. 

Maybe this video could be interesting,

Books I don't know, all of them are wrong I'd say 😅. I didn't read any but I ask to chat gpt about all the spiritual teachers and it's principles, and absolutely all of them have mistakes in their basis. It's not ego, it's obvious, you could check any and let's analize it. 

Thanks i will look at that.


Nothing will prevent Willy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A small critique of Advaita, both neo- and classical, see Spira, Ralston, and even the sacred Ramana:

Many spiritual paths based on Advaita adopt a negative path: "you are not this, you are not that." This denial may partially dissolve identification with form, but if it stops there, it leaves an illusory foundation intact: consciousness as the absolute stage. To say that "everything happens in consciousness" maintains a hidden duality between what appears and the framework in which it appears. The void left after denying form is not reality, but rather another form: the form of absence.

Reality is not emptiness, nor silence, nor witness: it is unlimited without a center. It is not what remains when everything is eliminated, but what is when seen without limits. What appears does not need to be denied, but rather understood as a synchronous reflection of the unlimited manifesting itself.

Reality is not consciousness, but that of which even consciousness is a structured reflection. The absolute is not achieved by denying form, but by seeing that every coherent form is already an expression of limitless being. Any vision that retains a privileged framework, even if it calls itself pure consciousness, has not reached reality. It has only emptied form without recognizing totality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

A small critique of Advaita, both neo- and classical, see Spira, Ralston, and even the sacred Ramana:

Many spiritual paths based on Advaita adopt a negative path: "you are not this, you are not that." This denial may partially dissolve identification with form, but if it stops there, it leaves an illusory foundation intact: consciousness as the absolute stage. To say that "everything happens in consciousness" maintains a hidden duality between what appears and the framework in which it appears. The void left after denying form is not reality, but rather another form: the form of absence.

Reality is not emptiness, nor silence, nor witness: it is unlimited without a center. It is not what remains when everything is eliminated, but what is when seen without limits. What appears does not need to be denied, but rather understood as a synchronous reflection of the unlimited manifesting itself.

Reality is not consciousness, but that of which even consciousness is a structured reflection. The absolute is not achieved by denying form, but by seeing that every coherent form is already an expression of limitless being. Any vision that retains a privileged framework, even if it calls itself pure consciousness, has not reached reality. It has only emptied form without recognizing totality.

My practice is: eliminate myself, since I believe myself limited and this is false. Drop ego to perceive perfectly. This leads to the void or the unmanifest which is as far I can go. Then grace rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I resonate with your writings in general. But it’s kind of like it’s more a resonance with you as a person, so with your self, your vibe. Your experiences of the limitless probably has affected you as a person, your self structure, perhaps softened it, so that contributes to your “vibe” that you give off. 
 

It seems to me you have directly “experienced” (not the best word but you get it) the limitless, and then when the self reappears and the mind comes back to normal, there is an interpretation of it, a mental framework about this “limitlessness” has been developed, and that’s where this writing comes from. Or do you also write when you are directly in the moment of being open to the limitless? Because then it’s like a writing directly from the “source”. Some very small YouTubers, and very few, who claim to have lost their self, the non dualists,  they can sometimes seem to me they are directly speaking from this “limitless” place. And so I can resonate with that too. 
 

I find you write clearly. Some parts I struggle to understand such as the synchronization, “a reflection of itself”, “coherence” etc, when you talk about how reality works.

It doesn’t matter though, I’m not the type that really seeks understanding so I’m content even if I don’t understand. 
 

I thought though, how do glimpses of the limitless lead to this kind of understanding of the “structure of reality”? If I have a glimpse, maybe it’s obvious, “oh this is infinite”, but all the other stuff, I don’t get how that understanding came about. Some other speakers don’t seem to have that understanding, they just say oh the self doesn’t exist. But they don’t talk about the structure of reality much, synchronized this and that

Edited by Sugarcoat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

I resonate with your writings in general. But it’s kind of like it’s more a resonance with you as a person, so with your self, your vibe. Your experiences of the limitless probably has affected you as a person, your self structure, perhaps softened it, so that contributes to your “vibe” that you give off. 
 

It seems to me you have directly “experienced” (not the best word but you get it) the limitless, and then when the self reappears and the mind comes back to normal, there is an interpretation of it, a mental framework about this “limitlessness” has been developed, and that’s where this writing comes from. Or do you also write when you are directly in the moment of being open to the limitless? Because then it’s like a writing directly from the “source”. Some very small YouTubers, and very few, who claim to have lost their self, the non dualists,  they can sometimes seem to me they are directly speaking from this “limitless” place. And so I can resonate with that too. 
 

I find you write clearly. Some parts I struggle to understand such as the synchronization, “a reflection of itself”, “coherence” etc, when you talk about how reality works.

It doesn’t matter though, I’m not the type that really seeks understanding so I’m content even if I don’t understand. 
 

I thought though, how do glimpses of the limitless lead to this kind of understanding of the “structure of reality”? If I have a glimpse, maybe it’s obvious, “oh this is infinite”, but all the other stuff, I don’t get how that understanding came about. Some other speakers don’t seem to have that understanding, they just say oh the self doesn’t exist. But they don’t talk about the structure of reality much, synchronized this and that

It's easy to explain. The main point is to completely break the limits, with meditation, psychedelics, or whatever. This is something that happens at a given moment. Now your mind is limited, and the next instant it isn't. It's totally real. You perceive yourself as the total reality, without the slightest hindrance, barrier, doubt, or possibility of error. You are outside of the human, outside of time and form. You have to have a certain detachment for this, maybe it has to be partly innate. Then you realize that you are, what is limitless . But this isn't a self, a center, someone; it's infinity. It's strange to the human self. You're not someone, you're let's say something, but you're still you; it's your nature.

So, given your absolute nature, you realize several things: there is nothing to achieve from an absolute perspective, no possible intention, no possible limit. There is no possibility of not flowing, and flow is a relationship with yourself, the relative movement of infinity within itself. And this movement is infinite; it is the inevitable expression of the total nature of reality. Anything is the same than anything else from an unlimited perspective, just forms, the essence is the unlimited, the form is just a possibility that happens. It's not that nothing matters, it's that mattering is a relative arising. Unlimited is just unlimited. 

This has many implications. Ultimately, any intention is impossible; any god is relative. But at the same time, all reality is synchronized because what appears is relative to itself. At the absolute level, change is impossible. Any change is an inevitable play of perspectives, and it must be perfectly synchronized, symmetrical with itself to appear. And at the same time, it is an expression of the total nature of that which has no limits.

From this, you can deduce that everything branches out infinitely, that each point of view is composed of infinite points of view. Everything is infinite, like a game of mirrors that never ends.

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, gettoefl said:

This leads to the void or the unmanifest which is as far I can go. Then grace rules.

Imo you open the limits, then you are the total, then the limits appears again and you are worried by the usual things, but little by little the real scope of the game that you are playing as this form starts to manifest. From an absolute perspective everything is the same, but from a relative perspective any cause has an infinite butterfly effect, right now you are dancing with the infinity. You are same time the whole and the part, as whole nothing matters, as a part, everything matters. You can open your relative experience to another level, and seems very possible, almost sure that there is continuity after death, you have a movement to do now, an expansion to achieve. Why? Just because this is the flow of reality .the path shows itself every moment, you have to flow with it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now